Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
SOIL, 8, 59–83, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-59-2022
SOIL, 8, 59–83, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-59-2022

Original research article 20 Jan 2022

Original research article | 20 Jan 2022

Synergy between compost and cover crops in a Mediterranean row crop system leads to increased subsoil carbon storage

Synergy between compost and cover crops in a Mediterranean row crop system leads to increased subsoil carbon storage
Daniel Rath1, Nathaniel Bogie2, Leonardo Deiss3, Sanjai J. Parikh1, Daoyuan Wang4, Samantha Ying5, Nicole Tautges6, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe7, Teamrat A. Ghezzehei7, and Kate M. Scow1 Daniel Rath et al.
  • 1Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95618, USA
  • 2Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA
  • 3School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
  • 4Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
  • 5Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
  • 6Michael Fields Agricultural Institute, East Troy, WI 53120, USA
  • 7Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA 95342, USA

Correspondence: Daniel Rath (darath@ucdavis.edu)

Abstract

Subsoil carbon (C) stocks are a prime target for efforts to increase soil C storage for climate change mitigation. However, subsoil C dynamics are not well understood, especially in soils under long-term intensive agricultural management. We compared subsoil C storage and soil organic matter (SOM) composition in tomato–corn rotations after 25 years of differing C and nutrient management in the California Central Valley: CONV (mineral fertilizer), CONV+WCC (mineral fertilizer and cover crops), and ORG (composted poultry manure and cover crops). The cover crop mix used in these systems is a mix of oat (Avena sativa L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth). Our results showed a ∼19Mg ha−1 increase in soil organic C (SOC) stocks down to 1 m under ORG systems, no significant SOC increases under CONV+WCC or CONV systems, and an increased abundance of carboxyl-rich C in the subsoil (60–100 cm) horizons of ORG and CONV+WCC systems. Our results show the potential for increased subsoil C storage with compost and cover crop amendments in tilled agricultural systems and identify potential pathways for increasing C transport and storage in subsoil layers.

1 Introduction

Agricultural subsoils (>60 cm) have the potential to store large amounts of C (Rumpel et al., 2012) for a longer period of time (Paul et al., 1997, 2001) relative to surface soils (<15 cm). Surface soils are much easier to sample than subsoils and respond more quickly to management, which makes them the focus of most studies of how soil organic C (SOC) is formed and stored. However, an increased focus on interrogating the surface soil to answer questions about processes in the entire soil profile exacerbates the risk of subsoils being treated merely as “more dilute surface soils” (Salomé et al., 2010) and ignores decades of research into the unique role that subsoils play in increasing soil C stocks (Rapalee et al., 1998; Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011). A focus on surface soils is particularly problematic in agricultural studies, given how practices such as cover cropping can have drastically different effects on surface versus subsoil SOC accumulation (Bernal et al., 2016; Harrison et al., 2011; Tautges et al., 2019) depending on the cover crop used. In addition, recent studies have highlighted that subsoil SOC may be vulnerable to loss under changing environmental conditions, such as warming (Hicks Pries et al., 2018) and drought (Min et al., 2020). To maximize C stored in the entire soil profile, we need to understand and capitalize on the numerous and interacting physical, chemical, and biological changes throughout the profile (Angst et al., 2018; Fierer et al., 2003b; Kautz et al., 2013).

The fact that the average soil sampling depth has decreased from 53 to 27 cm in studies published in the last 30 years (Yost and Hartemink, 2020) may be based on ease of sampling and a focus on surface microbiological processes but may also be due to the lack of agreement on where surface soils end and subsoils begin. Depending on the goals of the study, the lower limit of surface soils may be anywhere between the top 7.5 and top 30 cm of the profile, while the upper limit of subsoils can range anywhere from 20 to 100 cm (Soong et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2018; Lorenz and Lal, 2005; Whitmore et al., 2015). There may also be an “intermediate” or “transition” zone that is operationally defined, often corresponding to the maximum tillage depth (Mobley et al., 2015). In this study, we define surface soils as the top 0–15 cm of the profile and subsoils as the lower 60–100 cm, with the intervening 15–60 cm as an intermediate zone based on previous work carried out at our study site and the relative lack of horizon formation in these young soils.

The unique role that subsoils play in storing SOC is due in part to the extensive, site-specific changes that happen across the soil profile. Often, there are changes in bulk density and mineralogy due to clay accumulation, but the exact magnitude and direction of this change vary depending on depositional environment and soil-forming factors (Brady and Weill, 2017; Soil Survey Staff, 2014; Jenny, 1941). Subsoils also experience much less disturbance than surface soils, with lower fluctuations in temperature and moisture content (Smitii, 1932; Cole and Matthews, 1939; Zeynoddin et al., 2019; de Quieroz et al., 2020) and less mechanical disturbance such as tillage (though it is important to note that tillage events deeper than 30 cm are not altogether rare in many systems). Inputs of oxygen, water, C, and nutrients are usually lower to subsoils than surface soils and mostly occur via transport through the soil pore network constructed from intra-aggregate pore spaces, root channels, and cracks that form as the soil dries (Pagliai, 2004; Sanderman and Amundson, 2008). The types of C input are much less varied in subsoils, mostly coming from biomass and exudates of plants with deep roots (Sokol and Bradford, 2019) and transport of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). This downward transport of DOC is described by the “cascade theory” (Kaiser and Kalbitz, 2012), where subsoil DOC inputs undergo a series of successive sorption, desorption, microbial processing, and transport steps. This results in a gradual increase in the age of C as we move through the soil profile, with subsoil C molecules as old as 103104 years (Rumpel et al., 2012) compared to younger C14 ages of 102103 years in the top 30 cm. The transport of C into the subsoil via both roots and DOC movement leads to more heterogeneous C distribution (Chabbi et al., 2009; Syswerda et al., 2011) that is closely associated with the soil pore network.

Since the soil pore networks responsible for dissolved carbon transport are also hotspots of microbial activity (Banfield et al., 2017), C molecules found in the subsoil have often undergone extensive microbial transformation and processing. However, once that C does enter the subsoil, it is less likely to undergo further microbial processing due to the combination of heterogeneous C distribution, decoupled microbial-carbon presence (Dungait et al., 2012), greater metabolic and physical restrictions on C decomposition (Fierer et al., 2003a), and lower microbial biomass (Taylor et al., 2002). This leads to higher concentrations of simpler, microbially derived carbohydrates, aliphatics, and carboxylates in subsoils, in contrast to the more complex aromatic structures in cellulose and lignin present in surface soils (Roth et al., 2019). These simple microbial products may preferentially associate with mineral surfaces (Samson et al., 2020, Williams et al., 2018), driving the formation of mineral-associated organic matter and further rendering that C inaccessible to microbes. Subsoil microbial communities have adapted to this relative scarcity of C and nutrients (Salomé et al., 2010; Sanaullah et al., 2011) by increasing the proportion of Gram+ bacteria, whose thicker cell walls make them more resilient to adverse environmental conditions. These subsoil microbes may also optimize for survival rather than population growth, being less efficient at C assimilation than surface microbes (Spohn et al., 2016) and thus more likely to mineralize SOC to CO2. Low C use efficiency would also be expected in soils with unfavorable carbon–nutrient stoichiometry for biomass production (Ng et al., 2014; Coonan et al., 2020).

Using existing methods to examine subsoils under different land management practices can help explain how the size and concentration of soil C stocks are related to types of C input and the status of the soil microbial community (Sradnick et al., 2014). While it is difficult to accurately estimate whether the C, nutrient, and water status of a particular subsoil will promote or hamper microbial SOC decomposition (Soong et al., 2020), some insight can be obtained by looking at microbial stress levels. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA) targets metabolically active cells in soil (Zhang et al., 2019) and is effective in measuring rapid changes in active microbial cell walls and membranes (Frostegård et al., 2011). Measurements of Gram : Gram+ ratios via PLFA agree with those obtained via the more recent 16 s rRNA metabarcoding (Orwin et al., 2018) and are useful as an indicator of microbial nutrient limitation under different land management practices. Understanding how these practices then affect the molecular composition of soil organic matter (SOM) is more difficult, as the most accurate method for quantifying specific C functional groups in soil (nuclear magnetic resonance, NMR) is sensitive to C concentrations and the presence of iron oxides and requires extensive sample preparation if samples contain low C concentrations or a high abundance of paramagnetic species (Fe, Mn) (Bleam, 1991; Smernik and Oades, 2002). However, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) presents a rapid, lower-cost method that allows pseudo-quantification of the relative abundance of certain carbon functional groups (Margenot et al., 2016). While FTIR may also be used as a high-throughput method to predict soil properties (Dangal et al., 2019; Deiss et al., 2020), it is particularly useful when comparing changes in SOM structure over time via spectral subtractions (Margenot et al., 2019).

Agricultural practices can increase or decrease subsoil SOC by modifying the physical, chemical, and biological processes that control microbial mineralization of soil C, including occlusion in soil aggregates, sorption to soil minerals, microbial processing of residues, and C transport into the subsoil (Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011). Crop root exudates can be efficiently transformed by microbes into stable soil C (Sokol and Bradford, 2019), but the same exudates can also destabilize aggregates and carbon–mineral bonds that are key for protecting C from mineralization (Keiluweit et al., 2015). Large inputs of dissolved organic C and nutrients can prime subsoil microbial biomass to decompose native SOC (Bernal et al., 2016; Kuzyakov, 2010) or provide the nutrients needed for microbes to process soil C (Coonan et al., 2020; Kirkby et al., 2013) and promote the formation of mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) (Lavallee et al., 2020). Cover crops may not only increase soluble organic C inputs (Steenwerth and Belina, 2008), but can also influence C dynamics indirectly by increasing soil macroporosity and pore connectivity (Scott et al., 1994; Haruna et al., 2018; Çerçioğlu et al., 2019; Gulick et al., 1994) as well as increasing topsoil disturbance due to the processes of planting, mowing, and incorporation. These indirect cover crop effects can lead to increases in both infiltration and hydraulic conductivity in fine-textured soils and potential increases in soluble C transport, particularly over longer timescales. It is clear that to accurately predict whether a specific farming practice will increase or decrease subsoil SOC storage in a changing climate, it is necessary to perform studies that explicitly examine deeper soils.

Given that small, cumulative subsoil management impacts may take decades to become detectable, impacts of agricultural management practices may not be detectable in the 2- to 3-year focus of most agronomic field studies (Dick, 1992; Johnston and Poulton, 2018; Keel et al., 2019). Additionally, measurements of soil C and available nutrients may be highly variable throughout the year (Wuest, 2014; Drenovsky et al., 2004), necessitating sampling at multiple time points. We conducted our study at the Century Experiment at the Russell Ranch (RR) Sustainable Agricultural Facility in Davis, CA, where inputs and management history have been tracked over the last 25 years and are representative of row crop systems of the California Central Valley (Wolf et al., 2018). This agricultural region is one of the world's most productive (Pathak et al., 2018) and is quite susceptible to negative impacts of climate warming and subsequent C losses (Medellín-Azuara et al., 2011). A previous study at the Century Experiment found that after 19 years of management cover cropping (oats, faba beans, and vetch) combined with mineral fertilizer application increased C stocks above 30 cm by ∼3.5 % but decreased C over the entire 2 m profile by 7 % (Tautges et al., 2019). The same mix of cover crops combined with compost both increased C stocks above 30 cm by 5 % and increased C over the whole 2 m profile by 12.6 %. At the same time, these systems had similar tomato and corn yields (Scow et al., 2012). Other studies have also demonstrated that surface and subsoil SOC responds differently to agricultural management practices that are primarily concentrated at the soil's surface (Chenu et al., 2019; Syswerda et al., 2011). Estimates of whole-profile C sequestration based solely on data from surface soils can lead to inaccurate estimates of C storage potential in agricultural systems (VandenBygaart et al., 2011).

