Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-1007-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-1007-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Near-continuous observation of soil surface changes at single slopes with high spatial resolution via an automated SfM photogrammetric mapping approach
Oliver Grothum
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Lea Epple
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Anne Bienert
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Xabier Blanch
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Anette Eltner
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Related authors
Lea Epple, Oliver Grothum, Anne Bienert, and Anette Eltner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The present study offers a unique, nested, high-resolution dataset that captures soil surface changes every 20 seconds during rainfall events, as well as over seasonal variations, across a range of spatial scales – plot, slope, and catchment. These data collected over a period of 3.5 years was facilitated by a camera-based approach. This open-access resource assists scientists in evaluating and refining existing models, improving process understanding, and training artificial intelligence.
Anette Eltner, David Favis-Mortlock, Oliver Grothum, Martin Neumann, Tomáš Laburda, and Petr Kavka
SOIL, 11, 413–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops a new method to improve the calibration and evaluation of models that predict soil erosion by water. By using advanced imaging techniques, we can capture detailed changes in the soil surface over time. This helps improve models that forecast erosion, especially as climate change creates new and unpredictable conditions. Our findings highlight the need for more precise tools to better model erosion of our land and environment in the future.
O. Grothum, A. Bienert, M. Bluemlein, and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, 2023
Felix Rocco Matzke, Tushar Jayesh Barot, Shreeja Sridharan, Nikolaus Ammann, Christoph Kessler, Hans-Gerd Maas, Frank H. P. Fitzek, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W11-2025, 211–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W11-2025-211-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W11-2025-211-2025, 2025
Hanne Hendrickx, Melanie Elias, Xabier Blanch, Reynald Delaloye, and Anette Eltner
Earth Surf. Dynam., 13, 705–721, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-705-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel AI-based method for tracking and analysing the movement of rock glaciers and landslides, key landforms in high mountain regions. By utilising time-lapse images, our approach generates detailed velocity data, uncovering movement patterns often missed by traditional methods. This cost-effective tool enhances geohazard monitoring, providing insights into environmental drivers, improving process understanding, and contributing to better safety in alpine areas.
Lea Epple, Oliver Grothum, Anne Bienert, and Anette Eltner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The present study offers a unique, nested, high-resolution dataset that captures soil surface changes every 20 seconds during rainfall events, as well as over seasonal variations, across a range of spatial scales – plot, slope, and catchment. These data collected over a period of 3.5 years was facilitated by a camera-based approach. This open-access resource assists scientists in evaluating and refining existing models, improving process understanding, and training artificial intelligence.
Anette Eltner, David Favis-Mortlock, Oliver Grothum, Martin Neumann, Tomáš Laburda, and Petr Kavka
SOIL, 11, 413–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops a new method to improve the calibration and evaluation of models that predict soil erosion by water. By using advanced imaging techniques, we can capture detailed changes in the soil surface over time. This helps improve models that forecast erosion, especially as climate change creates new and unpredictable conditions. Our findings highlight the need for more precise tools to better model erosion of our land and environment in the future.
Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ralf Hedel, and Anette Eltner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-724, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a low-cost, automated system for monitoring river water levels using cameras and AI. By combining AI-based image analysis with photogrammetry, it accurately measures water levels in real-time, even in challenging conditions. Tested over 2.5 years at four sites, it achieved high accuracy (errors of 1.0–2.3 cm) and processed over 219,000 images. Its resilience makes it ideal for flood detection and water management in remote areas.
Robert Krüger, Xabier Blanch, Jens Grundmann, Ghazi Al-Rawas, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 243–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-243-2024, 2024
Pedro Alberto Pereira Zamboni, Hanne Hendrickx, Dennis Sprute, Holger Flatt, Muhtasimul Islam Rushdi, Florian Brodrecht, and Anette Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W8-2024, 483–490, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W8-2024-483-2024, 2024
Anne Bienert, Katja Richter, Sophia Boehme, and Hans-Gerd Maas
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-2024, 33–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-33-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-2024-33-2024, 2024
Melanie Elias, Steffen Isfort, Anette Eltner, and Hans-Gerd Maas
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-2-2024, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-57-2024, 2024
Robert Krüger, Pierre Karrasch, and Anette Eltner
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 163–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Low-cost sensors could fill gaps in existing observation networks. To ensure data quality, the quality of the factory calibration of a given sensor has to be evaluated if the sensor is used out of the box. Here, the factory calibration of a widely used low-cost rain gauge type has been tested both in the lab (66) and in the field (20). The results of the study suggest that the calibration of this particular type should at least be checked for every sensor before being used.
