Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
Original research article
04 Mar 2015
Original research article | 04 Mar 2015
Comparison of spatial association approaches for landscape mapping of soil organic carbon stocks
B. A. Miller et al.
No articles found.
Adrian Dahlmann, Mathias Hoffmann, Gernot Verch, Marten Schmidt, Michael Sommer, Jürgen Augustin, and Maren Dubbert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,
Preprint under review for HESSShort summary
In light of ongoing global climate crisis, it is crucial to understand the ecosystem water cycle. Evapotranspiration plays a pivotal role, returning up to 90 % of precipitation to the atmosphere. We studied impacts of soil type and management on an agroecosystem using an automated system coupled with modern gap-filling approaches. We were able to calculate ET in a high spatial and temporal resolution and found significant differences between yield and smaller differences in evapotranspiration.
Peter Stimmler, Mathias Goeckede, Bo Elberling, Susan Natali, Peter Kuhry, Nia Perron, Fabrice Lacroix, Gustaf Hugelius, Oliver Sonnentag, Jens Strauss, Christina Minions, Michael Sommer, and Jörg Schaller
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss.,
Preprint under review for ESSDShort summary
Arctic soils store large amounts of carbon and nutrients. The availability of nutrients such as silicon, calcium, iron, aluminum, phosphorus and amorphous silica is crucial to understand future carbon fluxes in the Arctic. Here we provide for the first time a unique data set on the availability of those nutrients for the different soil layers including the currently frozen permafrost layer. We relate this data to several geographical and geological parameters.
Marc Wehrhan, Daniel Puppe, Danuta Kaczorek, and Michael Sommer
Biogeosciences, 18, 5163–5183,Short summary
UAS remote sensing provides a promising tool for new insights into Si biogeochemistry at catchment scale. Our study on an artificial catchment shows surprisingly high silicon stocks in the biomass of two grass species (C. epigejos, 7 g m−2; P. australis, 27 g m−2). The distribution of initial sediment properties (clay, Tiron-extractable Si, nitrogen, plant-available potassium) controlled the spatial distribution of C. epigejos. Soil wetness determined the occurrence of P. australis.
Daniel A. Frick, Rainer Remus, Michael Sommer, Jürgen Augustin, Danuta Kaczorek, and Friedhelm von Blanckenburg
Biogeosciences, 17, 6475–6490,Short summary
Silicon is taken up by some plants to increase structural stability and to develop stress resistance and is rejected by others. To explore the underlying mechanisms, we used the stable isotopes of silicon that shift in their relative abundance depending on the biochemical transformation involved. On species with a rejective (tomato, mustard) and active (wheat) uptake mechanism, grown in hydroculture, we found that the transport of silicic acid is controlled by the precipitation of biogenic opal.
Florian Wilken, Michael Ketterer, Sylvia Koszinski, Michael Sommer, and Peter Fiener
SOIL, 6, 549–564,Short summary
Soil redistribution by water and tillage erosion processes on arable land is a major threat to sustainable use of soil resources. We unravel the role of tillage and water erosion from fallout radionuclide (239+240Pu) activities in a ground moraine landscape. Our results show that tillage erosion dominates soil redistribution processes and has a major impact on the hydrological and sedimentological connectivity, which started before the onset of highly mechanised farming since the 1960s.
W. Marijn van der Meij, Arnaud J. A. M. Temme, Jakob Wallinga, and Michael Sommer
SOIL, 6, 337–358,Short summary
We developed a model to simulate long-term development of soils and landscapes under varying rainfall and land-use conditions to quantify the temporal variation of soil patterns. In natural landscapes, rainfall amount was the dominant factor influencing soil variation, while for agricultural landscapes, landscape position became the dominant factor due to tillage erosion. Our model shows potential for simulating past and future developments of soils in various landscapes and climates.
Jannis Groh, Jan Vanderborght, Thomas Pütz, Hans-Jörg Vogel, Ralf Gründling, Holger Rupp, Mehdi Rahmati, Michael Sommer, Harry Vereecken, and Horst H. Gerke
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1211–1225,
Daniel Puppe, Axel Höhn, Danuta Kaczorek, Manfred Wanner, Marc Wehrhan, and Michael Sommer
Biogeosciences, 14, 5239–5252,Short summary
We quantified different biogenic Si pools in soils of a developing ecosystem and analyzed their influence on short-term changes of the water soluble Si fraction. From our results we concluded small (< 5 µm) and/or fragile phytogenic Si structures to have the biggest impact on short-term changes of water soluble Si. Analyses of these phytogenic Si structures are urgently needed in future as they seem to represent the most important driver of Si cycling in terrestrial biogeosystems in general.
Mathias Hoffmann, Nicole Jurisch, Juana Garcia Alba, Elisa Albiac Borraz, Marten Schmidt, Vytas Huth, Helmut Rogasik, Helene Rieckh, Gernot Verch, Michael Sommer, and Jürgen Augustin
Biogeosciences, 14, 1003–1019,Short summary
We present a suitable and reliable method to detect short-term and small-scale soil organic carbon stock dynamics (ΔSOC). Spatiotemporal dynamics of ΔSOC are determined for a 5-year study period at the experimental field trial
CarboZALFusing automatic chamber measurements of NEE and modeled NPPshoot. Results were compared against ΔSOC observed from repeated soil inventories. Both ∆SOC data sets corresponded well regarding their magnitude and spatial tendency.
Mathias Hoffmann, Maximilian Schulz-Hanke, Juana Garcia Alba, Nicole Jurisch, Ulrike Hagemann, Torsten Sachs, Michael Sommer, and Jürgen Augustin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 109–118,Short summary
Processes driving production and transport of CH4 in wetlands are complex. We present an algorithm to separate open-water automatic chamber CH4 fluxes into diffusion and ebullition. This helps to reveal dynamics, identify drivers and obtain reliable CH4 emissions. The algorithm is based on sudden concentration changes during single measurements. A variable filter is applied using a multiple of the interquartile range. The algorithm was verified for data of a rewetted former fen grassland site.
W. Marijn van der Meij, Arnaud J. A. M. Temme, Christian M. F. J. J. de Kleijn, Tony Reimann, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Zbigniew Zwoliński, Grzegorz Rachlewicz, Krzysztof Rymer, and Michael Sommer
SOIL, 2, 221–240,Short summary
This study combined fieldwork, geochronology and modelling to get a better understanding of Arctic soil development on a landscape scale. Main processes are aeolian deposition, physical and chemical weathering and silt translocation. Discrepancies between model results and field observations showed that soil and landscape development is not as straightforward as we hypothesized. Interactions between landscape processes and soil processes have resulted in a complex soil pattern in the landscape.
