Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-23-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-23-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Perspectives on the misconception of levitating soil aggregates
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology – ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
John Koestel
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7014, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
Alice Johannes
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Olivier Heller
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Sebastian Doetterl
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology – ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology – ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA
Thomas Keller
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7014, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
Related authors
Moritz Mainka, Laura Summerauer, Daniel Wasner, Gina Garland, Marco Griepentrog, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, and Sebastian Doetterl
Biogeosciences, 19, 1675–1689, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1675-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1675-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The largest share of terrestrial carbon is stored in soils, making them highly relevant as regards global change. Yet, the mechanisms governing soil carbon stabilization are not well understood. The present study contributes to a better understanding of these processes. We show that qualitative changes in soil organic matter (SOM) co-vary with alterations of the soil matrix following soil weathering. Hence, the type of SOM that is stabilized in soils might change as soils develop.
Mario Reichenbach, Peter Fiener, Gina Garland, Marco Griepentrog, Johan Six, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL, 7, 453–475, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-453-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-453-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In deeply weathered tropical rainforest soils of Africa, we found that patterns of soil organic carbon stocks differ between soils developed from geochemically contrasting parent material due to differences in the abundance of organo-mineral complexes, the presence/absence of chemical stabilization mechanisms of carbon with minerals and the presence of fossil organic carbon from sedimentary rocks. Physical stabilization mechanisms by aggregation provide additional protection of soil carbon.
Johanne Lebrun Thauront, Philippa Ascough, Sebastian Doetterl, Negar Haghipour, Pierre Barré, Christian Walter, and Samuel Abiven
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2693, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2693, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Fire-derived carbon is a form of organic carbon that has a long persistence in soils. However, its persistence at the landscape scale may be underestimated due to lateral and vertical redistribution. We measured fire-derived carbon in soils of a hilly agricultural watershed to identify the result of transport processes on the centennial time-scale. We show that the subsoil stores a large amount of fire-derived carbon and that erosion can redistribute it to localized accumulation zones.
Lei Zhang, Lin Yang, Thomas W. Crowther, Constantin M. Zohner, Sebastian Doetterl, Gerard B. M. Heuvelink, Alexandre M. J.-C. Wadoux, A.-Xing Zhu, Yue Pu, Feixue Shen, Haozhi Ma, Yibiao Zou, and Chenghu Zhou
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2605–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2605-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2605-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Current understandings of depth-dependent variations and controls of soil organic carbon turnover time (τ) at global, biome, and local scales remain incomplete. We used the state-of-the-art soil and root profile databases and satellite observations to generate new spatially explicit global maps of topsoil and subsoil τ, with quantified uncertainties for better user applications. The new insights from the resulting maps will facilitate efforts to model the carbon cycle and will support effective carbon management.
Annina Maier, Maria E. Macfarlane, Marco Griepentrog, and Sebastian Doetterl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2006, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2006, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A systematic analysis of the interaction between pedo- and biosphere in shaping alpine soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks remains missing. Our regional-scale study of alpine SOC stocks across five parent materials shows that plant biomass is not a strong control of SOC stocks. Rather, the greatest SOC stocks are linked to more weathered soil profiles with higher Fe and Al pedogenic oxide content, showing the importance of parent material weatherability and geochemistry for SOC stabilization.
Hanna Sjulgård, Lukas Valentin Graf, Tino Colombi, Juliane Hirte, Thomas Keller, and Helge Aasen
Biogeosciences, 22, 1341–1354, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1341-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1341-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study showed that stress-related crop response to changing environmental conditions can be detected by monitoring crops using satellite images at the landscape level. This could be useful for farmers to identify when stresses occur. Our results also suggest that satellite imagery can be used to discover soil impacts on crop development at farm fields. The inclusion of soil properties in satellite image analyses could further improve the accuracy of the prediction of drought stress on crops.
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3391–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic properties of soils. The appropriateness of these predictions critically relies on the nature of the datasets for training the PTFs and the physical comprehensiveness of the models. This roadmap paper is addressed to PTF developers and users and critically reflects the utility and future of PTFs. To this end, we present a manifesto aiming at a paradigm shift in PTF research.
Johan Six, Sebastian Doetterl, Moritz Laub, Claude R. Müller, and Marijn Van de Broek
SOIL, 10, 275–279, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-275-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil C saturation has been tested in several recent studies and led to a debate about its existence. We argue that, to test C saturation, one should pay attention to six fundamental principles: the right measures, the right units, the right dispersive energy and application, the right soil type, the right clay type, and the right saturation level. Once we take care of those six rights across studies, we find support for a maximum of C stabilized by minerals and thus soil C saturation.
