Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Original research article
| 
04 Aug 2021
Original research article |
| 04 Aug 2021
| 04 Aug 2021
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
Bartosz Bartkowski
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany
Stephan Bartke
Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany
Nina Hagemann
International Institute Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, Germany
Bernd Hansjürgens
Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany
Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Michael Peichl, Stephan Thober, Luis Samaniego, Bernd Hansjürgens, and Andreas Marx
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6523–6545, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6523-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6523-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using a statistical model that can also take complex systems into account, the most important factors affecting wheat yield in Germany are determined. Different spatial damage potentials are taken into account. In many parts of Germany, yield losses are caused by too much soil water in spring. Negative heat effects as well as damaging soil drought are identified especially for north-eastern Germany. The model is able to explain years with exceptionally high yields (2014) and losses (2003, 2018).
Hans-Jörg Vogel, Stephan Bartke, Katrin Daedlow, Katharina Helming, Ingrid Kögel-Knabner, Birgit Lang, Eva Rabot, David Russell, Bastian Stößel, Ulrich Weller, Martin Wiesmeier, and Ute Wollschläger
SOIL, 4, 83–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-83-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-83-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper deals with the importance of soil for our terrestrial environment and the need to predict the impact of soil management on the multitude of functions that soil provides. We suggest to consider soil as a self-organized complex system and provide a concept of how this could be achieved. This includes how soil research, currently fragmented into a number of more or less disjunct disciplines, may be integrated to substantially contribute to a science-based evaluation of soil functions.
Related subject area
Soils and managed ecosystems
Managing soil organic carbon in tropical agroecosystems: evidence from four long-term experiments in Kenya
Impact of contrasting fertilizer technologies on N dynamics from subsurface bands of “pure” or blended fertilizer applications
Wetting and drying cycles, organic amendments, and gypsum play a key role in structure formation and stability of sodic Vertisols
Quality assessment of meta-analyses on soil organic carbon
The role of long-term mineral and manure fertilization on P species accumulation and phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in paddy red soils
Soil depth as a driver of microbial and carbon dynamics in a planted forest (Pinus radiata) pumice soil
Transforming living labs into lighthouses: a promising policy to achieve land-related sustainable development
The QuantiSlakeTest, dynamic weighting of soil under water to measure soil structural stability
What comes after the Sun? On the integration of soil biogeochemical pre-weathering into microplastic experiments
Transition to conservation agriculture: how tillage intensity and covering affect soil physical parameters
Combining colour parameters and geochemical tracers to improve sediment source discrimination in a mining catchment (New Caledonia, South Pacific Islands)
The effects of sealing on urban soil carbon and nutrients
Middle Bronze Age land use practices in the northwestern Alpine foreland – a multi-proxy study of colluvial deposits, archaeological features and peat bogs
Spatial variability in heavy metal concentration in urban pavement joints – a case study
Global concentrations of microplastics in soils – a review
Using constructed soils for green infrastructure – challenges and limitations
Effects of microplastic and microglass particles on soil microbial community structure in an arable soil (Chernozem)
Women's agricultural practices and their effects on soil nutrient content in the Nyalenda urban gardens of Kisumu, Kenya
Effects of golf course management on subsurface soil properties in Iowa
Local soil quality assessment of north-central Namibia: integrating farmers' and technical knowledge
How Alexander von Humboldt's life story can inspire innovative soil research in developing countries
Paleosols can promote root growth of recent vegetation – a case study from the sandy soil–sediment sequence Rakt, the Netherlands
An insight into pre-Columbian raised fields: the case of San Borja, Bolivian lowlands
The impact of ancestral heath management on soils and landscapes: a reconstruction based on paleoecological analyses of soil records in the central and southeastern Netherlands
Soil archives of a Fluvisol: subsurface analysis and soil history of the medieval city centre of Vlaardingen, the Netherlands – an integral approach
Effect of grassland cutting frequency on soil carbon storage – a case study on public lawns in three Swedish cities
Facing policy challenges with inter- and transdisciplinary soil research focused on the UN Sustainable Development Goals
The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
Case studies of soil in art
Effects of fresh and aged chars from pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization on nutrient sorption in agricultural soils
Soil properties and pre-Columbian settlement patterns in the Monumental Mounds Region of the Llanos de Moxos, Bolivian Amazon
An ecosystem approach to assess soil quality in organically and conventionally managed farms in Iceland and Austria
Moritz Laub, Marc Corbeels, Antoine Couëdel, Samuel Mathu Ndungu, Monicah Wanjiku Mucheru-Muna, Daniel Mugendi, Magdalena Necpalova, Wycliffe Waswa, Marijn Van de Broek, Bernard Vanlauwe, and Johan Six
SOIL, 9, 301–323, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In sub-Saharan Africa, long-term low-input maize cropping threatens soil fertility. We studied how different quality organic inputs combined with mineral N fertilizer could counteract this. Farmyard manure was the best input to counteract soil carbon loss; mineral N fertilizer had no effect on carbon. Yet, the rates needed to offset soil carbon losses are unrealistic for farmers (>10 t of dry matter per hectare and year). Additional agronomic measures may be needed.
Chelsea K. Janke and Michael J. Bell
SOIL, 9, 243–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-243-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-243-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Fertilizer blends of controlled release and stabilized nitrogen (N) demonstrated temporal N dynamics intermediate of unblended fertilizers. Soil characteristics had a significant impact on N dynamics and the efficacy of the differing enhanced efficiency fertilizer mechanisms to minimize potential N losses. Insights can improve N supply predictability, offering opportunities to improve N use efficiency in cropping systems.
