Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-77-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-77-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Original research article
| 
01 Feb 2024
Original research article |
| 01 Feb 2024
| 01 Feb 2024
Organic matters, but inorganic matters too: column examination of elevated mercury sorption on low organic matter aquifer material using concentrations and stable isotope ratios
David S. McLagan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L3N6, Canada
School of Environmental Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L3J6, Canada
Carina Esser
Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Lorenz Schwab
Department for Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
Environmental Engineering Institute IIE-ENAC, Soil Biogeochemistry Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, 1950, Switzerland
Jan G. Wiederhold
Department for Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
Jan-Helge Richard
Institute for Hygiene and Environment Hamburg, 20539 Hamburg, Germany
Harald Biester
Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Related authors
David S. McLagan, Excellent O. Eboigbe, and Rachel J. Strickman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3847, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3847, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
ASGM is rapidly expanding and Hg-use in the sector impacts agricultural system surrounding these spatially distributed activities. Contamination of crops from ASGM-derived Hg occurs via both uptake from both air and soil/water. In addition to risks to human consumers, Hg in staple crops can also be passed along to livestock/poultry further conflating risks. Research in this area requires interdisciplinary, collaborative, and adaptable approaches to improve our comprehension of these impacts.
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2747–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the Multi-Compartment Mercury (Hg) Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP) aimed at informing the effectiveness evaluations of two multilateral environmental agreements: the Minamata Convention on Mercury and the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. The experimental design exploits a variety of models (atmospheric, land, oceanic ,and multimedia mass balance models) to assess the short- and long-term influences of anthropogenic Hg releases into the environment.
Excellent O. Eboigbe, Nimelan Veerasamy, Abiodun M. Odukoya, Nnamdi C. Anene, Jeroen E. Sonke, Sayuri Sakisaka Méndez, and David S. McLagan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1402, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Air, soil, and three common staple crops were assess at an ASGM processing site and Hg contamination observed at a farm ≈500 m from the processing site. Of the crop tissues examined, foliage had the highest concentrations. Mercury stable isotopes indicate uptake of mercury from the air to the foliage as is the dominant uptake pathway. Using typical dietary data for Nigerians, Hg intake from these crops were below reference dose levels and generally safe for consumption.
David S. McLagan, Harald Biester, Tomas Navrátil, Stephan M. Kraemer, and Lorenz Schwab
Biogeosciences, 19, 4415–4429, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4415-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4415-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Spruce and larch trees are effective archiving species for historical atmospheric mercury using growth rings of bole wood. Mercury stable isotope analysis proved an effective tool to characterise industrial mercury signals and assess mercury uptake pathways (leaf uptake for both wood and bark) and mercury cycling within the trees. These data detail important information for understanding the mercury biogeochemical cycle particularly in forest systems.
David S. McLagan, Geoff W. Stupple, Andrea Darlington, Katherine Hayden, and Alexandra Steffen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5635–5653, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An assessment of mercury emissions from a burning boreal forest was made by flying an aircraft through its plume to collect in situ gas and particulate measurements. Direct data show that in-plume gaseous elemental mercury concentrations reach up to 2.4× background for this fire and up to 5.6× when using a correlation with CO data. These unique data are applied to a series of known empirical emissions estimates and used to highlight current uncertainties in the literature.
David S. McLagan, Excellent O. Eboigbe, and Rachel J. Strickman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3847, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3847, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
ASGM is rapidly expanding and Hg-use in the sector impacts agricultural system surrounding these spatially distributed activities. Contamination of crops from ASGM-derived Hg occurs via both uptake from both air and soil/water. In addition to risks to human consumers, Hg in staple crops can also be passed along to livestock/poultry further conflating risks. Research in this area requires interdisciplinary, collaborative, and adaptable approaches to improve our comprehension of these impacts.
