Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
SOIL, 4, 169–171, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
SOIL, 4, 169–171, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018
Original research article
07 Jun 2018
Original research article | 07 Jun 2018

Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017)

Eleanor Ursula Hobley et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,456 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,559 796 101 2,456 51 77
  • HTML: 1,559
  • PDF: 796
  • XML: 101
  • Total: 2,456
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,232 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,210 with geography defined and 22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 07 Aug 2022
Short summary
This research evaluates equations to calculate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Although various equations exist for SOC stock calculations, we recommend using the simplest equation with THE lowest associated errors. Adjusting SOC stock calculations for rock content is essential. Using the mass proportion of rocks to do so minimizes error.