Sara Niaz, J. Bernhard Wehr, Ram C. Dalal, Peter M. Kopittke, and Neal W. Menzies
SOIL, 9, 141–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-141-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-141-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sodic soils affect ~580 Mha in semi-arid and arid regions of the world. These soils have a weak structure. This laboratory study evaluated treatments to overcome the weak aggregate structure in two sodic Vertisols by applying organic amendments, gypsum, and wetting–drying cycles. We conclude that sodic soils need to be treated with gypsum to flocculate clay and organic amendments (lucerne or chicken manure) to form aggregates, whereas drying cycles aid in small macroaggregates formation.
Julia Fohrafellner, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Rajasekaran Murugan, and Elena Valkama
SOIL, 9, 117–140, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The number of meta-analyses in agriculture and soil sciences is continuously rising, but they are often of poor quality. We quantitatively analyzed the quality of 31 meta-analyses studying the effects of different management practices on soil organic carbon (SOC). We found that only one meta-analysis on no tillage/reduced tillage obtained a high score. New or improved meta-analyses on the effects of organic agriculture, biochar, fertilization, and crop diversification on SOC are urgently needed.
Shuiqing Chen, Jusheng Gao, Huaihai Chen, Zeyuan Zhang, Jing Huang, Lefu Lv, Jinfang Tan, and Xiaoqian Jiang
SOIL, 9, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-101-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-101-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Long-term inorganic P (IP) fertilization increased total P (TP), available P (AP) and IP, but manure fertilization accelerated the accumulation of organic P (OP). Long-term mineral fertilization had a negative impact on bacterial communities, while manure fertilization and rhizosphere soil provided more nutrients that improved the separation of bacterial communities. Correspondingly, P indicators such as IP and TP were related to the variation in a phosphate-solubilizing bacterial community.
Alexa K. Byers, Loretta G. Garrett, Charlotte Armstrong, Fiona Dean, and Steve A. Wakelin
SOIL, 9, 55–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-55-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forest soils store large amounts of carbon (C), but research has remained focused on C storage in topsoil layers. We investigated changes in forest soil C storage and microbial ecology to 1 m depth. Though absolute soil C content, microbial diversity and microbial biomass declined sharply with depth, 35 % of total soil C was cumulatively stored in subsoil layers. Our findings highlight the importance of including subsoils when calculating the C storage capacity of forest systems.
Johan Bouma
SOIL, 8, 751–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-751-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-751-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In the new
Soil Deal for Europe, land users, mostly farmers, and scientists are required to work jointly in
living labsto develop sustainable land use systems. We propose that threshold values for different ecosystem services in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the EU Green Deal (GD) have to be met to define
lighthousesthat demonstrate successful sustainable land use systems, functioning as inspiring examples. A case study illustrates the important role of soils.
Frédéric M. Vanwindekens and Brieuc F. Hardy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1092, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1092, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Structural stability is critical for sustainable agricultural soil management. We invented a simple test to measure soil structural stability. The QuantiSlakeTest consists in a dynamic weighting of a dried soil sample in water.The test is rapid, doesn’t require expensive equipment and provides a high density of information on soil structural properties. With an open access program for data management under development, the test has a strong potential for adoption by a large community of users.
Frederick Büks and Martin Kaupenjohann
SOIL, 8, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The adverse effect of microplastic (MP) on soil biota and soil structure depends on MP particle size and surface characteristics. Since weathering plays a major role in the genesis of these, it must be considered in both the analysis of environmental MP and the production of artificial MP for laboratory experiments. This work integrates recent findings on adverse effects and the genesis of its surface characteristics and discusses how to reproduce them to obtain closer-to-nature designer MP.
Felice Sartori, Ilaria Piccoli, Riccardo Polese, and Antonio Berti
SOIL, 8, 213–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-213-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of the transition from conventional to conservation agriculture on soil physical properties, by determining the best soil tillage and covering combination, to exploit the benefits of conservation agriculture from the first conversion years. The results proved that, despite an increase in bulk density and penetration resistance, soil under reduced tillage systems with a cover crop improved its hydraulic properties.
Virginie Sellier, Oldrich Navratil, John Patrick Laceby, Cédric Legout, Anthony Foucher, Michel Allenbach, Irène Lefèvre, and Olivier Evrard
SOIL, 7, 743–766, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-743-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-743-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Open-cast mining increases soil erosion and transfer of sediment in river systems. Providing a methodology to better understand the sediment dynamic of these catchments is essential to manage this pollution. In this study, different tracers such as elemental geochemistry or colour properties were tested to trace and quantify the mining source contributions to the sediment inputs in the Thio River catchment, one of the first areas exploited for nickel mining in New Caledonia (i.e. since 1880).
Roisin O'Riordan, Jess Davies, Carly Stevens, and John N. Quinton
SOIL, 7, 661–675, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-661-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-661-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
As urban populations grow, soil sealing with impermeable surfaces will increase. At present there is limited knowledge on the effect of sealing on soil carbon and nutrients. We found that, in general, sealing reduced soil carbon and nutrients; however, where there were additions due to human activity, soil carbon and nutrients were increased. This suggests that there is a legacy soil carbon store in areas with an industrial past and highlights the influence of artefacts in urban soil.
