Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
SOIL, 8, 587–604, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022
SOIL, 8, 587–604, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-587-2022
Original research article
22 Sep 2022
Original research article | 22 Sep 2022

Spatial prediction of organic carbon in German agricultural topsoil using machine learning algorithms

Ali Sakhaee et al.

Related authors

On the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalization
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Can soil spectroscopy contribute to soil organic carbon monitoring on agricultural soils?
Javier Reyes and Mareike Ließ
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-273,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-273, 2022
Short summary
Geogenic organic carbon in terrestrial sediments and its contribution to total soil carbon
Fabian Kalks, Gabriel Noren, Carsten W. Mueller, Mirjam Helfrich, Janet Rethemeyer, and Axel Don
SOIL, 7, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-347-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-347-2021, 2021
Short summary
Vertical partitioning of CO2 production in a forest soil
Patrick Wordell-Dietrich, Anja Wotte, Janet Rethemeyer, Jörg Bachmann, Mirjam Helfrich, Kristina Kirfel, Christoph Leuschner, and Axel Don
Biogeosciences, 17, 6341–6356, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6341-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6341-2020, 2020
Short summary
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
Patrick Liebmann, Patrick Wordell-Dietrich, Karsten Kalbitz, Robert Mikutta, Fabian Kalks, Axel Don, Susanne K. Woche, Leena R. Dsilva, and Georg Guggenberger
Biogeosciences, 17, 3099–3113, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3099-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3099-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil and methods
On the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalization
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
An open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT data
Ulrich Weller, Lukas Albrecht, Steffen Schlüter, and Hans-Jörg Vogel
SOIL, 8, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Identification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markers
Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, and Jens Leifeld
SOIL, 8, 451–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating soil fungal abundance and diversity at a macroecological scale with deep learning spectrotransfer functions
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-223-2022, 2022
Short summary
An underground, wireless, open-source, low-cost system for monitoring oxygen, temperature, and soil moisture
Elad Levintal, Yonatan Ganot, Gail Taylor, Peter Freer-Smith, Kosana Suvocarev, and Helen E. Dahlke
SOIL, 8, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-85-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-85-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Al-Anazi, A. F. and Gates, I. D.: Support vector regression to predict porosity and permeability: Effect of sample size, Comput. Geosci., 39, 64–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.06.011, 2012. 
Arrouays, D., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., Bodineau, G., Saby, N., and Grolleau, E.: A new projection in France: a multi-institutional soil quality monitoring network, Comptes Rendus l'Académie d'Agriculture Fr., 88, 93–103, 2002. 
Awad, M. and Khanna, R.: Support Vector Regression, in: Efficient Learning Machines, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 67–80, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_4, 2015. 
Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., and Monatanarella, L.: Mapping topsoil physical properties at European scale using the LUCAS database, Geoderma, 261, 110–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.07.006, 2016. 
Ballabio, C., Lugato, E., Fernández-Ugalde, O., Orgiazzi, A., Jones, A., Borrelli, P., Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P.: Mapping LUCAS topsoil chemical properties at European scale using Gaussian process regression, Geoderma, 355, 113912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113912, 2019. 
Download
Short summary
As soil carbon has become a key component of climate-smart agriculture, the demand for high-resolution maps has increased drastically. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are becoming more widely used and are opening up new solutions in soil mapping. This paper shows which algorithms perform best, how soil inventory data can be most efficiently used for digital soil mapping, and the different available options and methods to derive high-resolution soil carbon data at the large regional scale.