The goal of this study was to explore some of the potential mechanisms behind the observed differences in carbon storage in different RR management systems and to see how these carbon stores have changed after an additional 7 years. In particular, we focus on the role of cover crops in promoting hydraulic conductivity and how those hydraulic changes impact water, C chemistry, nutrient distribution, microbial biomass, and community composition in the subsoil under the addition of additional C (compost) and N (nitrogen fertilizer). We hypothesized that the combination of cover crops and additional C input would result in large amounts of soluble C and nutrients being transported deeper via hydraulic transport and the cascade process, leading to more microbially processed carbon and increased carbon stocks in the subsoil. We also hypothesized that these differences are not due to seasonal variation and that increased soluble C and nutrient stocks will be consistent at multiple time points throughout the year.

2 Methods

2.1 Field site and historical management

The experiment was conducted at the Century Experiment at the Russell Ranch Sustainable Agricultural Facility in Davis, CA, in the southern region of the Sacramento Valley at an elevation of 16 m. A detailed description of management history at the Century Experiment is provided in Tautges et al. (2019) and is described here only briefly. Davis experiences hot summers and cool winters, with a 2018–2019 average temperature of 16 C from November to March when cover cropping occurs and 29 C during the normal vegetable production period of April to September. Average annual rainfall for the 2018–2019 year was 812 mm, most of which fell between December and April, in keeping with the xeric moisture regime in this area (Fig. A5) (http://atm.ucdavis.edu/weather/uc-davis-weather-climate-station/, last access: 13 January 2022).

The site has two soil types: (a) Yolo silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, non-acid, thermic Mollic Xerofluvent) and (b) Rincon silty clay loam (fine, smectitic, thermic Mollic Haploxeralf). Detailed soil horizon information (classification, texture, and depths) can be found in Table A3 and the Century Experiment published dataset in Wolf et al. (2018). Abbreviations used in this paper (CONV, CONV+WCC, ORG) correspond to the abbreviations used in Wolf et al. (2018) (CMT, LMT, OMT) and are identical to those used in Tautges et al. (2019) for ease of comparison.

The experimental design is a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three blocks and nine systems. Two blocks are placed on the Rincon silty clay loam, and the third block is on the Yolo silt loam. Experimental plots were 64 m×64 m (0.4 ha). Only three systems of the nine described in Tautges et al. (2019) were measured in the current paper: CONV (mineral fertilizer), CONV+WCC (mineral fertilizer and cover-cropped), and ORG (composted poultry manure and cover-cropped). All plots are in a 2-year maize–tomato rotation, with three replicate plots of each crop in any given year. Each treatment sampled in this paper consisted of three plots under tomato and three plots under corn to give a total of nine corn plots and nine tomato plots in total. All plots were irrigated with subsurface drip at the time of sampling, having converted from furrow irrigation to subsurface drip in 2014. All plots also received four tillage passes to a depth of 20.5 cm, and ORG and CONV+WCC plots received additional tillage passes to 6.5 cm to incorporate cover crop and compost residue (Table A5). While the lack of a compost-only treatment at Russell Ranch precludes conclusions about the impact of compost application alone, comparing the CONV+WCC treatment to the ORG treatment allows us to highlight how adding compost to a cover-cropped plot impacts surface and subsoil C stocks and provides insight into why these impacts occur.

2.2 Historic carbon, nutrient, and bulk density values

Historical cover crop shoot, compost, and crop residue inputs were calculated based on the Century Experiment published dataset in Wolf et al. (2018). Total C and N of composted manure, aboveground cover crop biomass, and crop residues were determined on a CS 4010 Costech Elemental Analyzer (Costech Analytical Technologies). Total aboveground C and N incorporated were calculated by multiplying percent C and N of residues by total harvest biomass. Due to compost nutrient analysis not being performed every year, estimates from 1993 to 2000 used percent C, N, P, and S values averaged for that 7-year period, while estimates from 2000 to 2018 used percent C, N, P, and S values averaged for that 18-year period. Total aboveground C, N, P, and S inputs were calculated by summing aboveground crop residue, WCC, mineral fertilizer, and compost inputs per plot per year. Calculated N inputs represent the total N content of the aboveground added WCC and crop residue biomass and do not differentiate between fixed N and N uptake from the soil in the case of cover crop legumes. Measurements do not include estimates of belowground biomass due to a lack of data.

Soil percent C and nitrogen (N) values for 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm in 1993 and 2012 were taken from Tautges et al. (2019), while values for the same depths in 2003 were taken from the Century Experiment published dataset in Wolf et al. (2018). C and N analyses used in this paper were all performed using the same methods (Tautges et al., 2019; Wolf et al., 2018) on ball-milled, air-dried samples in a CS 4010 Costech Elemental Analyzer (Costech Analytical Technologies). Total C and N values for 15–60 cm in 1993 were calculated by performing a weighted average of C and N % values from 15 to 30 cm and from 30 to 60 cm.

Bulk density values used in this paper were sampled using a Giddings hydraulic probe to 2 m in 1993, 2007, and 2012 (2007 values taken from Wolf et al., 2018, and 1993 and 2012 values taken from Tautges et al., 2019). In 1993, bulk density was collected in 0–25, 25–50, 50–100, and 100–200 cm depth layers with an 8.25 cm diameter probe. In 2007 and 2012, bulk density was collected in 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm depth layers, with a 4.7 cm diameter probe. In 1993, 2007, and 2012, cores were collected from four random locations within each plot. Bulk densities were determined using mass of oven-dried soil (105 C, 24 h) and total volume of the core averaged for each depth increment (Blake and Hartge, 1986). Bulk density depths from 1993, 2007, and 2012 were adjusted to 2018 depths through the calculation of weighted averages using adjacent depth layers for comparison. Historical C stocks from 0 to 100 cm for 1993, 2003, and 2012 were calculated via a depth-weighted sum (Tautges et al., 2019) using bulk density values taken in 1993, 2007, and 2012, respectively. Depth-adjusted 2012 bulk density values were then used to calculate 2018 C and nutrient stocks due to the lack of more recent bulk density measurements for all plots. Bulk density values below 30 cm were assumed to have not undergone large changes between 2012 and 2018 (Tautges et al., 2019), while bulk density sampling from 0 to 20 cm in select Century Experiment plots indicated a limited difference in bulk density (less than 3 %) from 2012 to 2019 (Wang, unpublished data).

2.3 Field operations

Cover crop planting and incorporation into ORG and CONV+WCC systems in 2017–2018 followed the trend of previous years, being planted onto 15 cm raised beds 1.5 m apart with a mixture of oat (Avena sativa L., 42.0 % C, 2.5 % N), faba bean (Vicia faba L., 44.1 % C, 3.5 % N), and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth, 44.5 % C, 5.2 % N) and terminated by mowing plus two to three disking passes in March. Cover crop biomass was sampled by cutting aboveground biomass from one 4.5 m2 area in each plot prior to termination. Corn and tomato biomass residues were measured by cutting aboveground biomass at two 1.5 m2 locations per plot after harvest. Biomass samples were oven-dried at 65 C for 4 d and ground to 2 mm prior to total C and N analysis.

Fertilization during the 2017–2018 growing season was also similar to previous years, with CONV and CONV+WCC plots receiving 325 kg ha−1 8–24–6 (26 kg N ha−1, 78 kg P ha−1, 19.5 kg K ha−1) starter fertilizer at the time of planting. Tomato CONV plots also received ammonium sulfate at a total rate of 200 kg N ha−1, while maize CONV plots received ammonium sulfate at a total rate of 235 kg N ha−1.

From 1993 to 2018, ORG plots normally received a spring application (February 2018) of composted poultry manure at a rate of 3.6 Mg ha−1 (24.9 % C, 3.5 % N, 1.6 % P, 1.47 % S). However, during the 2018 season, these plots switched from spring to fall compost application, resulting in an additional application of 3.6 Mg ha−1 compost in September 2018.

2.4 Soil sampling

Soil sample collection took place in the 2018–2019 growing season. Plots were sampled at four time points: February 2018 (pre-CC incorporation), June 2018 (mid-season), September/October 2018 (post-harvest), and February 2019 (pre-CC incorporation). A substantial amount of variation in both extractable organic carbon (EOC) and mineral N measurements can occur during the growing season (Li et al., 2018). Our sampling regime at multiple time points was meant to account for that variation in both winter and summer months to give a more accurate snapshot of C and nutrient availability during the growing season. All sampling took place in the raised beds between furrows. Samples in February 2018, September/October 2018, and February 2019 were taken using a tractor-mounted Giddings probe with a diameter of 3 cm from all replicate plots of each system (n=6 plots per treatment). Samples taken in June 2018 were taken using an auger to 100 cm and were only taken in the experimental plots planted with tomato (n=3 plots per treatment). Three replicate cores were taken per plot, sectioned into 0–15, 15–60, and 60–100 cm depths, composited, and then subsampled. Aliquots of each soil were frozen at −20C for PLFA analysis within 48 h of sampling, while the remaining samples were sieved to 8 mm and stored at 4 C until analyzed.

2.5 Carbon, nutrient, and aggregation analysis

All analyses described below were carried out on samples taken during the 2018–2019 growing season. Extractable organic carbon was determined using a 0.5 M potassium sulfate extraction within 48 h of sampling. For each sample, 6 g of soil was extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 in a 1:5 ratio, shaken for 1 h, filtered through Q5 filter paper, and analyzed within 48 h on a Shimadzu TOC-L Total Organic Carbon analyzer according to Jones and Willett (2006). Due to the moisture-limited conditions present during summer at our study site, we chose an EOC extraction method as opposed to DOC sampling via tension lysimeters in order to compare soluble C measurements at different time points and soil water contents. Measurements of EOC are commonly used to estimate soluble C (Slessarev et al., 2020; Matlou and Haynes, 2006) and may be more sensitive to recent C and litter inputs, making them more suitable for answering questions on the impacts of C input, N amendment, and tillage (Li et al., 2018).

Aliquots of the K2SO4 extract were immediately frozen at −20C and later analyzed for nitrate by reacting with vanadium(III) chloride according to Doane and Horwath (2003) and ammonium via the Berthelot reaction as laid out in Rhine et al. (1998). Available calcium, phosphorus, and sulfur were measured on 2 mm sieved air-dried samples using the Mehlich-3 soil test (Mehlich, 1984). Total soil C and N values were measured on a CS 4010 Costech Elemental Analyzer (Costech Analytical Technologies) using air-dried, ball-milled samples. The 2018 C and nutrient stocks were calculated using depth-weighted sums (Tautges et al., 2019) with bulk density values from 2012.

Aggregation measurements were carried out using the method outlined in Wang et al. (2017), adapted from the wet-sieving method outlined in Elliott (1986). Soils were gently passed through an 8 mm sieve, and a 50 g representative sample was submerged in room temperature water on top of a 2 mm sieve. This sieve was moved up and down for 2 min (50 submersions per minute) using an audio metronome to keep track of the number of submersions. The soil and water passed through the 2 mm sieve were gently transferred by rinsing onto a 250 µm sieve and submerged again. The process was repeated using a 53 µm sieve to generate four aggregate size fractions (8–2 mm, 2 mm–250 µm, 250–50 µm, > 50 µm) which were rinsed into pre-weighed aluminum pans, oven-dried at 60 C, and weighed. Mean weight diameter of the aggregate fractions was calculated as the weighted average of the four aggregate size fractions (van Bavel, 1950).

2.6 Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis

PLFA analysis was carried out on 2018 samples using the high-throughput method outlined in Buyer and Sasser (2012). Briefly, freeze-dried aliquots were extracted using Bligh–Dyer extractant. Phospholipid fractions were separated from the neutral lipid and glycolipid fractions using solid-phase extraction columns. Phospholipids were then dried under N2 gas, transesterified, and methylated. After methylation, the samples were dried again with N2 gas and redissolved in hexane containing a known concentration of an internal standard (19:0) (Microbial ID, Newark, DE, USA). PLFAs were identified using the Sherlock software from Microbial Identification Systems and quantified using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. A total of 56 different PLFAs were identified. PLFAs were assigned to Gram+, Gram, cyclopropyl precursors, saturated and monounsaturated groups as outlined in Bossio and Scow (1998) (Table A1).

2.7 Hydraulic conductivity and moisture content

Three 20 cm3 cores were collected in September 2018 for saturated hydraulic conductivity from each plot that had been under tomato in 2017–2018 (a total of nine plots). Cores were taken from a depth of 35 cm. Unfortunately, 2 cores were damaged during measurement, giving a total of 25 cores measured from the three treatments. Care was taken to transport the cores in foam holders to avoid creating compaction or preferential flow paths in transit. Cores were stored at 5 C until measurement. A KSAT device was used to measure the cores with a falling head technique per the manufacturers' manual, and conductivity data were normalized to 20 C using the Ksat software from the manufacturer (Meter Group, Pullman, Washington, USA).

Soil moisture content was measured with a multi-depth profile capacitance probe in carbon fiber access tubes that were installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations with great care taken to avoid air gaps along the tube (PR 2/6, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, UK). The factory calibration of the profile probe was used with an accuracy of ±0.04m3 m−3. Volumetric soil moisture was measured at six depths (10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 100 cm) (PR 2/6, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, UK). Access tubes were installed in the field with a custom auger, taking care to make the holes smooth and straight according to the manufacturer's recommendations. A total of 27 tubes were installed, with 3 tubes per subplot for a total of n=9 per treatment (ORG, CONV+WCC, CONV). The measurements were made on eight dates between 12 January and 1 March 2019. Data were processed using R (R Core Team, 2017), and soil moisture depth from 10 to 100 cm was calculated using trapezoidal integration.

2.8 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of soil samples from 1993 and 2018 were collected using diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFT; PIKE Technologies EasiDiff) with soil (air-dried) diluted to 10 % with KBr (Deiss et al., 2020). Spectra from 1993 samples were collected from air-dried, homogenized, archived soils from the Century Experiment Archive, while 2018 spectra were collected from air-dried, homogenized samples taken in 2018; 1993 spectra from 15–30 and 30–60 cm were combined into a single 15–60 cm spectrum via a weighted average for comparison with 2018 samples. The variation between these averaged 15–30 and 30–60 cm soils was found to be negligible for all three systems (Fig. A6). All DRIFT spectra were collected using a Thermo Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) using 256 scans, 4 cm−1 resolution, and a DTGS detector. Three replicate samples were used, and average spectra were created for analysis. Peak intensity ratios of aromatic to carboxyl moieties [ν(C=C):ν as (COO) (1662cm-1:1631cm-1)] were calculated using peak areas.

While FTIR is not a strictly quantitative tool for identifying specific compounds in mixed samples, it can be used pseudo-quantitatively due to the fact that the absorption of IR light by a specific molecular bond at a specific electromagnetic frequency follows the Beer–Lambert law (Beer's law) (e.g., Margenot et al., 2016; Smith, 2011). Therefore, the height and area of a spectral peak are proportional to the abundance of molecules in a sample (linear relationship), and comparing the presence and absence of peaks and the relative differences in spectral contributions from each peak in a subtraction can suggest differences in C chemistry. However, it is important to note that spectral reflectance can lead to some nonlinearity in concentration and absorbance and thus pseudo-quantification. Previous studies with DRIFTS in both the near-infrared (Dalal and Henry, 1986) and mid-infrared regions (Demyan et al., 2012; Margenot et al., 2015; West et al., 2020; Deiss et al., 2021) have shown direct associations between soil organic C concentration and absorbance at specific frequencies (depicted as peak height or area of single peaks or peak ratios). Spectral subtractions were performed using Omnic 9.8.286 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and corrected for nonlinearity of concentration and absorbance by using the Kubelka–Munk (KM) function. Plots of FTIR spectra were made using Origin 2018b (OriginLab Corporation). Subtractions were performed in two ways: (1) mean spectra, for each treatment and depth, of the 1993 spectra were separately subtracted from the corresponding 2018 spectra to reveal C chemistry changes over this period, and (2) the 2018 mean spectra, for each depth, were subtracted (ORG-CONV, ORG-CONV+WCC, CONV+WCC-CONV) to show the difference in C chemistry by treatment.

2.9 Statistical analysis

All data analysis and graph production were done using R v. 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2017) using the tidyverse package (Wickham et al., 2019). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using a linear model to determine the effects of management system, depth, and time point. We first checked for normality and assumptions of the linear model prior to ANOVA and then fit a mixed effect model with “block” as a random effect. Since “block” was not significant for any of the variables measured, we removed it from the model. Statistical differences between management systems were analyzed separately for each depth using paired t tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple tests at the 5 % significance level. Data and code used for this paper are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558161.

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f01

Figure 1(a–d) Total aboveground C, N, phosphorus, and sulfur added per plot to ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems between 1993 and 2018. All values are given on a mass basis (megagram per hectare).

Download

3 Results

3.1 Nutrient inputs

The cumulative estimated aboveground C input over 25 years was 186, 123, and 113 Mg ha−1 for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems, respectively (Fig. 1a). Averaged per year over 25 years, C inputs to each system were 7.44, 4.92, and 4.52 Mg ha−1 for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems, respectively (Table A4). Due to the combination of compost and cover crop residue and root inputs, ORG systems received approximately 1.5× more C than CONV+WCC. Although CONV+WCC produced similar amounts of tomato residue and less maize residue than CONV, the presence of cover crops meant that CONV+WCC systems received 1.1× more C than CONV systems.

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f02

Figure 2Carbon stocks of the 1 m profiles of ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems from 1993 to 2018. Carbon stocks are given in megagram per hectare. Error bars denote standard error. Please note that all systems transitioned from furrow to drip irrigation in 2014.

Download

Due to combined N inputs from cover crop and compost, ORG systems received 1.4 times as many external N inputs (7.5 Mg ha−1) as CONV+WCC systems (5.4 Mg ha−1) and 1.65 times as much N as CONV systems (4.5 Mg ha−1) (Fig. 1b). External N inputs to CONV+WCC systems were close to 1 Mg ha−1 higher than CONV systems over 25 years, with ∼40 % of the external N inputs to CONV+WCC systems coming from the decomposition of cover crop residue and the other ∼60 % from mineral fertilizer application, compared to 100 % of total N inputs in the CONV coming from mineral fertilizer application. ORG systems received over 3 times as much phosphorus via compost (3.23 Mg ha−1) as CONV+WCC (1.09 Mg ha−1) and CONV (0.99 Mg ha−1) did from P fertilizer (Fig. 1c). ORG systems also received 1.15 Mg ha−1 of sulfur from compost, approximately 0.5 times as much as CONV+WCC (2.19 Mg ha−1) or CONV (1.98 Mg ha−1) systems received (Fig. 1d).

3.2 Soil carbon content changes over 25 years

Carbon stocks in the 1 m profile of ORG systems showed an increase of ∼19Mg ha−1 from 1993 to 2018 (p=0.06) (Fig. 2). Most of this C gain was concentrated in the 0–15 cm (∼5Mg ha−1, p<0.01) and 15–60 cm depths ( 10 Mg ha−1, p=0.1). Due to the large amount of variation present in these observations and the limited number of replicates, it was difficult to spot strong trends in C stock changes, as shown in the lack of significant change in the bottom 60–100 cm (∼3Mg ha−1, p=0.26). No significant changes in C stocks in the 1 m profile were noted in CONV or CONV+WCC systems from 1993 to 2018 (p=0.47, p=0.51). When depth intervals were considered separately, only CONV systems showed a decrease in C stocks (-3Mg ha−1) at the 0–15 cm (p<0.01) depth (Fig. 3). CONV+WCC systems did not show a clear trend of C decrease at any individual depth with the significance testing used.

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f03

Figure 3Change in C stocks of ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems from 1993 to 2018 by depth. Values were obtained by subtracting C stocks in 1993 from 2018 stocks for individual systems and then averaging by management system. Error bars denote standard error. (*:significantly different from 0, p value<0.05, +:significantly different from 0, p value0.05<x<0.1).

Download

3.3 Moisture content, hydraulic conductivity, and aggregation

Cover-cropped systems (ORG and CONV+WCC) stored approximately 10 % more water than non-cover-cropped systems (CONV) in the upper 1 m of the soil profile during the 2019 winter (Fig. 4). There was no difference in moisture content between ORG and CONV+WCC systems. Averaged hydraulic conductivity measurements showed differences among all three systems, but treatments with cover crops (ORG and CONV+WCC) had values that spanned 3 orders of magnitude compared to treatments without cover crops (CONV) (Fig. 5). There was no significant difference in mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates between all three systems at any depth (Fig. A2).

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f04

Figure 4Depth equivalent of water (cm) in the upper 1 m of ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV profiles during the January–March 2019 winter season. Error bars represent standard error.

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f05

Figure 5Saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm/day) in ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems taken in August 2018.

Download

3.4 Soil nutrient content: extractable organic carbon, mineral nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur

Composted systems (ORG) had higher amounts of extractable organic carbon (EOC) (p<0.01), plant-available phosphorus (p<0.01), and sulfur (p<0.01) in the 1 m profile than non-composted systems (CONV+WCC and CONV) averaged across all dates of the 2018–2019 year (Fig. 6). These differences were most pronounced in the upper 15 cm, where ORG systems had approximately 2× more EOC (p<0.01), 3× more phosphorus (p<0.01) and 1.75× more sulfur (p<0.01) than CONV+WCC or CONV systems (Fig. A1).

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f06

Figure 6(a–d) Extractable organic C, mineral N (NO3-+NH4+), phosphorus, and sulfur in 0–100 cm profiles of ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems over the February 2018–February 2019 season. All values are given on a mass basis (kg ha−1). Error bars represent standard error.

Download

CONV+WCC systems had more mineral N (NO3+NH4) than CONV systems during the June and August time points (p=0.04), with up to 3.5 times more mineral N than CONV systems mid-season and 1.6 times more mineral N at harvest. ORG systems trended towards higher mineral N during the April–September growing season, but the magnitude of this difference was small (p=0.17).