Sascha Scherer, Benjamin Höpfer, Katleen Deckers, Elske Fischer, Markus Fuchs, Ellen Kandeler, Jutta Lechterbeck, Eva Lehndorff, Johanna Lomax, Sven Marhan, Elena Marinova, Julia Meister, Christian Poll, Humay Rahimova, Manfred Rösch, Kristen Wroth, Julia Zastrow, Thomas Knopf, Thomas Scholten, and Peter Kühn
SOIL, 7, 269–304, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-269-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-269-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper aims to reconstruct Middle Bronze Age (MBA) land use practices in the northwestern Alpine foreland (SW Germany, Hegau). We used a multi-proxy approach including biogeochemical proxies from colluvial deposits in the surroundings of a MBA settlement, on-site archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological data and off-site pollen data. From our data we infer land use practices such as plowing, cereal growth, forest farming and use of fire that marked the beginning of major colluvial deposition.
Collin J. Weber, Alexander Santowski, and Peter Chifflard
SOIL, 7, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-15-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-15-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Pavement joints, defined as the joint between paving stones and filled with different materials, in the inner city area of Marburg (Hesse, Germany) show moderate to high pollution with different heavy metals. Enrichment of heavy metals in pavement joints is related to surface run-off accumulation. As the pollution of pavement joints poses direct risks to the environment and humans in urban areas, the inconspicuous joints should be considered in urban water management strategies.
Frederick Büks and Martin Kaupenjohann
SOIL, 6, 649–662, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-649-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-649-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Laboratory experiments that assess microplastic (MP) impact on the terrestrial environment require information on common soil MP concentrations. We reviewed item numbers and mass concentrations recorded in 23 studies, with 223 sampling sites in total with respect to the underlying entry pathways, land uses and vicinities. Common values included amounts of up to 13 000 items kg−1 and 4.5 mg kg−1 dry soil. Based on the collected data, we identified problems in past field studies.
Maha Deeb, Peter M. Groffman, Manuel Blouin, Sara Perl Egendorf, Alan Vergnes, Viacheslav Vasenev, Donna L. Cao, Daniel Walsh, Tatiana Morin, and Geoffroy Séré
SOIL, 6, 413–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-413-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-413-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The goal of this study was to discuss current methods to create soils adapted for various green infrastructure (GI) designs. Investigating these new soils for several design categories of GI will provide technical information for management and design agencies. Moreover, these studies can serve as pioneer experiments to prevent recurring errors and, thus, provide improved plant growth practices. Results show that these constructed soils have a high potential to provide multiple soil functions.
Katja Wiedner and Steven Polifka
SOIL, 6, 315–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-315-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-315-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Microplastics and microglass are used in a wide range of everyday and industrial applications acting as abrasives, filler and binding agents, which could enter aquatic and terrestrial environments with unexpected consequences for ecosystems. Our study suggests that different types of microparticles seem to have contrary effects on soil microorganisms, depending on the origin and properties of microparticles. This study should be seen as basis for further research, which is urgently needed.
Nicolette Tamara Regina Johanna Maria Jonkman, Esmee Daniëlle Kooijman, Karsten Kalbitz, Nicky Rosa Maria Pouw, and Boris Jansen
SOIL, 5, 303–313, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-303-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-303-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In the urban gardens of Kisumu we interviewed female farmers to determine the sources and scope of their agricultural knowledge. We assessed the impact of the knowledge by comparing the influence of two types of management on soil nutrients. While one type of management was more effective in terms of preserving soil nutrients, the other management type had socioeconomic benefits. Both environmental and socioeconomic effects have to be considered in agricultural training to increase their impact.
Matthew T. Streeter and Keith E. Schilling
SOIL, 4, 93–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-93-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-93-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Iowa golf courses provide an ideal location to evaluate whether golf course management is affecting the quality of soils at depth. Our study evaluated how soil properties relating to soil health and resiliency varied with depth at golf courses across Iowa and interpreted relationships of these properties to current golf course management and inherent soil properties. Systematic variation in soil properties including sand content, NO3, and SOM was observed with depth.
Brice Prudat, Lena Bloemertz, and Nikolaus J. Kuhn
SOIL, 4, 47–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-47-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-47-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Soil degradation is a major threat for farmers of semi-arid north-central Namibia. Having tools to assess soil quality is important to evaluate soil conditions and helps targeting important issues. We developed a soil evaluation toolbox that integrates farmers' field experiences and technical knowledge. The combination of local soil descriptions, field soil texture evaluation and soil colour provides locally meaningful information that reveals soil quality improvement potentials.
Johan Bouma
SOIL, 3, 153–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-153-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-153-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Alexander von Humboldt was an inspiring scientist in the early 1800s, traveling widely, making many measurements, and linking different scientific disciplines while keeping an eye open to the needs of society. This is particularly relevant today in our information society, and researchers in developing countries are advised to follow the von Humboldt example when planning their future research.
Martina I. Gocke, Fabian Kessler, Jan M. van Mourik, Boris Jansen, and Guido L. B. Wiesenberg
SOIL, 2, 537–549, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-537-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-537-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Investigation of a Dutch sandy profile demonstrated that buried soils provide beneficial growth conditions for plant roots in terms of nutrients. The intense exploitation of deep parts of the soil profile, including subsoil and soil parent material, by roots of the modern vegetation is often underestimated by traditional approaches. Potential consequences of deep rooting for terrestrial carbon stocks, located to a relevant part in buried soils, remain largely unknown and require further studies.
Leonor Rodrigues, Umberto Lombardo, Mareike Trauerstein, Perrine Huber, Sandra Mohr, and Heinz Veit
SOIL, 2, 367–389, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-367-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-367-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Our study examines pre-Columbian agricultural raised fields in the Bolivian Amazon.
