Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Using 3D observations with high spatio-temporal resolution to calibrate and evaluate a process-focused cellular automaton model of soil erosion by water
Anette Eltner
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
David Favis-Mortlock
British Geological Survey, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
Oliver Grothum
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Martin Neumann
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
Tomáš Laburda
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
Petr Kavka
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
Related authors
Hanne Hendrickx, Melanie Elias, Xabier Blanch, Reynald Delaloye, and Anette Eltner
Earth Surf. Dynam., 13, 705–721, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel AI-based method for tracking and analysing the movement of rock glaciers and landslides, key landforms in high mountain regions. By utilising time-lapse images, our approach generates detailed velocity data, uncovering movement patterns often missed by traditional methods. This cost-effective tool enhances geohazard monitoring, providing insights into environmental drivers, improving process understanding, and contributing to better safety in alpine areas.
Lea Epple, Oliver Grothum, Anne Bienert, and Anette Eltner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The present study offers a unique, nested, high-resolution dataset that captures soil surface changes every 20 seconds during rainfall events, as well as over seasonal variations, across a range of spatial scales – plot, slope, and catchment. These data collected over a period of 3.5 years was facilitated by a camera-based approach. This open-access resource assists scientists in evaluating and refining existing models, improving process understanding, and training artificial intelligence.
Oliver Grothum, Lea Epple, Anne Bienert, Xabier Blanch, and Anette Eltner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2291, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2291, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Soil erosion threatens landscapes worldwide, and understanding how surfaces change over time is key to addressing this issue. We developed a new camera-based system that automatically captures and analyzes daily surface changes on a hillside over several years. Triggered by rain and a clock, the system showed how weather and farming impact the land. Our method offers a powerful way to monitor surface changes and can help improve predictions and solutions for soil erosion.
Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ralf Hedel, and Anette Eltner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a low-cost, automated system for monitoring river water levels using cameras and AI. By combining AI-based image analysis with photogrammetry, it accurately measures water levels in real-time, even in challenging conditions. Tested over 2.5 years at four sites, it achieved high accuracy (errors of 1.0–2.3 cm) and processed over 219,000 images. Its resilience makes it ideal for flood detection and water management in remote areas.
Robert Krüger, Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ghazi Al-Rawas, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 243–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, 2024
Pedro Alberto Pereira Zamboni, Hanne Hendrickx, Dennis Sprute, Holger Flatt, Muhtasimul Islam Rushdi, Florian Brodrecht, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 483–490, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, 2024
Melanie Elias, Steffen Isfort, Anette Eltner, and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, 2024
Robert Krüger, Pierre Karrasch, and Anette Eltner
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 163–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Low-cost sensors could fill gaps in existing observation networks. To ensure data quality, the quality of the factory calibration of a given sensor has to be evaluated if the sensor is used out of the box. Here, the factory calibration of a widely used low-cost rain gauge type has been tested both in the lab (66) and in the field (20). The results of the study suggest that the calibration of this particular type should at least be checked for every sensor before being used.
O. Grothum, A. Bienert, M. Bluemlein, and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, 2023
Xabier Blanch, Marta Guinau, Anette Eltner, and Antonio Abellan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3285–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present cost-effective photogrammetric systems for high-resolution rockfall monitoring. The paper outlines the components, assembly, and programming codes required. The systems utilize prime cameras to generate 3D models and offer comparable performance to lidar for change detection monitoring. Real-world applications highlight their potential in geohazard monitoring which enables accurate detection of pre-failure deformation and rockfalls with a high temporal resolution.
R. Blaskow and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W1-2023, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, 2023
Robert Ljubičić, Dariia Strelnikova, Matthew T. Perks, Anette Eltner, Salvador Peña-Haro, Alonso Pizarro, Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso, Ulf Scherling, Pietro Vuono, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5105–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rise of new technologies such as drones (unmanned aerial systems – UASs) has allowed widespread use of image velocimetry techniques in place of more traditional, usually slower, methods during hydrometric campaigns. In order to minimize the velocity estimation errors, one must stabilise the acquired videos. In this research, we compare the performance of different UAS video stabilisation tools and provide guidelines for their use in videos with different flight and ground conditions.
Lea Epple, Andreas Kaiser, Marcus Schindewolf, and Anette Eltner
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Intensified extreme weather events due to climate change can result in changes of soil erosion. These unclear developments make an improvement of soil erosion modelling all the more important. Assuming that soil erosion models cannot keep up with the current data, this work gives an overview of 44 models, their strengths and weaknesses and discusses their potential for further development with respect to new and improved soil and soil erosion assessment techniques.
A. Eltner, D. Mader, N. Szopos, B. Nagy, J. Grundmann, and L. Bertalan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 717–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, 2021
Hanne Hendrickx, Melanie Elias, Xabier Blanch, Reynald Delaloye, and Anette Eltner
Earth Surf. Dynam., 13, 705–721, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel AI-based method for tracking and analysing the movement of rock glaciers and landslides, key landforms in high mountain regions. By utilising time-lapse images, our approach generates detailed velocity data, uncovering movement patterns often missed by traditional methods. This cost-effective tool enhances geohazard monitoring, providing insights into environmental drivers, improving process understanding, and contributing to better safety in alpine areas.
Lea Epple, Oliver Grothum, Anne Bienert, and Anette Eltner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The present study offers a unique, nested, high-resolution dataset that captures soil surface changes every 20 seconds during rainfall events, as well as over seasonal variations, across a range of spatial scales – plot, slope, and catchment. These data collected over a period of 3.5 years was facilitated by a camera-based approach. This open-access resource assists scientists in evaluating and refining existing models, improving process understanding, and training artificial intelligence.
Oliver Grothum, Lea Epple, Anne Bienert, Xabier Blanch, and Anette Eltner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2291, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2291, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Soil erosion threatens landscapes worldwide, and understanding how surfaces change over time is key to addressing this issue. We developed a new camera-based system that automatically captures and analyzes daily surface changes on a hillside over several years. Triggered by rain and a clock, the system showed how weather and farming impact the land. Our method offers a powerful way to monitor surface changes and can help improve predictions and solutions for soil erosion.
Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ralf Hedel, and Anette Eltner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a low-cost, automated system for monitoring river water levels using cameras and AI. By combining AI-based image analysis with photogrammetry, it accurately measures water levels in real-time, even in challenging conditions. Tested over 2.5 years at four sites, it achieved high accuracy (errors of 1.0–2.3 cm) and processed over 219,000 images. Its resilience makes it ideal for flood detection and water management in remote areas.
Robert Krüger, Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ghazi Al-Rawas, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 243–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, 2024
Pedro Alberto Pereira Zamboni, Hanne Hendrickx, Dennis Sprute, Holger Flatt, Muhtasimul Islam Rushdi, Florian Brodrecht, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 483–490, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, 2024
Melanie Elias, Steffen Isfort, Anette Eltner, and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, 2024
Robert Krüger, Pierre Karrasch, and Anette Eltner
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 163–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Low-cost sensors could fill gaps in existing observation networks. To ensure data quality, the quality of the factory calibration of a given sensor has to be evaluated if the sensor is used out of the box. Here, the factory calibration of a widely used low-cost rain gauge type has been tested both in the lab (66) and in the field (20). The results of the study suggest that the calibration of this particular type should at least be checked for every sensor before being used.
O. Grothum, A. Bienert, M. Bluemlein, and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, 2023
Xabier Blanch, Marta Guinau, Anette Eltner, and Antonio Abellan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3285–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present cost-effective photogrammetric systems for high-resolution rockfall monitoring. The paper outlines the components, assembly, and programming codes required. The systems utilize prime cameras to generate 3D models and offer comparable performance to lidar for change detection monitoring. Real-world applications highlight their potential in geohazard monitoring which enables accurate detection of pre-failure deformation and rockfalls with a high temporal resolution.
Petr Kavka, Jiří Cajthaml, Adam Tejkl, and Martin Hanel
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 6, 120, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-120-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-120-2023, 2023
R. Blaskow and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W1-2023, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, 2023
Petr Kavka, Luděk Strouhal, and Jiří Cajthaml
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 3, 142, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-142-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-142-2021, 2021
Robert Ljubičić, Dariia Strelnikova, Matthew T. Perks, Anette Eltner, Salvador Peña-Haro, Alonso Pizarro, Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso, Ulf Scherling, Pietro Vuono, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5105–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rise of new technologies such as drones (unmanned aerial systems – UASs) has allowed widespread use of image velocimetry techniques in place of more traditional, usually slower, methods during hydrometric campaigns. In order to minimize the velocity estimation errors, one must stabilise the acquired videos. In this research, we compare the performance of different UAS video stabilisation tools and provide guidelines for their use in videos with different flight and ground conditions.