Nutrient values showed large seasonal variation, with the highest levels of C and N observed during the June time point and the highest sulfur levels at the August time point. EOC, mineral N, and sulfur values were lowest during the winter (November–February), which coincided with the period of highest rainfall. Phosphorus levels increased slightly throughout the 2018–2019 year.

Differences among systems and seasonal variation were also noted at a depth of 60 cm. ORG systems had more EOC (p<0.01), phosphorus (p<0.001), and sulfur at 60–100 cm than CONV+WCC or CONV systems. Mineral N values did not show significant differences between any of the three systems at 60–100 cm, though ORG and CONV+WCC systems trended higher during the growing season (Fig. 7).

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f07

Figure 7(a–d) Extractable organic C, mineral N, phosphorus, and sulfur stocks at 60–100 cm in ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems over the February 2018–February 2019 season. All values are given in kilogram per hectare. Error bars represent standard error.

Download

3.5 SOM composition via FTIR

Spectral subtractions of 1993 from 2018 FTIR spectra revealed positive peaks (increased absorbance) from 1900 to 1200 cm−1 in all systems, indicating an increase in C functional groups within this region (e.g., aromatic, carboxyl) (Fig. 8a). FTIR band assignments are presented in Table A2. All treatments showed positive peaks, indicating an increase in carboxylate functional groups between 1993 and 2018, as denoted by bands at 1625 and 1400 cm−1 (Fig. 8a). However, ORG and CONV+WCC showed these distinct peaks at 15–60 and 60–100 cm depths, while CONV systems showed distinct peaks only at the 0–15 and 15–60 cm depths. CONV systems also showed a lower aromatic : carboxylate peak intensity ratio at all depths than ORG and CONV+WCC systems from 1993 to 2018 (Table 1).

Table 1Peak intensity ratios for aromatic (1662 cm−1) to asymmetric carboxyl (1631 cm−1) groups in spectral subtractions.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f08

Figure 8(a, b) DRIFT spectral subtractions for the 1900–1200 cm−1 range comparing (a) 2018–1993 spectra for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV and (b) ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV spectra in 2018. Spectra are plotted with Kubelka–Munk units on a common y-axis scale and are offset from one another for ease of comparison.

Download

ORG and CONV+WCC systems showed distinct positive peaks associated with carboxylate functional groups at the 60–100 cm depths in 2018 when compared with CONV systems (bands at 1631 cm−1) and slightly higher peaks associated with aromatic functional groups from 0 to 15 cm for CONV+WCC and from 15 to 60 cm for ORG (bands at 1662 cm−1) (Fig. 8b). ORG also showed positive peaks associated with aromatic functional groups from 0 to 15 and from 15 to 60 cm when compared to CONV+WCC (bands at 1662 and 1602 cm−1) in 2018. Aromatic : carboxylate ratios provide an indication of the intensity of carboxyl peaks relative to aromatic peaks, which can be related back to concentrations of these functional groups in the sample. A lower aromatic : carboxyl ratio can indicate either more carboxyl or fewer aromatic functional groups, while a higher ratio can mean increased aromatic or decreased carboxyl groups. Aromatic : carboxylate peak intensity ratios decreased with depth for ORG and CONV systems when looking at changes from 1993 to 2018, but CONV+WCC ratios increased with depth (Table 1).

3.6 Microbial biomass and stress indicators – July 2018

Microbial biomass decreased with depth in all systems. ORG and CONV+WCC systems had more microbial biomass at 0–15 cm than CONV systems (p=0.04 and p=0.04, respectively), while ORG systems had more microbial biomass at the 15–60 cm depth than CONV+WCC or CONV systems (p=0.03 and p=0.06, respectively) (Fig. 9a). Saturated : unsaturated fatty acid ratio and cyclopropyl 19 : precursor ratio increased with depth, with CONV systems showing a weaker trend of higher Cy19 : pre (p=0.12) and saturated : unsaturated fatty acid (p=0.07) ratios than ORG at 60–100 cm (Fig. 9b–c). Gram+:Gram- ratio also increased with depth, with CONV systems having a higher ratio than ORG or CONV+WCC systems at 60–100 cm (p=0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) (Fig. 9d).

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f09

Figure 9(a–d) Microbial biomass and PLFA stress indicators measured in ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems during mid-season (July 2018). Ratios are unitless, while microbial biomass is given in kilograms per hectare.

Download

4 Discussion

The ∼19Mg ha−1 increase in SOC over the 1 m ORG profile after 25 years was attributed to a synergistic effect between cover crops and compost, which resulted in the movement of mobile C and nutrients deeper into the soil profile. We believe that high concentrations of mobile C and essential nutrients for microbial activity provided by the compost, combined with the easier movement of water downward associated with a history of cover cropping, helped transport the material needed to build C in the subsoil.

4.1 Cover crop roots increase water storage and movement into subsoils

The higher moisture contents noted in CONV+WCC and ORG than CONV systems during the winter growing season are likely due to the presence of more water-filled spaces from cover crop roots (Fig. 4). Cover crops increase both soil macroporosity and pore connectivity in fine-textured soils, leading to an increase in both infiltration and hydraulic conductivity over longer timescales (Scott et al., 1994; Haruna et al., 2018; Çerçioğlu et al., 2019; Gulick et al., 1994). A similar impact of cover crops has been noted in previous work done in Russell Ranch soils: a cover crop mix of purple vetch (Vicia benghalensis L.), common vetch (Vicia sativa L.), and oats (Avena sativa L.) increased soil moisture-holding capacity during saturated conditions (Joyce et al., 2002); a cover crop of common vetch produced no changes in bulk density after 10 years (Colla et al., 2000), and a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop increased infiltration by 43 % and decreased DOC export by 54 % in a furrow-irrigated system, causing the soil profile to become a DOC sink (Mailapalli et al., 2012). Proposed mechanisms are that cover crops increase infiltration and hydraulic conductivity by increasing soil structure through aggregate formation, reduced soil crusting, and reduced soil compaction due to increased organic matter content and formation of root channels (Chen and Weil, 2010; Franzluebbers, 2002). Other potential, albeit less likely, explanations for increased moisture content could include lateral subsurface flow (unlikely due to the <1 % slope of this field) and differences in run-off and run-on (also unlikely due to low slope). Given that our cover crop mix is known to have extensive root networks that extend deeper than the 30 cm plow layer (Fan et al., 2016), the observed differences in moisture content were attributed to increased biopores created by roots (Hangen et al., 2002).

Despite the presence of cover crops, we found no significant difference in aggregate MWD among systems (Fig. A2). This may be because root-induced soil alterations, such as aggregation, are highly localized and dependent on the root architecture of the cover crops. Specifically, cover crops with prominent tap roots, such as faba bean, are effective at creating continuous biopores, while fibrous roots such as in oats and hairy vetch are particularly effective at promoting soil aggregate formation (Ogilvie et al., 2021). Therefore, the mixture of cover crops planted at the site likely resulted in a large amount of variation in aggregation and pore connectivity and may have resulted in the non-significant aggregate MWD values.

While mean hydraulic conductivity values were also not significantly different between treatment systems, hydraulic conductivities were more variable in the two systems with than without cover crops (Fig. 5). Roots may increase macroporosity by opening up channels as they decay (Ghestem et al., 2011), and increased water movement through these macropores can result in hydraulic conductivity values that can range over 3 orders of magnitude (Øygarden et al., 1997), similar to what we observed. In addition, the sample size used for Ksat measurements (cross-sectional area of 250 cm2) may be too small to capture the effects of cover crop roots, whose impacts are likely to be detected at a larger scale (Ozelim and Cavalcante, 2018). It is well recognized that hydraulic conductivity measurements can vary widely across fields and landscapes (Rahmati et al., 2018) and often do not reflect the presence of macropores (Brooks et al., 2004). Though our measurements do not reveal statistically significant differences between treatments, the scattered high-permeability zones in the cover crop treatments likely play a role in rapid moisture redistribution and may explain the elevated deep moisture contents in ORG and CONV+WCC plots compared to CONV plots. We therefore attributed the more variable hydraulic conductivity and increased moisture content in ORG and CONV+WCC than CONV systems to the deeper, more abundant root-derived macropores from cover crops.

4.2 Compost and cover crops increased the amount of EOC and carboxylate functional groups in subsoils

Increased EOC levels (Figs. 6a, 7a) in ORG plots and relatively more oxidized carboxylate C in the bottom 60–100 cm of ORG and CONV+WCC plots relative to CONV plots (Fig. 8b) point to an accelerated cascade process (Kaiser and Kalbitz, 2012) in these systems relative to CONV systems. The presence of elevated EOC levels in ORG plots is due to the higher amounts of soluble C found in compost (Wright et al., 2008; Zmora-Nahum et al., 2005), the increase in dissolved and water-extractable organic C expected from cover crop residue (Singh et al., 2021; cereal rye and hairy vetch), and the larger amounts of C added to ORG plots (Fig. 1a). Compost also contains a large proportion of aromatic functional groups derived from lignin and other biomolecules (Leifeld et al., 2002), which tend to be rapidly removed from the soil solution at the surface (Leinemann et al., 2018). This preferential removal at the soil surface may be a function of the relatively low solubilities of non-polar aromatic functional groups (Maxin and Kogel-Knabner, 1995) as well as their tendency to partition into other non-polar, insoluble organic matter (Pignatello, 1999). When these aromatic functional groups are eventually oxidized by microbes, the higher solubility of carboxylate and other O-rich functional groups may allow for greater C transport. Carboxylate functional groups' ability to form mineral-associated organic matter through association with charged surfaces or cation bridging (Aquino et al., 2011) would also promote MAOM formation and increase C storage times (Cotrufo et al., 2013; Leinemann et al., 2018), though our results do not provide sufficient support to determine the stability of the increased C stocks at 60–100 cm. As the C cascade is triggered by fresh C inputs which are preferentially sorbed within the top 30 cm (Liebmann et al., 2020), the regular application of soluble C-rich compost and WCC residue combined with increased hydraulic conductivity due to WCC roots can accelerate the process, leading to greater subsoil C transport.

Cover crops are associated with elevated EOC levels and more aromatic functional groups in topsoil SOC (Ding et al., 2006; Zhou et al., 2012). Application of cover crops in CONV+WCC did not increase EOC content deeper than 15 cm compared to CONV (Fig. 7a) but did have an impact on carboxylate functional group presence at the 60 cm depth (Fig. 8b), possibly indicating that cover crop residues are associated with smaller inputs of soluble C that are not as easily detected as the larger soluble C inputs coming from the compost. Additionally, the trend of increasing aromatic : carboxylate ratios with depth in CONV+WCC systems (Table 1) indicates that CONV+WCC systems may be accumulating more aromatic C relative to carboxylate C in deeper soil layers. This accumulation of aromatic C in CONV+WCC subsoils may be due to cover crop root residue introducing lignin and cellulose directly into the subsoil, while the carboxylate C obtained from the decomposition of surface residues can be potentially mineralized before being transported deeper as DOC (Chantigny, 2003; White et al., 2020).

