Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-489-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-489-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Original research article
| 
08 Jul 2025
Original research article |
| 08 Jul 2025
| 08 Jul 2025
Evaluating N2O emissions and carbon sequestration in temperate croplands with cover crops: insights from field trials
Victoria Nasser
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
René Dechow
Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Mirjam Helfrich
Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Ana Meijide
Environment Modeling, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Pauline Sophie Rummel
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
Department of Biology, Microbiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Heinz-Josef Koch
Department of Agronomy, Institute of Sugar Beet Research, 37079 Göttingen, Germany
Reiner Ruser
Department of Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Lisa Essich
Department of Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Klaus Dittert
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Beatriz P. Cazorla, Ana Meijide, Javier Cabello, Julio Peñas, Rodrigo Vargas, Javier Martínez-López, Leonardo Montagnani, Alexander Knohl, Lukas Siebicke, Benimiano Gioli, Jiří Dušek, Ladislav Šigut, Andreas Ibrom, Georg Wohlfahrt, Eugénie Paul-Limoges, Kathrin Fuchs, Antonio Manco, Marian Pavelka, Lutz Merbold, Lukas Hörtnagl, Pierpaolo Duce, Ignacio Goded, Kim Pilegaard, and Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2835, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2835, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We assess whether satellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) reflect spatial heterogeneity in carbon fluxes across Europe. Using Eddy Covariance data from 50 sites, we show that EFTs capture distinct Net Ecosystem Exchange dynamics and perform slightly better than PFTs. EFTs offer a scalable, annually updatable approach to monitor ecosystem functioning and its interannual variability.
Konstantin Aiteew, Jarno Rouhiainen, Claas Nendel, and René Dechow
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1349–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the biogeochemical model MONICA and its performance in simulating soil organic carbon changes. MONICA can reproduce plant growth, carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil water and temperature. The model results were compared with five established carbon turnover models. With the exception of certain sites, adequate reproduction of soil organic carbon stock change rates was achieved. The MONICA model was capable of performing similar to or even better than the other models.
Balázs Grosz, Reinhard Well, Rene Dechow, Jan Reent Köster, Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil, Simone Merl, Andreas Rode, Bianca Ziehmer, Amanda Matson, and Hongxing He
Biogeosciences, 18, 5681–5697, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To assure quality predictions biogeochemical models must be current. We use data measured using novel incubation methods to test the denitrification sub-modules of three models. We aim to identify limitations in the denitrification modeling to inform next steps for development. Several areas are identified, most urgently improved denitrification control parameters and further testing with high-temporal-resolution datasets. Addressing these would significantly improve denitrification modeling.
Fabian Kalks, Gabriel Noren, Carsten W. Mueller, Mirjam Helfrich, Janet Rethemeyer, and Axel Don
SOIL, 7, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-347-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-347-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Sedimentary rocks contain organic carbon that may end up as soil carbon. However, this source of soil carbon is overlooked and has not been quantified sufficiently. We analysed 10 m long sediment cores with three different sedimentary rocks. All sediments contain considerable amounts of geogenic carbon contributing 3 %–12 % to the total soil carbon below 30 cm depth. The low 14C content of geogenic carbon can result in underestimations of soil carbon turnover derived from 14C data.
Patrick Wordell-Dietrich, Anja Wotte, Janet Rethemeyer, Jörg Bachmann, Mirjam Helfrich, Kristina Kirfel, Christoph Leuschner, and Axel Don
Biogeosciences, 17, 6341–6356, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6341-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6341-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The release of CO2 from soils, known as soil respiration, plays a major role in the global carbon cycle. However, the contributions of different soil depths or the sources of soil CO2 have hardly been studied. We quantified the CO2 production for different soil layers (up to 1.5 m) in three soil profiles for 2 years. We found that 90 % of CO2 production occurs in the first 30 cm of the soil profile, and that the CO2 originated from young carbon sources, as revealed by radiocarbon measurements.
Pauline Sophie Rummel, Birgit Pfeiffer, Johanna Pausch, Reinhard Well, Dominik Schneider, and Klaus Dittert
Biogeosciences, 17, 1181–1198, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1181-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1181-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical composition of plant litter controls C availability for biological N transformation processes in soil. In this study, we showed that easily degradable maize shoots stimulated microbial respiration and mineralization leading to high N2O formation in litter-associated hot spots. A higher share of slowly degradable C compounds and lower concentrations of water-soluble N restricted N2O emissions from maize roots. Bacterial community structure reflected degradability of maize litter.
Christian Stiegler, Ana Meijide, Yuanchao Fan, Ashehad Ashween Ali, Tania June, and Alexander Knohl
Biogeosciences, 16, 2873–2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2873-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2873-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We show the response of a commercial oil palm plantation in Indonesia to the extreme El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event in 2015. Our measurements and model suggest that without human-induced forest fires and related smoke emissions, the observed negative impact on oil palm carbon dioxide greenhouse gas fluxes, carbon accumulation and yield due to ENSO-related drought would have been less pronounced. With respect to climate change we highlight the importance of fire prevention in the area.
