Journal cover Journal topic
SOIL An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.343 IF 3.343
  • IF 5-year value: 4.963 IF 5-year
    4.963
  • CiteScore value: 9.6 CiteScore
    9.6
  • SNIP value: 1.637 SNIP 1.637
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • SJR value: 1.403 SJR 1.403
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 25 Scimago H
    index 25
Volume 4, issue 1
SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Original research article 10 Jan 2018

Original research article | 10 Jan 2018

Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates

Madlene Nussbaum et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,632 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,942 1,511 179 3,632 406 113 144
  • HTML: 1,942
  • PDF: 1,511
  • XML: 179
  • Total: 3,632
  • Supplement: 406
  • BibTeX: 113
  • EndNote: 144
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,123 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,109 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 21 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper presents an extensive evaluation of digital soil mapping (DSM) tools. Recently, large sets of environmental covariates (e.g. from analysis of terrain on multiple scales) have become more common for DSM. Many DSM studies, however, only compared DSM methods using less than 30 covariates or tested approaches on few responses. We built DSM models from 300–500 covariates using six approaches that are either popular in DSM or promising for large covariate sets.
This paper presents an extensive evaluation of digital soil mapping (DSM) tools. Recently, large...
Citation