SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-193-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-193-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
06 Feb 2025
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 06 Feb 2025

On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence – comment on “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” by Säumel et al. (2023)

José Paruelo, Luis López-Mársico, Pablo Baldassini, Felipe Lezama, Bruno Bazzoni, Luciana Staiano, Agustin Nuñez, Anaclara Guido, Cecilia Ríos, Andrea Tommasino, Federico Gallego, Fabiana Pezzani, Gonzalo Camba Sans, Andrés Quincke, Santiago Baeza, Gervasio Piñeiro, and Walter Baethgen
Note on duplicated preprint: although EGUsphere's policy does not support double preprinting, this preprint has also been posted on OSF Preprints in parallel to the EGUsphere preprint.

Viewed

Total article views: 999 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
752 176 71 999 57 74
  • HTML: 752
  • PDF: 176
  • XML: 71
  • Total: 999
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 999 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 969 with geography defined and 30 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Sep 2025
Download

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the article.

Short summary
In this article, we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay  (Säumel et al., 2023; https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-425-2023). We identified several design and methodological problems in the aforementioned publication that may induce potential misinterpretations. 
Read more
Share