M. Hoffmann, M. Schulz-Hanke, J. Garcia Alba, N. Jurisch, U. Hagemann, T. Sachs, M. Sommer, and J. Augustin
Manuscript not accepted for further reviewShort summary
Processes driving the production, transformation and transport of CH4 in wetlands are highly complex. Thus, serious challenges are constitutes in terms of process understanding, potential drivers and the calculation of reliable CH4 emission estimates. We present a simple calculation algorithm to separate CH4 fluxes measured with closed chambers into diffusion- and ebullition-derived components, which helps facilitating the identification of underlying dynamics and potential drivers.
M. Pohl, M. Hoffmann, U. Hagemann, M. Giebels, E. Albiac Borraz, M. Sommer, and J. Augustin
Biogeosciences, 12, 2737–2752,Short summary
Dynamic SOC and N stocks in the aerobic zone play a key role in the regulation of plant- and microbially mediated CO2 and CH4 fluxes in drained and cultivated fen peatlands. Their interaction with the groundwater level (GWL) strongly influenced soil C gas exchange, indicating effects of GWL-dependent N availability on C formation and transformation processes in the plant--soil system. In contrast, static SOC and N stocks showed no significant effect on C gas fluxes.
J. Leifeld, C. Bader, E. Borraz, M. Hoffmann, M. Giebels, M. Sommer, and J. Augustin
Revised manuscript not accepted
M. Sommer, H. Jochheim, A. Höhn, J. Breuer, Z. Zagorski, J. Busse, D. Barkusky, K. Meier, D. Puppe, M. Wanner, and D. Kaczorek
Biogeosciences, 10, 4991–5007,
Related subject area
Soil and methodsSpatial prediction of organic carbon in German agricultural topsoil using machine learning algorithmsOn the benefits of clustering approaches in digital soil mapping: an application example concerning soil texture regionalizationAn open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT dataIdentification of thermal signature and quantification of charcoal in soil using differential scanning calorimetry and benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) markersEstimating soil fungal abundance and diversity at a macroecological scale with deep learning spectrotransfer functionsAn underground, wireless, open-source, low-cost system for monitoring oxygen, temperature, and soil moistureEstimation of soil properties with mid-infrared soil spectroscopy across yam production landscapes in West AfricaThe central African soil spectral library: a new soil infrared repository and a geographical prediction analysisDeveloping the Swiss mid-infrared soil spectral library for local estimation and monitoringPredicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific dataImproved calibration of the Green–Ampt infiltration module in the EROSION-2D/3D model using a rainfall-runoff experiment databaseQuantifying soil carbon in temperate peatlands using a mid-IR soil spectral libraryAre researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties?Quantifying and correcting for pre-assay CO2 loss in short-term carbon mineralization assaysThe influence of training sample size on the accuracy of deep learning models for the prediction of soil properties with near-infrared spectroscopy dataGame theory interpretation of digital soil mapping convolutional neural networksComparing three approaches of spatial disaggregation of legacy soil maps based on the Disaggregation and Harmonisation of Soil Map Units Through Resampled Classification Trees (DSMART) algorithmOblique geographic coordinates as covariates for digital soil mappingDevelopment of pedotransfer functions for water retention in tropical mountain soil landscapes: spotlight on parameter tuning in machine learningThe 15N gas-flux method to determine N2 flux: a comparison of different tracer addition approachesA new model for intra- and inter-institutional soil data sharingMachine learning and soil sciences: a review aided by machine learning toolsIdentification of new microbial functional standards for soil quality assessmentIdentifying and quantifying geogenic organic carbon in soils – the case of graphiteError propagation in spectrometric functions of soil organic carbonWord embeddings for application in geosciences: development, evaluation, and examples of soil-related conceptsSoil lacquer peel do-it-yourself: simply capturing beautyMulti-source data integration for soil mapping using deep learningUsing deep learning for digital soil mappingNo silver bullet for digital soil mapping: country-specific soil organic carbon estimates across Latin AmericaSeparation of soil respiration: a site-specific comparison of partition methodsProximal sensing for soil carbon accountingEvaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariatesPlanning spatial sampling of the soil from an uncertain reconnaissance variogramMapping of soil properties at high resolution in Switzerland using boosted geoadditive modelsQuantitative imaging of the 3-D distribution of cation adsorption sites in undisturbed soilDecision support for the selection of reference sites using 137Cs as a soil erosion tracerSoil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment contentThe added value of biomarker analysis to the genesis of plaggic Anthrosols; the identification of stable fillings used for the production of plaggic manureSynchrotron microtomographic quantification of geometrical soil pore characteristics affected by compactionPedotransfer functions for Irish soils – estimation of bulk density (ρb) per horizon typeAssessing the performance of a plastic optical fibre turbidity sensor for measuring post-fire erosion from plot to catchment scalePassive soil heating using an inexpensive infrared mirror design – a proof of conceptThe application of terrestrial laser scanner and SfM photogrammetry in measuring erosion and deposition processes in two opposite slopes in a humid badlands area (central Spanish Pyrenees)Soil surface roughness: comparing old and new measuring methods and application in a soil erosion modelEddy covariance for quantifying trace gas fluxes from soils
Ali Sakhaee, Anika Gebauer, Mareike Ließ, and Axel Don
SOIL, 8, 587–604,Short summary
As soil carbon has become a key component of climate-smart agriculture, the demand for high-resolution maps has increased drastically. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are becoming more widely used and are opening up new solutions in soil mapping. This paper shows which algorithms perform best, how soil inventory data can be most efficiently used for digital soil mapping, and the different available options and methods to derive high-resolution soil carbon data at the large regional scale.
István Dunkl and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 8, 541–558,Short summary
Digital soil mapping (DSM) allows us to regionalize soil properties by relating them to environmental covariates with the help of an empirical model. Legacy soil data provide a valuable basis to generate high-resolution soil maps with DSM. We studied the usefulness of data-clustering methods to tackle potential sampling bias in legacy soil data while applying DSM for soil texture regionalization. Clustering has proved to be useful in various steps of the DSM process.
Ulrich Weller, Lukas Albrecht, Steffen Schlüter, and Hans-Jörg Vogel
SOIL, 8, 507–515,Short summary
Soil structure is of central importance for soil functions. It is, however, ill defined. With the increasing availability of X-ray CT scanners, more and more soils are scanned and an undisturbed image of the soil's structure is produced. Often, a qualitative description is all that is derived from these images. We provide now a web-based Soil Structure Library where these images can be evaluated in a standardized quantitative way and can be compared to a world-wide data set.
Brieuc Hardy, Nils Borchard, and Jens Leifeld
SOIL, 8, 451–466,Short summary
Soil amendment with artificial black carbon (BC; biomass transformed by incomplete combustion) has the potential to mitigate climate change. Nevertheless, the accurate quantification of BC in soil remains a critical issue. Here, we successfully used dynamic thermal analysis (DTA) to quantify centennial BC in soil. We demonstrate that DTA is largely under-exploited despite providing rapid and low-cost quantitative information over the range of soil organic matter.