A. Röll, F. Niu, A. Meijide, A. Hardanto, Hendrayanto, A. Knohl, and D. Hölscher
Biogeosciences, 12, 5619–5633, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5619-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5619-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The study provides first insight into eco-hydrological consequences of the continuing oil palm expansion in the tropics. Stand transpiration rates of some studied oil palm stands compared to or even exceeded values reported for tropical forests, indicating high water use of oil palms under certain conditions. Oil palm landscapes show some spatial variations in (evapo)transpiration rates, e.g. due to varying plantation age, but the day-to-day variability of oil palm transpiration is rather low.
Related subject area
Soils and global change
Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system
Missing the input: the underrepresentation of plant physiology in global soil carbon research
Large errors in soil carbon measurements attributed to inconsistent sample processing
Research at the interface between Indigenous knowledge and soil science; weaving knowledges to understand horticultural land use in Aotearoa New Zealand
Soil is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change
Impact of crop type on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of a rewetted cultivated peatland
Thermodynamic and hydrological drivers of the soil and bedrock thermal regimes in central Spain
The effect of different biopreparations on soil physical properties and CO2 emissions when growing winter wheat and oilseed rape
Earthworm-invaded boreal forest soils harbour distinct microbial communities
Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay
Effects of a warmer climate and forest composition on soil carbon cycling, soil organic matter stability and stocks in a humid boreal region
Effects of mild alternate wetting and drying irrigation and rice straw application on N2O emissions in rice cultivation
Whole-soil warming decreases abundance and modifies the community structure of microorganisms in the subsoil but not in surface soil
Short- and long-term temperature responses of soil denitrifier net N2O efflux rates, inter-profile N2O dynamics, and microbial genetic potentials
Acute glyphosate exposure does not condition the response of microbial communities to a dry–rewetting disturbance in a soil with a long history of glyphosate-based herbicides
Depletion of soil carbon and aggregation after strong warming of a subarctic Andosol under forest and grassland cover
Effect of deforestation and subsequent land use management on soil carbon stocks in the South American Chaco
The effects of worms, clay and biochar on CO2 emissions during production and soil application of co-composts
Climate and soil factors influencing seedling recruitment of plant species used for dryland restoration
A call for international soil experiment networks for studying, predicting, and managing global change impacts
Global distribution of soil organic carbon – Part 2: Certainty of changes related to land use and climate
The economics of soil C sequestration and agricultural emissions abatement
Samuel Franco-Luesma, María Alonso-Ayuso, Benjamin Wolf, Borja Latorre, and Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes
SOIL, 11, 523–533, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-523-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-523-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Agriculture may play a significant role in climate change mitigation. For this reason, it is necessary to have good estimations of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural activities. In this work, two different chamber systems to determine GHGs were compared. Our results highlighted that automated chamber systems, compared to manual chamber systems, are a powerful tool for quantifying GHG fluxes, allowing us to capture the large temporal variability that characterizes them.
Sajjad Raza, Hannah V. Cooper, Nicholas T. Girkin, Matthew S. Kent, Malcolm J. Bennett, Sacha J. Mooney, and Tino Colombi
SOIL, 11, 363–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-363-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-363-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Plant physiology has been addressed by less than 10 % of peer-reviewed soil organic carbon research published in the last century. Thus, our understanding of soil carbon dynamics is overwhelmingly built on research that neglects the fundamental processes underlying organic carbon inputs. Active engagement of plant scientists in soil carbon research is imperative for shedding light on this blind spot and developing holistic policies that support soil carbon sequestration.
Rebecca J. Even, Megan B. Machmuller, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Tamara J. Zelikova, and M. Francesca Cotrufo
SOIL, 11, 17–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-17-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-17-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a service soil laboratory comparison study and tested the individual effect of common sieving, grinding, drying, and quantification methods on total, inorganic, and organic soil carbon (C) measurements. We found that inter-lab variability is large and each soil processing step impacts C measurement accuracy and/or precision. Standardizing soil processing methods is needed to ensure C measurements are accurate and precise, especially for C credit allocation and model calibration.
Julie Gillespie, Matiu Payne, Dione Payne, Sarah Edwards, Dyanna Jolly, Carol Smith, and Jo-Anne Cavanagh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3546, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Addressing soil health and food security challenges requires weaving different ways of knowing. This paper presents a case study from New Zealand, showing how combining soil science with mātauraka Māori (Māori knowledge) helps reveal past food growing practices, guiding efforts to restore traditional horticulture and enhance Māori soil health. This study also offers a practical example of integrating knowledge systems to tackle complex environmental issues in real-world contexts.
Peter M. Kopittke, Ram C. Dalal, Brigid A. McKenna, Pete Smith, Peng Wang, Zhe Weng, Frederik J. T. van der Bom, and Neal W. Menzies
SOIL, 10, 873–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-873-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil produces 98.8 % of the calories consumed by humans, but the contribution that the anthropogenic use of soil makes to global warming is not clear. We show that soil has contributed 15 % of the total global warming caused by well-mixed greenhouse gases. Thus, our finding that soil is a substantial contributor to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions represents a "wicked problem" – how do we continue to increase food production from soil whilst also decreasing emissions?