Alexander Land, Aleta Neugebauer, Jürgen Franzaring, Petra Schmidt, and Harald Biester
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2325, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2325, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Trees take up mercury through their leaves and enrich it in their tree-rings . We investigated tree-ring records of oak and Douglas fir in Germany reaching back ~120 years. We have found that the overall magnitude of mercury loads in trees are determined by local atmospheric Hg concentrations while changes in mercury uptake are controlled by climate. Oak and Douglas fir show different Hg records through time as a results of different adaptation strategies to high temperatures and drought.
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2747–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the Multi-Compartment Mercury (Hg) Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP) aimed at informing the effectiveness evaluations of two multilateral environmental agreements: the Minamata Convention on Mercury and the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. The experimental design exploits a variety of models (atmospheric, land, oceanic ,and multimedia mass balance models) to assess the short- and long-term influences of anthropogenic Hg releases into the environment.
Excellent O. Eboigbe, Nimelan Veerasamy, Abiodun M. Odukoya, Nnamdi C. Anene, Jeroen E. Sonke, Sayuri Sakisaka Méndez, and David S. McLagan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1402, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Air, soil, and three common staple crops were assess at an ASGM processing site and Hg contamination observed at a farm ≈500 m from the processing site. Of the crop tissues examined, foliage had the highest concentrations. Mercury stable isotopes indicate uptake of mercury from the air to the foliage as is the dominant uptake pathway. Using typical dietary data for Nigerians, Hg intake from these crops were below reference dose levels and generally safe for consumption.
Laura Balzer, Carluvy Baptista-Salazar, Sofi Jonsson, and Harald Biester
Biogeosciences, 20, 1459–1472, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1459-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1459-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Toxic methylmercury (MeHg) in lakes can be enriched in fish and is harmful for humans. Phytoplankton is the entry point for MeHg into the aquatic food chain. We investigated seasonal MeHg concentrations in plankton of a productive lake. Our results show that high amounts of MeHg occur in algae and suspended matter in lakes and that productive lakes are hot spots of MeHg formation, which is mainly controlled by decomposition of algae organic matter and water-phase redox conditions.
David S. McLagan, Harald Biester, Tomas Navrátil, Stephan M. Kraemer, and Lorenz Schwab
Biogeosciences, 19, 4415–4429, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4415-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4415-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Spruce and larch trees are effective archiving species for historical atmospheric mercury using growth rings of bole wood. Mercury stable isotope analysis proved an effective tool to characterise industrial mercury signals and assess mercury uptake pathways (leaf uptake for both wood and bark) and mercury cycling within the trees. These data detail important information for understanding the mercury biogeochemical cycle particularly in forest systems.
David S. McLagan, Geoff W. Stupple, Andrea Darlington, Katherine Hayden, and Alexandra Steffen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5635–5653, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An assessment of mercury emissions from a burning boreal forest was made by flying an aircraft through its plume to collect in situ gas and particulate measurements. Direct data show that in-plume gaseous elemental mercury concentrations reach up to 2.4× background for this fire and up to 5.6× when using a correlation with CO data. These unique data are applied to a series of known empirical emissions estimates and used to highlight current uncertainties in the literature.
Cited articles
Andersson, A.: Mercury in soil, in: The biochemistry of mercury in the environment, edited by: Nriagu, J. O., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holland, 79–112, ISBN 0444801103, 1979.
Akcay, H., Kilinç, S., and Karapire, C.: A comparative study on the sorption and desorption of Hg, Th and U on clay, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 214, 51–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02165058, 1996.
Avotins, P. V.: Adsorption and coprecipitation studies of mercury on hydrous iron oxide, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, ISBN 9798660526602, 1975.
Bergquist, B. A. and Blum, J. D.: Mass-dependent and-independent fractionation of Hg isotopes by photoreduction in aquatic systems, Science, 318, 417–420, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1148050, 2007.
Bergquist, B. A. and Blum, J. D.: The odds and evens of mercury isotopes: applications of mass-dependent and mass-independent isotope fractionation, Elements, 5, 353–357, https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.5.6.353, 2009.
