Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-109-2024
Original research article
 | 
13 Feb 2024
Original research article |  | 13 Feb 2024

Sensitivity of source sediment fingerprinting to tracer selection methods

Thomas Chalaux-Clergue, Rémi Bizeul, Pedro V. G. Batista, Núria Martínez-Carreras, J. Patrick Laceby, and Olivier Evrard

Viewed

Total article views: 8,233 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
6,349 1,591 293 8,233 290 273 386
  • HTML: 6,349
  • PDF: 1,591
  • XML: 293
  • Total: 8,233
  • Supplement: 290
  • BibTeX: 273
  • EndNote: 386
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 8,233 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,956 with geography defined and 277 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 08 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Sediment source fingerprinting is a relevant tool to support soil conservation and watershed management in the context of accelerated soil erosion. To quantify sediment source contribution, it requires the selection of relevant tracers. We compared the three-step method and the consensus method and found very contrasted trends. The divergences between virtual mixtures and sample prediction ranges highlight that virtual mixture statistics are not directly transferable to actual samples.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint