Articles | Volume 1, issue 2
SOIL, 1, 509–513, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-509-2015

Special issue: Advancements in data acquisition for soil erosion studies

SOIL, 1, 509–513, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-509-2015

Original research article 10 Jul 2015

Original research article | 10 Jul 2015

Gully geometry: what are we measuring?

J. Casalí et al.

Related subject area

Soil degradation (chemical, physical and biological)
Understanding the role of water and tillage erosion from 239+240Pu tracer measurements using inverse modelling
Florian Wilken, Michael Ketterer, Sylvia Koszinski, Michael Sommer, and Peter Fiener
SOIL, 6, 549–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-549-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-549-2020, 2020
Short summary
Variation of soil organic carbon, stable isotopes, and soil quality indicators across an erosion–deposition catena in a historical Spanish olive orchard
José A. Gómez, Gema Guzmán, Arsenio Toloza, Christian Resch, Roberto García-Ruíz, and Lionel Mabit
SOIL, 6, 179–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-179-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-179-2020, 2020
Short summary
Impacts of land use and topography on soil organic carbon in a Mediterranean landscape (north-western Tunisia)
Donia Jendoubi, Hanspeter Liniger, and Chinwe Ifejika Speranza
SOIL, 5, 239–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-239-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-239-2019, 2019
Short summary
Spatial assessments of soil organic carbon for stakeholder decision-making – a case study from Kenya
Tor-Gunnar Vågen, Leigh Ann Winowiecki, Constance Neely, Sabrina Chesterman, and Mieke Bourne
SOIL, 4, 259–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-259-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-259-2018, 2018
Short summary
How serious a problem is subsoil compaction in the Netherlands? A survey based on probability sampling
Dick J. Brus and Jan J. H. van den Akker
SOIL, 4, 37–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-37-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-37-2018, 2018
Short summary

Cited articles

Campo-Bescós, M. A., Flores-Cervantes, J. H., Bras, R. L., Casalí, J., and Giráldez, J. V.: Evaluation of a gully headcut retreat model using multitemporal aerial photographs and digital elevation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118, 1–15, 2013.
Casalí, J., López, J. J., and Giráldez, J. V.: Ephemeral gully erosion in southern Navarra (Spain), Catena, 36, 65–84, 1999.
Casalí, J., Loizu, J., Campo, M. A., De Santisteban, L. M., and Álvarez-Mozos, J.: Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion, Catena, 67, 128–138, 2006.
Castillo, C., Taguas, E. V., Zarco-Tejada, P., James, M. R., and Gómez, J. A.: The normalized topographic method: An automated procedure for gully mapping using GIS, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 2002–2015, 2014.
Evans, M. and Lindsay, J.: High resolution quantification of gully erosion in upland peatlands at the landscape scale, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 35, 876–886, 2010.
Download
Short summary
Despite gullies having been intensively studied in the past decades, there is no general consensus on such basic aspects as the correct determination of the geometry (width and depth) of these erosion features. Therefore, a measurement protocol is proposed to characterize the geometry of a gully by its effective width and effective depth, which, together with its length, would permit the definition of the equivalent prismatic gully (EPG); this would facilitate the comparison between gullies.