Bel, L., Allard, D., Laurent, J. M., Cheddadi, R., and Bar-Hen, A.: CART algorithm for spatial data: Application to environmental and ecological data, Comput. Stat. Data An., 53, 3082–3093, 2009.
Belbeze, S., Djemil, M., Béranger, S., and Stochetti, A.: Détermination de FPGA – Fonds Pédo-Géochimiques Anthropisés urbains Agglomération pilote: TOULOUSE MÉTROPOLE, Technical Report BRGM/RP-69502-FR, 347 pp.,
http://ficheinfoterre.brgm.fr/document/RP-69502-FR (last access: 25 September 2024), 2019 (in French).
Belbeze, S., Assy, Y., Le Cointe, P., and Rame, E.: CAPacité d'Infiltration des eaux pluviales du territoire de TOULouse Métropole (CAPITOUL), Technical Report BRGM/RP71904-FR, 72 pp.,
http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-71904-FR.pdf (last access: 25 September 2024), 2022 (in French).
Belbeze, S., Rohmer, J., Négrel, P., and Guyonnet, D.: Defining urban soil geochemical backgrounds: A review for application to the French context, J. Geochem. Explor., 254, 107298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107298, 2023.
Bénard, C., Da Veiga, S., and Scornet, E.: Mean decrease accuracy for random forests: inconsistency, and a practical solution via the Sobol-MDA, Biometrika, 109, 881–900, 2022.
Ben Salem, M., Roustant, O., Gamboa, F., and Tomaso, L.: Universal prediction distribution for surrogate models, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 5, 1086–1109, 2017.
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., and Stone, C. J.: Classification and regression trees, Wadsworth, California, 1984.
Chen, H., Covert, I. C., Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S. I.: Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributions, Nature Machine Intelligence, 5, 590–601, 2023.
Chilès, J. P. and Desassis, N.: Fifty Years of Kriging, in: Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences, edited by: Daya Sagar, B., Cheng, Q., and Agterberg, F., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78999-6_29, 2018.
Da Veiga, S.: Global sensitivity analysis with dependence measures, J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 85, 1283–1305, 2015.
De Bruin, S., Brus, D. J., Heuvelink, G. B., van Ebbenhorst Tengbergen, T., and Wadoux, A. M. C.: Dealing with clustered samples for assessing map accuracy by cross-validation, Ecol. Inform., 69, 101665, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101665, 2022.
El Amri, M. R. and Marrel, A.: Optimized HSIC‐based tests for sensitivity analysis: Application to thermalhydraulic simulation of accidental scenario on nuclear reactor, Qual. Reliab. Eng.Int., 38, 1386–1403, 2022.
Gretton, A., Bousquet, O., Smola, A., and Schölkopf, B.: Measuring Statistical Dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt Norms, in: Algorithmic Learning Theory,edited by: Jain, S., Simon, H. U., and Tomita, E., ALT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3734, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/11564089_7, 2005.
Gullo, F., Ponti, G., and Tagarelli, A.: Clustering Uncertain Data Via K-Medoids, in: Scalable Uncertainty Management, edited by: Greco, S. and Lukasiewicz, T., SUM 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5291, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87993-0_19, 2008.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7, 2009.
Heuvelink, G. B. and Webster, R.: Spatial statistics and soil mapping: A blossoming partnership under pressure, Spat. Stat.-Neth., 50, 100639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100639, 2022.
Jay, C., Yu, Y., Crawford, I., Archer-Nicholls, S., James, P., Gledson, A., Shaddick, G., Haines, R., Lannelongue, L., Lines, E., Hosking, S., and Topping, D.: Prioritize environmental sustainability in use of AI and data science methods, Nat. Geosci., 17, 106–108, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01369-y, 2024.
Jullum, M., Redelmeier, A., and Aas, K.: Efficient and Simple Prediction Explanations with groupShapley: A Practical Perspective, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Italian Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence, 28–43, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1–3 December 2021,
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3014/paper3.pdf (last access: 25 September 2024) 2021.
Kirkwood, C., Economou, T., Pugeault, N., and Odbert, H.: Bayesian deep learning for spatial interpolation in the presence of auxiliary information, Math. Geosci., 54, 507–531, 2022.
Leprond, H: Bilan annuel du projet
≪ Etablissements Sensibles
≫, Technical Report BRGM/RP-62878-FR, 24 pp.,
http://ficheinfoterre.brgm.fr/document/RP-62878-FR (last access: 25 September 2024), 2013 (in French).