Biester, H. and Scholz, C.: Determination of mercury binding forms in contaminated soils: mercury pyrolysis versus sequential extractions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 233–239, https://doi.org/10.1021/es960369h, 1996.
Bloom, N. S., Preus, E., Katon, J., and Hiltner, M.: Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils, Anal. Chim. Ac, 479, 233–248, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01550-7, 2003.
Bollen, A., Wenke, A., and Biester, H.: Mercury speciation analyses in HgCl2-contaminated soils and groundwater – implications for risk assessment and remediation strategies, Water Res., 42, 91–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.011, 2008.
Brocza, F. M., Biester, H., Richard, J. H., Kraemer, S. M., and Wiederhold, J. G.: Mercury isotope fractionation in the subsurface of a Hg(II) chloride-contaminated industrial legacy site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 7296–7305, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00619, 2019.
Bradl, H. B.: Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 277, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.005, 2004.
Clarkson, T. W.: The toxicology of mercury, Crit. Rev. Clinic. Lab. Sci., 34, 369–403, https://doi.org/10.3109/10408369708998098, 1997.
Delnomdedieu, M., Boudou, A., Georgescauld, D., and Dufourc, E. J.: Specific interactions of mercury chloride with membranes and other ligands as revealed by mercury-NMR, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 81, 243–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2797(92)90081-U, 1992.
Demers, J. D., Blum, J. D., Brooks, S. C., Donovan, P. M., Riscassi, A. L., Miller, C. L., Zheng, W. and Gu, B.: Hg isotopes reveal in-stream processing and legacy inputs in East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 20, 686–707, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00538E, 2018.
DIN ISO: Method 11277: Soil quality–Determination of particle size distribution in mineral soil material–Method by sieving and sedimentation, German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung; DIN) International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Berlin, ICS number: 13.080.20, Germany, 2002.
DIN: Method 1483: Water quality - Determination of mercury - Method using atomic absorption spectrometry, German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung; DIN), Berlin, ICS number: 13.060.50, Germany, 2007.
DIN: 19528-01: Leaching of solid materials – Percolation method for the joint examination of the leaching behaviour of organic and inorganic substances for materials with a particle size up to 32 mm – Basic characterization using a comprehensive column test and compliance test using a quick column test, German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung; DIN), Berlin, Germany, ICS number: 13.060.50, 2009.
Gabriel, M. C. and Williamson, D. G.: Principal biogeochemical factors affecting the speciation and transport of mercury through the terrestrial environment, Environ. Geochem. Health, 26, 421–434, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-004-1308-0, 2004.
Gettens, R. J., Feller, R. L., and Chase, W. T.: Vermilion and cinnabar, Stud. Conserv., 17, 45–69, https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1972.006, 1972.
Goix, S., Maurice, L., Laffont, L., Rinaldo, R., Lagane, C., Chmeleff, J., Menges, J., Heimbürger, L. E., Maury-Brachet, R., and Sonke, J. E.: Quantifying the impacts of artisanal gold mining on a tropical river system using mercury isotopes, Chemosphere, 219, 684–694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.036, 2019.
Grigg, A. R., Kretzschmar, R., Gilli, R. S., and Wiederhold, J. G.: Mercury isotope signatures of digests and sequential extracts from industrially contaminated soils and sediments, Sci. Tot. Environ., 636, 1344–1354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.261, 2018.
Gu, B., Bian, Y., Miller, C. L., Dong, W., Jiang, X., and Liang, L.: Mercury reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 1479–1483, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008747108, 2011.
Gunneriusson, L. and Sjöberg, S.: Surface complexation in the H+-goethite (α-FeOOH)-Hg (II)-chloride system, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 156, 121–128, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1993.1090, 1993.
Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., and Ryan, J. N.: Binding of mercury (II) to dissolved organic matter: the role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3564–3570, https://doi.org/10.1021/es025699i, 2002.
