Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-57
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-57

  06 Jul 2021

06 Jul 2021

Review status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal SOIL (SOIL). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Soil water repellency influences maize yield by changing soil water availability under long-term tillage management

Shengping Li1,2, Guopeng Liang3, Xueping Wu1, Jinjing Lu1,2, Erwan Plougonven4, Huijun Wu1, Zixuan Han2, Ahmed Ali Abdelrhmana1, and Xiaotong Liu1 Shengping Li et al.
  • 1Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, PR China
  • 2University of Liege, GxABT, Terra Research Center, 2 Passage des Déportés, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium
  • 3Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA
  • 4University of Liege, Department of Applied Chemistry, Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Sart Tilman, 4000 Liege, Belgium

Abstract. Drought is increasingly common due to frequent occurrences of extreme weather events, which further increases soil water repellency (SWR) and influences grain yield. Conservation agriculture is playing a vital role in attaining high food security and it could also increase SWR. However, the relationship between SWR and grain yield under conservation agriculture is still not fully understood. We studied the impact of SWR in 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, and 10–20 cm layers during three growth periods on grain yield from a soil water availability perspective using a long-term field experiment. In particular, we assessed the effect of SWR on soil water content under two rainfall events with different rainfall intensities. Three treatments were conducted: conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT), and no-tillage (NT). The results showed that the water repellency index (RI) of NT and RT treatments in 0–20 cm layers was increased by 12.9 %–39.9 % and 5.7 %–18.2 % compared to CT treatment during the three growth periods, respectively. The effect of the RI on soil water content became more obvious with the decrease in soil moisture following rainfall, which was also influenced by rainfall intensity. The RI played a prominent role in increasing soil water storage during the three growth periods compared to the soil total porosity, penetration resistance, mean weight diameter, and organic carbon content. Furthermore, although the increment in the RI under NT treatment increased the soil water storage, grain yield was not influenced by RI (p > 0.05) because the grain yield under NT treatment was mainly driven by penetration resistance and least limiting water range (LLWR). The higher water sorptivity increased LLWR and water use efficiency, which further increased the grain yield under RT treatment. Overall, SWR, which was characterized by water sorptivity and RI, had the potential to influence grain yield by changing soil water availability (e.g. LLWR and soil water storage) and RT treatment was the most effective tillage management compared to CT and NT treatments in improving grain yield.

Shengping Li et al.

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Shengping Li et al.

Shengping Li et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 418 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
316 82 20 418 12 9
  • HTML: 316
  • PDF: 82
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 418
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 409 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 409 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Oct 2021
Download
Short summary
Soil water repellency (SWR) is an intrinsic physiochemical property in soils. No-tillage can increase SWR, which further affects some soil processes and plant growth. However, studies about the effect of SWR on yield are lacking. We found that despite there was no direct relationship between SWR and yield, SWR had the potential influence on grain yield by changing soil water availability and the effect of SWR on yield was worthy of further study under conservation tillage practices.