Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-843-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-843-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Original research article
| 
04 Dec 2024
Original research article |
| 04 Dec 2024
| 04 Dec 2024
Uncovering soil compaction: performance of electrical and electromagnetic geophysical methods
DAFNAE, University of Padua, viale dell'Università 16, 35131 Legnaro, Italy
Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padua, Italy
Luca Peruzzo
Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padua, Italy
Matteo Longo
DAFNAE, University of Padua, viale dell'Università 16, 35131 Legnaro, Italy
Giorgio Cassiani
Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padua, Italy
Francesco Morari
DAFNAE, University of Padua, viale dell'Università 16, 35131 Legnaro, Italy
Related authors
Mirko Pavoni, Luca Peruzzo, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Ilaria Barone, and Alexander Bast
The Cryosphere, 19, 4141–4148, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4141-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose an alternative electrode to perform Electrical Resistivity Tomography measurements in coarse blocky environments, such as rock glaciers. Compared to the traditional steel spike electrodes, which need to be hammered between the blocks, the proposed steel-net electrodes can be easily pushed between the builders by hand and then removed. Furthermore, the steel-net electrode weighs one-sixth of the steel spike, and is, therefore, easier to carry in challenging mountain environments.
Mirko Pavoni, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Giulia Zuecco, Luca Carturan, and Matteo Zumiani
The Cryosphere, 17, 1601–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decades, geochemical investigations at the springs of rock glaciers have been used to estimate their drainage processes, and the frozen layer is typically considered to act as an aquiclude or aquitard. In this work, we evaluated the hydraulic behavior of a mountain permafrost site by executing a geophysical monitoring experiment. Several hundred liters of salt water have been injected into the subsurface, and geoelectrical measurements have been performed to define the water flow.
Mirko Pavoni, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Stefano Urbini, Fabrizio de Blasi, and Jacopo Gabrieli
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-190, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The Ice Memory project aims to extract, analyze, and store ice cores from worldwide retreating glaciers. One of the selected sites is the last remaining ice body in the Apennines, the Calderone Glacier. To assess the most suitable drilling position, geophysical surveys were performed. Reliable ground penetrating radar measurements have been positively combined with a geophysical technique rarely applied in glacier environments, the Frequency Domain Electro-Magnetic prospection.
Mirko Pavoni, Luca Peruzzo, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Ilaria Barone, and Alexander Bast
The Cryosphere, 19, 4141–4148, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4141-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose an alternative electrode to perform Electrical Resistivity Tomography measurements in coarse blocky environments, such as rock glaciers. Compared to the traditional steel spike electrodes, which need to be hammered between the blocks, the proposed steel-net electrodes can be easily pushed between the builders by hand and then removed. Furthermore, the steel-net electrode weighs one-sixth of the steel spike, and is, therefore, easier to carry in challenging mountain environments.
Luca Peruzzo, Ulrike Werban, Marco Pohle, Mirko Pavoni, Benjamin Mary, Giorgio Cassiani, Simona Consoli, and Daniela Vanella
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2117, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2117, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Both spatial and temporal information are important in agriculture. Information regarding the above-ground variables ever-increasing in density and precision. On the contrary, below-ground information lags behind and has been typically limited to time series. This study uses methods that map the subsurface spatial variability. A numerical simulations of above- and below water fluxes are then based on such spatial information and additional time-oriented datasets that are common in agriculture.
Benjamin Mary, Veronika Iván, Franco Meggio, Luca Peruzzo, Guillaume Blanchy, Chunwei Chou, Benedetto Ruperti, Yuxin Wu, and Giorgio Cassiani
Biogeosciences, 20, 4625–4650, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4625-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4625-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores the partial root zone drying method, an irrigation strategy aimed at improving water use efficiency. We imaged the root–soil interaction using non-destructive techniques consisting of soil and plant current stimulation. The study found that imaging the processes in time was effective in identifying spatial patterns associated with irrigation and root water uptake. The results will be useful for developing more efficient root detection methods in natural soil conditions.
Mirko Pavoni, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Giulia Zuecco, Luca Carturan, and Matteo Zumiani
The Cryosphere, 17, 1601–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1601-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decades, geochemical investigations at the springs of rock glaciers have been used to estimate their drainage processes, and the frozen layer is typically considered to act as an aquiclude or aquitard. In this work, we evaluated the hydraulic behavior of a mountain permafrost site by executing a geophysical monitoring experiment. Several hundred liters of salt water have been injected into the subsurface, and geoelectrical measurements have been performed to define the water flow.