Hall, G. E., Pelchat, J. C., Pelchat, P., and Vaive, J. E.: Sample collection, filtration and preservation protocols for the determination of “total dissolved” mercury in waters, Analyst, 127, 674–680, https://doi.org/10.1039/B110491H, 2002.
Hammerschmidt, C. R., Bowman, K. L., Tabatchnick, M. D., and Lamborg, C. H.: Storage bottle material and cleaning for determination of total mercury in seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 9, 426–431, https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2011.9.426, 2011.
Hebig, K. H., Nödler, K., Licha, T., and Scheytt, T. J.: Impact of materials used in lab and field experiments on the recovery of organic micropollutants, Sci. Tot. Environ., 473, 125–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.004, 2014.
Ho, T. L.: Hard soft acids bases (HSAB) principle and organic chemistry, Chem. Rev., 75, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60293a001, 1975.
Jiskra, M., Wiederhold, J. G., Bourdon, B., and Kretzschmar, R.: Solution speciation controls mercury isotope fractionation of Hg(II) sorption to goethite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 6654–6662, https://doi.org/10.1021/es3008112, 2012.
Jiskra, M., Wiederhold, J. G., Skyllberg, U., Kronberg, R. M., and Kretzschmar, R.: Source tracing of natural organic matter bound mercury in boreal forest runoff with mercury stable isotopes, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 19, 1235–1248, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00245A, 2017.
Katsenovich, Y., Tachiev, G., Fuentes, H. R., Roelant, D., and Henao, A.: A study of the mercury (II) sorption and transport with Oak Ridge Reservation soil, Waste Management Conference 2010, Phoenix, USA, https://archivedproceedings.econference.io/wmsym/2010/pdfs/10222.pdf (last access: 19 January 2024), 2010.
Kim, C. S., Rytuba, J. J., and Brown Jr., G. E.: EXAFS study of mercury (II) sorption to Fe-and Al-(hydr) oxides: II. Effects of chloride and sulfate, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 270, 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.07.029, 2004.
Kocman, D., Horvat, M., Pirrone, N., and Cinnirella, S.: Contribution of contaminated sites to the global mercury budget, Environ. Res., 125, 160–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.12.011, 2013.
Lamborg, C. H., Kent, D. B., Swarr, G. J., Munson, K. M., Kading, T., O'Connor, A. E., Fairchild, G. M., LeBlanc, D. R., and Wiatrowski, H. A.: Mercury speciation and mobilization in a wastewater-contaminated groundwater plume, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13239–13249, https://doi.org/10.1021/es402441d, 2013.
Leterme, B., Blanc, P., and Jacques, D.: A reactive transport model for mercury fate in soil – application to different anthropogenic pollution sources, Environ. Sci. Poll. Res., 21, 12279–12293, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3135-x, 2014.
Lewis, J. and Sjöstrom, J.: Optimizing the experimental design of soil columns in saturated and unsaturated transport experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 115, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.04.001, 2010.
Lockwood, R. A. and Chen, K. Y.: Adsorption of mercury (II) by hydrous manganese oxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 1028–1034, https://doi.org/10.1021/es60083a006, 1973.
Llanos, W., Kocman, D., Higueras, P., and Horvat, M.: Mercury emission and dispersion models from soils contaminated by cinnabar mining and metallurgy, J. Environ. Monit., 13, 3460–3468, https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EM10694E, 2011.
Lu, Y. F., Wu, Q., Yan, J. W., Shi, J. Z., Liu, J., and Shi, J. S.: Realgar, cinnabar and An-Gong-Niu-Huang Wan are much less chronically nephrotoxic than common arsenicals and mercurial, Exp. Biol. Med., 236, 233–239, https://doi.org/10.1258/ebm.2010.010247, 2011.
Lyon, B. F., Ambrose, R., Rice, G., and Maxwell, C. J.: Calculation of soil-water and benthic sediment partition coefficients for mercury, Chemosphere, 35, 791–808, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00200-2, 1997.