Yuanyuan Yang, Zefang Shen, Andrew Bissett, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 8, 223–235,Short summary
We present a new method to estimate the relative abundance of the dominant phyla and diversity of fungi in Australian soil. It uses state-of-the-art machine learning with publicly available data on soil and environmental proxies for edaphic, climatic, biotic and topographic factors, and visible–near infrared wavelengths. The estimates could serve to supplement the more expensive molecular approaches towards a better understanding of soil fungal abundance and diversity in agronomy and ecology.
Elad Levintal, Yonatan Ganot, Gail Taylor, Peter Freer-Smith, Kosana Suvocarev, and Helen E. Dahlke
SOIL, 8, 85–97,Short summary
Do-it-yourself hardware is a new approach for improving measurement resolution in research. Here we present a new low-cost, wireless underground sensor network for soil monitoring. All data logging, power, and communication component cost is USD 150, much cheaper than other available commercial solutions. We provide the complete building guide to reduce any technical barriers, which we hope will allow easier reproducibility and open new environmental monitoring applications.
Philipp Baumann, Juhwan Lee, Emmanuel Frossard, Laurie Paule Schönholzer, Lucien Diby, Valérie Kouamé Hgaza, Delwende Innocent Kiba, Andrew Sila, Keith Sheperd, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 717–731,Short summary
This work delivers openly accessible and validated calibrations for diagnosing 26 soil properties based on mid-infrared spectroscopy. These were developed for four regions in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire, including 80 fields of smallholder farmers. The models can help to site-specifically and cost-efficiently monitor soil quality and fertility constraints to ameliorate soils and yields of yam or other staple crops in the four regions between the humid forest and the northern Guinean savanna.
Laura Summerauer, Philipp Baumann, Leonardo Ramirez-Lopez, Matti Barthel, Marijn Bauters, Benjamin Bukombe, Mario Reichenbach, Pascal Boeckx, Elizabeth Kearsley, Kristof Van Oost, Bernard Vanlauwe, Dieudonné Chiragaga, Aimé Bisimwa Heri-Kazi, Pieter Moonen, Andrew Sila, Keith Shepherd, Basile Bazirake Mujinya, Eric Van Ranst, Geert Baert, Sebastian Doetterl, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 693–715,Short summary
We present a soil mid-infrared library with over 1800 samples from central Africa in order to facilitate soil analyses of this highly understudied yet critical area. Together with an existing continental library, we demonstrate a regional analysis and geographical extrapolation to predict total carbon and nitrogen. Our results show accurate predictions and highlight the value that the data contribute to existing libraries. Our library is openly available for public use and for expansion.
Philipp Baumann, Anatol Helfenstein, Andreas Gubler, Armin Keller, Reto Giulio Meuli, Daniel Wächter, Juhwan Lee, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 525–546,Short summary
We developed the Swiss mid-infrared spectral library and a statistical model collection across 4374 soil samples with reference measurements of 16 properties. Our library incorporates soil from 1094 grid locations and 71 long-term monitoring sites. This work confirms once again that nationwide spectral libraries with diverse soils can reliably feed information to a fast chemical diagnosis. Our data-driven reduction of the library has the potential to accurately monitor carbon at the plot scale.
Kpade O. L. Hounkpatin, Johan Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, and Erik Karltun
SOIL, 7, 377–398,Short summary
Forests store large amounts of carbon in soils. Implementing suitable measures to improve the sink potential of forest soils would require accurate data on the carbon stored in forest soils and a better understanding of the factors affecting this storage. This study showed that the prediction of soil carbon stock in Swedish forest soils can increase in accuracy when one divides a big region into smaller areas in combination with information collected locally and derived from satellites.
Hana Beitlerová, Jonas Lenz, Jan Devátý, Martin Mistr, Jiří Kapička, Arno Buchholz, Ilona Gerndtová, and Anne Routschek
SOIL, 7, 241–253,Short summary
This study presents transfer functions for a calibration parameter of the Green–Ampt infiltration module of the EROSION-2D/3D model, which are significantly improving the model performance compared to the current state. The relationships found between calibration parameters and soil parameters however put the Green–Ampt implementation in the model and the state-of-the-art parametrization method in question. A new direction of the infiltration module development is proposed.
Anatol Helfenstein, Philipp Baumann, Raphael Viscarra Rossel, Andreas Gubler, Stefan Oechslin, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 193–215,Short summary
In this study, we show that a soil spectral library (SSL) can be used to predict soil carbon at new and very different locations. The importance of this finding is that it requires less time-consuming lab work than calibrating a new model for every local application, while still remaining similar to or more accurate than local models. Furthermore, we show that this method even works for predicting (drained) peat soils, using a SSL with mostly mineral soils containing much less soil carbon.
Jennifer M. Rhymes, Irene Cordero, Mathilde Chomel, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Angela L. Straathof, Deborah Ashworth, Holly Langridge, Marina Semchenko, Franciska T. de Vries, David Johnson, and Richard D. Bardgett
SOIL, 7, 95–106,
Matthew A. Belanger, Carmella Vizza, G. Philip Robertson, and Sarah S. Roley
SOIL, 7, 47–52,Short summary
Soil health is often assessed by re-wetting a dry soil and measuring CO2 production, but the potential bias introduced by soils of different moisture contents is unclear. Our study found that wetter soil tended to lose more carbon during drying than drier soil, thus affecting soil health interpretations. We developed a correction factor to account for initial soil moisture effects, which future studies may benefit from adapting for their soil.
Wartini Ng, Budiman Minasny, Wanderson de Sousa Mendes, and José Alexandre Melo Demattê
SOIL, 6, 565–578,Short summary
The number of samples utilised to create predictive models affected model performance. This research compares the number of samples needed by a deep learning model to outperform the traditional machine learning models using visible near-infrared spectroscopy data for soil properties predictions. The deep learning model was found to outperform machine learning models when the sample size was above 2000.
José Padarian, Alex B. McBratney, and Budiman Minasny
SOIL, 6, 389–397,Short summary
In this paper we introduce the use of game theory to interpret a digital soil mapping (DSM) model to understand the contribution of environmental factors to the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) in Chile. The analysis corroborated that the SOC model is capturing sensible relationships between SOC and climatic and topographical factors. We were able to represent them spatially (map) addressing the limitations of the current interpretation of models in DSM.
Yosra Ellili-Bargaoui, Brendan Philip Malone, Didier Michot, Budiman Minasny, Sébastien Vincent, Christian Walter, and Blandine Lemercier
SOIL, 6, 371–388,
Anders Bjørn Møller, Amélie Marie Beucher, Nastaran Pouladi, and Mogens Humlekrog Greve
SOIL, 6, 269–289,Short summary
Decision trees have become a widely adapted tool for mapping soil properties in geographic space. However, it is problematic to implement spatial relationships in the models. We present a new method which uses geographic coordinates along several axes tilted at oblique angles in the models. We test this method on four spatial datasets. The results show that the new method is at least as accurate as other proposed alternatives, has a computational advantage and is flexible and interpretable.