Kristiina Lång, Henri Honkanen, Jaakko Heikkinen, Sanna Saarnio, Tuula Larmola, and Hanna Kekkonen
SOIL, 10, 827–841, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-827-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We studied greenhouse (GHG) gas fluxes at an agricultural peat soil site with willow, forage and set-aside. The mean annual water table rose from 80 to 30 cm in 2019–2022. Raising the water table slowed down annual CO2 emissions. CH4 fluxes changed from uptake to emissions, and nitrous oxide emissions decreased towards the end of the experiment. The total greenhouse gas balance was relatively high, highlighting the challenge in mitigating emissions from cultivated peatlands.
Félix García-Pereira, Jesús Fidel González-Rouco, Thomas Schmid, Camilo Melo-Aguilar, Cristina Vegas-Cañas, Norman Julius Steinert, Pedro José Roldán-Gómez, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Almudena García-García, Hugo Beltrami, and Philipp de Vrese
SOIL, 10, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work addresses air–ground temperature coupling and propagation into the subsurface in a mountainous area in central Spain using surface and subsurface data from six meteorological stations. Heat transfer of temperature changes at the ground surface occurs mainly by conduction controlled by thermal diffusivity of the subsurface, which varies with depth and time. A new methodology shows that near-surface diffusivity and soil moisture content changes with time are closely related.
Sidona Buragienė, Egidijus Šarauskis, Aida Adamavičienė, Kęstutis Romaneckas, Kristina Lekavičienė, Daiva Rimkuvienė, and Vilma Naujokienė
SOIL, 9, 593–608, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-593-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-593-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different biopreparations on soil porosity, temperature, and CO2 emission from the soil in northeast Europe (Lithuania) when growing food-type crops. The application of the biopreparations showed a cumulative effect on the soil properties. In the third year of the study, the total porosity of the soil was higher in all scenarios compared to the control, ranging between 51% and 74%.
Justine Lejoly, Sylvie Quideau, Jérôme Laganière, Justine Karst, Christine Martineau, Mathew Swallow, Charlotte Norris, and Abdul Samad
SOIL, 9, 461–478, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-461-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-461-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earthworm invasion in North American forests can alter soil functioning. We investigated how the presence of invasive earthworms affected microbial communities, key drivers of soil biogeochemistry, across the major soil types of the Canadian boreal forest, which is a region largely understudied. Although total microbial biomass did not change, community composition shifted in earthworm-invaded mineral soils, where we also found higher fungal biomass and greater microbial species diversity.
Ina Säumel, Leonardo R. Ramírez, Sarah Tietjen, Marcos Barra, and Erick Zagal
SOIL, 9, 425–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-425-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-425-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed intensification of Uruguayan grasslands in a country-wide survey on fertility proxies, pH and trace metals in topsoils. We observed a loss of nutrients, trace metals and organic matter in grasslands, croplands and timber plantations and accumulation in riverine forests. This raises questions about the carrying capacity of Uruguayan soils with regard to currently implemented intensification strategies and supports more conservative forms of extensive grassland management.
David Paré, Jérôme Laganière, Guy R. Larocque, and Robert Boutin
SOIL, 8, 673–686, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-673-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-673-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Major soil carbon pools and fluxes were assessed along a climatic gradient expanding 4 °C in mean annual temperature for two important boreal conifer forest stand types. Species and a warmer climate affected soil organic matter (SOM) cycling but not stocks. Contrarily to common hypotheses, SOM lability was not reduced by warmer climatic conditions and perhaps increased. Results apply to cold and wet conditions and a stable vegetation composition along the climate gradient.
Kaikuo Wu, Wentao Li, Zhanbo Wei, Zhi Dong, Yue Meng, Na Lv, and Lili Zhang
SOIL, 8, 645–654, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-645-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-645-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We explored the effects of mild alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation combined with rice straw return on N2O emissions and rice yield through rice pot experiments. Mild AWD irrigation significantly increased both N2O and yield-scaled N2O emissions. The addition of rice straw under mild AWD irrigation could promote N2O emissions. Mild AWD irrigation could reduce soil-nitrogen uptake by rice when urea was applied. Mild AWD irrigation reduced rice aboveground biomass but not rice yield.
Cyrill U. Zosso, Nicholas O. E. Ofiti, Jennifer L. Soong, Emily F. Solly, Margaret S. Torn, Arnaud Huguet, Guido L. B. Wiesenberg, and Michael W. I. Schmidt
SOIL, 7, 477–494, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-477-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-477-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
How subsoil microorganisms respond to warming is largely unknown, despite their crucial role in the soil organic carbon cycle. We observed that the subsoil microbial community composition was more responsive to warming compared to the topsoil community composition. Decreased microbial abundance in subsoils, as observed in this study, might reduce the magnitude of the respiration response over time, and a shift in the microbial community will likely affect the cycling of soil organic carbon.
Kate M. Buckeridge, Kate A. Edwards, Kyungjin Min, Susan E. Ziegler, and Sharon A. Billings
SOIL, 6, 399–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-399-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We do not understand the short- and long-term temperature response of soil denitrifiers, which produce and consume N2O. Boreal forest soils from a long-term climate gradient were incubated in short-term warming experiments. We found stronger N2O consumption at depth, inconsistent microbial gene abundance and function, and consistent higher N2O emissions from warmer-climate soils at warmer temperatures. Consideration of our results in models will contribute to improved climate projections.