Manceau, A. and Nagy, K. L.: Thiols in natural organic matter: Molecular forms, acidity, and reactivity with mercury (II) from First-Principles calculations and high energy-resolution X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 2795–2807, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00278, 2019.
McLagan, D. S., Schwab, L., Wiederhold, J. G., Chen, L., Pietrucha, J., Kraemer, S. M., and Biester, H.: Demystifying mercury geochemistry in contaminated soil–groundwater systems with complementary mercury stable isotope, concentration, and speciation analyses, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 24, 1406–1429, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00368B, 2022.
Miretzky, P., Bisinoti, M. C., andJardim, W. F.: Sorption of mercury (II) in Amazon soils from column studies, Chemosphere, 60, 1583–1589, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.050, 2005.
Norrby, L. J.: Why is mercury liquid? Or, why do relativistic effects not get into chemistry textbooks?, J. Chem. Ed., 68, 110, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed068p110, 1991.
Obrist, D., Agnan, Y., Jiskra, M., Olson, C. L., Colegrove, D. P., Hueber, J., Moore, C. W., Sonke, J. E., and Helmig, D.: Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution, Nature, 547, 201–204, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22997, 2017.
Parker, J. L. and Bloom, N. S.: Preservation and storage techniques for low-level aqueous mercury speciation, Sci. Tot. Environ., 337, 253–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.07.006, 2005.
Patterson, B. M., Pribac, F., Barber, C., Davis, G. B., and Gibbs, R.: Biodegradation and retardation of PCE and BTEX compounds in aquifer material from Western Australia using large-scale columns, J. Contam. Hydrol., 14, 261–278, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(93)90028-Q, 1993.
Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010, 2010.
Reis, A. T., Davidson, C. M., Vale, C., and Pereira, E.: Overview and challenges of mercury fractionation and speciation in soils, Trends Anal. Chem., 82, 109–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2016.05.008, 2016.
Richard, J. H., Bischoff, C., and Biester, H.: Comparing modeled and measured mercury speciation in contaminated groundwater: Importance of dissolved organic matter composition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 7508–7516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2016.05.008, 2016a.
Richard, J. H., Bischoff, C., Ahrens, C. G., and Biester, H.: Mercury (II) reduction and co-precipitation of metallic mercury on hydrous ferric oxide in contaminated groundwater, Sci. Tot. Environ., 539, 36–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.116, 2016b.
Sentenac, P., Lynch, R. J., and Bolton, M. D.: Measurement of a side-wall boundary effect in soil columns using fibre-optics sensing, Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech., 1, 35–41, https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2001.010404, 2001.
Sanemasa, I.: The solubility of elemental mercury vapor in water, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 48, 1795–1798, https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.48.1795, 1975
Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J.: Atmospheric mercury – an overview, Atmos. Environ., 32, 809–822, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00293-8, 1998.
Schlüter, K., Seip, H. M., and Alstad, J.: Mercury translocation in and evaporation from soil. II. Evaporation of mercury from podzolized soil profiles treated with HgCl2 and CH3HgCl, Soil Sediment Contam., 4, 269–298, https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389509383498, 1995.
Schlüter, K.: Sorption of inorganic mercury and monomethyl mercury in an iron–humus podzol soil of southern Norway studied by batch experiments, Environ. Geol., 30, 266–279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050156, 1997.
Schnaar, G. and Brusseau, M. L.: Measuring equilibrium sorption coefficients with the miscible-displacement method, J. Environ. Sci. Health A, 48, 355–359, https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.727733, 2013.
Schöndorf, T., Egli, M., Biester, H., Mailahn, W., and Rotard, W.: Distribution, Bioavailability and Speciation of Mercury in Contaminated Soil and Groundwater of a Former Wood Impregnation Plant, in: Mercury Contaminated Sites, edited by: Ebinghaus, R., Turner, R. R., de Lacerda, L. D., Vasiliev, O., Salomons, W., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 181–206, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03754-6_ 9, 1999.