Lea Epple, Andreas Kaiser, Marcus Schindewolf, and Anette Eltner
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Intensified extreme weather events due to climate change can result in changes of soil erosion. These unclear developments make an improvement of soil erosion modelling all the more important. Assuming that soil erosion models cannot keep up with the current data, this work gives an overview of 44 models, their strengths and weaknesses and discusses their potential for further development with respect to new and improved soil and soil erosion assessment techniques.
A. Eltner, D. Mader, N. Szopos, B. Nagy, J. Grundmann, and L. Bertalan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 717–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, 2021
Cited articles
Anders, K., Winiwarter, L., Mara, H., Lindenbergh, R., Vos, S. E., and Höfle, B.: Fully automatic spatiotemporal segmentation of 3D LiDAR time series for the extraction of natural surface changes, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 173, 297–308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.015, 2021.
Baartman, J. E. M., Nunes, J. P., Masselink, R., Darboux, F., Bielders, C., Degré, A., Cantreul, V., Cerdan, O., Grangeon, T., Fiener, P., Wilken, F., Schindewolf, M., and Wainwright, J.: What do models tell us about water and sediment connectivity?, Geomorphology, 367, 107300, https://doi.org/10/gg5phb, 2020.
Batista, P. V. G., Davies, J., Silva, M. L. N., and Quinton, J. N.: On the evaluation of soil erosion models: Are we doing enough?, Earth Sci. Rev., 197, 102898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102898, 2019.
Beven, K.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007, 2006.
Blanch, X., Guinau, M., Eltner, A., and Abellan, A.: A cost-effective image-based system for 3D geomorphic monitoring: An application to rockfalls, Geomorphology, 449, 109065, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109065, 2024.
Boardman, J., Evans, R., Favis-Mortlock, D. T., and Harris, T. M.: Climate change and soil erosion on agricultural land in England and Wales, Land Degrad. Rehabil., 2, 95–106, 1990.
Bosio, R., Cagninei, A., and Poggi, D.: Large Laboratory Simulator of Natural Rainfall: From Drizzle to Storms, Water, 15, 2205, https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122205, 2023.
Brazier, R. E., Beven, K. J., Anthony, S. G., and Rowan, J. S.: Implications of model uncertainty for the mapping of hillslope-scale soil erosion predictions, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 26, 1333–1352, 2001.
Cappuccio, R., Cattaneo, G., Erbacci, G., and Jocher, U.: A parallel implementation of a cellular automata based model for coffee percolation, Parallel Comput., 27, 685–717, 2001.
Chen, Y., Wei, T., Li, J., Xin, Y., and Ding, M.: Future changes in global rainfall erosivity: Insights from the precipitation changes, J. Hydrol., 638, 131435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131435, 2024.
Coulthard, T. J., Macklin, M. G., and Kirkby, M. J.: A cellular model of Holocene upland river basin and alluvial fan evolution, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 27, 269–288, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.318, 2002.
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., and Lewy, H.: Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik, Math. Ann., 100, 32–74, 1928.
Darboux, F., Gascuel-Odoux, C., and Davy, P.: Effects of surface water storage by soil roughness on overland-flow generation, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 27, 223–233, https://doi.org/10/dncj4g, 2002.
de Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G., and Ritsema, C. J.: LISEM: A Single-Event Physically Based Hydrological and Soil Erosion Model for Drainage Basins. I: Theory, Input and Output, Hydrol. Process., 10, 1107–1117, 1996
Dunkerley, D. L.: Rainfall intensity bursts and the erosion of soils: an analysis highlighting the need for high temporal resolution rainfall data for research under current and future climates, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 345–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-345-2019, 2019.
Eltner, A.: Raw Data & Source Code, OPARA [code, data set], https://doi.org/10.25532/OPARA-602, 2025.
Eltner, A. and Sofia, G.: Structure from motion photogrammetric technique, in: Developments in Earth Surface Processes, edited by: Tarolli, P. and Mudd, S., vol. 23, 1–24, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64177-9.00001-1, 2020.
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Abellan, A., and Schindewolf, M.: Time lapse structure from motion photogrammetry for continuous geomorphic monitoring, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 42, 2240–2253, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4178, 2017.
Eltner, A., Maas, H.-G., and Faust, D.: Soil micro-topography change detection at hillslopes in fragile Mediterranean landscapes, Geoderma, 313, 217–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.034, 2018.
Epple, L., Kaiser, A., Schindewolf, M., Bienert, A., Lenz, J., and Eltner, A.: A Review on the Possibilities and Challenges of Today's Soil and Soil Surface Assessment Techniques in the Context of Process-Based Soil Erosion Models, Remote Sens., 14, 2468, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102468, 2022.