Anika Gebauer, Monja Ellinger, Victor M. Brito Gomez, and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 6, 215–229,Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for soil water retention were developed for two tropical soil landscapes using machine learning. The models corresponding to these PTFs had to be adjusted by tuning their parameters. The standard tuning approach was compared to mathematical optimization. The latter resulted in much better model performance. The PTFs derived are of particular importance for soil process and hydrological models.
Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak and Reinhard Well
SOIL, 6, 145–152,Short summary
This study aimed at comparison of various experimental strategies for incubating soil samples to determine the N2 flux. Such experiments require addition of isotope tracer, i.e. nitrogen fertilizer enriched in heavy nitrogen isotopes (15N). Here we compared the impact of soil homogenization and mixing with the tracer and tracer injection to the intact soil cores. The results are well comparable: both techniques would provide similar conclusions on the magnitude of N2 flux.
José Padarian and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 6, 89–94,Short summary
Data sharing and collaboration are critical to solving large-scale problems. The prevailing soil data-sharing model is of a centralized nature and, consequently, results in the participants ceding control and governance over their data to the lead party. Here we explore the use of a distributed ledger (blockchain) to solve the aforementioned issues. We also describe the potential use case of developing a global soil spectral library between multiple, international institutions.
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 6, 35–52,Short summary
The application of machine learning (ML) has shown an accelerated adoption in soil sciences. It is a difficult task to manually review all papers on the application of ML. This paper aims to provide a review of the application of ML aided by topic modelling in order to find patterns in a large collection of publications. The objective is to gain insight into the applications and to discuss research gaps. We found 12 main topics and that ML methods usually perform better than traditional ones.
Sören Thiele-Bruhn, Michael Schloter, Berndt-Michael Wilke, Lee A. Beaudette, Fabrice Martin-Laurent, Nathalie Cheviron, Christian Mougin, and Jörg Römbke
SOIL, 6, 17–34,Short summary
Soil quality depends on the functioning of soil microbiota. Only a few standardized methods are available to assess this as well as adverse effects of human activities. So we need to identify promising additional methods that target soil microbial function. Discussed are (i) molecular methods using qPCR for new endpoints, e.g. in N and P cycling and greenhouse gas emissions, (ii) techniques for fungal enzyme activities, and (iii) field methods on carbon turnover such as the litter bag test.
Jeroen H. T. Zethof, Martin Leue, Cordula Vogel, Shane W. Stoner, and Karsten Kalbitz
SOIL, 5, 383–398,Short summary
A widely overlooked source of carbon (C) in the soil environment is organic C of geogenic origin, e.g. graphite. Appropriate methods are not available to quantify graphite and to differentiate it from other organic and inorganic C sources in soils. Therefore, we examined Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and the smart combustion method for their ability to identify and quantify graphitic C in soils. The smart combustion method showed the most promising results.
Monja Ellinger, Ines Merbach, Ulrike Werban, and Mareike Ließ
SOIL, 5, 275–288,Short summary
Vis–NIR spectrometry is often applied to capture soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addresses the impact of the involved data and modelling aspects on SOC precision with a focus on the propagation of input data uncertainties. It emphasizes the necessity of transparent documentation of the measurement protocol and the model building and validation procedure. Particularly, when Vis–NIR spectrometry is used for soil monitoring, the aspect of uncertainty propagation becomes essential.
José Padarian and Ignacio Fuentes
SOIL, 5, 177–187,Short summary
A large amount of descriptive information is available in geosciences. Considering the advances in natural language it is possible to
rescuethis information and transform it into a numerical form (embeddings). We used 280764 full-text scientific articles to train a language model capable of generating such embeddings. Our domain-specific embeddings (GeoVec) outperformed general domain embedding tasks such as analogies, relatedness, and categorisation, and can be used in novel applications.
Cathelijne R. Stoof, Jasper H. J. Candel, Laszlo A. G. M. van der Wal, and Gert Peek
SOIL, 5, 159–175,Short summary
Teaching and outreach of soils is often done with real-life snapshots of soils and sediments in lacquer or glue peels. While it may seem hard, anyone can make such a peel. Illustrated with handmade drawings and an instructional video, we explain how to capture soils in peels using readily available materials. A new twist to old methods makes this safer, simpler, and more successful, and thus a true DIY (do-it-yourself) activity, highlighting the value and beauty of the ground below our feet.
Alexandre M. J.-C. Wadoux, José Padarian, and Budiman Minasny
SOIL, 5, 107–119,
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 5, 79–89,Short summary
Digital soil mapping has been widely used as a cost-effective method for generating soil maps. DSM models are usually calibrated using point observations and rarely incorporate contextual information of the landscape. Here, we use convolutional neural networks to incorporate spatial context. We used as input a 3-D stack of covariate images to simultaneously predict organic carbon content at multiple depths. In this study, our model reduced the error by 30 % compared with conventional techniques.
Mario Guevara, Guillermo Federico Olmedo, Emma Stell, Yusuf Yigini, Yameli Aguilar Duarte, Carlos Arellano Hernández, Gloria E. Arévalo, Carlos Eduardo Arroyo-Cruz, Adriana Bolivar, Sally Bunning, Nelson Bustamante Cañas, Carlos Omar Cruz-Gaistardo, Fabian Davila, Martin Dell Acqua, Arnulfo Encina, Hernán Figueredo Tacona, Fernando Fontes, José Antonio Hernández Herrera, Alejandro Roberto Ibelles Navarro, Veronica Loayza, Alexandra M. Manueles, Fernando Mendoza Jara, Carolina Olivera, Rodrigo Osorio Hermosilla, Gonzalo Pereira, Pablo Prieto, Iván Alexis Ramos, Juan Carlos Rey Brina, Rafael Rivera, Javier Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Ronald Roopnarine, Albán Rosales Ibarra, Kenset Amaury Rosales Riveiro, Guillermo Andrés Schulz, Adrian Spence, Gustavo M. Vasques, Ronald R. Vargas, and Rodrigo Vargas
SOIL, 4, 173–193,Short summary
We provide a reproducible multi-modeling approach for SOC mapping across Latin America on a country-specific basis as required by the Global Soil Partnership of the United Nations. We identify key prediction factors for SOC across each country. We compare and test different methods to generate spatially explicit predictions of SOC and conclude that there is no best method on a quantifiable basis.
Louis-Pierre Comeau, Derrick Y. F. Lai, Jane Jinglan Cui, and Jenny Farmer
SOIL, 4, 141–152,Short summary
To date, there are still many uncertainties and unknowns regarding the soil respiration partitioning procedures. This study compared the suitability and accuracy of five different respiration partitioning methods. A qualitative evaluation table of the partition methods with five performance parameters was produced. Overall, no systematically superior or inferior partition method was found and the combination of two or more methods optimizes assessment reliability.
