Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017)

Hobley, Eleanor Ursula; Murphy, Brian; Simmons, Aaron

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018

Articles | Volume 4, issue 2

SOIL, 4, 169–171, 2018

https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

SOIL, 4, 169–171, 2018

https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-169-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 4, issue 2

Original research article 07 Jun 2018

Original research article | 07 Jun 2018

Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al. (2017)

Eleanor Ursula Hobley et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,129 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	BibTeX	EndNote
1,357	680	92	2,129	46	70

HTML: 1,357
PDF: 680
XML: 92
Total: 2,129
BibTeX: 46
EndNote: 70

Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Feb 2018	121	60	12	193
Mar 2018	111	42	1	154
Apr 2018	54	19	1	74
May 2018	29	7	1	37
Jun 2018	209	78	7	294
Jul 2018	84	29	1	114
Aug 2018	45	21	0	66
Sep 2018	18	18	2	38
Oct 2018	33	18	2	53
Nov 2018	16	11	2	29
Dec 2018	10	10	1	21
Jan 2019	18	18	3	39
Feb 2019	10	8	0	18
Mar 2019	14	14	2	30
Apr 2019	11	3	0	14
May 2019	21	12	0	33
Jun 2019	28	14	0	42
Jul 2019	18	17	0	35
Aug 2019	8	10	0	18
Sep 2019	12	8	0	20
Oct 2019	15	11	0	26
Nov 2019	18	4	1	23
Dec 2019	14	12	0	26
Jan 2020	17	13	2	32
Feb 2020	20	2	0	22
Mar 2020	23	6	0	29
Apr 2020	21	5	2	28
May 2020	13	5	1	19
Jun 2020	46	32	1	79
Jul 2020	78	70	23	171
Aug 2020	19	6	3	28
Sep 2020	10	7	5	22
Oct 2020	8	5	4	17
Nov 2020	14	12	0	26
Dec 2020	21	8	4	33
Jan 2021	30	9	2	41
Feb 2021	25	7	3	35
Mar 2021	11	6	3	20
Apr 2021	15	6	0	21
May 2021	10	4	0	14
Jun 2021	27	6	1	34
Jul 2021	7	6	1	14
Aug 2021	16	16	0	32
Sep 2021	9	5	1	15

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2018)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Feb 2018	121	60	12	193
Mar 2018	111	42	1	154
Apr 2018	54	19	1	74
May 2018	29	7	1	37
Jun 2018	209	78	7	294
Jul 2018	84	29	1	114
Aug 2018	45	21	0	66
Sep 2018	18	18	2	38
Oct 2018	33	18	2	53
Nov 2018	16	11	2	29
Dec 2018	10	10	1	21
Jan 2019	18	18	3	39
Feb 2019	10	8	0	18
Mar 2019	14	14	2	30
Apr 2019	11	3	0	14
May 2019	21	12	0	33
Jun 2019	28	14	0	42
Jul 2019	18	17	0	35
Aug 2019	8	10	0	18
Sep 2019	12	8	0	20
Oct 2019	15	11	0	26
Nov 2019	18	4	1	23
Dec 2019	14	12	0	26
Jan 2020	17	13	2	32
Feb 2020	20	2	0	22
Mar 2020	23	6	0	29
Apr 2020	21	5	2	28
May 2020	13	5	1	19
Jun 2020	46	32	1	79
Jul 2020	78	70	23	171
Aug 2020	19	6	3	28
Sep 2020	10	7	5	22
Oct 2020	8	5	4	17
Nov 2020	14	12	0	26
Dec 2020	21	8	4	33
Jan 2021	30	9	2	41
Feb 2021	25	7	3	35
Mar 2021	11	6	3	20
Apr 2021	15	6	0	21
May 2021	10	4	0	14
Jun 2021	27	6	1	34
Jul 2021	7	6	1	14
Aug 2021	16	16	0	32
Sep 2021	9	5	1	15

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,933 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,911 with geography defined and 22 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%

1

1

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 17 Sep 2021

Short summary

This research evaluates equations to calculate soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Although various equations exist for SOC stock calculations, we recommend using the simplest equation with THE lowest associated errors. Adjusting SOC stock calculations for rock content is essential. Using the mass proportion of rocks to do so minimizes error.

Article