Marco Allegrini, Elena Gomez, and María Celina Zabaloy
SOIL, 6, 291–297, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-291-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-291-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Research was conducted to assess the response of microbial communities in a soil with a long history of glyphosate-based herbicides to a secondary imposed perturbation (dry–rewetting event). Both perturbations could increase their frequency under current agricultural practices and climate change. The results of this study demonstrate that acute exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide does not have a conditioning effect on the response of microbial communities to the dry–rewetting event.
Christopher Poeplau, Páll Sigurðsson, and Bjarni D. Sigurdsson
SOIL, 6, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-115-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-115-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Global warming leads to increased mineralisation of soil organic matter, inducing a positive climate–carbon cycle feedback loop. Loss of organic matter can be associated with loss of soil structure. Here we use a strong geothermal gradient to investigate soil warming effects on soil organic matter and structural parameters in subarctic forest and grassland soils. Strong depletion of organic matter caused a collapse of aggregates, highlighting the potential impact of warming on soil function.
Natalia Andrea Osinaga, Carina Rosa Álvarez, and Miguel Angel Taboada
SOIL, 4, 251–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-251-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-251-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The sub-humid Argentine Chaco, originally covered by forest, has been subjected to clearing since the end of the 1970s and replacement of the forest by no-till farming. The organic carbon stock content up to 1 m depth varied as follows: forest > pasture > continuous cropping, with no impact of the number of years under cropping. The incorporation of pastures of warm-season grasses was able to mitigate the decrease of C stocks caused by cropping and so could be considered sustainable management.
Justine Barthod, Cornélia Rumpel, Remigio Paradelo, and Marie-France Dignac
SOIL, 2, 673–683, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-673-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-673-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we evaluated CO2 emissions during composting of green wastes with clay and/or biochar in the presence and absence of worms, as well as the effect of those amendments on carbon mineralization after application to soil. Our results indicated that the addition of clay or clay–biochar mixture reduced carbon mineralization during co-composting without worms by up to 44 %. In the presence of worms, CO2 emissions during composting increased for all treatments except for the low clay dose.
Miriam Muñoz-Rojas, Todd E. Erickson, Dylan C. Martini, Kingsley W. Dixon, and David J. Merritt
SOIL, 2, 287–298, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-287-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-287-2016, 2016
M. S. Torn, A. Chabbi, P. Crill, P. J. Hanson, I. A. Janssens, Y. Luo, C. H. Pries, C. Rumpel, M. W. I. Schmidt, J. Six, M. Schrumpf, and B. Zhu
SOIL, 1, 575–582, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-575-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-575-2015, 2015
M. Köchy, A. Don, M. K. van der Molen, and A. Freibauer
SOIL, 1, 367–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-367-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-367-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Using ranges for variables in a model of organic C stocks of the top 1m of soil on a global 0.5° grid, we assessed the (un)certainty of changes in stocks over the next 75 years. Changes are more certain where land-use change strongly affects carbon inputs and where higher temperatures and adequate moisture favour decomposition, e.g. tropical mountain forests. Global stocks will increase by 1% with a certainty of 75% if inputs to the soil increase due to CO₂ fertilization of the vegetation.
P. Alexander, K. Paustian, P. Smith, and D. Moran
SOIL, 1, 331–339, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-331-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-331-2015, 2015
Cited articles
Abalos, D., Rittl, T. F., Recous, S., Thiébeau, P., Topp, C. F. E., van Groenigen, K. J., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Thorman, R. E., Smith, K. E., Ahuja, I., Olesen, J. E., Bleken, M. A., Rees, R. M., and Hansen, S.: Predicting field N2O emissions from crop residues based on their biochemical composition: A meta-analytical approach, Sci. Total Environ., 812, 152532, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152532, 2022.
Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D., Espenberg, M., Truu, J., Rees, R. M., and Smith, P.: A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 2530–2543, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644, 2019.
Adetunji, A. T., Ncube, B., Mulidzi, R., and Lewu, F. B.: Management impact and benefit of cover crops on soil quality: A review, Soil Till. Res., 204, 104717, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104717, 2020.
Araújo, F. C. D., Nascente, A. S., Guimarães, J. L. N., Sousa, V. S., Freitas, M. A. M. D., and Santos, F. L. D. S.: Cover crops in the off-season in the weed management at notillage area, Rev. Caatinga, 34, 50–57, https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n106rc, 2021.
Balkcom, K. S., Duzy, L. M., Kornecki, T. S., and Price, A. J.: Timing of Cover Crop Termination: Management Considerations for the Southeast, Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management, 1, cftm2015.0161, https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2015.0161, 2015.
Basche, A. D., Miguez, F. E., Kaspar, T. C., and Castellano, M. J.: Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis, J. Soil Water Conserv., 69, 471–482, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.6.471, 2014.