Shane W. Stoner, Marion Schrumpf, Alison Hoyt, Carlos A. Sierra, Sebastian Doetterl, Valier Galy, and Susan Trumbore
Biogeosciences, 20, 3151–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3151-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3151-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Soils store more carbon (C) than any other terrestrial C reservoir, but the processes that control how much C stays in soil, and for how long, are very complex. Here, we used a recent method that involves heating soil in the lab to measure the range of C ages in soil. We found that most C in soil is decades to centuries old, while some stays for much shorter times (days to months), and some is thousands of years old. Such detail helps us to estimate how soil C may react to changing climate.
Guillaume Blanchy, Lukas Albrecht, Gilberto Bragato, Sarah Garré, Nicholas Jarvis, and John Koestel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2703–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2703-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2703-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We collated the Open Tension-disk Infiltrometer Meta-database (OTIM). We analysed topsoil hydraulic conductivities at supply tensions between 0 and 100 mm of 466 data entries. We found indications of different flow mechanisms at saturation and at tensions >20 mm. Climate factors were better correlated with near-saturated hydraulic conductivities than soil properties. Land use, tillage system, soil compaction and experimenter bias significantly influenced K to a similar degree to soil properties.
Guillaume Blanchy, Lukas Albrecht, John Koestel, and Sarah Garré
SOIL, 9, 155–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-155-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Adapting agricultural practices to future climatic conditions requires us to synthesize the effects of management practices on soil properties with respect to local soil and climate. We showcase different automated text-processing methods to identify topics, extract metadata for building a database and summarize findings from publication abstracts. While human intervention remains essential, these methods show great potential to support evidence synthesis from large numbers of publications.
Moritz Mainka, Laura Summerauer, Daniel Wasner, Gina Garland, Marco Griepentrog, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, and Sebastian Doetterl
Biogeosciences, 19, 1675–1689, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1675-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1675-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The largest share of terrestrial carbon is stored in soils, making them highly relevant as regards global change. Yet, the mechanisms governing soil carbon stabilization are not well understood. The present study contributes to a better understanding of these processes. We show that qualitative changes in soil organic matter (SOM) co-vary with alterations of the soil matrix following soil weathering. Hence, the type of SOM that is stabilized in soils might change as soils develop.
Pengzhi Zhao, Daniel Joseph Fallu, Sara Cucchiaro, Paolo Tarolli, Clive Waddington, David Cockcroft, Lisa Snape, Andreas Lang, Sebastian Doetterl, Antony G. Brown, and Kristof Van Oost
Biogeosciences, 18, 6301–6312, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6301-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6301-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the factors controlling the soil organic carbon (SOC) stability and temperature sensitivity of abandoned prehistoric agricultural terrace soils. Results suggest that the burial of former topsoil due to terracing provided an SOC stabilization mechanism. Both the soil C : N ratio and SOC mineral protection regulate soil SOC temperature sensitivity. However, which mechanism predominantly controls SOC temperature sensitivity depends on the age of the buried terrace soils.
Laura Summerauer, Philipp Baumann, Leonardo Ramirez-Lopez, Matti Barthel, Marijn Bauters, Benjamin Bukombe, Mario Reichenbach, Pascal Boeckx, Elizabeth Kearsley, Kristof Van Oost, Bernard Vanlauwe, Dieudonné Chiragaga, Aimé Bisimwa Heri-Kazi, Pieter Moonen, Andrew Sila, Keith Shepherd, Basile Bazirake Mujinya, Eric Van Ranst, Geert Baert, Sebastian Doetterl, and Johan Six
SOIL, 7, 693–715, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-693-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-693-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a soil mid-infrared library with over 1800 samples from central Africa in order to facilitate soil analyses of this highly understudied yet critical area. Together with an existing continental library, we demonstrate a regional analysis and geographical extrapolation to predict total carbon and nitrogen. Our results show accurate predictions and highlight the value that the data contribute to existing libraries. Our library is openly available for public use and for expansion.
Benjamin Bukombe, Peter Fiener, Alison M. Hoyt, Laurent K. Kidinda, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL, 7, 639–659, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-639-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Through a laboratory incubation experiment, we investigated the spatial patterns of specific maximum heterotrophic respiration in tropical African mountain forest soils developed from contrasting parent material along slope gradients. We found distinct differences in soil respiration between soil depths and geochemical regions related to soil fertility and the chemistry of the soil solution. The topographic origin of our samples was not a major determinant of the observed rates of respiration.
