SOIL – An interactive open-access journal
SOIL – An interactive OA journal
SOIL – An interactive OA journal
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
SOIL, 7, 495–509, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
SOIL, 7, 495–509, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-495-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 2

Original research article 04 Aug 2021

Original research article | 04 Aug 2021

Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy

Bartosz Bartkowski et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 914 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
681 210 23 914 14 10
  • HTML: 681
  • PDF: 210
  • XML: 23
  • Total: 914
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 886 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 16 Oct 2021
Download
Short summary
We use a holistic framework to analyze how agricultural policy in Germany affects the sustainability of soil management. We look at the adequacy of policy targets, objects (i.e. drivers of soil degradation), instruments, assumptions about farmers' behaviour, and the coherence among these four dimensions. We find deficits in each dimension, particularly object and instrument adequacy. Agricultural soil policy in Germany lacks depth and coherence, and the role of biomass demand is neglected.
Read more