Basche, A. D., Kaspar, T. C., Archontoulis, S. V., Jaynes, D. B., Sauer, T. J., Parkin, T. B., and Miguez, F. E.: Soil water improvements with the long-term use of a winter rye cover crop, Agr. Water Manage., 172, 40–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.006, 2016.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015.
Beauchamp, E. G., Trevors, J. T., and Paul, J. W.: Carbon Sources for Bacterial Denitrification, in: Advances in Soil Science, vol. 10, edited by: Stewart, B. A., Springer, New York, NY, 113–142, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8847-0_3, 1989.
Blagodatsky, S., Grote, R., Kiese, R., Werner, C., and Butterbach-Bahl, K.: Modelling of microbial carbon and nitrogen turnover in soil with special emphasis on N-trace gases emission, Plant Soil, 346, 297–330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0821-z, 2011.
Blanco-Canqui, H.: Cover crops and carbon sequestration: Lessons from U. S. studies, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 86, 501–519, https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20378, 2022.
Blanco-Canqui, H., Shaver, T. M., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., Elmore, R. W., Francis, C. A., and Hergert, G. W.: Cover Crops and Ecosystem Services: Insights from Studies in Temperate Soils, Agron. J., 107, 2449–2474, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0086, 2015.
Bolinder, M. A., Crotty, F., Elsen, A., Frac, M., Kismányoky, T., Lipiec, J., Tits, M., Tóth, Z., and Kätterer, T.: The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic carbon changes in agroecosystems: a synthesis of reviews, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl., 25, 929–952, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3, 2020.
Bollmann, A. and Conrad, R.: Influence of O2 availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 387–396, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00161.x, 1998.
Chatskikh, D., Olesen, J. E., Hansen, E. M., Elsgaard, L., and Petersen, B. M.: Effects of reduced tillage on net greenhouse gas fluxes from loamy sand soil under winter crops in Denmark, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 128, 117–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.010, 2008.
Chen, H., Li, X., Hu, F., and Shi, W.: Soil nitrous oxide emissions following crop residue addition: a meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 2956–2964, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12274, 2013.
Coleman, K. and Jenkinson, D. S.: RothC-26.3 – A Model for the turnover of carbon in soil, in: Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models, NATO ASI Series, vol. 38, edited by: Powlson, D. S., Smith, P., and Smith, J. U., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 237–246, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_17, 1996.
Constantin, J., Beaudoin, N., Laurent, F., Cohan, J.-P., Duyme, F., and Mary, B.: Cumulative effects of catch crops on nitrogen uptake, leaching and net mineralization, Plant Soil, 341, 137–154, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0630-9, 2011.
Cosentino, V. R. N., Figueiro Aureggui, S. A., and Taboada, M. A.: Hierarchy of factors driving N2O emissions in non-tilled soils under different crops, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 550–557, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12080, 2013.
Daryanto, S., Fu, B., Wang, L., Jacinthe, P.-A., and Zhao, W.: Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops, Earth-Sci. Rev., 185, 357–373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.013, 2018.
Davidson, E. A.: The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860, Nat. Geosci., 2, 659–662, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo608, 2009.
Dechow, R., Franko, U., Kätterer, T., and Kolbe, H.: Evaluation of the RothC model as a prognostic tool for the prediction of SOC trends in response to management practices on arable land, Geoderma, 337, 463–478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.001, 2019.
Dobbie, K. E. and Smith, K. A.: Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water-filled pore space and other controlling variables, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 204–218, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00563.x, 2003.
Doran, J. W. and Smith, M. S.: Role of cover crops in nitrogen cycling, Cover crops for clean water, 85, 85–90, 1991.
DWD: Wetter und Klima – Deutscher Wetterdienst – CDC (Climate Data Center), https://www.dwd.de/EN/climate_environment/cdc/cdc_node_en.html (last access: 12 July 2023), 2023.
Elhakeem, A., van der Werf, W., Ajal, J., Lucà, D., Claus, S., Vico, R. A., and Bastiaans, L.: Cover crop mixtures result in a positive net biodiversity effect irrespective of seeding configuration, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 285, 106627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106627, 2019.
Finney, D. M., Buyer, J. S., and Kaye, J. P.: Living cover crops have immediate impacts on soil microbial community structure and function, J. Soil Water Conserv., 72, 361–373, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.4.361, 2017.
Flessa, H., Dörsch, P., and Beese, F.: Seasonal variation of N2O and CH4 fluxes in differently managed arable soils in southern Germany, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 23115–23124, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02270, 1995.
Fosu, M., Kühne, R. F., and Vlek, P. L. G.: Mineralization and microbial biomass dynamics during decomposition of four leguminous residues, Journal of Biological Sciences, 7, 632–637, 2007.
Franko, U., Kolbe, H., Thiel, E., and Ließ, E.: Multi-site validation of a soil organic matter model for arable fields based on generally available input data, Geoderma, 166, 119–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.019, 2011.
Fuss, R. and Hueppi, R.: gasfluxes: Greenhouse Gas Flux Calculation from Chamber Measurements, CRAN [code], https://git-dmz.thuenen.de/fuss/gasfluxes (last access: 11 February 2023), 2020.