Sebastian Doetterl, Rodrigue K. Asifiwe, Geert Baert, Fernando Bamba, Marijn Bauters, Pascal Boeckx, Benjamin Bukombe, Georg Cadisch, Matthew Cooper, Landry N. Cizungu, Alison Hoyt, Clovis Kabaseke, Karsten Kalbitz, Laurent Kidinda, Annina Maier, Moritz Mainka, Julia Mayrock, Daniel Muhindo, Basile B. Mujinya, Serge M. Mukotanyi, Leon Nabahungu, Mario Reichenbach, Boris Rewald, Johan Six, Anna Stegmann, Laura Summerauer, Robin Unseld, Bernard Vanlauwe, Kristof Van Oost, Kris Verheyen, Cordula Vogel, Florian Wilken, and Peter Fiener
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4133–4153, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The African Tropics are hotspots of modern-day land use change and are of great relevance for the global carbon cycle. Here, we present data collected as part of the DFG-funded project TropSOC along topographic, land use, and geochemical gradients in the eastern Congo Basin and the Albertine Rift. Our database contains spatial and temporal data on soil, vegetation, environmental properties, and land management collected from 136 pristine tropical forest and cropland plots between 2017 and 2020.
Mario Reichenbach, Peter Fiener, Gina Garland, Marco Griepentrog, Johan Six, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL, 7, 453–475, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-453-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-453-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In deeply weathered tropical rainforest soils of Africa, we found that patterns of soil organic carbon stocks differ between soils developed from geochemically contrasting parent material due to differences in the abundance of organo-mineral complexes, the presence/absence of chemical stabilization mechanisms of carbon with minerals and the presence of fossil organic carbon from sedimentary rocks. Physical stabilization mechanisms by aggregation provide additional protection of soil carbon.
Joseph Tamale, Roman Hüppi, Marco Griepentrog, Laban Frank Turyagyenda, Matti Barthel, Sebastian Doetterl, Peter Fiener, and Oliver van Straaten
SOIL, 7, 433–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-433-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-433-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes were measured monthly from nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), N and P, and control plots of the first nutrient manipulation experiment located in an African pristine tropical forest using static chambers. The results suggest (1) contrasting soil GHG responses to nutrient addition, hence highlighting the complexity of the tropical forests, and (2) that the feedback of tropical forests to the global soil GHG budget could be altered by changes in N and P availability.
Florian Wilken, Peter Fiener, Michael Ketterer, Katrin Meusburger, Daniel Iragi Muhindo, Kristof van Oost, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL, 7, 399–414, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-399-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-399-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates the usability of fallout radionuclides 239Pu and 240Pu as a tool to assess soil degradation processes in tropical Africa, which is particularly valuable in regions with limited infrastructure and challenging monitoring conditions for landscape-scale soil degradation monitoring. The study shows no indication of soil redistribution in forest sites but substantial soil redistribution in cropland (sedimentation >40 cm in 55 years) with high variability.
Sophie F. von Fromm, Alison M. Hoyt, Markus Lange, Gifty E. Acquah, Ermias Aynekulu, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, Stephan M. Haefele, Steve P. McGrath, Keith D. Shepherd, Andrew M. Sila, Johan Six, Erick K. Towett, Susan E. Trumbore, Tor-G. Vågen, Elvis Weullow, Leigh A. Winowiecki, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL, 7, 305–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-305-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-305-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated various soil and climate properties that influence soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations in sub-Saharan Africa. Our findings indicate that climate and geochemistry are equally important for explaining SOC variations. The key SOC-controlling factors are broadly similar to those for temperate regions, despite differences in soil development history between the two regions.
Surya Gupta, Tomislav Hengl, Peter Lehmann, Sara Bonetti, and Dani Or
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1593–1612, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1593-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1593-2021, 2021
Mengyuan Mu, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna M. Ukkola, Andy J. Pitman, Teresa E. Gimeno, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dani Or, Jinyan Yang, and David S. Ellsworth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 447–471, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-447-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-447-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface model (LSM) is a critical tool to study land responses to droughts and heatwaves, but lacking comprehensive observations limited past model evaluations. Here we use a novel dataset at a water-limited site, evaluate a typical LSM with a range of competing model hypotheses widely used in LSMs and identify marked uncertainty due to the differing process assumptions. We show the extensive observations constrain model processes and allow better simulated land responses to these extremes.