It provides a new interpretation for pre-Columbian management of raised fields.
The results show that differences in field size and height are the result of an adaptation to a site where soil properties vary significantly on a scale of tens to hundreds of meters. The analysis and dating of the raised fields sediments point towards an extensive and rather brief use of the raised fields, for about 100–200 years.
Marieke Doorenbosch and Jan M. van Mourik
SOIL, 2, 311–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-311-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-311-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Soil records provide information about 5 millennia of heath management in cultural landscapes on sandy soils. Deforestations and the introduction of the deep, stable economy in the 18th century resulted in sand drifting and heath degradation. After the introduction of chemical fertilizers more than 90 % of the heaths were transformed into productive arable field or forests. Currently the last heaths are preserved as part of the cultural heritage.
Sjoerd Kluiving, Tim de Ridder, Marcel van Dasselaar, Stan Roozen, and Maarten Prins
SOIL, 2, 271–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-271-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-271-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In medieval times the city of Vlaardingen (the Netherlands) was strategically located on the confluence of three rivers, the Maas, the Merwede, and the Vlaarding. Combined research on the history and soil of this city was initiated by an archaeological research question, following Dutch legislation. The start of fluvial system 2 in AD 600 correlates with evidence of the church that was present at least in AD 726/727. Results record the period before and after the flooding in AD 1170.
C. Poeplau, H. Marstorp, K. Thored, and T. Kätterer
SOIL, 2, 175–184, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-175-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-175-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We compared two long-term contrasting systems of urban lawn management (frequently cut utility lawn vs. seldomly cut meadow-like lawn) regarding their effect on soil carbon in three Swedish cities. Biomass production was also measured during 1 year. The utility lawns had a significantly higher biomass production, which resulted in a higher soil carbon storage, since clippings were not removed. Soil carbon sequestration outweighed the higher management-related CO2 emissions of the utility lawns.
Johan Bouma and Luca Montanarella
SOIL, 2, 135–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-135-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-135-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The recently accepted UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a major challenge to the research community, including soil science. SDGs require a interdisciplinary research approach that forces every discipline to critically evaluate its core messages. Effective communication with the policy arena requires use of common policy concepts such as policy phases and distinction of drivers, pressures, and responses to change. To accomodate such needs, research practices will have to change.
Saskia D. Keesstra, Johan Bouma, Jakob Wallinga, Pablo Tittonell, Pete Smith, Artemi Cerdà, Luca Montanarella, John N. Quinton, Yakov Pachepsky, Wim H. van der Putten, Richard D. Bardgett, Simon Moolenaar, Gerben Mol, Boris Jansen, and Louise O. Fresco
SOIL, 2, 111–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-111-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-111-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Soil science, as a land-related discipline, has links to several of the UN Sustainable Development Goals which are demonstrated through the functions of soils and related ecosystem services. We discuss how soil scientists can rise to the challenge both internally and externally in terms of our relations with colleagues in other disciplines, diverse groups of stakeholders and the policy arena. To meet these goals we recommend the set of steps to be taken by the soil science community as a whole.
C. Feller, E. R. Landa, A. Toland, and G. Wessolek
SOIL, 1, 543–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-543-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-543-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Case studies of artworks focused on painting, installation, and film are presented, with the view of encouraging further exploration of art about, in, and with soil, as a contribution to raising soil awareness.
M. Gronwald, A. Don, B. Tiemeyer, and M. Helfrich
SOIL, 1, 475–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-475-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-475-2015, 2015
U. Lombardo, S. Denier, and H. Veit
SOIL, 1, 65–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-65-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-65-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In the present paper we explore to what degree soil properties might have influenced pre-Columbian settlement patterns in the Monumental Mounds Region (MMR) of the Llanos de Moxos (LM), Bolivian Amazon. This study provides new data on the soil properties of the south-eastern Bolivian Amazon and reinforces the hypothesis that environmental constraints and opportunities exerted an important role on pre-Columbian occupation patterns and the population density reached in the Bolivian Amazon.
J. P. van Leeuwen, T. Lehtinen, G. J. Lair, J. Bloem, L. Hemerik, K. V. Ragnarsdóttir, G. Gísladóttir, J. S. Newton, and P. C. de Ruiter
SOIL, 1, 83–101, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-83-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-83-2015, 2015
Cited articles
Bai, Z., Caspari, T., Gonzalez, M. R., Batjes, N. H., Mäder, P.,
Bünemann, E. K., de Goede, R., Brussaard, L., Xu, M., Ferreira, C. S.
S., Reintam, E., Fan, H., Mihelič, R., Glavan, M., and Tóth, Z.:
Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of
long-term experiments for Europe and China, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 265,
1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.028, 2018.
Bartkowski, B.: Don't throw efficiency out with the bathwater: A reply to
Jeffery and Verheijen (2020), Environ. Sci. Policy, 122, 72–74,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.011, 2021.
Bartkowski, B. and Bartke, S.: Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural
Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers' Decision-Making,
Sustainability, 10, 3179, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093179, 2018.
Bartkowski, B., Hansjürgens, B., Möckel, S., and Bartke, S.:
Institutional Economics of Agricultural Soil Ecosystem Services,
Sustainability, 10, 2447, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072447, 2018.
Bartkowski, B., Bartke, S., Helming, K., Paul, C., Techen, A.-K., and
Hansjürgens, B.: Potential of the economic valuation of soil-based
ecosystem services to inform sustainable soil management and policy, PeerJ,
8, e8749, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8749, 2020.