Gabriel, J. L. and Quemada, M.: Replacing bare fallow with cover crops in a maize cropping system: Yield, N uptake and fertiliser fate, Eur. J. Agron., 34, 133–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.006, 2011.
Gale, M. R. and Grigal, D. F.: Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status, Can. J. Forest. Res., 17, 829–834, https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-131, 1987.
Galloway, J. N. and Cowling, E. B.: Reactive Nitrogen and The World: 200 Years of Change, ambi, 31, 64–71, https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.64, 2002.
German Fertilizer Ordinance: Verordnung zur Neuordnung der guten fachlichen Praxis beim Düngen, Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I, 1305, 2017.
Goodroad, L. L. and Keeney, D. R.: Nitrous oxide emissions from soils during thawing, Can. J. Soil. Sci., 64, 187–194, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss84-020, 1984.
Grunwald, D., Stracke, A., and Koch, H.: Cover crop effects on soil structure and early sugar beet growth, Soil Use Manage., 39, 209–217, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12800, 2022.
Guenet, B., Gabrielle, B., Chenu, C., Arrouays, D., Balesdent, J., Bernoux, M., Bruni, E., Caliman, J.-P., Cardinael, R., Chen, S., Ciais, P., Desbois, D., Fouche, J., Frank, S., Henault, C., Lugato, E., Naipal, V., Nesme, T., Obersteiner, M., Pellerin, S., Powlson, D. S., Rasse, D. P., Rees, F., Soussana, J.-F., Su, Y., Tian, H., Valin, H., and Zhou, F.: Can N2O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage?, Glob. Change Biol., 27, 237–256, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15342, 2021.
Hanrahan, B. R., King, K. W., Duncan, E. W., and Shedekar, V. S.: Cover crops differentially influenced nitrogen and phosphorus loss in tile drainage and surface runoff from agricultural fields in Ohio, USA, J. Environ. Manage., 293, 112910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112910, 2021.
Helfrich, M., Dechow, R., Merl, S., Fuß, R., Räbiger, T., Kühling, I., Schlathölter, M., Kage, H., and Flessa, H.: Winter cover crops decreased soil mineral N contents and increased soil organic C stocks and N2O emission, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 367, 108985, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108985, 2024.
Hillel, D.: Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics, 1st Edn., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 511 pp., ISBN 9780123486554, 2003.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate Change 2022 – Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926, 2022.
IPCC: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, edited by: Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S., IPCC, Switzerland, ISBN 978-4-88788-232-4, 2019.
IUSS Working Group WRB: World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106, FAO, Rome, ISBN 978-92-5-108369-7 (print), E-ISBN 978-92-5-108370-3 (PDF), 2015.
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714, 1996.
Jacobs, A., Poeplau, C., Weiser, C., Fahrion-Nitschke, A., and Don, A.: Exports and inputs of organic carbon on agricultural soils in Germany, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 118, 249–271, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10087-5, 2020.
Jian, J., Du, X., Reiter, M. S., and Stewart, R. D.: A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping, Soil Biol. Biochem., 143, 107735, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735, 2020.
Koch, H.-J., Grunwald, D., Essich, L., and Ruser, R.: Temporal dynamics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) N supply from cover crops differing in biomass quantity and composition, Front. Plant. Sci., 13, 920531, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.920531, 2022.
Kravchenko, A. N., Toosi, E. R., Guber, A. K., Ostrom, N. E., Yu, J., Azeem, K., Rivers, M. L., and Robertson, G. P.: Hotspots of soil N2O emission enhanced through water absorption by plant residue, Nat. Geosci., 10, 496–500, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2963, 2017.
Kühling, I., Mikuszies, P., Helfrich, M., Flessa, H., Schlathölter, M., Sieling, K., and Kage, H.: Effects of winter cover crops from different functional groups on soil-plant nitrogen dynamics and silage maize yield, Eur. J. Agron., 148, 126878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126878, 2023.
Lapierre, J., Machado, P. V. F., Debruyn, Z., Brown, S. E., Jordan, S., Berg, A., Biswas, A., Henry, H. A. L., and Wagner-Riddle, C.: Cover crop mixtures: A powerful strategy to reduce post-harvest surplus of soil nitrate and leaching, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 325, 107750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107750, 2022.
Lemke, R. L., Izaurralde, R. C., Malhi, S. S., Arshad, M. A., and Nyborg, M.: Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Soils of the Boreal and Parkland Regions of Alberta, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 1096–1102, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040034x, 1998.
Lenth, R. V., Bolker, B., Buerkner, P., Giné-Vázquez, I., Herve, M., Jung, M., Love, J., Miguez, F., Riebl, H., and Singmann, H.: emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means, CRAN [code], https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/ (last access: 4 March 2024), 2025.
Li, X., Hu, F., and Shi, W.: Plant material addition affects soil nitrous oxide production differently between aerobic and oxygen-limited conditions, Appl. Soil Ecol., 64, 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.003, 2013.
Li, X., Petersen, S. O., Sørensen, P., and Olesen, J. E.: Effects of contrasting catch crops on nitrogen availability and nitrous oxide emissions in an organic cropping system, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 199, 382–393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.016, 2015.