4.3 Compost and cover crops increased nutrient availability and decreased microbial stress in subsoils

The higher P and S values noted in ORG subsoils (Fig. 7c, d) can be attributed both to the higher organic P and S inputs associated with compost (Preusch et al., 2002) (Fig. 1c, d) as well as the increased mobility of these inputs. Differences in crop uptake also play a potential role, but the lack of significant treatment effects at RR on crop nitrogen use efficiency (Kong et al., 2009) or P cycling (Maltais-Landry et al., 2014) in these plots makes crop uptake less likely to be a significant factor in nutrient availability. Organic phosphorus is more mobile than mineral P (Laos et al., 2000; Sharpley and Moyer, 2000), and mineralization of organic S into more soluble sulfate could also facilitate its movement (Edwards, 1998). Though our results were not able to detect significant differences in mineral N in the measured subsoils, the higher amount of organic N added in compost (Fig. 1b) was also likely mineralized into more soluble nitrate (Vinten et al., 1994) (Fig. 7b). Although soil microbial communities are primarily water and C-limited (Soong et al., 2020), the addition of N, P, and S in ratios similar to that found in soil organic matter may increase transformation of C inputs into SOM by up to 52 % by promoting microbial anabolism (Coonan et al., 2020).

Greater C and nutrient inputs were associated with the lower Gram+:Gram- ratios observed in subsoil ORG soils (Fig. 9b). Higher values for these ratios, such as those observed in CONV plots, have been associated with nutrient and energy limitation (Bossio and Scow, 1998; Petersen and Klug, 1994). Increases in these ratios represent an overall shift away from the thinner, more permeable cell membranes associated with Gram bacteria and monounsaturated fatty acids towards more tightly packed, less permeable cell membranes associated with Gram+ bacteria and saturated fatty acids (Silhavy et al., 2010). An increase in the Gram+:Gram- ratio has been associated with a decrease in easily available water and C (Fanin et al., 2019; Fierer et al., 2003b, Bossio et al., 1998), while an increase in the saturated:unsaturated ratio and cy17:pre ratios has been associated with low water potentials (−1.3 to −0.9 MPa) and potential dehydration (Moore-Kucera and Dick, 2008). The stress indicator trends in our data support our observations of increased soluble C and water content in ORG systems.

Adding compost and cover crop residue increases microbial biomass at the 0–15 and 15–60 cm depths but not 60–100 cm depth relative to CONV systems (Fig. 9a). This greater biomass increase in ORG than CONV plots was attributed to compost providing a favorable nutrient stoichiometry for biomass formation (Kirkby et al., 2011; Richardson et al., 2014). Increased microbial biomass in surface layers of soil is an important potential source of C and other nutrients to subsoil layers through cell lysis from predation and wet–dry cycles (Bonkowski, 2004; Xiang et al., 2008). It is associated with increased C storage through microbial necromass formation (Buchmann and Schaumann, 2018; Jilling et al., 2020), and we hypothesize that transport of microbial products downwards through the profile could have contributed to the SOC increase in the subsoil observed in ORG systems (Fig. 2b).

4.4 Compost and cover crops increased profile C stocks after 25 years, but cover crops alone did not

We found evidence that the SOC increases under the ORG system after 25 years (Fig. 2) were due to the increased mobility of compost-added C and nutrients combined with increased infiltration due to cover crop roots as well as the larger amounts of C added to ORG plots. Larger SOC increases under yard waste compost and cover crops relative to cover crops alone have also been noted in other California long-term experiments on a loamy sand soil (White et al., 2020a; rye, faba bean, pea, common vetch, purple vetch), indicating that C input from cover crops alone may not play a large role in increasing subsoil C. These experiments also note the importance of belowground carbon inputs to SOC stocks, a factor that was not included in this analysis. While cover crop biomass does represent significant C and N input to surface soils, the channels their roots create for mobile nutrients (either organic or mineral) to move downwards may be as important as their C and N inputs to subsoil SOC dynamics.

We noted significant seasonal variation in EOC, mineral N, P, and S levels throughout the 2018–2019 growing season, though ORG plots consistently had higher EOC and P than CONV+WCC or CONV plots at all time points (Fig. 6a and c) and higher S during the growing season. These soluble C and nutrient inputs peaked during the growing season, likely due to the influence of compost application, root exudates, and fertigation. Since the months of April–September are the driest months of the year at the study site, the large C and nutrient inputs during the growing season may have depended on irrigation water being transported into subsoil layers, highlighting the importance of irrigation amounts and types (drip, furrow) to understanding changes in subsoil C stocks. The shifts in soluble C:N:P:S ratios during the course of the year may also indicate that C : nutrient stoichiometry is more suitable for microbial biomass growth in these row-cropped plots during the growing season than it is during the winter rainy season.

In contrast to the ORG system, SOC stocks did not significantly increase in the CONV+WCC plots after 25 years (Fig. 2). While our FTIR results suggest that cover crop residues have an impact on subsoil C by increasing the proportion of carboxylate C relative to the CONV system (Fig. 8b), they do not suggest a clear reason behind the lack of an increase in SOC stocks. A possible hypothesis is that small inputs of C and N over time from cover crop roots primed decomposition of native SOC, potentially by stimulating phosphatases and accelerating MAOM breakdown (Cui et al., 2020; Mise et al., 2020). Additionally, common root exudates such as oxalic acid may have dispersed organomineral complexes (Keiluweit et al., 2015), making that C more accessible for decomposition. While any priming of SOC due to cover crop root exudates would also be occurring in the ORG systems, we believe this was counteracted by the higher EOC inputs and more favorable nutrient stoichiometry for microbial biomass provided by the compost.

We also observed a continual decline in SOC in subsoil in the conventional with cover crop treatment (CONV+WCC) as observed in Tautges et al. (2019); however, the rate of decline was lower over the last 7 years than in the first 19 years of study. This slower decline in subsoil C stocks from 2012 to 2019 may be due to the switch from furrow to drip irrigation in 2014. Lower water inputs with drip reduce microbial activity and C and N cycling enzyme activities (e.g., beta-glucosidase and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase) in a large part of the bed in the surface of these same plots (Schmidt et al., 2018). The shift in irrigation and reduced water inputs potentially increased the prevalence of complex SOM by reducing microbial mineralization and may have facilitated greater DOC transport during the winter rainy season.

5 Conclusion

The combination of growing cover crops and compost amendment created a unique set of conditions conducive to C transport and accumulation in the subsoils of a tilled row crop rotation. This was, in part, likely due to increased hydraulic conductivity facilitated by cover crop roots leading to higher rates of transport of soluble C and nutrients from the surface to subsoil. In turn, higher transport led to increased C stocks, reduced levels of microbial stress, and higher available C, P, and S values throughout the year in ORG systems. The accumulation of oxygen-rich carboxylate C in subsoil horizons under all treatments, attributed to an increase in microbially processed C, provides support for the “cascade theory” of C transport. These results demonstrate the potential for subsoil C storage in tilled agricultural systems and highlight a potential pathway for increasing C transport, storage, and sequestration in subsoil layers.

Appendix A
https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f10

Figure A1Extractable organic C, mineral N, phosphorus, and sulfur stocks at 0–15 cm in ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems over the February 2018–February 2019 season. All values are given in kilograms per hectare. Error bars represent standard error.

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f11

Figure A2Mean weight diameter of aggregates obtained by wet sieving for 0–15, 15–60, and 60–100 cm depth intervals in ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV systems.

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f12

Figure A3(a, b) FTIR spectral subtractions for the 4000–1200 cm−1 range comparing (a) 2018–1993 spectra for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV and (b) ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV spectra in 2018.

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f13

Figure A4(a, b) FTIR spectral subtractions for the 1900–1200 cm−1 range comparing (a) 2018–1993 spectra for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV and (b) ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV spectra in 2018.

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f14

Figure A5Rainfall and soil temperature at 50 cm at Russell Ranch from October 2018 to October 2019. Data taken from http://atm.ucdavis.edu/weather/uc-davis-weather-climate-station (last access: 13 January 2022).

Download

https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/59/2022/soil-8-59-2022-f15

Figure A6Example DRIFT spectra showing three replicate spectra, the mean spectra, and the residual spectra for 1993 and 2008 samples.

Download

Table A1PLFA (phospholipid fatty acid) assignments taken from Bossio and Scow (1998).

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table A2FTIR peak assignments* used for analysis of spectra.

* Assignments taken from Baes and Bloom (1989), Hesse et al. (2005), Parikh et al. (2014), and Orlov (1986).

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table A3Texture, pH, OM, and clay content for the Rincon and Yolo soil series found at Russell Ranch.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table A4Average annual inputs of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur to ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV plots between 1993 and 2018. Please note that sudangrass and Wheat C inputs were excluded from this table, as they were only grown for a limited amount of time.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table A5Management summary for ORG, CONV+WCC, and CONV plots for the 2018–2019 year.

n/a – not applicable.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Code availability

The code for the graphs and analyses in this paper is available at https://github.com/danrath/2018_RRCARBON_DEPTH (last access: 13 January 2022) (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558161; Rath et al., 2021a).

Data availability

The data included in this paper are part of the Russell Ranch long-term dataset and are available at https://github.com/danrath/2018_RRCARBON_DEPTH (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558161; Rath et al., 2021b).

Author contributions

NB, AAB, SY, KMS, SJP, and DR acquired funding for this project. DR, NT, NB, KS, and DW designed the experiment, and DR, NB, DW, LD, SJP, and NT collected the data. DR, NB, LD, and SJP performed data analysis and interpretation with assistance from DW, NT, KMS, SY, and AAB. DR prepared the manuscript with contributions from all the co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

All opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), nor the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to express gratitude to Israel Herrera and the Russell Ranch staff for field assistance during the project and Danielle Gelardi and Oren Hoffman for offering comments on the draft version of the manuscript.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Office of the President, University of California (CATALYST Award), and was also made possible by the USDA NIFA through the UCOP Catalyst Grant, the USDA-NIFA AFRI ELI Predoctoral Fellowship, Hatch Formula Funding CA 2122-H, and multistate regional project W-2082.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Jocelyn Lavallee and reviewed by Jonathan Sanderman and two anonymous referees.

References

Angst, G., Messinger, J., Greiner, M., Häusler, W., Hertel, D., Kirfel, K., Kögel-Knabner, I., Leuschner, C., Rethemeyer, J., and Mueller, C. W.: Soil organic carbon stocks in topsoil and subsoil controlled by parent material, carbon input in the rhizosphere, and microbial-derived compounds, Soil Biol. Biochem., 122, 19–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.026, 2018. 

Aquino, A. J. A., Tunega, D., Schaumann, G. E., Haberhauer, G., Gerzabek, M. H., and Lischka, H.: The functionality of cation bridges for binding polar groups in soil aggregates, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 111, 1531–1542, https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.22693, 2011. 

Baes, A. U. and Bloom, P. R.: Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared (DRIFT) of humic and fulvic acids, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 695–700, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300030008x, 1989. 

Banfield, C. C., Dippold, M. A., Pausch, J., Hoang, D. T. T., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Biopore history determines the microbial community composition in subsoil hotspots, Biol. Fert. Soils, 53, 573–588, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00374-017-1201-5, 2017. 

Bernal, B., McKinley, D. C., Hungate, B. A., White, P. M., Mozdzer, T. J., and Megonigal, J. P.: Limits to soil carbon stability; Deep, ancient soil carbon decomposition stimulated by new labile organic inputs, Soil Biol. Biochem., 98, 85–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2016.04.007, 2016. 

Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H.: Bulk Density, in: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 – Physical and Mineralogical Methods, edited by: Klute, A., SSSA Book Ser. 5.1. SSSA, ASA, Madison, WI, 363–375, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13, 1986. 

Bleam, W. F.: Soil Science Applications of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Adv. Agron., 46, 91–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60579-9, 1991. 

Bonkowski, M.: Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited, New Phytol., 162, 617–631, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01066.x, 2004. 

Bossio, D. A. and Scow, K. M.: Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns, Microb. Ecol., 35, 265–278, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900082, 1998. 

Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R.: The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th Edn., Pearson Education, Pearson Press, Columbus, Ohio, ISBN-13 978-0133254488, 2017. 

Brooks, E. S., Boll, J., and McDaniel, P. A.: A hillslope-scale experiment to measure lateral saturated hydraulic conductivity, Water Resour. Res., 40, 4208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002858, 2004. 

Buchmann, C. and Schaumann, G. E.: The contribution of various organic matter fractions to soil–water interactions and structural stability of an agriculturally cultivated soil, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 181, 586–599, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201700437, 2018. 

Buyer, J. S. and Sasser, M.: High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils, Appl. Soil Ecol., 61, 127–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.06.005, 2012. 

Çerçioğlu, M., Anderson, S. H., Udawatta, R. P., and Alagele, S.: Effect of cover crop management on soil hydraulic properties, Geoderma, 343, 247–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.027, 2019. 

Chabbi, A., Kögel-Knabner, I., and Rumpel, C.: Stabilised carbon in subsoil horizons is located in spatially distinct parts of the soil profile, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 256–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.033, 2009. 

Chantigny, M. H.: Dissolved and water-extractable organic matter in soils: A review on the influence of land use and management practices, Geoderma, 113, 357–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00370-1, 2003. 

Chen, G. and Weil, R. R.: Penetration of cover crop roots through compacted soils, Plant Soil, 331, 31–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0223-7, 2010. 

Chen, S., Martin, M. P., Saby, N. P. A., Walter, C., Angers, D. A., and Arrouays, D.: Fine resolution map of top- and subsoil carbon sequestration potential in France, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.209, 2018. 

Chenu, C., Angers, D. A., Barré, P., Derrien, D., Arrouays, D., and Balesdent, J.: Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations, Soil Till. Res., 188, 41–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011, 2019. 

Cole, J. S. and Mathews, O. R.: Subsoil moisture under semiarid conditions, Technical Bulletins 167381, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.167381, 1939. 

Colla, G., Mitchell, J. P., Joyce, B. A., Huyck, L. M., Wallender, W. W., Temple, S. R., Hsiao, T. C., and Poudel, D. D.: Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems, Agron. J., 92, 924–932, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925924x, 2000. 

Coonan, E. C., Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Amidy, M. R., Strong, C. L., and Richardson, A. E.: Microorganisms and nutrient stoichiometry as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 117, 273–298, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10076-8, 2020. 

Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., and Paul, E.: The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 988–995, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12113, 2013. 

Cui, Y., Zhang, Y., Duan, C., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Ju, W., Chen, H., Yue, S., Wang, Y., Li, S., and Fang, L.: Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry reveals microbial phosphorus limitation decreases the nitrogen cycling potential of soils in semi-arid agricultural ecosystems, Soil Till. Res., 197, 104463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104463, 2020. 

Dalal, R. C. and Henry, R. J.: Simultaneous Determination of Moisture, Organic Carbon, and Total Nitrogen by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectrophotometry, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 50, 120–123, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000010023x, 1986. 

Dangal, S. R. S., Sanderman, J., Wills, S., and Ramirez-Lopez, L.: Accurate and Precise Prediction of Soil Properties from a Large Mid-Infrared Spectral Library, Soil Systems, 3, 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/SOILSYSTEMS3010011, 2019. 

Deiss, L., Margenot, A. J., Culman, S. W., and Demyan, M. S.: Optimizing acquisition parameters in diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy of soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 84, 930–948, https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20028, 2020. 

Deiss, L., Sall, A., Demyan, M. S., and Culman, S. W.: Does crop rotation affect soil organic matter stratification in tillage systems, Soil Till. Res., 209, 104932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.104932, 2021. 

Demyan, M. S., Rasche, F., Schulz, E., Breulmann, M., Müller, T., and Cadisch, G.: Use of specific peaks obtained by diffuse reflectance Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy to study the composition of organic matter in a Haplic Chernozem, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 189–199, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01420.x, 2012. 

de Queiroz, M. G., da Silva, T. G. F., Zolnier, S., Jardim, A. M. da R. F., de Souza, C. A. A., Araújo Júnior, G. do N., de Morais, J. E. F., and de Souza, L. S. B.: Spatial and temporal dynamics of soil moisture for surfaces with a change in land use in the semi-arid region of Brazil, CATENA, 188, 104457, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATENA.2020.104457, 2020. 

Dick, R. P.: A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 40, 25–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(92)90081-L, 1992. 

Ding, G., Liu, X., Herbert, S., Novak, J., Amarasiriwardena, D., and Xing, B.: Effect of cover crop management on soil organic matter, Geoderma, 130, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2005.01.019, 2006. 

Doane, T. A. and Horwáth, W. R.: Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent, Anal. Lett., 36, 2713–2722, https://doi.org/10.1081/AL-120024647, 2003. 

Drenovsky, R. E., Vo, D., Graham, K. J., and Scow, K. M.: Soil water content and organic carbon availability are major determinants of soil microbial community composition, Microb. Ecol., 48, 424–430, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2, 2004. 

Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S., and Whitmore, A. P.: Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1781–1796, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x, 2012. 

Edwards, P.: Sulfur cycling, retention, and mobility in soils: a review, available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtown_square/publications/technical_reports/pdfs/1998/gtrne250.pdf (last access: 10 April 2020), 1998. 

Elliott, E. T.: Aggregate Structure and Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in Native and Cultivated Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 50, 627–633, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030017x, 1986. 

Fan, J., McConkey, B., Wang, H., and Janzen, H.: Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops, Field Crop. Res., 189, 68–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.013, 2016. 

Fanin, N., Kardol, P., Farrell, M., Nilsson, M. C., Gundale, M. J., and Wardle, D. A.: The ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacterial PLFA markers as an indicator of carbon availability in organic soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 128, 111–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.10.010, 2019. 

Fierer, N., Allen, A. S., Schimel, J. P., and Holden, P. A.: Controls on microbial CO2 production: A comparison of surface and subsurface soil horizons, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 1322–1332, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00663.x, 2003a. 

Fierer, N., Schimel, J. P., and Holden, P. A.: Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles, Soil Biol. Biochem., 35, 167–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00251-1, 2003b. 

Franzluebbers, A. J.: Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth, Soil Till. Res., 66, 197–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00027-2, 2002. 

Frostegård, Å., Tunlid, A., and Bååth, E.: Use and misuse of PLFA measurements in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 1621–1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.021, 2011. 

Ghestem, M., Sidle, R. C., and Stokes, A.: The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: Implications for slope stability, Bioscience, 61, 869–879, https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.6, 2011. 

Gulick, S. H., Grimes, D. W., Munk, D. S., and Goldhamer, D. A.: Cover-Crop-Enhanced Water Infiltration of a Slowly Permeable Fine Sandy Loam, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 1539–1546, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050038x, 1994. 

Hangen, E., Buczko, U., Bens, O., Brunotte, J., and Hüttl, R. F.: Infiltration patterns into two soils under conventional and conservation tillage: Influence of the spatial distribution of plant root structures and soil animal activity, Soil Till. Res., 63, 181–186, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00234-3, 2002. 

Harrison, R. B., Footen, P. W., and Strahm, B. D.: Deep soil horizons: Contribution and importance to soil carbon pools and in assessing whole-ecosystem response to management and global change, Forest Sci., 57, 67–76, 2011. 

Haruna, S. I., Nkongolo, N. V., Anderson, S. H., Eivazi, F., and Zaibon, S.: In situ infiltration as influenced by cover crop and tillage management, J. Soil Water Conserv., 73, 164–172, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.2.164, 2018. 

Hesse, M., Meier, H., and Zeeh, B.: Spektroskopische Methoden in der Organischen Chemie, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, https://doi.org/10.1002/pauz.19960250417, 2005 (in German). 

Hicks Pries, C. E., Sulman, B. N., West, C., O'Neill, C., Poppleton, E., Porras, R. C., Castanha, C., Zhu, B., Wiedemeier, D. B., and Torn, M. S.: Root litter decomposition slows with soil depth, Soil Biol. Biochem., 125, 103–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.002, 2018. 

Jenny, H.: Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology, Dover Publications, New York, ISBN 978-05-9853-785-0, 1941. 

Jilling, A., Kane, D., Williams, A., Yannarell, A. C., Davis, A., Jordan, N. R., Koide, R. T., Mortensen, D. A., Smith, R. G., Snapp, S. S., Spokas, K. A., and Stuart Grandy, A.: Rapid and distinct responses of particulate and mineral-associated organic nitrogen to conservation tillage and cover crops, Geoderma, 359, 114001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114001, 2020. 

Johnston, A. E. and Poulton, P. R.: The importance of long-term experiments in agriculture: their management to ensure continued crop production and soil fertility; the Rothamsted experience, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 69, 113–125, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12521, 2018. 

Jones, D. L. and Willett, V. B.: Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38, 991–999, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2005.08.012, 2006. 

Joyce, B. A., Wallender, W. W., Mitchell, J. P., Huyck, L. M., Temple, S. R., Brostrom, P. N., and Hsiao, T. C.: Infiltration and Soil Water Storage Under Winter Cover Cropping in California's Sacramento Valley, T. ASAE, 45, 315–326, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.8526, 2002. 

Kaiser, K. and Kalbitz, K.: Cycling downwards – dissolved organic matter in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 52, 29–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2012.04.002, 2012. 

Kautz, T., Amelung, W., Ewert, F., Gaiser, T., Horn, R., Jahn, R., Javaux, M., Kemna, A., Kuzyakov, Y., Munch, J. C., Pätzold, S., Peth, S., Scherer, H. W., Schloter, M., Schneider, H., Vanderborght, J., Vetterlein, D., Walter, A., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., and Köpke, U.: Nutrient acquisition from arable subsoils in temperate climates: A review, Soil Biol. Biochem., 57, 1003–1022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.014, 2013. 

Keel, S. G., Anken, T., Büchi, L., Chervet, A., Fliessbach, A., Flisch, R., Huguenin-Elie, O., Mäder, P., Mayer, J., Sinaj, S., Sturny, W., Wüst-Galley, C., Zihlmann, U., and Leifeld, J.: Loss of soil organic carbon in Swiss long-term agricultural experiments over a wide range of management practices, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 286, 106654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106654, 2019. 

Keiluweit, M., Bougoure, J. J., Nico, P. S., Pett-Ridge, J., Weber, P. K., and Kleber, M.: Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 588–595, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2580, 2015. 

Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Blanchard, C., and Batten, G.: Stable soil organic matter: A comparison of C:N:P:S ratios in Australian and other world soils, Geoderma, 163, 197–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.010, 2011. 

