SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Original research article
 | 
04 Aug 2021
Original research article |  | 04 Aug 2021

Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy

Bartosz Bartkowski, Stephan Bartke, Nina Hagemann, Bernd Hansjürgens, and Christoph Schröter-Schlaack

Viewed

Total article views: 2,952 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,064 815 73 2,952 58 59
  • HTML: 2,064
  • PDF: 815
  • XML: 73
  • Total: 2,952
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 59
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,952 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,794 with geography defined and 158 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
We use a holistic framework to analyze how agricultural policy in Germany affects the sustainability of soil management. We look at the adequacy of policy targets, objects (i.e. drivers of soil degradation), instruments, assumptions about farmers' behaviour, and the coherence among these four dimensions. We find deficits in each dimension, particularly object and instrument adequacy. Agricultural soil policy in Germany lacks depth and coherence, and the role of biomass demand is neglected.
Read more
Share