Schuster, E.: The behavior of mercury in the soil with special emphasis on complexation and adsorption processes-a review of the literature, Water Air Soil Poll., 56, 667–680, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342308, 1991.
Schuster, P. F., Shanley, J. B., Marvin-Dipasquale, M., Reddy, M. M., Aiken, G. R., Roth, D. A., Taylor, H. E., Krabbenhoft, D. P. and DeWild, J. F.: Mercury and organic carbon dynamics during runoff episodes from a northeastern USA watershed, Water Air Soil Poll., 187, 89–108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9500-3, 2008.
Schwab, L., Gallati, N., Reiter, S. M., Kimber, R. L., Kumar, N., McLagan, D. S., Biester, H., Kraemer, S. M., and Wiederhold, J. G.: Mercury Isotope Fractionation during Dark Abiotic Reduction of Hg (II) by Dissolved, Surface-Bound, and Structural Fe (II), Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15243–15254, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03703, 2023.
Skyllberg, U.: Chemical speciation of mercury in soil and sediment, in: Environmental chemistry and toxicology of mercury, edited by: Liu, G., Cai, Y., Driscoll, N., Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, USA, 219–258, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118146644.ch7, 2012.
Streets, D. G., Horowitz, H. M., Lu, Z., Levin, L., Thackray, C. P., and Sunderland, E. M.: Global and regional trends in mercury emissions and concentrations, 2010–2015, Atmos. Environ., 201, 417–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.031, 2019.
Ullrich, S. M., Tanton, T. W., and Abdrashitova, S. A.: Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 241–293, https://doi.org/10.1080/20016491089226, 2001.
USEPA: Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Washington, DC, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/method_1631e_2002.pdf, (last access: 19 January 2024), 2002.
USEPA.: Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd, values. Volume III: Review of Geochemistry and Available Kd Values for Americium, Arsenic, Curium, Iodine, Neptunium, Radium, and Technetium. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Washington, DC, USA, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/402-r-04-002c.pdf, (last access: 19 January 2024), 2004.
Van Genuchten, M. T. and Parker, J. C.: Boundary conditions for displacement experiments through short laboratory soil columns, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 703–708, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040002x, 1984.
Van Glubt, S., Brusseau, M. L., Yan, N., Huang, D., Khan, N., and Carroll, K. C.: Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia. Environ. Poll., 268, 115917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115917, 2021.
Wiederhold, J. G.: Metal stable isotope signatures as tracers in environmental geochemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2606–2624, https://doi.org/10.1021/es504683e, 2015.
Wiederhold, J. G., Cramer, C. J., Daniel, K., Infante, I., Bourdon, B., and Kretzschmar, R.: Equilibrium mercury isotope fractionation between dissolved Hg (II) species and thiol-bound Hg, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 4191–4197, https://doi.org/10.1021/es100205t, 2010.
Yin, Y., Allen, H. E., Li, Y., Huang, C. P., and Sanders, P. F.: Adsorption of mercury (II) by soil: effects of pH, chloride, and organic matter, J. Environ. Qual., 25, 837–844, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500040027x, 1996.
Yin, Y., Allen, H. E., Huang, C., Sparks, D. L., and Sanders, P. F.: Kinetics of mercury (II) adsorption and desorption on soil, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 496–503, https://doi.org/10.1021/es9603214, 1997.
Zheng, W. and Hintelmann, H.: Nuclear field shift effect in isotope fractionation of mercury during abiotic reduction in the absence of light, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 4238–4245, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910353y, 2010.
Short summary
Sorption of mercury in soils, aquifer materials, and sediments is primarily linked to organic matter. Using column experiments, mercury concentration, speciation, and stable isotope analyses, we show that large quantities of mercury in soil water and groundwater can be sorbed to inorganic minerals; sorption to the solid phase favours lighter isotopes. Data provide important insights on the transport and fate of mercury in soil–groundwater systems and particularly in low-organic-matter systems.
Sorption of mercury in soils, aquifer materials, and sediments is primarily linked to organic...