Mirko Pavoni, Jacopo Boaga, Alberto Carrera, Stefano Urbini, Fabrizio de Blasi, and Jacopo Gabrieli
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-190, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The Ice Memory project aims to extract, analyze, and store ice cores from worldwide retreating glaciers. One of the selected sites is the last remaining ice body in the Apennines, the Calderone Glacier. To assess the most suitable drilling position, geophysical surveys were performed. Reliable ground penetrating radar measurements have been positively combined with a geophysical technique rarely applied in glacier environments, the Frequency Domain Electro-Magnetic prospection.
Cited articles
Alaoui, A. and Diserens, E.: Mapping soil compaction – A review, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal., 5, 60–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.05.003, 2018.
Anjos, L., Gaistardo, C., Deckers, J., Dondeyne, S., Eberhardt, E., Gerasimova, M., Harms, B., Jones, A., Krasilnikov, P., Reinsch, T., Vargas, R., and Zhang, G.: World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, edited by: Schad, P., Van Huyssteen, C., and Micheli, E., Rome (Italy), FAO, 2015, JRC91947, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC91947, 2014.
Batey, T. and McKenzie, D. C.: Soil compaction: Identification directly in the field, Soil Use Manag., 22, 123–131, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00017.x, 2006.
Benevenute, P. A. N., de Morais, E. G., Souza, A. A., Vasques, I. C. F., Cardoso, D. P., Sales, F. R., Severiano, E. C., Homem, B. G. C., Casagrande, D. R., and Silva, B. M.: Penetration resistance: An effective indicator for monitoring soil compaction in pastures, Ecol. Indic., 117, 106647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106647, 2020.
Berisso, F. E., Schjønning, P., Keller, T., Lamandé, M., Etana, A., De Jonge, L. W., Iversen, B. V, Arvidsson, J., and Forkman, J.: Persistent effects of subsoil compaction on pore size distribution and gas transport in a loamy soil, Soil Till. Res., 122, 42–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.02.005, 2012.
Bernatek-Jakiel, A. and Kondracka, M.: Detection of soil pipe network by geophysical approach: Electromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), Land Degrad. Dev., 33, 1002–1014, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4205, 2022.
Binley, A.: Tools and Techniques: Electrical Methods, Elsevier B.V., 233–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00192-5, 2015.
Binley, A., Ramirez, A., and Daily, W.: Regularised image reconstruction of noisy electrical resistance tomography data, in: Process Tomography, 401–410, 1995.
Binley, A., Hubbard, S. S., Huisman, J. A., Revil, A., Robinson, D. A., Singha, K., and Slater, L. D.: The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales, 51, 3837–3866, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016, 2015.
Bittelli, M., Andrenelli, M. C. C., Simonetti, G., Pellegrini, S., Artioli, G., Piccoli, I., and Morari, F.: Shall we abandon sedimentation methods for particle size analysis in soils?, Soil Till. Res., 185, 36–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.08.018, 2019.
Blanchy, G., Saneiyan, S., Boyd, J., McLachlan, P., and Binley, A.: ResIPy, an intuitive open source software for complex geoelectrical inversion/modeling, Comput. Geosci., 137, 104423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104423, 2020a.
Blanchy, G., Virlet, N., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., Watts, C. W., Hawkesford, M. J., Whalley, W. R., and Binley, A.: Time-intensive geoelectrical monitoring under winter wheat, Near Surf. Geophys., 18, 413–425, https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12107, 2020b.
Blanchy, G., Mclachlan, P., Mary, B., Censini, M., Boaga, J., and Cassiani, G.: Comparison of multi-coil and multi-frequency frequency domain electromagnetic induction instruments, Front. Soil Sci., 4, 1239497, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2024.1239497, 2024.
Boaga, J.: The use of FDEM in hydrogeophysics: A review, J. Appl. Geophys., 139, 36–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.02.011, 2017.
Brevik, E. C., Fenton, T. E., and Lazari, A.: Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping, Precis. Agric., 7, 393–404, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-006-9021-x, 2006.
Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review, 124, 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005, 2004.
Caliñski, T. and Harabasz, J.: A Dendrite Method Foe Cluster Analysis, Commun. Stat., 3, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101, 1974.
Carrera, A.: AlbCa/Electrocomp_SOIL: v1.0.0 (v1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11356672, 2024.