Jacqueline R. England and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 4, 101–122,Short summary
Proximal sensing can be used for soil C accounting, but the methods need to be standardized and procedural guidelines developed to ensure proficient measurement and accurate reporting. This is particularly important if there are financial incentives for landholders to adopt practices to sequester C. We review sensing for C accounting and discuss the requirements for the development of new soil C accounting methods based on sensing, including requirements for reporting, auditing and verification.
Madlene Nussbaum, Kay Spiess, Andri Baltensweiler, Urs Grob, Armin Keller, Lucie Greiner, Michael E. Schaepman, and Andreas Papritz
SOIL, 4, 1–22,Short summary
This paper presents an extensive evaluation of digital soil mapping (DSM) tools. Recently, large sets of environmental covariates (e.g. from analysis of terrain on multiple scales) have become more common for DSM. Many DSM studies, however, only compared DSM methods using less than 30 covariates or tested approaches on few responses. We built DSM models from 300–500 covariates using six approaches that are either popular in DSM or promising for large covariate sets.
R. Murray Lark, Elliott M. Hamilton, Belinda Kaninga, Kakoma K. Maseka, Moola Mutondo, Godfrey M. Sakala, and Michael J. Watts
SOIL, 3, 235–244,Short summary
An advantage of geostatistics for mapping soil properties is that, given a statistical model of the variable of interest, we can make a rational decision about how densely to sample so that the map is sufficiently precise. However, uncertainty about the statistical model affects this process. In this paper we show how Bayesian methods can be used to support decision making on sampling with an uncertain model, ensuring that the probability of meeting certain levels of precision is high enough.
Madlene Nussbaum, Lorenz Walthert, Marielle Fraefel, Lucie Greiner, and Andreas Papritz
SOIL, 3, 191–210,Short summary
Digital soil mapping (DSM) relates soil property data to environmental data that describe soil-forming factors. With imagery sampled from satellites or terrain analysed at multiple scales, large sets of possible input to DSM are available. We propose a new statistical framework (geoGAM) that selects parsimonious models for DSM and illustrate the application of geoGAM to two study regions. Straightforward interpretation of the modelled effects likely improves end-user acceptance of DSM products.
Hannes Keck, Bjarne W. Strobel, Jon Petter Gustafsson, and John Koestel
SOIL, 3, 177–189,Short summary
Several studies have shown that the cation adsorption sites in soils are heterogeneously distributed in space. In many soil system models this knowledge is not included yet. In our study we proposed a new method to map the 3-D distribution of cation adsorption sites in undisturbed soils. The method is based on three-dimensional X-ray scanning with a contrast agent and image analysis. We are convinced that this approach will strongly aid the development of more realistic soil system models.
Laura Arata, Katrin Meusburger, Alexandra Bürge, Markus Zehringer, Michael E. Ketterer, Lionel Mabit, and Christine Alewell
SOIL, 3, 113–122,
Christopher Poeplau, Cora Vos, and Axel Don
SOIL, 3, 61–66,Short summary
This paper shows that three out of four frequently used methods to calculate soil organic carbon stocks lead to systematic overestimation of those stocks. Stones, which can be assumed to be free of carbon, have to be corrected for in both bulk density and layer thickness. We used data of the German Agricultural Soil Inventory to illustrate the potential bias and suggest a unified and unbiased calculation method for stocks of soil organic carbon, which is the largest terrestrial carbon pool.
Jan M. van Mourik, Thomas V. Wagner, J. Geert de Boer, and Boris Jansen
SOIL, 2, 299–310,
Ranjith P. Udawatta, Clark J. Gantzer, Stephen H. Anderson, and Shmuel Assouline
SOIL, 2, 211–220,Short summary
Soil compaction degrades soil structure and affects water, heat, and gas exchange as well as root penetration and crop production. The objective of this study was to use X-ray computed microtomography (CMT) techniques to compare differences in geometrical soil pore parameters as influenced by compaction of two different aggregate size classes.
B. Reidy, I. Simo, P. Sills, and R. E. Creamer
SOIL, 2, 25–39,Short summary
This study reviews pedotransfer functions from the literature for different soil and horizon types. It uses these formulae to predict bulk density (ρb) per horizon using measured data of other soil properties. These data were compared to known pb per horizon and recalibrated. These calculations were used to fill missing horizon data in the Irish soil database. This allowed the generation of a pb map to 50 cm. These pb data are at horizon level allowing more accurate estimation of C with depth.
J. J. Keizer, M. A. S. Martins, S. A. Prats, L. F. Santos, D. C. S. Vieira, R. Nogueira, and L. Bilro
SOIL, 1, 641–650,Short summary
In this study, a novel plastic optical fibre turbidity sensor was exhaustively tested with a large set of runoff samples, mainly from a recently burnt area. The different types of samples from the distinct study sites revealed without exception an increase in normalized light loss with increasing sediment concentrations that agreed (reasonably) well with a power function. Nevertheless, sensor-based predictions of sediment concentration should ideally involve site-specific calibrations.
C. Rasmussen, R. E. Gallery, and J. S. Fehmi
SOIL, 1, 631–639,Short summary
There is a need to understand the response of soil systems to predicted climate warming for modeling soil processes. Current experimental methods for soil warming include expensive and difficult to implement active and passive techniques. Here we test a simple, inexpensive in situ passive soil heating approach, based on easy to construct infrared mirrors that do not require automation or enclosures. Results indicated that the infrared mirrors yielded significant heating and drying of soils.
E. Nadal-Romero, J. Revuelto, P. Errea, and J. I. López-Moreno
SOIL, 1, 561–573,Short summary
Geomatic techniques have been routinely applied in erosion studies, providing the opportunity to build high-resolution topographic models.The aim of this study is to assess and compare the functioning of terrestrial laser scanner and close range photogrammetry techniques to evaluate erosion and deposition processes in a humid badlands area. Our results demonstrated that north slopes experienced more intense and faster dynamics than south slopes as well as the highest erosion rates.
L. M. Thomsen, J. E. M. Baartman, R. J. Barneveld, T. Starkloff, and J. Stolte
SOIL, 1, 399–410,
W. Eugster and L. Merbold
SOIL, 1, 187–205,Short summary
The eddy covariance (EC) method has become increasingly popular in soil science. The basic concept of this method and its use in different types of experimental designs in the field are given, and we indicate where progress in advancing and extending the field of applications is made. The greatest strengths of EC measurements in soil science are (1) their uninterrupted continuous measurement of gas concentrations and fluxes and (2) spatial integration over small-scale heterogeneity in the soil.
Adhikari, K., Kheir, R. B., Greve, M. B., and Greve, M. H.: Comparing kriging and regression approaches for mapping soil clay content in a diverse Danish landscape, Soil Sci., 178, 505–517, https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000013, 2013.