O. Grothum, A. Bienert, M. Bluemlein, and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, 2023
Xabier Blanch, Marta Guinau, Anette Eltner, and Antonio Abellan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3285–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present cost-effective photogrammetric systems for high-resolution rockfall monitoring. The paper outlines the components, assembly, and programming codes required. The systems utilize prime cameras to generate 3D models and offer comparable performance to lidar for change detection monitoring. Real-world applications highlight their potential in geohazard monitoring which enables accurate detection of pre-failure deformation and rockfalls with a high temporal resolution.
R. Blaskow and A. Eltner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W1-2023, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-45-2023, 2023
Robert Ljubičić, Dariia Strelnikova, Matthew T. Perks, Anette Eltner, Salvador Peña-Haro, Alonso Pizarro, Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso, Ulf Scherling, Pietro Vuono, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5105–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rise of new technologies such as drones (unmanned aerial systems – UASs) has allowed widespread use of image velocimetry techniques in place of more traditional, usually slower, methods during hydrometric campaigns. In order to minimize the velocity estimation errors, one must stabilise the acquired videos. In this research, we compare the performance of different UAS video stabilisation tools and provide guidelines for their use in videos with different flight and ground conditions.
Lea Epple, Andreas Kaiser, Marcus Schindewolf, and Anette Eltner
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-85, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Intensified extreme weather events due to climate change can result in changes of soil erosion. These unclear developments make an improvement of soil erosion modelling all the more important. Assuming that soil erosion models cannot keep up with the current data, this work gives an overview of 44 models, their strengths and weaknesses and discusses their potential for further development with respect to new and improved soil and soil erosion assessment techniques.
A. Eltner, D. Mader, N. Szopos, B. Nagy, J. Grundmann, and L. Bertalan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 717–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-717-2021, 2021
Cited articles
Agisoft LLC: Metashape Professional Edition – User Manual, Version 1.8, https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape-pro_1_8_en.pdf (last access: 7 May 2025), 2022.
Anders, K., Winiwarter, L., Mara, H., Lindenbergh, R., Vos, S. E., and Höfle, B.: Fully Automatic Spatiotemporal Segmentation of 3D LiDAR Time Series for the Extraction of Natural Surface Changes, ISPRS J. of Photogram. and Remote Sens., 173, 297–308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.015, 2021.
Balaguer-Puig, M., Marqués-Mateu, Á., Lerma, J. L., and Ibáñez-Asensio, S.: Estimation of small-scale soil erosion in laboratory experiments with Structure from Motion photogrammetry, Geomorphology, 295, 285–296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.035, 2017.
Batista, P. V. G., Davies, J., Silva, M. L. N., and Quinton, J. N.: On the Evaluation of Soil Erosion Models: Are We Doing Enough?, Earth-Science Reviews, 197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102898, 2019.
Besl, P. J. and McKay, N. D.: A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14, 239–56, https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791, 1992.
Blanch, X., Guinau, M., Eltner, A., and Abellan, A.: Fixed photogrammetric systems for natural hazard monitoring with high spatio-temporal resolution, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3285–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3285-2023, 2023.
Blanch, X., Guinau, M., Eltner, A., and Abellan, A.: A cost-effective image-based system for 3D geomorphic monitoring: an application to rockfalls, Geomorphology, 449, 109065, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109065, 2024.
Blanch, X., Jäschke, A., Elias, M., and Eltner, A.: Sub-pixel automatic detection of GCPs coordinates in time-lapse images using a Deep Learning keypoint network, IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3514854, 2025.
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro, V., Bagarello, V., Oost, K. V., Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P.: An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion, Nature Communications, 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7, 2017.
Brown, D.: Close-Range Camera Calibration, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 37, 855–66, 1971.
Cândido, B. M., Quinton, J. N., James, M. R., Silva, M. L. N., Carvalho, T. S., Lima, W., Beniaich, A., and Eltner, A.: High-Resolution Monitoring of Diffuse (Sheet or Interrill) Erosion Using Structure-from-Motion, Geoderma, 375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114477, 2020.
Chen, Y. and Medioni, G.: Object Modeling by Registration of Multiple Range Images, in: Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, USA, 2724–2729, https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1991.132043, 1991.
Cloudcompare: Cloudcompare (version 2.13.2) [GPL software], http://www.cloudcompare.org (last access: 22 November 2025), 2024.
Dai, W., Qian, W., Liu, A., Wang, C., Yang, X., Hu, G., and Tang, G.: Monitoring and modeling sediment transport in space in small loess catchments using UAV-SfM photogrammetry, Catena, 214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106244, 2022.
