Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024
Original research article
 | 
13 Feb 2024
Original research article |  | 13 Feb 2024

Sensitivity of source sediment fingerprinting to tracer selection methods

Thomas Chalaux-Clergue, Rémi Bizeul, Pedro V. G. Batista, Núria Martínez-Carreras, J. Patrick Laceby, and Olivier Evrard

Related authors

Research and management challenges following soil and landscape decontamination at the onset of the reopening of the Difficult-to-Return Zone, Fukushima (Japan)
Olivier Evrard, Thomas Chalaux-Clergue, Pierre-Alexis Chaboche, Yoshifumi Wakiyama, and Yves Thiry
SOIL, 9, 479–497, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-479-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-479-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil degradation
A millennium of arable land use – the long-term impact of tillage and water erosion on landscape-scale carbon dynamics
Lena Katharina Öttl, Florian Wilken, Anna Juřicová, Pedro V. G. Batista, and Peter Fiener
SOIL, 10, 281–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-281-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-281-2024, 2024
Short summary
Response of soil nutrients and erodibility to slope aspect in the northern agro-pastoral ecotone, China
Yuxin Wu, Guodong Jia, Xinxiao Yu, Honghong Rao, Xiuwen Peng, Yusong Wang, Yushi Wang, and Xu Wang
SOIL, 10, 61–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-61-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-61-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping land degradation risk due to land susceptibility to dust emission and water erosion
Mahdi Boroughani, Fahimeh Mirchooli, Mojtaba Hadavifar, and Stephanie Fiedler
SOIL, 9, 411–423, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023, 2023
Short summary
Validating plutonium-239+240 as a novel soil redistribution tracer – a comparison to measured sediment yield
Katrin Meusburger, Paolo Porto, Judith Kobler Waldis, and Christine Alewell
SOIL, 9, 399–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-399-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-399-2023, 2023
Short summary
Quantification of the effects of long-term straw return on soil organic matter spatiotemporal variation: a case study in a typical black soil region
Yang Yan, Wenjun Ji, Baoguo Li, Guiman Wang, Songchao Chen, Dehai Zhu, and Zhong Liu
SOIL, 9, 351–364, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-351-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-351-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Agnihotri, R., Kumar, R., Prasad, M. V. S. N., Sharma, C., Bhatia, S. K., and Arya, B. C.: Experimental Setup and Standardization of a Continuous Flow Stable Isotope Mass Spectrometer for Measuring Stable Isotopes of Carbon, Nitrogen and Sulfur in Environmental Samples, MAPAN, 29, 195–205, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0099-8, 2014. a
Balsam, W., Ji, J., and Chen, J.: Climatic Interpretation of the Luochuan and Lingtai Loess Sections, China, Based on Changing Iron Oxide Mineralogy and Magnetic Susceptibility, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 223, 335–348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.04.023, 2004. a
Batista, P. V. G., Laceby, J. P., Silva, M. L. N., Tassinari, D., Bispo, D. F. A., Curi, N., Davies, J., and Quinton, J. N.: Using Pedological Knowledge to Improve Sediment Source Apportionment in Tropical Environments, J. Soils Sediments, 19, 3274–3289, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2199-5, 2019. a
Batista, P. V. G., Laceby, J. P., and Evrard, O.: How to Evaluate Sediment Fingerprinting Source Apportionments, J. Soils Sediments, 22, 1315–1328, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03157-4, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Present and Future Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification Maps at 1-Km Resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
Sediment source fingerprinting is a relevant tool to support soil conservation and watershed management in the context of accelerated soil erosion. To quantify sediment source contribution, it requires the selection of relevant tracers. We compared the three-step method and the consensus method and found very contrasted trends. The divergences between virtual mixtures and sample prediction ranges highlight that virtual mixture statistics are not directly transferable to actual samples.