Articles | Volume 1, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-509-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-509-2015
Original research article
 | 
10 Jul 2015
Original research article |  | 10 Jul 2015

Gully geometry: what are we measuring?

J. Casalí, R. Giménez, and M. A. Campo-Bescós

Related authors

Effects of innovative long-term soil and crop management on topsoil properties of a Mediterranean soil based on detailed water retention curves
Alaitz Aldaz-Lusarreta, Rafael Giménez, Miguel A. Campo-Bescós, Luis M. Arregui, and Iñigo Virto
SOIL, 8, 655–671, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-655-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-655-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil degradation
Gully rehabilitation in Southern Ethiopia – value and impacts for farmers
Wolde Mekuria, Euan Phimister, Getahun Yakob, Desalegn Tegegne, Awdenegest Moges, Yitna Tesfaye, Dagmawi Melaku, Charlene Gerber, Paul Hallett, and Jo Smith
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1125,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1125, 2024
Short summary
A millennium of arable land use – the long-term impact of tillage and water erosion on landscape-scale carbon dynamics
Lena Katharina Öttl, Florian Wilken, Anna Juřicová, Pedro V. G. Batista, and Peter Fiener
SOIL, 10, 281–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-281-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-281-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of source sediment fingerprinting to tracer selection methods
Thomas Chalaux-Clergue, Rémi Bizeul, Pedro V. G. Batista, Núria Martínez-Carreras, J. Patrick Laceby, and Olivier Evrard
SOIL, 10, 109–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024, 2024
Short summary
Response of soil nutrients and erodibility to slope aspect in the northern agro-pastoral ecotone, China
Yuxin Wu, Guodong Jia, Xinxiao Yu, Honghong Rao, Xiuwen Peng, Yusong Wang, Yushi Wang, and Xu Wang
SOIL, 10, 61–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-61-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-61-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping land degradation risk due to land susceptibility to dust emission and water erosion
Mahdi Boroughani, Fahimeh Mirchooli, Mojtaba Hadavifar, and Stephanie Fiedler
SOIL, 9, 411–423, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Campo-Bescós, M. A., Flores-Cervantes, J. H., Bras, R. L., Casalí, J., and Giráldez, J. V.: Evaluation of a gully headcut retreat model using multitemporal aerial photographs and digital elevation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118, 1–15, 2013.
Casalí, J., López, J. J., and Giráldez, J. V.: Ephemeral gully erosion in southern Navarra (Spain), Catena, 36, 65–84, 1999.
Casalí, J., Loizu, J., Campo, M. A., De Santisteban, L. M., and Álvarez-Mozos, J.: Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion, Catena, 67, 128–138, 2006.
Castillo, C., Taguas, E. V., Zarco-Tejada, P., James, M. R., and Gómez, J. A.: The normalized topographic method: An automated procedure for gully mapping using GIS, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 2002–2015, 2014.
Evans, M. and Lindsay, J.: High resolution quantification of gully erosion in upland peatlands at the landscape scale, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 35, 876–886, 2010.
Download
Short summary
Despite gullies having been intensively studied in the past decades, there is no general consensus on such basic aspects as the correct determination of the geometry (width and depth) of these erosion features. Therefore, a measurement protocol is proposed to characterize the geometry of a gully by its effective width and effective depth, which, together with its length, would permit the definition of the equivalent prismatic gully (EPG); this would facilitate the comparison between gullies.