Kirkby, C. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Batten, G. D., Blanchard, C., and Kirkegaard, J. A.: Carbon-nutrient stoichiometry to increase soil carbon sequestration, Soil Biol. Biochem., 60, 77–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.011, 2013. 

Kong, A. Y. Y., Fonte, S. J., van Kessel, C., and Six, J.: Transitioning from standard to minimum tillage: Trade-offs between soil organic matter stabilization, nitrous oxide emissions, and N availability in irrigated cropping systems, Soil Till. Res., 104, 256–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2009.03.004, 2009. 

Kuzyakov, Y.: Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1363–1371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003, 2010. 

Laos, F., Satti, P., Walter, I., Mazzarino, M. J., and Moyano, S.: Nutrient availability of composted and noncomposted residues in a Patagonian Xeric Mollisol, Biol. Fert. Soils, 31, 462–469, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000192, 2000. 

Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., and Cotrufo, M. F.: Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 261–273, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859, 2020. 

Leifeld, J., Siebert, S., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Changes in the chemical composition of soil organic matter after application of compost, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 53, 299–309, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2002.00453.x, 2002. 

Leinemann, T., Preusser, S., Mikutta, R., Kalbitz, K., Cerli, C., Höschen, C., Mueller, C. W., Kandeler, E., and Guggenberger, G.: Multiple exchange processes on mineral surfaces control the transport of dissolved organic matter through soil profiles, Soil Biol. Biochem., 118, 79–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.006, 2018. 

Li, S., Zheng, X., Liu, C., Yao, Z., Zhang, W., and Han, S.: Influences of observation method, season, soil depth, land use and management practice on soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations: A meta-analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 631–632, 105–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.238, 2018. 

Liebmann, P., Wordell-Dietrich, P., Kalbitz, K., Mikutta, R., Kalks, F., Don, A., Woche, S. K., Dsilva, L. R., and Guggenberger, G.: Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective, Biogeosciences, 17, 3099–3113, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3099-2020, 2020. 

Lorenz, K. and Lal, R.: The Depth Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon in Relation to Land Use and Management and the Potential of Carbon Sequestration in Subsoil Horizons, Adv. Agron., 88, 35–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88002-2, 2005. 

Mailapalli, D. R., Horwath, W. R., Wallender, W. W., and Burger, M.: Infiltration, Runoff, and Export of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Furrow-Irrigated Forage Fields under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in the Arid Climate of California, J. Irrig. Drain. E., 138, 35–42, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000385, 2012. 

Maltais-Landry, G., Scow, K., and Brennan, E.: Soil phosphorus mobilization in the rhizosphere of cover crops has little effect on phosphorus cycling in California agricultural soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 78, 255–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2014.08.013, 2014. 

Margenot, A. J., Calderón, F. J., Bowles, T. M., Parikh, S. J., and Jackson, L. E.: Soil organic matter functional group composition in relation to organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus fractions in organically managed tomato fields, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 79, 772–782, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.02.0070, 2015. 

Margenot, A. J., Calderon, F. J., and Parikh, S. J.: Limitations and potential of spectral subtractions in Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of soil samples, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 10–26, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.06.0228, 2016. 

Margenot, A. J., Parikh, S. J., and Calderón, F. J.: Improving infrared spectroscopy characterization of soil organic matter with spectral subtractions, JOVE-J. Vis. Exp., 2019, e57464, https://doi.org/10.3791/57464, 2019. 

Matlou, M. C. and Haynes, R. J.: Soluble organic matter and microbial biomass C and N in soils under pasture and arable management and the leaching of organic C, N and nitrate in a lysimeter study, Appl. Soil Ecol., 34, 160–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.02.005, 2006. 

Maxin, C. R. and Kogel-Knabner, I.: Partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) to water-soluble soil organic matter, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 46, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01827.x, 1995. 

Medellín-Azuara, J., Howitt, R. E., MacEwan, D. J., and Lund, J. R.: Economic impacts of climate-related changes to California agriculture, Clim. Change, 109, 387–405, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0314-3, 2011. 

Mehlich, A.: Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 15, 1409–1416, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628409367568, 1984. 

Min, K., Berhe, A. A., Khoi, C. M., van Asperen, H., Gillabel, J., and Six, J.: Differential effects of wetting and drying on soil CO2 concentration and flux in near-surface vs. deep soil layers, Biogeochemistry, 148, 255–269, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00658-7, 2020. 

Mise, K., Maruyama, R., Miyabara, Y., Kunito, T., Senoo, K., and Otsuka, S.: Time-series analysis of phosphorus-depleted microbial communities in carbon/nitrogen-amended soils, Appl. Soil Ecol., 145, 103346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.08.008, 2020. 

Mobley, M. L., Lajtha, K., Kramer, M. G., Bacon, A. R., Heine, P. R., and Richter, D. D.: Surficial gains and subsoil losses of soil carbon and nitrogen during secondary forest development, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 986–996, https://doi.org/10.1111/GCB.12715, 2015. 

Moore-Kucera, J. and Dick, R. P.: PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence, Microb. Ecol., 55, 500–511, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9295-1, 2008. 

Ng, E. L., Patti, A. F., Rose, M. T., Schefe, C. R., Wilkinson, K., and Cavagnaro, T. R.: Functional stoichiometry of soil microbial communities after amendment with stabilised organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 76, 170–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.016, 2014. 

Ogilvie, C. M., Ashiq, W., Vasava, H. B., and Biswas, A.: Quantifying Root-Soil Interactions in Cover Crop Systems: A Review, Agriculture, 11, 218, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030218, 2021. 

Orlov, D. S.: Humus acids of soil, Balkema, Rotterdam, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19871500116, 1986. 

Orwin, K. H., Dickie, I. A., Holdaway, R., and Wood, J. R.: A comparison of the ability of PLFA and 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding to resolve soil community change and predict ecosystem functions, Soil Biol. Biochem., 117, 27–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.036, 2018. 

Øygarden, L., Kværner, J., and Jenssen, P. D.: Soil erosion via preferential flow to drainage systems in clay soils, Geoderma, 76, 65–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(96)00099-7, 1997. 

Ozelim, L. C. de S. M. and Cavalcante, A. L. B.: Representative Elementary Volume Determination for Permeability and Porosity Using Numerical Three-Dimensional Experiments in Microtomography Data, Int. J. Geomech., 18, 04017154, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001060, 2018. 

Pagliai, M., Vignozzi, N., and Pellegrini, S.: Soil structure and the effect of management practices, Soil Till. Res., 79, 131–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2004.07.002, 2004. 

Parikh, S. J., Margenot, A. J., Mukome, F. N. D., Calderon, F., and Goyne, K. W.: Soil Chemical Insights Provided through Vibrational Spectroscopy, Adv. Agron., 126, 1–148, 2014. 

Pathak, T., Maskey, M., Dahlberg, J., Kearns, F., Bali, K., and Zaccaria, D.: Climate Change Trends and Impacts on California Agriculture: A Detailed Review, Agronomy, 8, 25, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8030025, 2018. 

Paul, E. A., Follett, R. F., Leavitt, S. W., Halvorson, A., Peterson, G. A., and Lyon, D. J.: Radiocarbon Dating for Determination of Soil Organic Matter Pool Sizes and Dynamics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 1058–1067, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040011x, 1997. 

Paul, E. A., Collins, H. P., and Leavitt, S. W.: Dynamics of resistant soil carbon of midwestern agricultural soils measured by naturally occurring 14C abundance, Geoderma, 104, 239–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00083-0, 2001. 

Petersen, S. O. and Klug, M. J.: Effects of sieving, storage, and incubation temperature on the phospholipid fatty acid profile of a soil microbial community, Appl. Environ. Microb., 60, 2421–2430, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.60.7.2421-2430.1994, 1994. 

Pignatello, J. J.: The Measurement and Interpretation of Sorption and Desorption Rates for Organic Compounds in Soil Media, Adv. Agron., 69, 1–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60946-3, 1999. 

Preusch, P. L., Adler, P. R., Sikora, L. J., and Tworkoski, T. J.: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability in Composted and Uncomposted Poultry Litter, J. Environ. Qual., 31, 2051–2057, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.2051, 2002. 

Rath, D., Bogie, N., Deiss, L., Parikh, S., Wang, D., Tautges, N., Berhe, A. A., and Scow, K.: danrath/2018_RRCARBON_DEPTH: Data and Code for Submission to Soil EGU Journal 2_23_21 (1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558161, 2021a. 

Rath, D., Bogie, N., Deiss, L., Parikh, S., Wang, D., Tautges, N., Berhe, A. A., and Scow, K.: danrath/2018_RRCARBON_DEPTH: Data and Code for Submission to Soil EGU Journal 2_23_21 (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558161, 2021b. 

Rahmati, M., Weihermüller, L., Vanderborght, J., Pachepsky, Y. A., Mao, L., Sadeghi, S. H., Moosavi, N., Kheirfam, H., Montzka, C., Van Looy, K., Toth, B., Hazbavi, Z., Al Yamani, W., Albalasmeh, A. A., Alghzawi, M. Z., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Antonino, A. C. D., Arampatzis, G., Armindo, R. A., Asadi, H., Bamutaze, Y., Batlle-Aguilar, J., Béchet, B., Becker, F., Blöschl, G., Bohne, K., Braud, I., Castellano, C., Cerdà, A., Chalhoub, M., Cichota, R., Císlerová, M., Clothier, B., Coquet, Y., Cornelis, W., Corradini, C., Coutinho, A. P., de Oliveira, M. B., de Macedo, J. R., Durães, M. F., Emami, H., Eskandari, I., Farajnia, A., Flammini, A., Fodor, N., Gharaibeh, M., Ghavimipanah, M. H., Ghezzehei, T. A., Giertz, S., Hatzigiannakis, E. G., Horn, R., Jiménez, J. J., Jacques, D., Keesstra, S. D., Kelishadi, H., Kiani-Harchegani, M., Kouselou, M., Kumar Jha, M., Lassabatere, L., Li, X., Liebig, M. A., Lichner, L., López, M. V., Machiwal, D., Mallants, D., Mallmann, M. S., de Oliveira Marques, J. D., Marshall, M. R., Mertens, J., Meunier, F., Mohammadi, M. H., Mohanty, B. P., Pulido-Moncada, M., Montenegro, S., Morbidelli, R., Moret-Fernández, D., Moosavi, A. A., Mosaddeghi, M. R., Mousavi, S. B., Mozaffari, H., Nabiollahi, K., Neyshabouri, M. R., Ottoni, M. V., Ottoni Filho, T. B., Pahlavan-Rad, M. R., Panagopoulos, A., Peth, S., Peyneau, P.-E., Picciafuoco, T., Poesen, J., Pulido, M., Reinert, D. J., Reinsch, S., Rezaei, M., Roberts, F. P., Robinson, D., Rodrigo-Comino, J., Rotunno Filho, O. C., Saito, T., Suganuma, H., Saltalippi, C., Sándor, R., Schütt, B., Seeger, M., Sepehrnia, N., Sharifi Moghaddam, E., Shukla, M., Shutaro, S., Sorando, R., Stanley, A. A., Strauss, P., Su, Z., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Taguas, E., Teixeira, W. G., Vaezi, A. R., Vafakhah, M., Vogel, T., Vogeler, I., Votrubova, J., Werner, S., Winarski, T., Yilmaz, D., Young, M. H., Zacharias, S., Zeng, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhao, H., and Vereecken, H.: Development and analysis of the Soil Water Infiltration Global database, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1237–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1237-2018, 2018. 