Epple, L., Grothum, O., Bienert, A., and Eltner, A.: Decoding rainfall effects on soil surface changes: Empirical separation of sediment yield in time-lapse SfM photogrammetry measurements, Soil Till. Res., 248, 106384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106384, 2025.
Favis-Mortlock, D.: RillGrow, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15576594, 2025.
Favis-Mortlock, D., Boardman, J., and MacMillan, V.: The Limits of Erosion Modeling, in: Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, edited by: Harmon, R. S. and Doe, W. W., Springer US, Boston, MA, 477–516, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0575-4_16, 2001.
Favis-Mortlock, D., Boardman, J., Foster, I., and Shepheard, M.: Comparison of observed and DEM-driven field-to-river routing of flow from eroding fields in an arable lowland catchment, Catena, 208, 105737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105737, 2022.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T.: A self-organising dynamic systems approach to the simulation of rill initiation and development on hillslopes, Comput. Geosci., 24, 353–372, 1998.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T.: Self-organization and cellular automata models, in: Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity, edited by: Wainwright, J. and Mulligan, M., Wiley, Chichester, UK, ISBN 0-471-49617-0, 2004.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T. and Boardman, J.: Nonlinear responses of soil erosion to climate change: a modelling study on the UK South Downs, Catena, 25, 365–387, 1995.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T., Quinton, J. N., and Dickinson, W. T.: The GCTE validation of soil erosion models for global change studies, J. Soil Water Conserv., 51, 397–403, 1996.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T., Guerra, A. J. T., and Boardman, J.: A self-organising dynamic systems approach to hillslope rill initiation and growth: model development and validation, edited by: Summer, W., Klaghofer, E., and Zhang, W., IAHS Press Publication, Wallingford, UK, 1998.
Favis-Mortlock, D. T., Boardman, J., Parsons, A. J., and Lascelles, B.: Emergence and erosion: a model for rill initiation and development, Hydrol. Process., 14, 2173–2205, 2000.
Fischer, F. K., Kistler, M., Brandhuber, R., Maier, H., Treisch, M., and Auerswald, K.: Validation of official erosion modelling based on high-resolution radar rain data by aerial photo erosion classification, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 43, 187–194, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4216, 2018.
Foucher, A., Evrard, O., Rabiet, L., Cerdan, O., Landemaine, V., Bizeul, R., Chalaux-Clergue, T., Marescaux, J., Debortoli, N., Ambroise, V., and Desprats, J.-F.: Uncontrolled deforestation and population growth threaten a tropical island's water and land resources in only 10 years, Sci. Adv, 10, 5941, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5941, 2024.
Grothum, O., Epple, L., Bienert, A., and Eltner, A.: Beobachtung und Rekonstruktion von Bodenerosionsprozessen mit permanenten Kamerastationen, Publikationen der DGPF e.V., Band 32, 106–115, 2024.
Hänsel, P., Schindewolf, M., Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., and Schmidt, J.: Feasibility of High-Resolution Soil Erosion Measurements by Means of Rainfall Simulations and SfM Photogrammetry, Hydrology, 3, 38, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3040038, 2016.
Helming, K., Römkens, M. J. M., and Prasad, S.: Surface roughness related processes of runoff and soil loss: a flume study, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 243–250, 1998.
Iserloh, T., Ries, J. B., Arnáez, J., Boix-Fayos, C., Butzen, V., Cerdà, A., Echeverría, M. T., Fernández-Gálvez, J., Fister, W., Geißler, C., Gómez, J. A., Gómez-Macpherson, H., Kuhn, N. J., Lázaro, R., León, F. J., Martínez-Mena, M., Martínez-Murillo, J. F., Marzen, M., Mingorance, M. D., Ortigosa, L., Peters, P., Regüés, D., Ruiz-Sinoga, J. D., Scholten, T., Seeger, M., Solé-Benet, A., Wengel, R., and Wirtz, S.: European small portable rainfall simulators: A comparison of rainfall characteristics, Catena, 110, 100–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.05.013, 2013.
James, M. R., Robson, S., and Smith, M. W.: 3-D uncertainty-based topographic change detection with structure-from-motion photogrammetry: Precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 42, 1769–1788, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125, 2017.
Jetten, V., Roo, A., and Favis-Mortlock, D.: Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion models, Catena, 37, 521–541, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00037-5, 1999.
Jetten, V., Govers, G., and Hessel, R.: Erosion models: Quality of spatial predictions, Hydrol. Process., 17, 887–900, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1168, 2003.