Lynch, M. J., Mulvaney, M. J., Hodges, S. C., Thompson, T. L., and Thomason, W. E.: Decomposition, nitrogen and carbon mineralization from food and cover crop residues in the central plateau of Haiti, SpringerPlus, 5, 973, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2651-1, 2016.
Malnou, C. S., Jaggard, K. W., and Sparkes, D. L.: A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop, Eur. J. Agron., 25, 254–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.002, 2006.
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, Ö., Yu, R., and Zhou, B. (Eds.): Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021.
Millar, N. and Baggs, E. M.: Chemical composition, or quality, of agroforestry residues influences N2O emissions after their addition to soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 935–943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.008, 2004.
Mitchell, J. P., Shrestha, A., and Irmak, S.: Trade-offs between winter cover crop production and soil water depletion in the San Joaquin Valley, California, J. Soil Water Conserv., 70, 430–440, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.6.430, 2015.
Muhammad, I., Sainju, U. M., Zhao, F., Khan, A., Ghimire, R., Fu, X., and Wang, J.: Regulation of soil CO2 and N2O emissions by cover crops: A meta-analysis, Soil Till. Res., 192, 103–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.04.020, 2019.
Mutegi, J. K., Munkholm, L. J., Petersen, B. M., Hansen, E. M., and Petersen, S. O.: Nitrous oxide emissions and controls as influenced by tillage and crop residue management strategy, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1701–1711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.004, 2010.
Nasser, V.: Managing Soil Nitrogen Surplus: The Role of Winter Cover Crops in N2O Emissions and Carbon Sequestration, GRO.data, V1 [data set], https://doi.org/10.25625/HFEDA7, 2024.
Nouri, A., Lukas, S., Singh, S., Singh, S., and Machado, S.: When do cover crops reduce nitrate leaching? A global meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 4736–4749, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16269, 2022.
Pan, F. F., Tang, J., and Chen, B. H.: Cover Crop Effects on Soil N Retention and Supply in Fertilizer-Intensive Cropping Systems (A Review), Eurasian Soil Sci.+, 55, 1278–1294, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322090125, 2022.
Parkin, T. B., Kaspar, T. C., Jaynes, D. B., and Moorman, T. B.: Rye Cover Crop Effects on Direct and Indirect Nitrous Oxide Emissions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 1551–1559, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0120, 2016.
Parr, M., Grossman, J. M., Reberg-Horton, S. C., Brinton, C., and Crozier, C.: Nitrogen Delivery from Legume Cover Crops in No-Till Organic Corn Production, Agron. J., 103, 1578–1590, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0007, 2011.
Pelster, D. E., Chantigny, M. H., Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Rieux, C., and Vanasse, A.: Nitrous Oxide Emissions Respond Differently to Mineral and Organic Nitrogen Sources in Contrasting Soil Types, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 427–435, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0261, 2012.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., Heisterkamp, S., Van Willigen, B., Ranke, J., and R Core Team: nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models, CRAN [code], https://svn.r-project.org/R-packages/trunk/nlme/ (last access: 4 March 2024), 2023.
Poeplau, C. and Don, A.: Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 200, 33–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024, 2015.
Qi, Z., Helmers, M. J., Malone, R. W., and Thorp, K. R.: Simulating Long-Term Impacts of Winter Rye Cover Crop on Hydrologic Cycling and Nitrogen Dynamics for a Corn-Soybean Crop System, T. ASABE, 54, 1575–1588, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.39836, 2011.
R Core Team: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 4 March 2024), 2023.
Ramirez-Garcia, J., Gabriel, J. L., Alonso-Ayuso, M., and Quemada, M.: Quantitative characterization of five cover crop species, J. Agric. Sci., 153, 1174–1185, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859614000811, 2015.
Riggers, C., Poeplau, C., Don, A., Bamminger, C., Höper, H., and Dechow, R.: Multi-model ensemble improved the prediction of trends in soil organic carbon stocks in German croplands, Geoderma, 345, 17–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.014, 2019.
Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Chantigny, M. H., and Bertrand, N.: Nitrous Oxide Emissions Respond Differently to No-Till in a Loam and a Heavy Clay Soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1363–1369, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0371, 2008.
Rösemann, C., Haenel, H.-D., Vos, C., Dämmgen, U., Döring, U., Wulf, S., Eurich-Menden, B., Freibauer, A., Döhler, H., Schreiner, C., Osterburg, B., and Fuß, R.: Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German agriculture 1990–2019: Input data and emission results, Thünen Institute [data set], https://doi.org/10.3220/DATA20210323134503, 2021.
Rummel, P. S., Well, R., Pfeiffer, B., Dittert, K., Floßmann, S., and Pausch, J.: Nitrate uptake and carbon exudation – do plant roots stimulate or inhibit denitrification?, Plant Soil, 459, 217–233, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04750-7, 2021.
Seitz, D., Fischer, L. M., Dechow, R., Wiesmeier, M., and Don, A.: The potential of cover crops to increase soil organic carbon storage in German croplands, Plant Soil, 488, 157–173, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05438-w, 2023.
Sierra, C. A., Müller, M., and Trumbore, S. E.: Models of soil organic matter decomposition: the SoilR package, version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1045–1060, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1045-2012, 2012.
