Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
SOIL, 6, 245–267, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-245-2020
SOIL, 6, 245–267, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-245-2020
Review article
08 Jul 2020
Review article | 08 Jul 2020

What do we know about how the terrestrial multicellular soil fauna reacts to microplastic?

Frederick Büks et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (26 May 2020) by Fuensanta García-Orenes
AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (15 Jun 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (15 Jun 2020) by Fuensanta García-Orenes
ED: Publish as is (15 Jun 2020) by John Quinton(Executive Editor)
Short summary
Via anthropogenic input, microplastics (MPs) today represent a part of the soil organic matter. We analyzed studies on passive translocation, active ingestion, bioaccumulation and adverse effects of MPs on multicellular soil faunal life. These studies on a wide range of soil organisms found a recurring pattern of adverse effects on motility, growth, metabolism, reproduction, mortality and gut microbiome. However, the shape and type of the experimental MP often did not match natural conditions.