Doetterl, S., Berhe, A. A., Nadeu, E., Wang, Z., Sommer, M., and Fiener, P.: Erosion, deposition and soil carbon: A review of process-level controls, experimental tools and models to address C cycling in dynamic landscapes, Earth-Science Reviews, 154, 102–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.12.005, 2016.
Eldar, Y., Lindenbaum, M., Porat, M., and Zeevi, Y. Y.: The Farthest Point Strategy for Progressive Image Sampling, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 1305–1315, https://doi.org/10.1109/83.623193, 1997.
Eltner, A. and Baumgart, P.: Accuracy constraints of terrestrial Lidar data for soil erosion measurement: Application to a Mediterranean field plot, Geomorphology, 245, 243–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.008, 2015.
Eltner, A. and Schneider, D.: Analysis of Different Methods for 3D Reconstruction of Natural Surfaces from Parallel-Axes UAV Images, The Photogrammetric Record, 30, 279–299, https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12115, 2015.
Eltner, A. and Sofia, G.: Chapter 1 – Structure from Motion photogrammetric technique. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 23, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64177-9.00001-1, 2020.
Eltner, A., Baumgart, P., Maas, H. G., and Faust, D.: Multi-temporal UAV data for automatic measurement of rill and interrill erosion on loess soil, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40, 741–755, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3673, 2015.
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Abellan, A., and Schindewolf, M.: Time Lapse Structure-from-motion Photogrammetry for Continuous Geomorphic Monitoring, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42, 2240–2253, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4178, 2017.
Eltner, A., Maas, H.-G., and Faust, D.: Soil Micro-Topography Change Detection at Hillslopes in Fragile Mediterranean Landscapes, Geoderma, 313, 217–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.034, 2018.
Eltner, A., Favis-Mortlock, D., Grothum, O., Neumann, M., Laburda, T., and Kavka, P.: Using 3D observations with high spatio-temporal resolution to calibrate and evaluate a process-focused cellular automaton model of soil erosion by water, SOIL, 11, 413–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-413-2025, 2025.
Epple, L., Kaiser, A., Schindewolf, M., Bienert, A., Lenz, J., and Eltner, A.: A Review on the Possibilities and Challenges of Today's Soil and Soil Surface Assessment Techniques in the Context of Process-Based Soil Erosion Models, Remote Sensing, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102468, 2022.
Epple, L., Grothum, O., Bienert, A., and Eltner, A.: Decoding rainfall effects on soil surface changes: Empirical separation of sediment yield in time-lapse SfM photogrammetry measurements, Soil & Tillage Research, 248, 106384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106384, 2025a.
Epple, L., Grothum, O., Bienert, A., and Eltner, A.: Soil surface change data of high spatio-temporal resolution from the plot to the catchment scale, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-380, in review, 2025b.
Evans, D. L., Cândido, B., Coelho, R. M., Maria, I. C. D., Moraes, J. F. L. de, Eltner, A., Martins, L. L., and Cantarella, H.: The Loss of Soil Parent Material: Detecting and Measuring the Erosion of Saprolite, Soil Systems, 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8020043, 2024.
Fiener, P., Dostál, T., Krása, J., Schmaltz, E., Strauss, P., and Wilken, F.: Operational USLE-Based Modelling of Soil Erosion in Czech Republic, Austria, and Bavaria-Differences in Model Adaptation, Parametrization, and Data Availability, Appl. Sci., 10, 3647, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103647, 2020.
Godding, R. and Luhmann, T.: Calibration and Accuracy Assessment of a Multi- Sensor Online- Photogrammetric System, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing XXIX:24–29, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., 1992.
Grothum, O.: https://github.com/onlyole/TimeLapseErosion.git, (last access: 26 November 2025), 2025.
Grothum, O., Bienert, A., Bluemlein, M., and Eltner, A.: Using machine learning techniques to filter vegetation in colorized sfm point clouds of soil surfaces, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1/W2-2023, 163–170, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-163-2023, 2023.
Hänsel, P., Schindewolf, M., Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., and Schmidt, J.: Feasibility of High-Resolution Soil Erosion Measurements by Means of Rainfall Simulations and SfM Photogrammetry, Hydrology, 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3040038, 2016.
He, T., Yang, Y., Shi, Y., Liang, X., Fu, S., Xie, G., Liu, B., and Liu, Y.: Quantifying spatial distribution of interrill and rill erosion in a loess at different slopes using structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 10, 393–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.01.001, 2022.
James, M. R., Robson, S., and Smith, M. W.: 3-D Uncertainty-based Topographic Change Detection with Structure-from-motion Photogrammetry: Precision Maps for Ground Control and Directly Georeferenced Surveys, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42, 1769–88, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125, 2017.