Carrera, A., Longo, M., Piccoli, I., Mary, B., Cassiani, G., and Morari, F.: Electro-Magnetic Geophysical Dynamics under Conservation and Conventional Farming, Remote Sens., 14, 6243, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246243, 2022.
Carrera, A., Pavoni, M., Barone, I., Boaga, J., Ferro, N. D., Cassiani, G., and Morari, F.: Assessment of different agricultural soil compaction levels using shallow seismic geophysical methods, Geoderma, 447, 116914, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2024.116914, 2024.
Carroll, Z. L. and Oliver, M. A.: Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity, Geoderma, 128, 354–374, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2005.03.008, 2005.
Cassiani, G., Bruno, V., Villa, A., Fusi, N., and Binley, A. M.: A saline trace test monitored via time-lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography, J. Appl. Geophys., 59, 244–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.007, 2006.
Cassiani, G., Boaga, J., Vanella, D., Perri, M. T., and Consoli, S.: Monitoring and modelling of soil–plant interactions: the joint use of ERT, sap flow and eddy covariance data to characterize the volume of an orange tree root zone, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2213–2225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2213-2015, 2015.
Corwin, D. L. and Lesch, S. M.: Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: Theory, principles, and guidelines, in: Agronomy Journal, 455–471, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.4550, 2003.
Deidda, G. P., Fenu, C., and Rodriguez, G.: Regularized solution of a nonlinear problem in electromagnetic sounding, Inverse Probl., 30, 125014, https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/12/125014, 2014.
De Smedt, P., Delefortrie, S., and Wyffels, F.: Identifying and removing micro-drift in ground-based electromagnetic induction data, J. Appl. Geophys., 131, 14–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAPPGEO.2016.05.004, 2016.
Doolittle, J. A. and Brevik, E. C.: The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies, 223–225, 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.027, 2014.
Elaoud, A. and Chehaibi, S.: Soil compaction due to tractor traffic, 11, 539–545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-011-9479-3, 2011.
Fortes, R., Millán, S., Prieto, M. H., and Campillo, C.: A methodology based on apparent electrical conductivity and guided soil samples to improve irrigation zoning, Precis. Agric., 16, 441–454, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9388-7, 2015.
Friedman, S. P.: Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: A review, Comput. Electron. Agric., 46, 45–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001, 2005a.
Friedman, S. P.: Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: A review, Comput. Electron. Agric., 46, 45–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001, 2005b.
Garciá-Tomillo, A., Figueiredo, T. De, Dafonte, J. D., Almeida, A., and Paz-González, A.: Effects of machinery trafficking in an agricultural soil assessed by Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Open Agric., 3, 378–385, https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0042, 2018.
Garré, S., Günther, T., Diels, J., and Vanderborght, J.: Evaluating Experimental Design of ERT for Soil Moisture Monitoring in Contour Hedgerow Intercropping Systems, Vadose Zone J., 11, vzj2011.0186, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0186, 2012.
Garré, S., Hyndman, D., Mary, B., and Werban, U.: Geophysics conquering new territories: The rise of “agrogeophysics,” Vadose Zone J., 20, e20115, https://doi.org/10.1002/VZJ2.20115, 2021.
Gore, S. D.: Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 103, 889–890, https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2008.s240, 2008.
Grossman, R. B. and Reinsch, T. G.: The Solid Phase: Bulk Density and Linear Extensibility, Methods Soil Anal. Part 4 Phys. Methods, 201–228, https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4.C9, 2018.
Håkansson, I. and Lipiec, J.: A review of the usefulness of relative bulk density values in studies of soil structure and compaction, Soil Till. Res., 53, 71–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00095-1, 2000.
Hamza, M. A. and Anderson, W. K.: Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions, Soil Till. Res., 82, 121–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2004.08.009, 2005.
Hanssens, D., Delefortrie, S., Bobe, C., Hermans, T., and De Smedt, P.: Improving the reliability of soil EC-mapping: Robust apparent electrical conductivity (rECa) estimation in ground-based frequency domain electromagnetics, Geoderma, 337, 1155–1163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.030, 2019.
Hartigan, J. A. and Wong, M. A.: Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm, Appl. Stat., 28, 100, https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830, 1979.
Heiniger, R. W., McBride, R. G., and Clay, D. E.: Using soil electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management, Agron. J., 508–519, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5080, 2003.