Simon Baumgartner, Matti Barthel, Travis William Drake, Marijn Bauters, Isaac Ahanamungu Makelele, John Kalume Mugula, Laura Summerauer, Nora Gallarotti, Landry Cizungu Ntaboba, Kristof Van Oost, Pascal Boeckx, Sebastian Doetterl, Roland Anton Werner, and Johan Six
Biogeosciences, 17, 6207–6218, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6207-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6207-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soil respiration is an important carbon flux and key process determining the net ecosystem production of terrestrial ecosystems. The Congo Basin lacks studies quantifying carbon fluxes. We measured soil CO2 fluxes from different forest types in the Congo Basin and were able to show that, even though soil CO2 fluxes are similarly high in lowland and montane forests, the drivers were different: soil moisture in montane forests and C availability in the lowland forests.
Laurent K. Kidinda, Folasade K. Olagoke, Cordula Vogel, Karsten Kalbitz, and Sebastian Doetterl
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2020-80, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2020-80, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
In deeply weathered tropical rainforest soils of Africa, we found that patterns of microbial processes differ between soils developed from geochemically contrasting parent materials due to differences in resource availability. Across investigated geochemical regions and soil depths, soil microbes were P-limited rather than N-limited. Topsoil microbes were more C-limited than their subsoil counterparts but inversely P-limited.
Katharina Hildegard Elisabeth Meurer, Claire Chenu, Elsa Coucheney, Anke Marianne Herrmann, Thomas Keller, Thomas Kätterer, David Nimblad Svensson, and Nicholas Jarvis
Biogeosciences, 17, 5025–5042, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5025-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5025-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present a simple model that describes, for the first time, the dynamic two-way interactions between soil organic matter and soil physical properties (porosity, pore size distribution, bulk density and layer thickness). The model was able to accurately reproduce the changes in soil organic carbon, soil bulk density and surface elevation observed during 63 years in a field trial, as well as soil water retention curves measured at the end of the experimental period.
Cited articles
Amelung, W., Tang, N., Siebers, N., Aehnelt, M., Eusterhues, V., Felde, G., Kaiser, K., Kögel-Knaber, I., Klumpp, E., Knief, C., Kruse, J., Lehndorff, E., Mikutta, R., Peth, S., Ray, N., Prechtel, A., Ritschel, T., Schweizer, S., Woche, S., Wu, B., and Totsche, K.: Architecture of soil microaggregates: Advanced methodologies to explore properties and functions, J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202300149, 2023.
Amézketa, E.: Soil aggregate stability: A Review, J. Sustain. Agric., 14, 83–151, https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v14n02_08, 1999.
Baveye, P. C.: Bypass and hyperbole in soil research: Worrisome practices critically reviewed through examples, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 72, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12941, 2020.
Blanco-Canqui, H. and Lal, R.: Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 23, 481–504, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490886842, 2004.
Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review, Geoderma, 124, 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005, 2005.
Chenu, C., Puget, P., and Balesdent, J.: Clay-organic matter associations in soils: Microstructure and contribution to soil physical stability, Proceedings of the 16th World Congress of Soil Science, Montpellier, France, 20–26 August 1998, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232322209_Clay-organic_matter_associations_in_soils_microstructure_and_contribution_to_soil_physical_stability (last access: 8 January 2024), 1998.
De Gryze, S., Six, J. and Merckx, R.: Quantifying water-stable soil aggregate turnover and its implication for soil organic matter dynamics in a model study, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 57, 693–707, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00760.x, 2006.
Dexter, A. R.: Advances in characterization of soil structure, Soil Till. Res., 11, 199–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(88)90002-5, 1988.
Edwards, A. P. and Bremner, J. M.: Microaggregates in soils, J. Soil Sci., 18, 64–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1967.tb01488.x, 1967.
Elliott, E. T. and D. C. Coleman: Let the Soil Work for Us, Ecol. Bull., 39, 23–32, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20112982 (last access: 7 January 2024), 1988.
Emerson, W.: The structure of soil crumbs, J. Soil Sci, 10, 235–244, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1959.tb02346.x, 1959.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): International Year of Soils 2015 Infographics, https://www.fao.org/soils-2015/resources/information-material/en/ (last access: 13 December 2021), 2015.
Fukumasu, J., Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Kätterer, T., and Larsbo, M.: Relations between soil organic carbon content and the pore size distribution for an arable topsoil with large variations in soil properties, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 73, e13212, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13212, 2021.