Bartkowski, B., Droste, N., Ließ, M., Sidemo-Holm, W., Weller, U., and
Brady, M. V.: Payments by modelled results: A novel design for
agri-environmental schemes, Land Use Policy, 102, 105230,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105230, 2021.
Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., and Vedung, E. (Eds.): Carrots, sticks
& sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation, Transaction
Publishers, New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A, 280 pp., 1998.
Berbés-Blázquez, M., González, J. A., and Pascual, U.: Towards
an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations, Curr.
Opin. Environ. Sustain., 19, 134–143,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003, 2016.
Binder, S.: Flurbereinigungsplanung und Ökosystemschutz als Rechts- und
Governance-Problem, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 426 pp., 2019.
Blackstock, K. L., Novo, P., Byg, A., Creaney, R., Juarez Bourke, A.,
Maxwell, J. L., Tindale, S. J., and Waylen, K. A.: Policy instruments for
environmental public goods: Interdependencies and hybridity, Land Use
Policy, 107, 104709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104709, 2021.
Bolognesi, T. and Nahrath, S.: Environmental Governance Dynamics: Some Micro
Foundations of Macro Failures, Ecol. Econ., 170, 106555,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106555, 2020.
Borrelli, P. and Panagos, P.: An indicator to reflect the mitigating effect
of Common Agricultural Policy on soil erosion, Land Use Policy, 92, 104467,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104467, 2020.
Borrelli, P., Lugato, E., Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P.: A New
Assessment of Soil Loss Due to Wind Erosion in European Agricultural Soils
Using a Quantitative Spatially Distributed Modelling Approach, Land Degrad.
Dev., 28, 335–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2588, 2017.
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Panagos, P., Lugato, E., Yang, J. E.,
Alewell, C., Wuepper, D., Montanarella, L., and Ballabio, C.: Land use and
climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015-2070), P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 21994–22001,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001403117, 2020.
Braathen, N. A.: Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy: How Many Stones
Should be Used to Kill a Bird?, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ., 1,
185–235, https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000005, 2007.
Braito, M., Leonhardt, H., Penker, M., Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., Thaler,
G., and Flint, C. G.: The plurality of farmers' views on soil management
calls for a policy mix, Land Use Policy, 99, 104876,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104876, 2020.
Brouwer, R., Lienhoop, N., and Oosterhuis, F.: Incentivizing afforestation
agreements: Institutional-economic conditions and motivational drivers, J.
For. Econ., 21, 205–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2015.09.003, 2015.
Brown, C., Kovács, E., Herzon, I., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Albizua, A.,
Galanaki, A., Grammatikopoulou, I., McCracken, D., Olsson, J. A., and
Zinngrebe, Y.: Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could
undermine the environmental potential of the Common Agricultural Policy,
Land Use Policy, 101, 105136,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136, 2021.
Bruckner, M., Häyhä, T., Giljum, S., Maus, V., Fischer, G.,
Tramberend, S., and Börner, J.: Quantifying the global cropland
footprint of the European Union's non-food bioeconomy, Environ. Res. Lett.,
14, 045011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab07f5, 2019.
Burton, R. J. F. and Schwarz, G.: Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes
in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change, Land Use
Policy, 30, 628–641, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.002,
2013.
Cavender-Bares, J., Polasky, S., King, E., and Balvanera, P.: A
sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services,
Ecol. Soc., 20, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06917-200117, 2015.
Chapman, P. J., Eze, S., de Bell, S., Barlow-Duncan, F., Firbank, L.,
Helgason, T., Holden, J., Kay, P., Brown, C. D., White, P. C. L., Little,
R., Reed, M., and Ziv, G.: Agricultural Land Management for Public Goods
Delivery: iCASP Evidence Review on Soil Health, Yorkshire Integrated
Catchment Solutions Programme (iCASP), 2018.
Daedlow, K., Lemke, N., and Helming, K.: Arable Land Tenancy and Soil
Quality in Germany: Contesting Theory with Empirics, Sustainability, 10,
2880, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082880, 2018.
Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., and van Bavel, R.: Behavioural
factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a
policy-oriented review, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 46, 417–471,
https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019, 2019.
Deutsche Vernetzungsstelle Ländliche Räume: ELER in Deutschland:
Übersicht über die Nationale Rahmenregelung und die Programme der
Länder. Programmübersicht 2014-2020, Deutsche Vernetzungsstelle
Ländliche Räume; Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und
Ernährung, Bonn, 2015.
EC: A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly
food system [COM(2020) 381], European Commission, Brussels, 2020a.
EC: EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back to our lives
[COM(2020) 380], European Commission, Brussels, 2020b.
Frelih-Larsen, A., Bowyer, C., Albrecht, S., Keenleyside, C., Kemper, M.,
Nanni, S., Naumann, S., Mottershead, D., Landgrebe, R., Andersen, E., Banfi,
P., Bell, S., Brémere, I., Cools, J., Herbert, S., Iles, A., Kampa, E.,
Kettunen, M., Lukacova, Z., Moreira, G., Kiresiewa, Z., Rouillard, J., Okx,
J., Pantzar, M., Paquel, K., Pederson, R., Peepson, A., Pelsy, F., Petrovic,
D., Psaila, E., Šarapatka, B., Sobocka, J., Stan, A.-C., Tarpey, J., and
Vidaurre, R.: Updated inventory and assessment of soil protection policy
instruments in EU Member States, Ecologic, Berlin, 2016.
