SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
Original research article
 | 
07 Jun 2018
Original research article |  | 07 Jun 2018

Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017)

Eleanor Ursula Hobley, Brian Murphy, and Aaron Simmons

Viewed

Total article views: 3,691 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,394 1,134 163 3,691 123 181
  • HTML: 2,394
  • PDF: 1,134
  • XML: 163
  • Total: 3,691
  • BibTeX: 123
  • EndNote: 181
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,691 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,384 with geography defined and 307 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
This research evaluates equations to calculate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Although various equations exist for SOC stock calculations, we recommend using the simplest equation with THE lowest associated errors. Adjusting SOC stock calculations for rock content is essential. Using the mass proportion of rocks to do so minimizes error.
Read more
Share