Gerke, K. M., Korostilev, E. V., Romanenko, K. A., and Karsanina, M.: Going submicron in the precise analysis of soil structure: A FIB-SEM imaging study at nanoscale, Geoderma, 383, 114739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114739, 2021.
Hemingway, J. D., Rothman, D. H., Grant, K. E., Rosengard, S. Z., Eglinton, T. I., Derry, L. A., and Galy, V. V.: Mineral protection regulates long-term global preservation of natural organic carbon, Nature 570, 228–231, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6, 2019.
Kay, B. V.: Rates of change of soil structure under different cropping systems, in: Advances in Soil Science, edited by: Stewart, B. A., vol. 12, Springer, New York, NY, 1–41, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3316-9_1, 1990.
Kemper, W. D. and Chepil, W. S.: Size distribution of aggregates, In Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling, vol. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, USA, 499–510, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c39, 1965.
Kemper, W. D. and Rosenau, R. C.: Aggregate stability and size distribution, In Methods of soil analysis, part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Inc., 425–442, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17, 1986.
Koestel, J., Fukumasu, J., Garland, G., Larsbo, M., and Svensson, D.: Approaches to delineate aggregates in intact soil using X-ray imaging, Geoderma, 402, 115360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115360, 2021.
Kravchenko, A., Otten, W., Garnier, P., Pot, V., and Baveye, P. C.: Soil aggregates as biogeochemical reactors: Not a way forward in the research on soil–atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 2205–2208, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14640, 2019.
Lal, R.: Soil structure and sustainability, J. Sustain. Agric., 1, 67–92, https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v01n04_06, 1991.
Lal, R., Bouma, J., Brevik, E., Dawson, L., Field, D. J., Glaser, B., Hatano, R., Hartemink, A. E., Kosaki, T., Lascelles, B., Monger, C., Muggler, C., Ndzana, G. M., Norra, S., Pan, X., Paradelo, R., Reyes-Sánchez, L. B., Sandén, T., Singh, B. R., Spiegel, H., Yanai, J., and Zhang, J.: Soils and sustainable development goals of the United Nations: An international union of soil sciences perspective, Geoderma Reg., 25, e00398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398, 2021.
Lavallee, J., Soong, J., and Cotrufo, M. F.: Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 261–273, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859, 2019.
Lehmann, A., Leifheit, E. F., and Rillig, M. C.: Chapter 14 – Mycorrhizas and Soil Aggregation, in: Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil, edited by: Collins Johnson, N., Gehring, C., and Jansa, J., Elsevier, 241–262, Paperback ISBN 9780128043127, eBook ISBN 9780128043837, 2017.
Lehmann, J., Bossio, D., Kögel-Knabner, I., and Rillig, M.: The concept and future prospects of soil health, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 544–553, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8, 2020.
Letey, J.: The study of soil structure- science or art, Aust. J. Soil Res., 29, 699–707, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910699, 1991.
Lucas, M.: Perspectives from the Fritz-Scheffer Awardee 2020 – The mutual interactions between roots and soil structure and how these affect rhizosphere processes, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 185, 8–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100385, 2021.
Martin, J., Martin, W., Page, J., Raney, W. A., and de Ment, J. D.: Soil aggregation, Adv. Agron., 7, 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60333-8, 1955.
Nimmo, J.: Aggregation: Physical Aspects, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.05087-9, 2013.
Oades, J. M.: Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management, Plant Soil, 76, 319–337, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205590, 1984.
Or, D., Keller, T., and Schlesinger, W.: Natural and managed soil structure: on the fragile scaffolding for soil functioning, Soil Till. Res., 208, 104912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104912, 2021.
Papadopoulos, A.: Soil aggregates, structure, and stability, in: Encyclopedia of Agrophysics, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, edited by: Gliński, J., Horabik, J., and Lipiec, J., Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3585-1_142, 2011.
Pihlap, E., Steffens, M., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Initial soil aggregate formation and stabilization in soils developed from calcareous loess, Geoderma, 385, 114854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114854, 2021.
Piron, D., Boizard, H., Heddadj, D., Peres, G., Hallaire, V., and Cluzeau, D.: Indicators of earthworm bioturbation to improve visual assessment of soil structure, Soil Till. Res., 173, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.10.013, 2017.
Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlueter, S., and Vogel, H. J.: Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review, Geoderma, 314, 122–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009, 2018.
