Journal cover Journal topic
SOIL An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.343 IF 3.343
  • IF 5-year value: 4.963 IF 5-year
    4.963
  • CiteScore value: 9.6 CiteScore
    9.6
  • SNIP value: 1.637 SNIP 1.637
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • SJR value: 1.403 SJR 1.403
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 25 Scimago H
    index 25
SOIL | Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
SOIL, 4, 141–152, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Regional perspectives and challenges of soil organic carbon...

SOIL, 4, 141–152, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-141-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Original research article 05 Jun 2018

Original research article | 05 Jun 2018

Separation of soil respiration: a site-specific comparison of partition methods

Louis-Pierre Comeau et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,950 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,254 615 81 1,950 97 67 81
  • HTML: 1,254
  • PDF: 615
  • XML: 81
  • Total: 1,950
  • Supplement: 97
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,640 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,627 with geography defined and 13 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
To date, there are still many uncertainties and unknowns regarding the soil respiration partitioning procedures. This study compared the suitability and accuracy of five different respiration partitioning methods. A qualitative evaluation table of the partition methods with five performance parameters was produced. Overall, no systematically superior or inferior partition method was found and the combination of two or more methods optimizes assessment reliability.
To date, there are still many uncertainties and unknowns regarding the soil respiration...
Citation