Signor, D. and Cerri, C. E. P.: Nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils: a review, Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop., 43, 322–338, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632013000300014, 2013.
Simmelsgaard, S. E.: The effect of crop, N-level, soil type and drainage on nitrate leaching from Danish soil, Soil Use Manage., 14, 30–36, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1998.tb00607.x, 1998.
Smith, K. A., Ball, T., Dobbie, K. E., Massheder, J., and Rey, A.: Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 54, 779–791, 2003.
Storr, T., Simmons, R. W., and Hannam, J. A.: Using frost-sensitive cover crops for timely nitrogen mineralization and soil moisture management, Soil Use Manage., 37, 427–435, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12619, 2021.
Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Christensen, B. T., Hutchings, N. J., Vejlin, J., Kätterer, T., Glendining, M., and Olesen, J. E.: C-TOOL: A simple model for simulating whole-profile carbon storage in temperate agricultural soils, Ecol. Model., 292, 11–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.016, 2014.
Thangarajan, R., Bolan, N. S., Tian, G., Naidu, R., and Kunhikrishnan, A.: Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil, Sci. Total Environ., 465, 72–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.031, 2013.
Thapa, R., Mirsky, S. B., and Tully, K. L.: Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems: A Global Meta-Analysis, J. Environ. Qual., 47, 1400–1411, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107, 2018.
Tian, H., Xu, R., Canadell, J. G., Thompson, R. L., Winiwarter, W., Suntharalingam, P., Davidson, E. A., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Prather, M. J., Regnier, P., Pan, N., Pan, S., Peters, G. P., Shi, H., Tubiello, F. N., Zaehle, S., Zhou, F., Arneth, A., Battaglia, G., Berthet, S., Bopp, L., Bouwman, A. F., Buitenhuis, E. T., Chang, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Dangal, S. R. S., Dlugokencky, E., Elkins, J. W., Eyre, B. D., Fu, B., Hall, B., Ito, A., Joos, F., Krummel, P. B., Landolfi, A., Laruelle, G. G., Lauerwald, R., Li, W., Lienert, S., Maavara, T., MacLeod, M., Millet, D. B., Olin, S., Patra, P. K., Prinn, R. G., Raymond, P. A., Ruiz, D. J., van der Werf, G. R., Vuichard, N., Wang, J., Weiss, R. F., Wells, K. C., Wilson, C., Yang, J., and Yao, Y.: A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks, Nature, 586, 248–256, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0, 2020.
Tonitto, C., David, M. B., and Drinkwater, L. E.: Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: A meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 112, 58–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.003, 2006.
Unger, P. W. and Vigil, M. F.: Cover crop effects on soil water relationships, J. Soil Water Conserv., 53, 200–207, 1998.
VDLUFA: Bestimmung von mineralischem Stickstoff (Nitrat und Ammonium) in Bodenprofilen (NminLabormethode A 6.1.4.1), 2002.
Voisin, A.-S., Salon, C., Munier-Jolain, N. G., and Ney, B.: Quantitative effects of soil nitrate, growth potential and phenology on symbiotic nitrogen fixation of pea (Pisum sativum L.), Plant Soil, 243, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019966207970, 2002.
Wagner-Riddle, C., Congreves, K. A., Abalos, D., Berg, A. A., Brown, S. E., Ambadan, J. T., Gao, X., and Tenuta, M.: Globally important nitrous oxide emissions from croplands induced by freeze–thaw cycles, Nat. Geosci., 10, 279–283, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2907, 2017.
Wang, J., Zhang, S., Sainju, U. M., Ghimire, R., and Zhao, F.: A meta-analysis on cover crop impact on soil water storage, succeeding crop yield, and water-use efficiency, Agr. Water Manage., 256, 107085, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107085, 2021.
Wayman, S., Cogger, C., Benedict, C., Burke, I., Collins, D., and Bary, A.: The influence of cover crop variety, termination timing and termination method on mulch, weed cover and soil nitrate in reduced-tillage organic systems, Renew. Agr. Food Syst., 30, 450–460, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170514000246, 2015.
Weitz, A. M., Linder, E., Frolking, S., Crill, P. M., and Keller, M.: N2O emissions from humid tropical agricultural soils: effects of soil moisture, texture and nitrogen availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 1077–1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00013-X, 2001.
Wickham, H., Pedersen, T. L., Seidel, D., and Thomas, L. P.: scales: Scale Functions for Visualization, CRAN [code], https://scales.r-lib.org (last access: 4 March 2024), 2023.
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M.: Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Springer New York, NY, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6, 2009.
Short summary
This study evaluated the impact of contrasting cover crops on topsoil mineral nitrogen (SMN), N2O emissions, and carbon (C) sequestration. Non-legume cover crops reduced SMN levels, showed potential for mitigating indirect N2O emissions, and increased C sequestration but did not reduce cumulative N2O emissions compared to fallow. The results highlight the need for tailored cover crop strategies to balance SMN capture, N2O emissions, and C sequestration effectively.
This study evaluated the impact of contrasting cover crops on topsoil mineral nitrogen (SMN),...
