Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
SOIL, 1, 217–233, 2015
SOIL, 1, 217–233, 2015
Original research article
04 Mar 2015
Original research article | 04 Mar 2015

Comparison of spatial association approaches for landscape mapping of soil organic carbon stocks

B. A. Miller et al.

Related authors

Measuring evapotranspiration on an eroded cropland by an automated and mobile chamber system: gap filling strategies and impact of soil type and topsoil removal
Adrian Dahlmann, Mathias Hoffmann, Gernot Verch, Marten Schmidt, Michael Sommer, Jürgen Augustin, and Maren Dubbert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Pan-Arctic soil element availability estimations
Peter Stimmler, Mathias Goeckede, Bo Elberling, Susan Natali, Peter Kuhry, Nia Perron, Fabrice Lacroix, Gustaf Hugelius, Oliver Sonnentag, Jens Strauss, Christina Minions, Michael Sommer, and Jörg Schaller
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss.,,, 2022
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Spatial patterns of aboveground phytogenic Si stocks in a grass-dominated catchment – results from UAS-based high-resolution remote sensing
Marc Wehrhan, Daniel Puppe, Danuta Kaczorek, and Michael Sommer
Biogeosciences, 18, 5163–5183,,, 2021
Short summary
Silicon uptake and isotope fractionation dynamics by crop species
Daniel A. Frick, Rainer Remus, Michael Sommer, Jürgen Augustin, Danuta Kaczorek, and Friedhelm von Blanckenburg
Biogeosciences, 17, 6475–6490,,, 2020
Short summary
Understanding the role of water and tillage erosion from 239+240Pu tracer measurements using inverse modelling
Florian Wilken, Michael Ketterer, Sylvia Koszinski, Michael Sommer, and Peter Fiener
SOIL, 6, 549–564,,, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil and methods
Spatial prediction of organic carbon in German agricultural topsoil using machine learning algorithms
Ali Sakhaee, Anika Gebauer, Mareike Ließ, and Axel Don
SOIL, 8, 587–604,,, 2022
Short summary
On the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalization
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558,,, 2022
Short summary
An open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT data
Ulrich Weller, Lukas Albrecht, Steffen Schlüter, and Hans-Jörg Vogel
SOIL, 8, 507–515,,, 2022
Short summary
Identification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markers
Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, and Jens Leifeld
SOIL, 8, 451–466,,, 2022
Short summary
Estimating soil fungal abundance and diversity at a macroecological scale with deep learning spectrotransfer functions
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Adhikari, K., Kheir, R. B., Greve, M. B., and Greve, M. H.: Comparing kriging and regression approaches for mapping soil clay content in a diverse Danish landscape, Soil Sci., 178, 505–517,, 2013.
Almond, P. C. and Tonkin, P. J.: Pedogenesis by upbuilding in an extreme leaching and weathering environment, and slow loess accretion, south Westland, New Zealand, Geoderma, 92, 1–36,, 1999.
Angers, D. A. and Carter, M. R.: Aggregation and organic matter storage in cool, humid agricultural soils, in: Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils, edited by: Carter, M. R. and Stewart, B. A., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 193–211, 1996.
Ashley, M. D. and Rea, J.: Seasonal vegetation differences from ERTS imagery, Journal of American Society of Photogrammetry, 41, 713–719, 1975.
Bannari, A., Morin, D., Bonn, F., and Huete, A. R.: A review of vegetation indices, Remote Sensing Reviews, 13, 95–120,, 1995.
Short summary
There are many different strategies for mapping SOC, among which is to model the variables needed to calculate the SOC stock indirectly or to model the SOC stock directly. The purpose of this research was to compare these two approaches for mapping SOC stocks from multiple linear regression models applied at the landscape scale via spatial association. Although the indirect approach had greater spatial variation and higher R2 values, the direct approach had a lower total estimated error.