Gaymard, S., Goujon, B., and Lefebvre, M.: Adherence to Environmental
Regulation in the European Union Common Agricultural Policy: Social
Representations and Conditionality among French Farmers, J. Agric. Food
Inf., 21, 104–125, https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2020.1772078, 2020.
Glæsner, N., Helming, K., and de Vries, W.: Do Current European Policies
Prevent Soil Threats and Support Soil Functions?, Sustainability, 6,
9538–9563, https://doi.org/10.3390/su6129538, 2014.
Gocht, A., Ciaian, P., Bielza, M., Terres, J.-M., Röder, N., Himics, M.,
and Salputra, G.: EU-wide economic and environmental impacts of CAP greening
with high spatial and farm-type detail, J. Agric. Econ., 68, 651–681,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12217, 2017.
Grajewski, R.: Vier ländliche Entwicklungsprogramme im Vergleich: PFEIL
Niedersachsen-Bremen, LPLR Schleswig-Holstein, NRW-Programm Ländlicher
Raum und EPLR Hessen: Finanzen – Fördermaßnahmen – Prioritäten
– Investitionstypen – Zielgruppen – Implementation, Thünen-Institut,
Braunschweig, 2016.
Gunstone, T., Cornelisse, T., Klein, K., Dubey, A., and Donley, N.:
Pesticides and Soil Invertebrates: A Hazard Assessment, Front. Environ.
Sci., 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643847, 2021.
Haddaway, N. R., Hedlund, K., Jackson, L. E., Kätterer, T., Lugato, E.,
Thomsen, I. K., Jørgensen, H. B., and Isberg, P.-E.: How does tillage
intensity affect soil organic carbon? A systematic review, Environ. Evid.,
6, 30, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017-0108-9, 2017.
Hagemann, N., Álvaro-Fuentes, J., Siebielec, G., Castañeda, C.,
Maring, L., Blauw, M., Bartke, S., Dietze, V., Arrúe, J. L., Playán,
E., Herrero, J., and Plaza-Bonilla, D.: Providing support in relation to the
implementation of the EU Soil Thematic Strategy. Drivers and transboundary
impacts of soil degradation, DG Environment, Brussels, 2019.
Hamidov, A., Helming, K., Bellocchi, G., Bojar, W., Dalgaard, T., Ghaley, B.
B., Hoffmann, C., Holman, I., Holzkämper, A., Krzeminska, D.,
Kværnø, S. H., Lehtonen, H., Niedrist, G., Øygarden, L., Reidsma,
P., Roggero, P. P., Rusu, T., Santos, C., Seddaiu, G., Skarbøvik, E.,
Ventrella, D., Żarski, J., and Schönhart, M.: Impacts of climate
change adaptation options on soil functions: A review of European
case-studies, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 2378–2389,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3006, 2018.
Hanley, N., Whitby, M., and Simpson, I.: Assessing the success of
agri-environmental policy in the UK, Land Use Policy, 16, 67–80,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(98)00041-6, 1999.
Ingram, J. and Mills, J.: Are advisory services “fit for purpose” to
support sustainable soil management? An assessment of advice in Europe, Soil
Use Manag., 35, 21–31, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12452, 2019.
IPBES: The assessment report on land degradation and restoration, IPBES
Secretariat, Bonn, 2018a.
IPBES: The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services
for Europe and Central Asia, IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, 2018b.
IPBES: Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on
biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy
Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service, IPBES Secretariat, Bonn,
2019.
Jeffery, S. and Verheijen, F. G. A.: A new soil health policy paradigm: Pay
for practice not performance!, Environ. Sci. Policy, 112, 371–373,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.006, 2020.
Juerges, N. and Hansjürgens, B.: Soil governance in the transition
towards a sustainable bioeconomy – A review, J. Clean. Prod., 170,
1628–1639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143, 2018.
Juerges, N., Hagemann, N., and Bartke, S.: A tool to analyse instruments for
soil governance: the REEL-framework, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 20, 617–631,
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1474731, 2018.
Jürges, N.: Wahrnehmungen und Funktionen in der Transformation zur
Bioökonomie – Eine Akteursanalyse im Politikfeld “Boden”,
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Leipzig, 2016.
Keesstra, S. D., Bouma, J., Wallinga, J., Tittonell, P., Smith, P., Cerdà, A., Montanarella, L., Quinton, J. N., Pachepsky, Y., van der Putten, W. H., Bardgett, R. D., Moolenaar, S., Mol, G., Jansen, B., and Fresco, L. O.: The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, SOIL, 2, 111–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-111-2016, 2016.
Leonhardt, H., Penker, M., and Salhofer, K.: Do farmers care about rented
land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation, Land Use
Policy, 82, 228–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.006,
2019.
Mack, G., Kohler, A., Heitkämper, K., and El-Benni, N.: Determinants of
the perceived administrative transaction costs caused by the uptake of an
agri-environmental program, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 62, 1802–1819,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1515311, 2019.
Mack, G., Ritzel, C., and Jan, P.: Determinants for the Implementation of
Action-, Result- and Multi-Actor-Oriented Agri-Environment Schemes in
Switzerland, Ecol. Econ., 176, 106715,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106715, 2020.
Marquard, E., Bartke, S., Gifreu i Font, J., Humer, A., Jonkman, A.,
Jürgenson, E., Marot, N., Poelmans, L., Repe, B., Rybski, R.,
Schröter-Schlaack, C., Sobocká, J., Tophøj Sørensen, M.,
Vejchodská, E., Yiannakou, A., and Bovet, J.: Land Consumption and Land
Take: Enhancing Conceptual Clarity for Evaluating Spatial Governance in the
EU Context, Sustainability, 12, 8269, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198269,
2020.