Rillig, M. C. and Mummey, D. L.: Mycorrhizas and soil structure, New Phytol., 171, 41–53, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x, 2006.
Schlüter, S., Eickhorst, T., and Mueller, C. W: Correlative Imaging Reveals Holistic View of Soil Microenvironments. Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 829–837, 2019.
Schlüter, S., Sammartino, S., and Koestel, J.: Exploring the relationship between soil structure and soil functions via pore-scale imaging, Geoderma, 370, 114370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114370, 2020.
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., and Paustian, K.: Soil structure and soil organic matter: II. A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1042–1049, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6431042x, 2000a.
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., and Paustian, K.: Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 2099–2103, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6, 2000b.
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., and Denef, K.: A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics, Soil Till. Res., 79, 7–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008, 2004.
Soil Science Society of America (SSSA): Glossary of soil science terms, SSSA, Madison, WI, https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary/browse/ (last access: 8 January 2024), 1997.
Sullivan, P. L., Billings, S., Hirmas, D., Li, L., Zhang, X., Ziegler, S., Murenbeeld, K., Ajami, H., Guthrie, A., Singha, K., Gimenez, D., Duro, A., Moreno, V., Flores, A., Cueva, A., Koop, Aronson, E. L., Barnard, H. R., Banwart, S. A., Keen, R. M., Nemes, A., Nikolaidis, N. P., Nippert, J. B., Richter, D., Robinson, D. A., Sadayappan, K., de Souza, L. F. T., Unruh, M., and Wen, H.: Embracing the dynamic nature of soil structure: A paradigm illuminating the role of life in critical zones of the Anthropocene, Earth Sci. Rev., 225, 103873, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103873, 2021.
Tisdall, J. M. and Oades, J. M.: Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils, J. Soil Sci., 33, 141–163, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x, 1982.
Totsche, K. U., Amelung, W., Gerzabek, M. H., Guggenberger, G., Klumpp, E. Knief, C., Lehndorff, E., Mikutta, R., Peth, S., Prechtel, A., Ray, N., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Microaggregates in soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 181, 104–136, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600451, 2018.
Vidal, A., Hirte, J., Bender, S. F., Mayer, J., Gattinger, A., Höschen, C., Schädler, S., Iqbal, T., and Mueller, C.: Linking 3D soil structure and plant-microbe-soil carbon transfer in the rhizosphere, Front. Environ. Sci., 6, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00009, 2018.
Vogel, H. J., Balseiro-Romero, M., Kravchenko, A., Otten, W., Pot, V., Schlüter, S., Weller, U., and Baveye, P. C.: A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 73, e1315, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13152, 2021.
Wang, B., Brewer, P. E., Shugart, H. H., Lerdau, M. T., and Allison, S. D.: Soil aggregates as biogeochemical reactors and implications for soil–atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases – A concept, Glob. Chang. Biol., 25, 373–385, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14515, 2019.
Weng, Z., Lehmann, J., Van Zwieten, L., Joseph, S., Archanjo, B., Cowie, B., Thomsen, L., Tobin, M., Vongsvivut, J., Klein, A., Doolette, C., Hou, H., Mueller, C., Lombi, E., and Kopittke, P.: Probing the nature of the soil organic matter, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 4072–4093, https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1980346, 2022.
Wilkinson, M., Richards, P., and Humphreys, G.: Breaking ground: Pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation, Earth Sci. Rev., 97, 257–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.09.005, 2009.
Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W., and Rappoldt, C.: New methods and models for characterizing structural heterogeneity of soil, Soil Till. Res., 61, 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00188-X, 2001.
Yudina, A. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Saving the face of soil aggregates, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 3574–3577, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14779, 2019.
Yudina, A. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Dual nature of soil structure: The unity of aggregates and pores, Geoderma, 434, 116478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116478, 2023.
Yudina, A., Fomin, D. S., Kotelnikova, A. D., and Milanovskii, E. Y.: From the notion of elementary soil particle to the particle-size and microaggregate-size distribution analyses: A review, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 51, 136–1347, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318110091, 2018.
Short summary
The concept of soil aggregates is hotly debated, leading to confusion about their function or relevancy to soil processes. We propose that the use of conceptual figures showing detached and isolated aggregates can be misleading and has contributed to this skepticism. Here, we conceptually illustrate how aggregates can form and dissipate within the context of undisturbed soils, highlighting the fact that aggregates do not necessarily need to have distinct physical boundaries.
The concept of soil aggregates is hotly debated, leading to confusion about their function or...