Huang, J., Kilminster, T., Barrett-Lennard, E. G., and Triantafilis, J.: Characterization of field-scale dryland salinity with depth by quasi-3d inversion of DUALEM-1 data, Soil Use Manage., 33. 205–215, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12345, 2017.
Hubbard, S. S., Schmutz, M., Balde, A., Falco, N., Peruzzo, L., Dafflon, B., Léger, E., and Wu, Y.: Estimation of soil classes and their relationship to grapevine vigor in a Bordeaux vineyard: advancing the practical joint use of electromagnetic induction (EMI) and NDVI datasets for precision viticulture, Precis. Agric., 22, 1353–1376, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09788-w, 2021.
Johnson, E. C. and Bailey, A. C.: Soil Compaction, Adv. Soil Dyn., 2, 155, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.9452, 2002.
Keller, T., Lamandé, M., Naderi-Boldaji, M., and de Lima, R. P.: Soil Compaction Due to Agricultural Field Traffic: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Techniques for Compaction Quantification and Mapping, in: Advances in Understanding Soil Degradation, Springer, Cham, 287–312, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85682-3_13, 2021.
Kühn, J., Brenning, A., Wehrhan, M., Koszinski, S., and Sommer, M.: Interpretation of electrical conductivity patterns by soil properties and geological maps for precision agriculture, Precis. Agric., 10, 490–507, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9103-z, 2009.
Lavoué, F., Van Der Kruk, J., Rings, J., André, F., Moghadas, D., Huisman, J. A., Lambot, S., LWeihermüller, Vanderborght, J., and Vereecken, H.: Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography, Near Surf. Geophys., 8, 553–561, https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2010037, 2010.
Longo, M., Piccoli, I., Minasny, B., and Morari, F.: Soil apparent electrical conductivity-directed sampling design for advancing soil characterization in agricultural fields, Vadose Zone J., 19, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20060, 2020.
Lück, E., Gebbers, R., Ruehlmann, J., and Spangenberg, U.: Electrical conductivity mapping for precision farming, Near Surf. Geophys., 7, 15–25, https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2008031, 2009.
Mansourian, D., Vanderhasselt, A., Cornelis, W., and Hermans, T.: Response to soil compaction of the electrical resistivity tomography, induced polarisation, and electromagnetic induction methods: a case study in Belgium, Soil Res., 62, SR22260, https://doi.org/10.1071/sr22260, 2023.
Marshall, T. J. and Holmes, J. W.: Soil physics, Soil Phys., Cambridge University Press, 1980.
Martinez, G., Vanderlinden, K., Ordóñez, R., and Muriel, J. L.: Can Apparent Electrical Conductivity Improve the Spatial Characterization of Soil Organic Carbon?, Vadose Zone J., 8, 586–593, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0123, 2009.
Mary, B., Peruzzo, L., Boaga, J., Schmutz, M., Wu, Y., Hubbard, S. S., and Cassiani, G.: Small-scale characterization of vine plant root water uptake via 3-D electrical resistivity tomography and mise-à-la-masse method, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5427–5444, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5427-2018, 2018.
McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L., and Minasny, B.: On digital soil mapping, Geoderma, 117, 3–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4, 2003.
McLachlan, P., Blanchy, G., and Binley, A.: EMagPy: Open-source standalone software for processing, forward modeling and inversion of electromagnetic induction data, Comput. Geosci., 146, 104561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104561, 2021.
McNeill, J.: Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers, Geonics Ltd., Technical Note TN-6, 1980.
Morari, F., Castrignanò, A., and Pagliarin, C.: Application of multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravelly vineyard using geo-electrical sensors, Comput. Electron. Agr., 68, 97–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.003, 2009.
Mulder, V. L., de Bruin, S., Schaepman, M. E., and Mayr, T. R.: The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping – A review, 162, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018, 2011.
Nawaz F., M., Bourrié, G., and Trolard, F.: Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 33, 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0071-8, 2012.
Pentoś, K., Pieczarka, K., and Serwata, K.: The Relationship between Soil Electrical Parameters and Compaction of Sandy Clay Loam Soil, Agriculture, 11, 114, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020114, 2021.
Piccoli, I., Seehusen, T., Bussell, J., Vizitu, O., Calciu, I., Berti, A., Börjesson, G., Kirchmann, H., Kätterer, T., Sartori, F., Stoate, C., Crotty, F., Panagea, I. S., Alaoui, A., and Bolinder, M. A.: Opportunities for Mitigating Soil Compaction in Europe–Case Studies from the SoilCare Project Using Soil-Improving Cropping Systems, Land, 11, 223, https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020223, 2022.
