Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
SOIL, 8, 559–586, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-559-2022
SOIL, 8, 559–586, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-559-2022
Original research article
05 Sep 2022
Original research article | 05 Sep 2022

How well does digital soil mapping represent soil geography? An investigation from the USA

David G. Rossiter et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,561 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,917 589 55 2,561 102 20 25
  • HTML: 1,917
  • PDF: 589
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 2,561
  • Supplement: 102
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,432 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,432 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 Sep 2022
Download
Short summary
Maps of soil properties made by machine learning techniques are increasingly applied in Earth surface process modelling and agronomy. Maps of the same area made by different methods appear quite different and also differ from field-based polygon soil survey maps. We explore these differences both visually and numerically, using methods that quantify the spatial patterns. Readers can apply the methods to their areas of interest in the USA with the supplied R Markdown scripts.