Almond, P. C. and Tonkin, P. J.: Pedogenesis by upbuilding in an extreme leaching and weathering environment, and slow loess accretion, south Westland, New Zealand, Geoderma, 92, 1–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00016-6, 1999.
Angers, D. A. and Carter, M. R.: Aggregation and organic matter storage in cool, humid agricultural soils, in: Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils, edited by: Carter, M. R. and Stewart, B. A., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 193–211, 1996.
Ashley, M. D. and Rea, J.: Seasonal vegetation differences from ERTS imagery, Journal of American Society of Photogrammetry, 41, 713–719, 1975.
Bannari, A., Morin, D., Bonn, F., and Huete, A. R.: A review of vegetation indices, Remote Sensing Reviews, 13, 95–120, https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259509532298, 1995.
Bartholic, J. F., Namken, L. N., and Wiegand, C. L.: Aerial thermal scanner to determine temperature of soils and of crop canopies differing in water stress, Agronomy J., 64, 603–608, 1972.
Bartholomeus, H. M., Schaepman, M. E., Kooistra, L., Stevens, A., Hoogmoed, W. B., and Spaargaren, O. S. P.: Spectral reflectance based indices for soil organic carbon quantification, Geoderma, 145, 28–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.010, 2008.
Batjes, N. H.: Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world, European J. Soil Sci., 47, 151–163, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x, 1996.
Beaudette, D. E. and O'Geen, A. T.: Quantifying the aspect affect: an application of solar radiation modeling for soil survey, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 1345–1352, 2009.
Bowman, R. A., Reeder, J. D., and Wienhold, B. J.: Quantifying laboratory and field variability to assess potential for carbon sequestration, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 33, 1629–1642, https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120004304, 2002.
Brenning, A., Koszinski, S., and Sommer, M.: Geostatistical homogenization of soil conductivity across field boundaries, Geoderma, 143, 254–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.007, 2008.
Bui, E. N., Henderson, B. L., and Viergever, K.: Knowledge discovery from models of soil properties developed through data mining, Ecol. Model., 191, 431–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.021, 2006.
Bushnell, T. M.: Some aspects of the soil catena concept, Soil Sci. Soc. Proc., 7, 466–476, 1943.
Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F., and Konopka, A. E.: Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 58, 1501–1511, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x, 1994.
Carlson, T. N., Gilles, R. R., and Perry, E. M.: A method to make use of thermal infrared temperature and NDVI measurements to infer surface soil water content and fractional vegetation cover, Remote Sensing Reviews, 9, 161–173, https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259409532220, 1994.
Churchill, R. R.: Aspect-related differences in badlands slope morphology, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 71, 374–388, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1981.tb01363.x, 1981.
Cuff, J. R. I.: Quantifying erosion-causing parameters in a New Zealand watershed, in: Soil Conservation, edited by: El-Swaify, S. A., Moldenhauer, W. C., and Lo, A., Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, 99–112, 1985.
Daughtry, C. S. T.: Discriminating crop residues from soil by shortwave infrared reflectance, Agronomy J., 93, 125–131, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.931125x, 2001.
Day, A. D. and Intalap, S.: Some effects of soil moisture stress on the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell), Agronomy J., 62, 27–29, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200010009x, 1970.
European Commission: European Soil Database v2, European Soil Data Centre, available at: http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu, last access: 7 October 2014.
FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC: Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2), FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2012.
Frazier, B. E. and Lee, G. B.: Characteristics and classification of three Wisconsin Histosols, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 35, 776–780, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500050040x, 1971.
Gates, F. C.: The bogs of northern lower Michigan, Ecol. Monogr., 12, 216–254, https://doi.org/10.2307/1943542, 1942.
GLCF: Global Land Cover Facility, University of Maryland, available at: http://glcf.umd.edu/data, last access: 19 February 2014.
Goidts, E., Van Wesemael, B., and Crucifix, M.: Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock assessments at various scales, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 723–739, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01157.x, 2009.
Gomez, C., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., and McBratney, A. B.: Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: An Australian case study, Geoderma, 146, 403–411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.011, 2008.
Goodman, L. A.: On the exact variance of products, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 55, 708–713, 1960.
Grace, J.: Understanding and managing the global carbon cycle, J. Ecology, 92, 189–202, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00874.x, 2004.
Grimm, R., Behrens, T., Märker, M., and Elsenbeer, H.: Soil organic carbon concentrations and stocks on Barro Colorado Island – digital soil mapping using random forests analysis, Geoderma, 146, 102–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.008, 2008.
Hatfield, J. L., Gitelson, A. A., Schepers, J. S., and Walthall, C. L.: Application of spectral remote sensing for agronomic decisions, Agronomy J., 100, S117–S131, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0370c, 2008.
Heilman, J. L., Kanemasu, E. T., Rosenberg, N. J., and Blad, B. L.: Thermal scanner measurement of canopy temperatures to estimate evapotranspiration, Remote Sens. Environ., 5, 137–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(76)90044-4, 1976.
Holmes, G., Hall, M., and Frank, E.: Generating rule sets from model trees, Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes Comput. Sc., 1747, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_1, 1999.
Huete, A. R.: A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ., 25, 295–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X, 1988.
Huggett, R. J.: Soil landscape systems: a model of soil genesis, Geoderma, 13, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(75)90035-X, 1975.
Hunckler, R. V. and Schaetzl, R. J.: Spodosol development as affected by geomorphic aspect, Baraga County, Michigan, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 1105–1115, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040017x, 1997.
Jobbágy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B.: The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation, Ecol. Appl., 10, 423–436, https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Johnson, D. L., Keller, E. A., and Rockwell, T. K.: Dynamic pedogenesis: new views on some key concepts, and a model for interpreting quaternary soils, Quaternary Res., 33, 306–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(90)90058-S, 1990.
Johnston, A. E., Poulton, P. R., and Coleman, K.: Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide fluxes, Adv. Agronomy, 101, 1–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00801-8, 2009.
Johnston, C. A., Groffman, P., Breshears, D. D., Cardon, Z. G., Currie, W., Emanuel, W., Gaudinski, J., Jackson, R. B., Lajtha, K., Nadelhoffer, K., Nelson Jr., D., Mac Post, W., Retallack, G., and Wielopolski, L.: Carbon cycling in soil, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 522–528, https://doi.org/10.2307/3868382, 2004.
Kay, B. D.: Soil structure and organic carbon: a review, in: Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, edited by: Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Stewart, B. A., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 169–197, 1998.
Kempen, B., Brus, D. J., and Stoorvogel, J. J.: Three-dimensional mapping of soil organic matter content using soil type-specific depth functions, Geoderma, 162, 107–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.010, 2011.
Kennedy, B. A.: Valley-side slopes and climate, in: Geomorphology and Climate, edited by: Derbyshire, E., John Wiley, London, 171–201, 1976.
Khalil, M. I., Kiely, G., O'Brien, P., and Müller, C.: Organic carbon stocks in agricultural soils in Ireland using combined empirical and GIS approaches, Geoderma, 193–195, 222–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.005, 2013.