Raper, R. L.: Agricultural traffic impacts on soil, J. Terramechanics, 42, 259–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTERRA.2004.10.010, 2005.
Reintam, E., TrüKmann, K., Kuht, J., Nugis, E., Edesi, L., Astover, A., Noormets, M., Kauer, K., Krebstein, K., and Rannik, K.: Soil compaction effects on soil bulk density and penetration resistance and growth of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Acta Agr. Scand. B.-S. P., 59, 265–272, https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710802030070, 2009.
Ren, L., D'Hose, T., Borra-Serrano, I., Lootens, P., Hanssens, D., De Smedt, P., Cornelis, W. M., and Ruysschaert, G.: Detecting spatial variability of soil compaction using soil apparent electrical conductivity and maize traits, Soil Use Manag., 38, 1749–1760, https://doi.org/10.1111/SUM.12812, 2022.
Romero-Ruiz, A., Linde, N., Keller, T., and Or, D.: A Review of Geophysical Methods for Soil Structure Characterization, Rev. Geophys., 56, 672–697, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000611, 2018.
Romero-Ruiz, A., Linde, N., Baron, L., Breitenstein, D., Keller, T., and Or, D.: Lasting Effects of Soil Compaction on Soil Water Regime Confirmed by Geoelectrical Monitoring, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030696, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030696, 2022.
Samouëlian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A., and Richard, G.: Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review, Soil Till. Res., 83, 173–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004, 2005.
Schjønning, P., Lamandé, M., and Thorsøe, M. H.: Soil compaction – drivers, pressures, state, impacts and responses, DCA Rep., ISBN 978-87-93787-51-3, 2019.
Seladji, S., Cosenza, P., Tabbagh, A., Ranger, J., and Richard, G.: The effect of compaction on soil electrical resistivity: A laboratory investigation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 61, 1043–1055, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01309.x, 2010.
Serrano, J., Shahidian, S., da Silva, J. M., Paixão, L., Moral, F., Carmona-Cabezas, R., Garcia, S., Palha, J., and Noéme, J.: Mapping management zones based on soil apparent electrical conductivity and remote sensing for implementation of variable rate irrigation–case study of corn under a center pivot, Water, 12, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123427, 2020.
Varmuza, K. and Filzmoser, P.: Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Chemometrics, CRC Press, 46 pp., https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420059496, 2016.
Vereecken, H., Binley, A., Cassiani, G., Revil, A., and Titov, K.: Applied Hydrogeophysics, in: Applied Hydrogeophysics, Springer Netherlands, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4912-5_1, 2007.
Von Hebel, C., Rudolph, S., Mester, A., Huisman, J. A., Kumbhar, P., Vereecken, H., and Van Der Kruk, J.: Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large-scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2732–2748, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014864, 2014.
Von Hebel, C., Van Der Kruk, J., Huisman, J. A., Mester, A., Altdorff, D., Endres, A. L., Zimmermann, E., Garré, S., and Vereecken, H.: Calibration, conversion, and quantitative multi-layer inversion of multi-coil rigid-boom electromagnetic induction data, Sensors (Switzerland), 19, 4753, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214753, 2019.
von Hebel, C., Reynaert, S., Pauly, K., Janssens, P., Piccard, I., Vanderborght, J., van der Kruk, J., Vereecken, H., and Garré S.: Toward high-resolution agronomic soil information and management zones delineated by ground-based electromagnetic induction and aerial drone data, Vadose Zone J., 20, 1539–1663, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20099, 2021.
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Adamchuk, V. I., Sudduth, K. A., McKenzie, N. J., and Lobsey, C.: Proximal Soil Sensing: An Effective Approach for Soil Measurements in Space and Time, in: Advances in Agronomy, vol. 113, Academic Press, 243–291, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386473-4.00005-1, 2011.
Wait, J.: Geo-electromagnetism, New York, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-730880-7.X5001-7, 1982.
Short summary
Soil compaction resulting from inappropriate agricultural practices affects soil ecological functions, decreasing the water-use efficiency of plants. Recent developments contributed to innovative sensing approaches aimed at safeguarding soil health. Here, we explored how the most used geophysical methods detect soil compaction. Results, validated with traditional characterization methods, show the pros and cons of non-invasive techniques and their ability to characterize compacted areas.
Soil compaction resulting from inappropriate agricultural practices affects soil ecological...
Special issue