Ludwig, M., Moreno-Martinez, A., Hölzel, N., Pebesma, E., and Meyer, H.: Assessing and improving the transferability of current global spatial prediction models, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 32, 356–368, 2023.
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S. I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Adv. Neur. In., 30, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874, 2017.
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., and Hornik, K.: cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions, R package version 2.1.6, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.cluster, 2023.
Meinshausen, N.: Quantile regression forests, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 983–999, 2006.
Meyer, H.: Vignette of the R package CAST available, Github [data set],
https://hannameyer.github.io/CAST/articles/cast02-AOA-tutorial.html, last access: 25 September 2024.
Meyer, H., Reudenbach, C., Hengl, T., Katurji, M., and Nauss, T.: Improving performance of spatio-temporal machine learning models using forward feature selection and target-oriented validation, Environ. Modell. Softw., 101, 1–9, 2018.
Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable, 2nd edn.,
https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ (last access: 2 January 2024), 2022.
Padarian, J., McBratney, A. B., and Minasny, B.: Game theory interpretation of digital soil mapping convolutional neural networks, SOIL, 6, 389–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-389-2020, 2020.
Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Borrelli, P., Köninger, J., Ballabio, C., Orgiazzi, A., Lugato, E., Liakos, L., Hervas, J., Jones, A., and Montanarella, L.: European Soil Data Centre 2.0: Soil data and knowledge in support of the EU policies, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 73, e13315, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13315, 2022.
Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Redelmeier, A., Jullum, M., and Aas, K.: Explaining Predictive Models with Mixed Features Using Shapley Values and Conditional Inference Trees, in: Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, edited by: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A., and Weippl, E., CD-MAKE 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12279, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57321-8_7, 2020.
Rohmer, J.: R script for computing group SHAPLEY dedicated to prediction uncertainty, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13838496, 2024.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S. (Eds.): Global sensitivity analysis: the primer, John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470725184, 2008.
Sellereite, N., Jullum, M., Redelmeier, A., and Lachmann, J.: shapr: Prediction Explanation with Dependence-Aware Shapley Values. R package version 0.2.3.9100,
https://github.com/NorskRegnesentral/shapr/ (last access: 25 September 2024),
https://norskregnesentral.github.io/shapr/ (last access: 25 September 2024), 2023.
Shapley, L. S.: A value for n-person games, in: Contributions to the Theory of Games, edited by: Kuhn, H. and Tucker, A. W., Volume II, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Chap. 17, 307–317, 1953.
Song, H., Liu, H., and Wu, M. C.: A fast kernel independence test for cluster-correlated data, Sci. Rep.-UK, 12, 21659, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26278-9, 2022.
Takoutsing, B. and Heuvelink, G. B.: Comparing the prediction performance, uncertainty quantification and extrapolation potential of regression kriging and random forest while accounting for soil measurement errors, Geoderma, 428, 116192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116192, 2022.
Varella, H., Guérif, M., and Buis, S.: Global sensitivity analysis measures the quality of parameter estimation: the case of soil parameters and a crop model, Environ. Modell. Softw., 25, 310–319, 2010.
Vaysse, K. and Lagacherie, P.: Using quantile regression forest to estimate uncertainty of digital soil mapping products, Geoderma, 291, 55–64, 2017.
Veronesi, F. and Schillaci, C.: Comparison between geostatistical and machine learning models as predictors of topsoil organic carbon with a focus on local uncertainty estimation, Ecol. Indic., 101, 1032–1044, 2019.
Wadoux, A. M. C. and Molnar, C.: Beyond prediction: methods for interpreting complex models of soil variation, Geoderma, 422, 115953, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115953, 2022.
Wadoux, A. M. C., Minasny, B., and McBratney, A. B.: Machine learning for digital soil mapping: Applications, challenges and suggested solutions, Earth-Sci. Rev., 210, 103359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359, 2020.
Wadoux, A. M. J.-C., Saby, N. P. A., and Martin, M. P.: Shapley values reveal the drivers of soil organic carbon stock prediction, SOIL, 9, 21–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-21-2023, 2023.
Watson, D. S., O'Hara, J., Tax, N., Mudd, R., and Guy, I.: Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Values, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.05724, 2023.
Wright, M. N. and Ziegler, A.: ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R, J. Stat. Softw., 77, 1–17, 2017.