Kaiser, A., Erhardt, A., and Eltner, A.: Addressing uncertainties in interpreting soil surface changes by multitemporal high-resolution topography data across scales, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 2264–2277, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2967, 2018.
Kavka, P., Strouhal, L., Jáchymová, B., Krasa, J., Bacova, M., Laburda, T., Dostal, T., Devaty, J., and Bauer, M.: DOUBLE SIZE FULLJET FIELD RAINFALL SIMULATOR FOR COMPLEX INTERRILL AND RILL EROSION STUDIES, Stavební Obzor – Civil Engineering Journal, 27, 183–194, https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2018.02.0015, 2018.
Kavka, P., Neumann, M., Laburda, T., and Zumr, D.: Developing of the Laboratory Rainfall Simulator for Testing the Technical Soil Surface Protection Measures and Droplets Impact, in: 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ECSMGE 2019 – Proceedings 2019-Septe, https://doi.org/10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0392, 2019.
Kinnell, P. I. A.: Comments on “vertical hydraulic gradient and run-on water and sediment effects on erosion processes and sediment regimes, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 953–956, 2001.
Kinnell, P. I. A. and Risse, L. M.: USLE-M: Empirical Modeling Rainfall Erosion through Runoff and Sediment Concentration, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 1667, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200060026x, 1998.
Lague, D., Brodu, N., and Leroux, J.: Accurate 3-D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z), ISPRS J. Photogramm., 82, 10–26, 2013.
Lawrence, D. S. L.: Macroscale surface roughness and frictional resistance in overland flow, Earth Surf Proc. Land., 22, 365–382, https://doi.org/10/bjjnxv, 1997.
Lei, T., Nearing, M. A., Haghighi, K., and Bralts, V. F.: Rill erosion and morphological evolution: A simulation model, Water Resour. Res., 34, 3157–3168, https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02162, 1998.
Li, Z. and Fang, H.: Impacts of climate change on water erosion: A review, Earth Sci. Rev., 163, 94–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.10.004, 2016.
Murray, A. B. and Paola, C.: Properties of a cellular braided-stream model, Earth Surf Proc. Land., 22, 1001–1025, 1997.
Nearing, M. A.: A probabilistic model of soil detachment by shallow turbulent flow, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 34, 81–85, 1991.
Nearing, M. A., Foster, G. R., Lane, L. J., and Finkner, S. C.: A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project technology, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 32, 1587–1593, 1989.
Nearing, M. A., Norton, L. D., Bulgakov, D. A., Larionov, G. A., West, L. T., and Dontsova, K. M.: Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills, Water Resour. Res., 33, 865–876, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00013, 1997.
Nearing, M. A., Xie, Y., Liu, B., and Ye, Y.: Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5, 77–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.04.001, 2017.
Nicholas, A. P.: Cellular modelling in fluvial geomorphology, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 645–649, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1231, 2005.
Nicks, A. D.: The use of USLE components in models, in: Modelling Soil Erosion by Water, edited by: In, B. J. and Favis-Mortlock, D. T., Springer-Verlag NATO-ASI Series I-55, Berlin, 1998.
Onnen, N., Eltner, A., Heckrath, G., and Van Oost, K.: Monitoring soil surface roughness under growing winter wheat with low altitude UAV sensing, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45, 3747–3759, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4998, 2020.
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Poesen, J., Ballabio, C., Lugato, E., Meusburger, K., Montanarella, L., and Alewell, C.: The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe, Environ. Sci. Policy, 54, 438–447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012, 2015.
Planchon, O., Esteves, M., Silvera, N., and Lapetite, J. M.: Raindrop erosion of tillage induced microrelief: possible use of the diffusion equation, Soil Till. Res., 15–16, 1–14, 2000.
Prosdocimi, M., Burguet, M., Prima, S., Sofia, G., Terol, E., Rodrigo Comino, J., Cerdà, A., and Tarolli, P.: Rainfall simulation and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry for the analysis of soil water erosion in Mediterranean vineyards, Sci. Total Environ, 574, 204–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.036, 2017.
Quinton, J. N. and Fiener, P.: Soil erosion on arable land: An unresolved global environmental threat, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 48, 136–161, https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333231216595, 2024.
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., and Sutskever, I.: Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.00020, 2021.
Raza, A., Ahrends, H., Habib-Ur-Rahman, M., and Gaiser, T.: Modeling Approaches to Assess Soil Erosion by Water at the Field Scale with Special Emphasis on Heterogeneity of Soils and Crops, Land, 10, 422, https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040422, 2021.
Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., and Porter, J. P.: RUSLE – Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, J. Soil Water Conserv., 46, 30–33, 1991.
Rose, C. W. and Haddadchi, A.: Review of soil erosion modelling involving water with field applications, Soil Res., 61, 735–754, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR23080, 2023.
Saggau, P., Kuhwald, M., Hamer, W. B. and Duttmann, R.: Are compacted tramlines underestimated features in soil erosion modeling? A catchment-scale analysis using a process-based soil erosion model, Land Degrad. Dev., 33, 452–469, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4161, 2022.
Salvucci, G. D. and Entekhabi, D.: Explicit Expressions for Green-Ampt (Delta Function Diffusivity) Infiltration and Cumulative Storage, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2661–2663, https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01494, 1994.
Schmidt, J.: A mathematical model to simulate rainfall erosion, Catena Suppl., 19, 101–109, 1991.
Schmidt, J.: EROSION 2D/3D: ein Computermodell zur Simulation der Bodenerosion durch Wasser, Sächsische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Dresden, Germany, https://katalog.slub-dresden.de/id/0-1137732075 (last access: 2 June 2025), 1996.
Silva, A. R., Silva, A. R., and Gouvêa, M. M.: A novel model to simulate cloud dynamics with cellular automaton, Environ. Modell. Softw., 122, 104537, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104537, 2019.
Singh, A., Mondal, S., Pandey, R., and Kumar Jha, S.: Assessing Fourier and Latin hypercube sampling methods as new multi-model methods for hydrological simulations, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 38, 1271–1295, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02627-6, 2024.
Smith, R.: The application of cellular automata to the erosion of landforms, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 16, 273–281, 1991.
Stašek, J., Krása, J., Mistr, M., Dostál, T., Devátý, J., Středa, T., and Mikulka, J.: Using a Rainfall Simulator to Define the Effect of Soil Conservation Techniques on Soil Loss and Water Retention, Land, 12, 431, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020431, 2023.
Vigiak, O., Sterk, G., Romanowicz, R. J. and Beven, K. J.: A semi-empirical model to assess uncertainty of spatial patterns of erosion, Catena, 66, 198–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.01.004, 2006.
Wahle, J., Neubert, L., Esser, J., and Shreckenberg, M.: A cellular automaton traffic flow model for online simulation of traffic, Parallel. Comput., 27, 719–735, 2001.
Wang, Y.-C. and Lai, C.-C.: Evaluating the Erosion Process from a Single-Stripe Laser-Scanned Topography: A Laboratory Case Study, Water, 10, 956, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070956, 2018.
Williams, J. R.: Sediment yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Publication ARS-S-40, 1975.
Wischmeier, W. H.: Use and misuse of the Universal Soil Loss Equation, J. Soil Water Conserv., 31, 5–9, 1976.
Wolff, F., Lotsari, E., Spieler, D., Elias, M., and Eltner, A.: Enhancement of two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling based on UAV-flow velocity data, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 49, 2736–2750, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5853, 2024.
Wolfram, S.: Cellular automata as models of complexity, Nature, 311, 419–424, 1984.
Wu, F.: SimLand: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 63–82, 1998.
Zamboni, P., Blümlein, M., Lenz, J., Goncaves, W., Marcato Jr., J., Wöhling, T., and Eltner, A.: Measuring Water Ponding Time, Location and Connectivity on Soil Surfaces Using Time-Lapse Images and Deep Learning, Catena, 254, 108919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108919, 2025.
Zhao, Y., Zhu, D., Wu, Z., and Cao, Z.: Extreme rainfall erosivity: Research advances and future perspectives, Sci. Total Environ., 917, 170425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170425, 2024.
Executive editor
Annette Eltner et al. presented a very insightful and innovative study, which is exactly what is needed in erosion modelling. The high quality of the manuscript was underlined by both anonymous reviewers who were quite enthusiastic about it. Overall, it is a manuscript worth reading for new ideas in erosion modelling.
Annette Eltner et al. presented a very insightful and innovative study, which is exactly what is...
Short summary
This study develops a new method to improve the calibration and evaluation of models that predict soil erosion by water. By using advanced imaging techniques, we can capture detailed changes in the soil surface over time. This helps improve models that forecast erosion, especially as climate change creates new and unpredictable conditions. Our findings highlight the need for more precise tools to better model erosion of our land and environment in the future.
This study develops a new method to improve the calibration and evaluation of models that...