Marx, K. and Jacobs, A.: SOILAssist-Teilprojekt “Akzeptanz und
Implementierung”: Analyse behördlicher Handlungsempfehlungen zur
Vermeidung von Bodenverdichtung auf Ackerböden, Thünen Working
Paper, https://doi.org/10.3220/WP1604915142000, 2020.
Mitter, H., Techen, A.-K., Sinabell, F., Helming, K., Schmid, E., Bodirsky,
B. L., Holman, I., Kok, K., Lehtonen, H., Leip, A., Le Mouël, C.,
Mathijs, E., Mehdi, B., Mittenzwei, K., Mora, O., Øistad, K.,
Øygarden, L., Priess, J. A., Reidsma, P., Schaldach, R., and
Schönhart, M.: Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture
and food systems: The Eur-Agri-SSPs, Glob. Environ. Change, 65, 102159,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102159, 2020.
Möckel, S.: “Best available techniques” as a mandatory basic standard
for more sustainable agricultural land use in Europe?, Land Use Policy, 47,
342–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.021, 2015a.
Möckel, S.: Politische und rechtliche Ziele zum vorsorgenden Schutz der
Böden in Deutschland, Nat. Landsch., 90, 497–502, 2015b.
Montanarella, L. and Panagos, P.: The relevance of sustainable soil
management within the European Green Deal, Land Use Policy, 100, 104950,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950, 2021.
Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., and
McGuinn, J.: Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and
Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU, Environ.
Policy Gov., 22, 395–423, https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589, 2012.
Panagos, P., Standardi, G., Borrelli, P., Lugato, E., Montanarella, L., and
Bosello, F.: Cost of agricultural productivity loss due to soil erosion in
the European Union: From direct cost evaluation approaches to the use of
macroeconomic models, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 471–484,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2879, 2018.
Pannell, D. J.: Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism
Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits, Land Econ., 84,
225–240, https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.2.225, 2008.
Paul, C. and Helming, K.: Handbook of Soil-Related Impact Assessment,
BonaRes Centre, 2019.
Pe'er, G., Zinngrebe, Y., Moreira, F., Sirami, C., Schindler, S.,
Müller, R., Bontzorlos, V., Clough, D., Bezák, P., Bonn, A.,
Hansjürgens, B., Lomba, A., Möckel, S., Passoni, G., Schleyer, C.,
Schmidt, J., and Lakner, S.: A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural
Policy, Science, 365, 449–451, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3146,
2019.
Peichl, M., Thober, S., Samaniego, L., Hansjürgens, B., and Marx, A.:
Climate impacts on long-term silage maize yield in Germany, Sci. Rep., 9,
7674, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44126-1, 2019.
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., and Kropp, J. P.: A
Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions, Earths
Future, 5, 1169–1179, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632, 2017.
Riediger, J., Breckling, B., Svoboda, N., and Schröder, W.: Modelling
regional variability of irrigation requirements due to climate change in
Northern Germany, Sci. Total Environ., 541, 329–340,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.043, 2016.
Ring, I. and Schröter-Schlaack, C.: Policy mixes for biodiversity
conservation and ecosystem service management, in: Ecosystem services –
Concept, methods and case studies, edited by: Grunewald, K. and Bastian, O.,
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 146–155, 2015.
Ronchi, S., Salata, S., Arcidiacono, A., Piroli, E., and Montanarella, L.:
Policy instruments for soil protection among the EU member states: A
comparative analysis, Land Use Policy, 82, 763–780,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.017, 2019.
Rose, M. T., Cavagnaro, T. R., Scanlan, C. A., Rose, T. J., Vancov, T.,
Kimber, S., Kennedy, I. R., Kookana, R. S., and Van Zwieten, L.: Impact of
Herbicides on Soil Biology and Function, Adv. Agron., 136, 133–220,
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.11.005, 2016.
Rumpel, C., Amiraslani, F., Chenu, C., Garcia Cardenas, M., Kaonga, M.,
Koutika, L.-S., Ladha, J., Madari, B., Shirato, Y., Smith, P., Soudi, B.,
Soussana, J.-F., Whitehead, D., and Wollenberg, E.: The 4p1000 initiative:
Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic
carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy, Ambio, 49,
350–360, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2, 2020.
Samaniego, L., Thober, S., Kumar, R., Wanders, N., Rakovec, O., Pan, M.,
Zink, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Marx, A.: Anthropogenic warming
exacerbates European soil moisture droughts, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 421–426,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0138-5, 2018.
Schaafsma, M. and Bartkowski, B.: Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Ecosystem
Services, in: Life on Land, edited by: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. M., Brandli,
L., Özuyar, P. G., and Wall, T., Springer International Publishing,
Cham, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_117-1,
2020.
Schader, C., Lampkin, N., Muller, A., and Stolze, M.: The role of
multi-target policy instruments in agri-environmental policy mixes, J.
Environ. Manage., 145, 180–190,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.016, 2014.
Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E.: Property-rights regimes and natural resources:
A conceptual analysis, Land Econ., 68, 249–262,
https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375, 1992.
Schröder, J. J., Ten Berge, H. F. M., Bampa, F., Creamer, R. E.,
Giraldez-Cervera, J. V., Henriksen, C. B., Olesen, J. E., Rutgers, M.,
Sandén, T., and Spiegel, H.: Multi-Functional Land Use Is Not
Self-Evident for European Farmers: A Critical Review, Front. Environ. Sci.,
8, 575466, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466, 2020.
Schröter-Schlaack, C. and Hansjürgens, B.: Fishing in muddy waters
– Governance risks in designing policy responses to manage ecosystem
services, in: Atlas of Ecosystem Services: Drivers, Risks, and Societal
Responses, edited by: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R.,
and Baessler, C., Springer, Dordrecht; New York, 315–320, 2019.
Seppelt, R., Lautenbach, S., and Volk, M.: Identifying trade-offs between
ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining
scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales, Curr. Opin.
Environ. Sustain., 5, 458–463,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002, 2013.
Siebert, L.: Energy Crops and Erosion Control in Germany in the Context of
the Bioeconomy Strategy, BonaRes Ser., 2020/2,
https://doi.org/10.20387/BonaRes-TZKG-FNRC, 2020.
Soule, M. J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K. D.: Land Tenure and the Adoption of
Conservation Practices, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 82, 993–1005, 2000.
Stankovics, P., Tóth, G., and Tóth, Z.: Identifying Gaps between the
Legislative Tools of Soil Protection in the EU Member States for a Common
European Soil Protection Legislation, Sustainability, 10, 2886,
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082886, 2018.
Techen, A.-K. and Helming, K.: Pressures on soil functions from soil
management in Germany. A foresight review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 37, 64,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0473-3, 2017.
Techen, A.-K., Helming, K., Brüggemann, N., Veldkamp, E.,
Reinhold-Hurek, B., Lorenz, M., Bartke, S., Heinrich, U., Amelung, W.,
Augustin, K., Boy, J., Corre, M., Duttman, R., Gebbers, R., Gentsch, N.,
Grosch, R., Guggenberger, G., Kern, J., Kiese, R., Kuhwald, M., Leinweber,
P., Schloter, M., Wiesmeier, M., Winkelmann, T., and Vogel, H.-J.: Soil
research challenges in response to emerging agricultural soil management
practices, Adv. Agron., 161, 179–240,
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.01.002, 2020.
Turpin, N., ten Berge, H., Grignani, C., Guzmán, G., Vanderlinden, K.,
Steinmann, H.-H., Siebielec, G., Spiegel, A., Perret, E., Ruysschaert, G.,
Laguna, A., Giráldez, J. V., Werner, M., Raschke, I., Zavattaro, L.,
Costamagna, C., Schlatter, N., Berthold, H., Sandén, T., and Baumgarten,
A.: An assessment of policies affecting Sustainable Soil Management in
Europe and selected member states, Land Use Policy, 66, 241–249,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.001, 2017.
Vainio, A., Tienhaara, A., Haltia, E., Hyvönen, T., Pyysiäinen, J.,
and Pouta, E.: The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented
agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers' and citizens'
perceptions, Land Use Policy, 107, 104358,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104358, 2021.
Vogel, H.-J., Bartke, S., Daedlow, K., Helming, K., Kögel-Knabner, I.,
Lang, B., Rabot, E., Russell, D., Stößel, B., Weller, U., Wiesmeier,
M., and Wollschläger, U.: A systemic approach for modeling soil
functions, SOIL, 4, 83–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-83-2018, 2018.
Vogel, H.-J., Eberhardt, E., Franko, U., Lang, B., Ließ, M., Weller, U.,
Wiesmeier, M., and Wollschläger, U.: Quantitative Evaluation of Soil
Functions: Potential and State, Front. Environ. Sci., 7,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00164, 2019.
Vrebos, D., Bampa, F., Creamer, R. E., Gardi, C., Ghaley, B. B., Jones, A.,
Rutgers, M., Sandén, T., Staes, J., and Meire, P.: The Impact of Policy
Instruments on Soil Multifunctionality in the European Union,
Sustainability, 9, 407, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030407, 2017.
Wiesmeier, M., Mayer, S., Paul, C., Helming, K., Don, A., Franko, U.,
Steffens, M., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: CO2 certificates for carbon
sequestration in soils: methods, management practices and limitations,
BonaRes Ser., 2020/3, https://doi.org/10.20387/BONARES-NE0G-CE98, 2020.
Zikeli, S. and Gruber, S.: Reduced Tillage and No-Till in Organic Farming
Systems, Germany-Status Quo, Potentials and Challenges, Agriculture, 7,
35, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7040035, 2017.
Zinngrebe, Y., Pe'er, G., Schueler, S., Schmitt, J., Schmidt, J., and
Lakner, S.: The EU's ecological focus areas – How experts explain farmers'
choices in Germany, Land Use Policy, 65, 93–108,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.027, 2017.
Zwetsloot, M. J., Leeuwen, J. van, Hemerik, L., Martens, H., Josa, I. S.,
Broek, M. V. de, Debeljak, M., Rutgers, M., Sandén, T., Wall, D. P.,
Jones, A., and Creamer, R. E.: Soil multifunctionality: Synergies and
trade-offs across European climatic zones and land uses, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 72, 1640–1654,
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13051, 2021.
Short summary
We use a holistic framework to analyze how agricultural policy in Germany affects the sustainability of soil management. We look at the adequacy of policy targets, objects (i.e. drivers of soil degradation), instruments, assumptions about farmers' behaviour, and the coherence among these four dimensions. We find deficits in each dimension, particularly object and instrument adequacy. Agricultural soil policy in Germany lacks depth and coherence, and the role of biomass demand is neglected.
We use a holistic framework to analyze how agricultural policy in Germany affects the...
