Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
Original research article
 | 
07 Jun 2018
Original research article |  | 07 Jun 2018

Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017)

Eleanor Ursula Hobley, Brian Murphy, and Aaron Simmons

Related subject area

Soils and biogeochemical cycling
Land inclination controls CO2 and N2O fluxes, but not CH4 uptake, in a temperate upland forest soil
Lauren M. Gillespie, Nathalie Y. Triches, Diego Abalos, Peter Finke, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Stephan Glatzel, and Eugenio Díaz-Pinés
SOIL, 9, 517–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-517-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-517-2023, 2023
Short summary
Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality and degradability in relation to soil geochemistry as affected by land use
Sastrika Anindita, Peter Finke, and Steven Sleutel
SOIL, 9, 443–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023, 2023
Short summary
Soil organic carbon stocks did not change after 130 years of afforestation on a former Swiss Alpine pasture
Tatjana Carina Speckert, Jeannine Suremann, Konstantin Gavazov, Maria Joao Santos, Frank Hagedorn, and Guido Lars Bruno Wiesenberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-645,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-645, 2023
Short summary
Elemental stoichiometry and Rock-Eval® thermal stability of organic matter in French topsoils
Amicie A. Delahaie, Pierre Barré, François Baudin, Dominique Arrouays, Antonio Bispo, Line Boulonne, Claire Chenu, Claudy Jolivet, Manuel P. Martin, Céline Ratié, Nicolas P. A. Saby, Florence Savignac, and Lauric Cécillon
SOIL, 9, 209–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-209-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-209-2023, 2023
Short summary
Oil-palm management alters the spatial distribution of amorphous silica and mobile silicon in topsoils
Britta Greenshields, Barbara von der Lühe, Harold J. Hughes, Christian Stiegler, Suria Tarigan, Aiyen Tjoa, and Daniela Sauer
SOIL, 9, 169–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-169-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-169-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Bispo, A., Andersen, L., Angers, D. A., Bernoux, M., Brossard, M., Cécillon, L., Comans, R. N. J., Harmsen, J., Jonassen, K., Lamé, F., Lhuillery, C., Maly, S., Martin, E., Mcelnea, A. E., Sakai, H., Watabe, Y., and Eglin, T. K.: Accounting for carbon stocks in soils and measuring GHGs emission fluxes from soils: Do we have necessary standards?, Frontiers in Environmental Science 5, 41, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00041, 2017.  
Ellert, B. H. and Bettany, J. R.: Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes, Can. J. Soil Sci., 75, 529–538, 1995. 
Goidts, E., van Wesemael, B., and Crucifix, M.: Magnitude and sources of uncertainty in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks assessments at various scales, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 723–739, 2009. 
Hazelton, P. A. and Murphy, B. W.: “What Do All the Numbers Mean? – A Guide to the Interpretation of Soil Test Results”, Third Edition, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, 2016. 
Mikha, M. M., Benjamin, J. G., Halvorson, A. D., and Nielsen, D. C.: Soil Carbon Changes Influenced by Soil Management and Calculation Method, Open Journal of Soil Science, 3, 123–131, 2013. 
Short summary
This research evaluates equations to calculate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Although various equations exist for SOC stock calculations, we recommend using the simplest equation with THE lowest associated errors. Adjusting SOC stock calculations for rock content is essential. Using the mass proportion of rocks to do so minimizes error.