Königlich Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt: Geologische Karte von Preußen und benachbarten Bundesstaten, 1:25,000 (Geological Map of Prussia and adjacent Federal States, 1:25,000), Landesamt f. Geologie und Bergwesen, Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany, Sheet Wulfen 4137, 1913a.
Königlich Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt: Geologische Karte von Preußen und benachbarten Bundesstaten, 1:25,000 (Geological Map of Prussia and adjacent Federal States, 1:25,000), Landesamt f. Geologie und Bergwesen, Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany, Sheet Cöthen 4237, 1913b.
Krause, H. H., Rieger, S., and Wilde, S. A.: Soils and forest growth on different aspects in the Tanana watershed of interior Alaska, Ecology, 40, 492–495, https://doi.org/10.2307/1929773, 1959.
Kravchenko, A. N., Robertson, G. P., Hao, X., and Bullock, D. G.: Management practice effects on surface total carbon: differences in spatial variability patterns, Agronomy J., 98, 1559–1568, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0066, 2006a.
Kravchenko, A. N., Robertson, G. P., Snap, S. S., and Smucker, A. J. M.: Using information about spatial variability to improve estimates of total soil carbon, Agronomy J., 98, 823–829, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0305, 2006b.
Ku, H. H.: Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards – C. Engineering and Instrumentation, 70C, 263–273, 1966.
Kühn, J., Brenning, A., Wehrhan, M., Koszinski, S., and Sommer, M.: Interpretation of electrical conductivity patterns by soil properties and geological maps for precision agriculture, Precis. Agric., 10, 490–507, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9103-z, 2009.
Lal, R.: Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security, Science, 304, 1623–1627, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396, 2004.
Lacoste, M., Minasny, B., McBratney, A., Michot, D., Viaud, V., and Walter, C.: High resolution 3D mapping of soil organic carbon in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape, Geoderma, 213, 296–311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.002, 2014.
Lemercier, B., Lacoste, M., Loum, M., and Walter, C.: Extrapolation at regional scale of local soil knowledge using boosted classification trees: a two-step approach, Geoderma, 171–172, 75–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.03.010, 2012.
Li, Z. L., Tang, R., Wan, Z., Bi, Y., Zhou, C., Tang, B., Yan, G., and Zhang, X.: A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data, Sensors, 9, 3801–3853, https://doi.org/10.3390/s90503801, 2009.
Liebens, J. and VanMolle, M.: Influence of estimation procedure on soil organic carbon stock assessment in Flanders, Belgium, Soil Use Manage., 19, 364–371, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2003.tb00327.x, 2003.
Lobell, D. B. and Asner, G. P.: Moisture effects on soil reflectance, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 722–727, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.7220, 2002.
Lowther, J. R., Smethurst, P. J., Carlyle, J. C., and Nambiar, E. K. S.: Methods for determining organic carbon in podzolic sands, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 21, 457–470, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629009368245, 1990.
Lufafa, A., Diédhiou, I., Samba, S. A. N., Séné, M., Khouma, M., Kizito, F., Dick, R. P., Dossa, E., and Noller, J. S.: Carbon stocks and patterns in native shrub communities of Senegal's Peanut Basin, Geoderma, 146, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.024, 2008.
Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., and Minasny, B.: Empirical estimates of uncertainty for mapping continuous depth functions of soil attributes, Geoderma, 160, 614–626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.013, 2011.
Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., and Bibby, J. M.: Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, 521 pp., 1979.
Martin, M. P., Orton, T. G., Lacarce, E., Meersmans, J., Saby, N. P. A., Paroissien, J. B., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., and Arrouays, D.: Evaluation of modelling approaches for predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks at the national scale, Geoderma, 223–225, 97–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.005, 2014.
Martin, M. P., Wattenbach, M., Smith, P., Meersmans, J., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., and Arrouays, D.: Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks in France, Biogeosciences, 8, 1053–1065, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1053-2011, 2011.
McBratney, A. B. and Pringle, M. J.: Estimating average and proportional variograms of soil properties and their potential use in precision agriculture, Precis. Agric., 1, 125–152, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995404447, 1999.
McDonald, E. V. and Busacca, A. J.: Record of pre-late Wisconsin giant floods in the Channeled Scabland interpreted from loess deposits, Geology, 16, 728–731, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0728:ROPLWG>2.3.CO;2, 1988.
Meersmans, J., Van Wesemael, B., De Ridder, F., Fallas Dotti, M., De Baets, S., and Van Molle, M.: Changes in organic carbon distribution with depth in agricultural soils in northern Belgium, 1960–2006, Global Change Biol., 15, 2739–2750, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01855.x, 2009.
Migdall, S., Bach, H., Bobert, J., Wehrhan, M., and Mauser, W.: Inversion of a canopy reflectance model using hyperspectral imagery for monitoring wheat growth and estimating yield, Precis. Agric., 10, 508–524, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-009-9104-6, 2009.
Miller, B. A., Koszinski, S., Wehrhan, M., and Sommer, M., Impact of multi-scale predictor selection for modeling soil properties, Geoderma, 239–240, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.018, 2015.
Minasny, B. and McBratney, A. B.: Regression rules as a tool for predicting soil properties from infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 94, 72–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.06.003, 2008.
Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., Malone, B. P., and Wheeler, I.: Digital mapping of soil carbon, Adv. Agron., 118, 1–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00001-3, 2013.
Mishra, U., Lal, R., Liu, D., and Van Meirvenne, M.: Predicting the spatial variation of the soil organic carbon pool at a regional scale, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74, 906–914, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0158, 2010.
Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., and Ladson, A. R.: Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications, Hydrol. Process., 5, 3–30, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103, 1991.
Mulder, V. L., de Bruin, S., Schaepman, M. E., and Mayr, T. R.: The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping – a review, Geoderma, 162, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018, 2011.
Myneni, R. B., Hall, F. G., Sellers, P. J., and Marshak, A. L.: The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 33, 481–486, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.377948, 1995.
Neemann, W.: Bestimmung des Bodenerodierbarkeitsfaktors für winderosionsgefährdete Böden Norddeutschlands (Determination of soil erodibility factors for wind-erosion endangered soils in Northern Germany), Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe F, 25, 131 pp., 1991.
Nyssen, J., Temesgen, H., Lemenih, M., Zenebe, A., Haregeweyn, N., and Haile, M.: Spatial and temporal variation of soil organic carbon stocks in a lake retreat area of the Ethiopian Rift Valley, Geoderma, 146, 261–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.007, 2008.
Orton, T. G., Pringle, M. J., Page, K. L., Dalal, R. C., and Bishop, T. F. A.: Spatial prediction of soil organic carbon stock using a linear model of coregionalisation, Geoderma, 230–231, 119–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.016, 2014.
