Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018
SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018
Original research article
10 Jan 2018
Original research article | 10 Jan 2018

Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates

Madlene Nussbaum et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 5,317 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,868 2,172 277 5,317 621 135 171
  • HTML: 2,868
  • PDF: 2,172
  • XML: 277
  • Total: 5,317
  • Supplement: 621
  • BibTeX: 135
  • EndNote: 171
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,317 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,732 with geography defined and 585 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 07 Dec 2022
Short summary
This paper presents an extensive evaluation of digital soil mapping (DSM) tools. Recently, large sets of environmental covariates (e.g. from analysis of terrain on multiple scales) have become more common for DSM. Many DSM studies, however, only compared DSM methods using less than 30 covariates or tested approaches on few responses. We built DSM models from 300–500 covariates using six approaches that are either popular in DSM or promising for large covariate sets.