Rapalee, G., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., Harden, J. W., and Veldhuis, H.: Soil Carbon stocks and their rates of accumulation and loss in a boreal forest landscape, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 687–701, https://doi.org/10.1029/98GB02336, 1998. 

R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 13 January 2022), 2017. 

Rhine, E. D., Mulvaney, R. L., Pratt, E. J., and Sims, G. K.: Improving the Berthelot reaction for determining ammonium in soil extracts and water, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 473–480, 1998. 

Richardson, A. E., Kirkby, C. A., Banerjee, S., and Kirkegaard, J. A.: The inorganic nutrient cost of building soil carbon, Carbon Manag., 5, 265–268, https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2014.923226, 2014. 

Roth, V. N., Lange, M., Simon, C., Hertkorn, N., Bucher, S., Goodall, T., Griffiths, R. I., Mellado-Vázquez, P. G., Mommer, L., Oram, N. J., Weigelt, A., Dittmar, T., and Gleixner, G.: Persistence of dissolved organic matter explained by molecular changes during its passage through soil, Nat. Geosci., 12, 755–761, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0417-4, 2019. 

Rumpel, C. and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Deep soil organic matter – a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle, Plant Soil, 338, 143–158, 2011. 

Rumpel, C., Chabbi, A., and Marschner, B.: Carbon storage and sequestration in subsoil horizons: Knowledge, gaps and potentials, in: Recarbonization of the Biosphere: Ecosystems and the Global Carbon Cycle, 445–464, Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4159-1_20, 2012. 

Salomé, C., Nunan, N., Pouteau, V., Lerch, T. Z., and Chenu, C.: Carbon dynamics in topsoil and in subsoil may be controlled by different regulatory mechanisms, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 416–426, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01884.x, 2010. 

Samson, M. E., Chantigny, M. H., Vanasse, A., Menasseri-Aubry, S., Royer, I., and Angers, D. A.: Management practices differently affect particulate and mineral-associated organic matter and their precursors in arable soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 148, 107867, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107867, 2020. 

Sanaullah, M., Chabbi, A., Leifeld, J., Bardoux, G., Billou, D., and Rumpel, C.: Decomposition and stabilization of root litter in top- and subsoil horizons: What is the difference?, Plant Soil, 338, 127–141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0554-4, 2011. 

Sanderman, J. and Amundson, R.: A comparative study of dissolved organic carbon transport and stabilization in California forest and grassland soils, Biogeochemistry, 89, 309–327, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9221-8, 2008. 

Schmidt, J. E., Peterson, C., Wang, D., Scow, K. M., and Gaudin, A. C. M.: Agroecosystem tradeoffs associated with conversion to subsurface drip irrigation in organic systems, Agr. Water Manage., 202, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.005, 2018. 

Scott, H. D., Waddle, B. A., Williams, W., Frans, R. E., and Keisling, T. C.: Winter cover crops influence on cotton yield and selected soil properties1, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 25, 3087–3100, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369250, 1994. 

Scow, K., Bryant, D. M., Burger, M., and Torbert, E.: Russell Ranch Sustainable Agriculture Facility, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255668835 (last access: 17 November 2021), 2012. 

Sharpley, A. and Moyer, B.: Phosphorus Forms in Manure and Compost and Their Release during Simulated Rainfall, J. Environ. Qual., 29, 1462–1469, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050012x, 2000. 

Silhavy, T. J., Kahne, D., and Walker, S.: The bacterial cell envelope, CSH Perspect. Biol., 2, a000414, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000414, 2010. 

Singh, G., Kaur, G., Williard, K. W. J., and Schoonover, J. E.: Cover crops and tillage effects on carbon–nitrogen pools: A lysimeter study, Vadose Zone J., 20, e20110, https://doi.org/10.1002/VZJ2.20110, 2021. 

Slessarev, E. W., Lin, Y., Jiménez, B. Y., Homyak, P. M., Chadwick, O. A., D'Antonio, C. M., and Schimel, J. P.: Cellular and extracellular C contributions to respiration after wetting dry soil, Biogeochemistry, 147, 307–324, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00645-y, 2020. 

Smernik, R. J. and Oades, J. M.: Paramagnetic Effects on Solid State Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra of Soil Organic Matter, J. Environ. Qual., 31, 414–420, https://doi.org/10.2134/JEQ2002.4140, 2002. 

Smith, B. C.: Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, 2nd Edn., CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, ISBN-13 978-1420069297, 2011. 

Smitii, A.: Seasonal subsoil temperature variations, J. Agric. Res., 44, 421–428, 1932. 

Soil Survey Staff: Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edn., USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-03-5957-324-0, 2014. 

Sokol, N. W. and Bradford, M. A.: Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input, Nat. Geosci., 12, 46–53, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6, 2019. 

Soong, J. L., Fuchslueger, L., Marañon-Jimenez, S., Torn, M. S., Janssens, I. A., Penuelas, J., and Richter, A.: Microbial carbon limitation: The need for integrating microorganisms into our understanding of ecosystem carbon cycling, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 1953–1961, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14962, 2020. 

Soong, J. L., Castanha, C., Pries, C. E. H., Ofiti, N., Porras, R. C., Riley, W. J., Schmidt, M. W. I., and Torn, M. S.: Five years of whole-soil warming led to loss of subsoil carbon stocks and increased CO2 efflux, Sci. Adv., 7, eabd1343, https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.ABD1343, 2021. 

Spohn, M., Klaus, K., Wanek, W., and Richter, A.: Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth – Implications for carbon cycling, Soil Biol. Biochem., 96, 74–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.016, 2016. 

Sradnick, A., Oltmanns, M., Raupp, J., and Joergensen, R. G.: Microbial residue indices down the soil profile after long-term addition of farmyard manure and mineral fertilizer to a sandy soil, Geoderma, 226–227, 79–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.005, 2014. 

Steenwerth, K. and Belina, K. M.: Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem, Appl. Soil Ecol., 40, 359–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.06.006, 2008. 

Syswerda, S. P., Corbin, A. T., Mokma, D. L., Kravchenko, A. N., and Robertson, G. P.: Agricultural Management and Soil Carbon Storage in Surface vs. Deep Layers, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75, 92–101, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0414, 2011. 

Tautges, N. E., Chiartas, J. L., Gaudin, A. C. M., O'Geen, A. T., Herrera, I., and Scow, K. M.: Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 3753–3766, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14762, 2019. 

Taylor, J. P., Wilson, B., Mills, M. S., and Burns, R. G.: Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques, Soil Biol. Biochem., 34, 387–401, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00199-7, 2002. 

van Bavel, C. H. M.: Mean Weight-Diameter of Soil Aggregates as a Statistical Index of Aggregation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 14, 20–23, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1950.036159950014000c0005x, 1950. 

VandenBygaart, A. J., Bremer, E., McConkey, B. G., Ellert, B. H., Janzen, H. H., Angers, D. A., Carter, M. R., Drury, C. F., Lafond, G. P., and McKenzie, R. H.: Impact of Sampling Depth on Differences in Soil Carbon Stocks in Long-Term Agroecosystem Experiments, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75, 226–234, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0099, 2011. 

Vinten, A. J. A., Vivian, B. J., Wright, F., and Howard, R. S.: A comparative study of nitrate leaching from soils of differing textures under similar climatic and cropping conditions, J. Hydrol., 159, 197–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90256-9, 1994. 

Wang, D., Fonte, S. J., Parikh, S. J., Six, J., and Scow, K. M.: Biochar additions can enhance soil structure and the physical stabilization of C in aggregates, Geoderma, 303, 110–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.027, 2017. 

West, J. R., Cates, A. M., Ruark, M. D., Deiss, L., Whitman, T., and Rui, Y.: Winter rye does not increase microbial necromass contributions to soil organic carbon in continuous corn silage in North Central US, Soil Biol. Biochem., 148, 107899, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107899, 2020. 

White, K. E., Brennan, E. B., Cavigelli, M. A., and Smith, R. F.: Winter cover crops increase readily decomposable soil carbon, but compost drives total soil carbon during eight years of intensive, organic vegetable production in California, edited by: Snapp, S. S., PLoS One, 15, e0228677, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228677, 2020. 

Whitmore, A. P., Kirk, G. J. D., and Rawlins, B. G.: Technologies for increasing carbon storage in soil to mitigate climate change, Soil Use Manage, 31, 62–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12115, 2015. 

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T., Miller, E., Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., and Yutani, H.: Welcome to the Tidyverse, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686, 2019.  

Williams, E. K., Fogel, M. L., Berhe, A. A., and Plante, A. F.: Distinct bioenergetic signatures in particulate versus mineral-associated soil organic matter, Geoderma, 330, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024, 2018. 

Wolf, K. M., Torbert, E. E., Bryant, D., Burger, M., Denison, R. F., Herrera, I., Hopmans, J., Horwath, W., Kaffka, S., Kong, A. Y. Y., Norris, R. F., Six, J., Tomich, T. P., and Scow, K. M.: The century experiment: the first twenty years of UC Davis' Mediterranean agroecological experiment, Ecology, 99, 503, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2105, 2018. 

Wright, A. L., Provin, T. L., Hons, F. M., Zuberer, D. A., and White, R. H.: Compost impacts on dissolved organic carbon and available nitrogen and phosphorus in turfgrass soil, Waste Manage., 28, 1057–1063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.003, 2008. 

Wuest, S.: Seasonal Variation in Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78, 1442–1447, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.10.0447, 2014. 

Xiang, S. R., Doyle, A., Holden, P. A., and Schimel, J. P.: Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 2281–2289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.004, 2008. 

Yost, J. L. and Hartemink, A. E.: How deep is the soil studied – an analysis of four soil science journals, Plant Soil, 452, 5–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04550-z, 2020. 

Zeynoddin, M., Bonakdari, H., Ebtehaj, I., Esmaeilbeiki, F., Gharabaghi, B., and Zare Haghi, D.: A reliable linear stochastic daily soil temperature forecast model, Soil Till. Res., 189, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2018.12.023, 2019. 

Zhang, Y., Zheng, N., Wang, J., Yao, H., Qiu, Q., and Chapman, S. J.: High turnover rate of free phospholipids in soil confirms the classic hypothesis of PLFA methodology, Soil Biol. Biochem., 135, 323–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.023, 2019. 

Zhou, X., Chen, C., Wu, H., and Xu, Z.: Dynamics of soil extractable carbon and nitrogen under different cover crop residues, J. Soil. Sediment., 12, 844–853, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11368-012-0515-Z, 2012. 

Zmora-Nahum, S., Markovitch, O., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as a parameter of compost maturity, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 2109–2116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.013, 2005. 

Download
Short summary
Storing C in subsoils can help mitigate climate change, but this requires a better understanding of subsoil C dynamics. We investigated changes in subsoil C storage under a combination of compost, cover crops (WCC), and mineral fertilizer and found that systems with compost + WCC had ~19 Mg/ha more C after 25 years. This increase was attributed to increased transport of soluble C and nutrients via WCC root pores and demonstrates the potential for subsoil C storage in tilled agricultural systems.