Jetten, V. and Favis-Mortlock, D.: Modelling Soil Erosion in Europe, in: Soil Erosion in Europe, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 695–716, https://doi.org/10.1002/0470859202.ch50, 2006.
Kaiser, A., Erhard, A., and Eltner, A.: Addressing uncertainties in interpreting soil surface changes by multi-temporal high resolution topography data across scales, Land Degradation & Development, 9, 2264–2277, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2967, 2018.
Karydas, C. G., Panagos, P., and Gitas, I. Z.: A classification of water erosion models according to their geospatial characteristics, International Journal of Digital Earth, 7, 229–250, https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2012.671380, 2014.
Kohrell, G. J., Mulla, D. J., and Gelder, B.: Calibration and validation of hillslope runoff and soil loss outputs from the Water Erosion Prediction Project model in Minnesota agricultural watersheds, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 59, 1529–1548, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13148, 2023.
Krimmel, R. M. and Rasmussen, L. A.: Using Sequential Photography to Estimate Ice Velocity at the Terminus of Columbia Glacier, Alaska, Annals of Glaciology, 8, 117–123, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500001270, 1986.
Kromer, R., Walton, G., Gray, B., Lato, M., and Group, R.: Development and Optimization of an Automated Fixed-Location Time Lapse Photogrammetric Rock Slope Monitoring System, Remote Sensing, 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161890, 2019.
Lague, D., Brodu, N., and Leroux, J.: Accurate 3D Comparison of Complex Topography with Terrestrial Laser Scanner: Application to the Rangitikei Canyon (N-Z), ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82, 10–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009, 2013.
Li, P., Ren, F., Hu, J., Yan, L., Hao, M., Liu, L., Gao, J., and Dang, T.: Monitoring soil erosion on field slopes by terrestrial laser scanning and structure-from-motion, Land Degradation and Development, 34, 3663–3680, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4712, 2023.
Luhmann, T., Fraser, C., and Maas, H.-G.: Sensor Modelling and Camera Calibration for Close-Range Photogrammetry, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 37–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.006, 2016.
Mallalieu, J., Carrivick, J. L., Quincey, D. J., Smith, M. W., and James, W. H. M.: An integrated structure-from-motion and time-lapse technique for quantifying ice-margin dynamics, J. Glaciol, 63, 937–949, 2017.
Möller, T. and Hughes, J. F.: Efficiently Building a Matrix to Rotate One Vector to Another, Journal of Graphics Tools, 4, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1080/10867651.1999.10487509, 1999.
Onnen, N., Eltner, A., Heckrath, G., and Van Oost, K.: Monitoring soil surface roughness under growing winter wheat with low altitude UAV sensing. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45, 3747–3759, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4998, 2020.
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Poesen, J., Ballabio, C., Lugato, E., Meusburger, K., Montanarella, L., and Alewell, C.: The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe, Environmental Science and Policy, 54, 438–447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012, 2015.
Rupnik, E., Daakir, M., and Pierrot Deseilligny, M.: MicMac – a free, open-source solution for photogrammetry. Open geospatial data, Softw. Stand., 2, 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-017-0027-2, 2017.
Schindewolf, M. and Schmidt, J.: Parameterization of the EROSION 2D/3D Soil Erosion Model Using a Small-Scale Rainfall Simulator and Upstream Runoff Simulation, CATENA, 91, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.007, 2012.
Schönberger, J. L. and Frahm, J.-M.: Structure-from-Motion Revisited, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4104–4113, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.445, 2016.
Schwalbe, E., Koschitzki, R., and Maas, H.-G.: RECOGNITION OF DRAINAGE TUNNELS DURING GLACIER LAKE OUTBURST EVENTS FROM TERRESTRIAL IMAGE SEQUENCES, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 537–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-537-2016, 2016.
Vos, S., Anders, K., Kuschnerus, M., Lindenbergh, R., Höfle, B., Aarninkhof, S., and Vries, S.: A High-Resolution 4D Terrestrial Laser Scan Dataset of the Kijkduin Beach-Dune System, The Netherlands, Scientific Data, 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01291-9, 2022.
Short summary
Soil erosion threatens landscapes worldwide, and understanding how surfaces change over time is key to addressing this issue. We developed a new camera-based system that automatically captures and analyzes daily surface changes on a hillside over several years. Triggered by rain and a clock, the system showed how weather and farming impact the land. Our method offers a powerful way to monitor surface changes and can help improve predictions and solutions for soil erosion.
Soil erosion threatens landscapes worldwide, and understanding how surfaces change over time is...