Panda, D. K., Singh, R., Kundu, D. K., Chakraborty, H., and Kumar, A.: Improved estimation of soil organic carbon storage uncertainty using first-order Taylor series approximation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1708–1710, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0242N, 2008.
Pennock, D. J. and De Jong, E.: The influence of slope curvature on soil erosion and deposition in hummock terrain, Soil Sci., 144, 209–217, https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198709000-00007, 1987.
Petropoulus, G., Carlson, T. N., Wooster, M. J., and Islam, S.: A review of Ts/VI remote sensing based methods for the retrieval of land surface energy fluxes and soil surface moisture, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 33, 224–250, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309338997, 2009.
Phachomphon, K., Dlamini, P., and Chaplot, V.: Estimating carbon stocks at a regional level using soil information and easily accessible auxiliary variables, Geoderma, 155, 372–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.020, 2010.
Phillips, J. D.: On the relations between complex systems and the factorial model of soil formation (with discussion), Geoderma, 86, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00054-8, 1998.
Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., and Goulding, K. W. T.: Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 62, 42–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x, 2011.
Quinlan, J. R.: Learning with continuous classes, Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 343–348, 1992.
Quinlan, J. R.: Combining instance-based and model-based learning, in: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, edited by: Kaufmann, M., 236–243, 1993.
Quinlan, J. R.: C4.5: Programs for machine learning, Mach. Learn., 16, 235–240, 1994.
Rasmussen, M. S.: Developing simple, operational, consistent NDVI-vegetation models by applying environmental and climatic information: Part I. Assessment of net primary production, Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698216459, 1998.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Saxton, K. E.: Estimation of soil water properties, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 25, 1316–1320, 1982.
Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y. A., Ritchie, J. C., Sobecki, T. M., and Bloodworth, H.: Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention, Geoderma, 116, 61–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00094-6, 2003.
Richards, J. A.: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Springer, 439 pp., 2006.
Richter, D. D. and Markewitz, D.: How deep is soil?, Bioscience, 45, 600–609, https://doi.org/10.2307/1312764, 1995.
Schaetzl, R. J.: Complete soil profile inversion by tree uprooting, Physical Geogr., 7, 181–189, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1986.10642290, 1986.
Schaetzl, R. J.: Effects of treethrow microtopography on the characteristics and genesis of Spodosols, Michigan, USA, Catena, 17, 111–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(90)90002-U, 1990.
Schrumpf, M., Schulze, E. D., Kaiser, K., and Schumacher, J.: How accurately can soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes be quantified by soil inventories?, Biogeosciences, 8, 1193–1212, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1193-2011, 2011.
Schwartz, D. and Namri, M.: Mapping the total organic carbon in the soils of the Congo, Global Planet. Change, 33, 77–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00063-2, 2002.
Selige, S., Böhner, J., and Schmidhalter, U.: High resolution topsoil mapping using hyperspectral image and field data in multivariate regression modeling procedures, Geoderma, 136, 235–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.03.050, 2006.
Simbahan, G. C., Dobermann, A., Goovaerts, P., Ping, J., and Haddix, L.: Fine-resolution mapping of soil organic carbon based on multivariate secondary data, Geoderma, 132, 471–489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.001, 2006.
Snyder, V. A. and Vazquez, M. A.: Structure, in: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, edited by: Hillel, D., Hatfield, J. L., Powlson, D. S., Rozenweig, C., Scow, K. M., Singer, M. J., and Sparks, D. L., Elsevier Academic Press, 54–68, 2005.
Shrestha, D. L. and Solomatine, D. P.: Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output, Neural Networks, 19, 225–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.012, 2006.
Sombroek, W. G., Fearnside, P. M., and Cravo, M.: Geographic assessment of carbon stored in Amazonian terrestrial ecosystems and their soils in particular, in: Global Climate Change and Tropical Ecosystems, edited by: Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., and Stewart, B. A., CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, 375–389, 2000.
Sommer, M., Halm, D., Weller, U., Zarei, M., and Stahr, K.: Lateral podzolization in a granite landscape, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1434–1442, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441434x, 2000.
Sommer, M., Gerke, H. H., and Deumlich, D.: Modelling soil landscape genesis – a "time split" approach for hummocky agricultural landscapes, Geoderma, 145, 480–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.012, 2008.
Soon, Y. K. and Abboud, S.: A comparison of some methods for soil organic carbon determination, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 22, 943–954, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629109368465, 1991.
Stevens, A., Udelhoven, T., Denis, A., Tychon, B., Lioy, R., Hoffmann, L., and van Wesemael, B.: Measuring soil organic carbon in croplands at regional scale using airborne imaging spectroscopy, Geoderma, 158, 32–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.032, 2010.
Sutherland, R. A.: Loss-on-ignition estimates of organic matter and relationships to organic carbon in fluvial sediments, Hydrobiologia, 389, 153–167, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003570219018, 1998.
Taylor, J. R.: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, 2nd Edn., University Science Books, Sausalito, California, USA, 1997.
Ungaro, F., Staffilani, F., and Tarocco, P.: Assessing and mapping topsoil organic carbon stock at regional scale: a scorpan kriging approach conditional on soil map delineations and land use, Land Degrad. Dev., 21, 565–581, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.998, 2010.
USGS: Earth Explorer, US Geological Survey, available at: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov, last access: 19 February 2014.
van Breda Weaver, A.: The distribution of soil erosion as a function of slope aspect and parent material in Ciskei, Southern Africa, GeoJournal, 23, 29–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204406, 1991.
Walter, C., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., and McBratney, A. B.: Spatio-temporal simulation of the field-scale evolution of organic carbon over the landscape, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 1477–1486, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1477, 2003.
Weisstein, E. W.: Error Propagation, Wolfram MathWorld, available at: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ErrorPropagation.html, last access: 25 August 2014.
Wilhelm, W. W., Johnson, J. M. F., Hatfield, J. L., Voorhees, W. B., and Linden, D. R.: Crop and soil productivity response to corn residue removal: a literature review, Agronomy J., 96, 1–17, 2004.
Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C. (Eds.): Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
Xie, Y., Sha, Z., and Yu, M.: Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review, J. Plant Ecol., 1, 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005, 2008.
Zevenbergen, L. W. and Thorne, C. R.: Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 12, 47–56, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120107, 1987.
Zhang, Z., Yu, D., Shi, X., Warner, E., Ren, H., Sun, W., Tan, M., and Wang, H.: Application of categorical information in the spatial prediction of soil organic carbon in the red soil area of China, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 56, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00457.x, 2010.
There are many different strategies for mapping SOC, among which is to model the variables needed to calculate the SOC stock indirectly or to model the SOC stock directly. The purpose of this research was to compare these two approaches for mapping SOC stocks from multiple linear regression models applied at the landscape scale via spatial association. Although the indirect approach had greater spatial variation and higher R2 values, the direct approach had a lower total estimated error.
There are many different strategies for mapping SOC, among which is to model the variables...