<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SOIL</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>SOIL</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SOIL</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">SOIL</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2199-398X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/soil-9-443-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and degradability in relation to <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> soil geochemistry as affected by land use</article-title><alt-title>Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality and degradability</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality and degradability}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Anindita~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Anindita</surname><given-names>Sastrika</given-names></name>
          <email>sastrika.anindita@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-5525</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Finke</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-1665</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Sleutel</surname><given-names>Steven</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Environment, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sastrika Anindita (sastrika.anindita@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>July</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>443</fpage><lpage>459</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Sastrika Anindita et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023.html">This article is available from https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e101">Land use is recognized to impact soil geochemistry on the centennial to millennial timescale, with implications for the distribution and stability
of soil organic carbon (SOC). Young volcanic soils in tropical areas are subject to much faster pedogenesis, noticeable already on the centennial or
even decadal timescale. As land use is a recognized factor for soil formation, it is thus conceivable that even relatively recent land use conversion in
such areas would already bear a significant impact on the resulting formed soils., e.g., in terms of content of pedogenic oxides. Very scarce
observational evidence exists, so such indirect implications of land use on SOC cycling are largely unknown. We here investigated SOC fractions,
substrate-specific mineralization (SOC or added plant residue), and net priming of SOC as a function of forest or agricultural land use on Indonesian
volcanic soils. The content of oxalate-extracted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlated well with organic carbon (OC) associated with sand-sized aggregates,
particularly in the subsoil. The proportion of SOC in sand-sized ultrasonication-resistant (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) aggregates was also higher in
agricultural land use compared to pine forest land use, and a likewise contrast existed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These combined observations suggest that enhanced
formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydr)oxides promoted aggregation and physical occlusion of OC. This was, importantly, also consistent with a relatively lesser
degradability of SOC in the agricultural sites, though we found no likewise difference in degradability of added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-labeled ryegrass or
in native SOC priming between the pine forest and agricultural land uses. We expected that amorphous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content under agricultural land use
would mainly have promoted mineral association of SOC compared to under pine forest land use but found no indications for this. Improved small-scale
aggregation of tropical Andosols caused by conversion to agriculture and high carbon input via organic fertilizer may thus partially counter the
otherwise expectable decline of SOC stocks following cultivation. Such indirect land use effects on the SOC balance appeared relevant for correct
interpretation and prediction of the long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of (agro)ecosystems with soil subject to intense development, like the here-studied tropical Andosols.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e197">Storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) in terrestrial ecosystems can improve ecosystem services such as soil health, agricultural productivity, and
climate change mitigation (Baldock, 2007; Lehmann and Kleber, 2015). The storage of SOC is influenced by the interaction of ecological processes with
net primary productivity and heterotrophic respiration usually being the most important terms of the SOC balance. Land use determines the net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input to soil and in doing so often bears an overriding control on the SOC balance compared to other drivers of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle at ecosystem level. Forest
ecosystems usually have relatively high net primary productivity compared to agricultural land use (Smith et al., 2014). The net result of cultivation
then typically leads to a decline in SOC stock and increased human-induced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission (Don et al., 2011; Wei et al., 2014). The long-term
SOC balance of ecosystems also depends on the capacity of soils to stabilize newly entering organic carbon (OC) against microbial decomposition, resulting from
heterotrophic<?pagebreak page444?> respiration. Physical occlusion of OC at the microaggregate scale and binding of OC onto reactive mineral surfaces constitute two
major mechanisms for stabilization of SOC (Matus et al., 2014). Soil characteristics such as content of poorly crystalline minerals, specific surface
area, clay content, and degree of soil microaggregation have all been linked to the capacity of soils to accumulate SOC (Hernández et al., 2012;
Kleber et al., 2015; Mikutta et al., 2006, 2009; Poirier et al., 2020). While soil mineralogy itself is thus a well-recognized controller of SOC
stabilization (Basile-Doelsch et al., 2005; Hernández et al., 2012; Lyu et al., 2021; Tamrat et al., 2019), surprisingly little attention has gone
into understanding how land use history, through its impact on soil geochemistry, might in turn indirectly control stability of SOC and organic matter
(OM) entering soil.</p>
      <p id="d1e227">The geochemistry of the reactive mineral phase of a soil is the resultant of both the composition of its parent material and soil weathering status
(Mikutta et al., 2009). Weathering status is crucially driven by the time since the onset of weathering, local climate and hydrologic conditions,
resilience of minerals to weathering, and vegetation cover (Doetterl et al., 2015). Land use, through its control on vegetation, can impact the
weathering process by modifying the pH, influencing soil biological activity and nutrient levels, and releasing organic complexing compounds (Van
Breemen et al., 1983; Cronan, 2018). On agricultural lands, moreover, fertilizer addition and soil disturbance caused by tillage have also been
reported to significantly enhance weathering (Churchman and Lowe, 2012; Li et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2016). While an extensive and still-growing
number of studies considered land use impacts on SOC stock and soil OM quality and its degradability (Covaleda et al., 2011; Cusack et al., 2013; Huygens
et al., 2005), just very few have considered the potential indirect impact of land use on SOC stability through its effect on the geochemical
properties. Moreover, the coverage remains limited for several soil groups, including tropical Andosols. A recent study on the Galápagos
Islands demonstrated that, even after a maximum of 15 years, conversion of native forest to cultivated land strikingly accelerated soil weathering
(Gerzabek et al., 2019). In particular, formation of secondary minerals should impact SOC retention in volcanic soils as their high capacity to do so
is acknowledged to emerge from abundantly present poorly crystalline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides. Indeed, Asano and Wagai (2014) highlighted the
importance of short-range-order minerals or organo-Al complexes for SOC stabilization in Andosols from correlations with OC stock (Miyazawa et al.,
2013), from mean residence time (reviewed by Parfitt, 2009), and by chemical characterization
of organo-mineral associations (Basile-Doelsch et al., 2007; Mikutta et al., 2009). Next to a large specific surface area, also microaggregation (and
occlusion therein) of intra-microaggregate particulate OM (iPOM) is known to grant a degree of protection against its microbial decay (Six et al.,
2000a), particularly in Andosols (Asano et al., 2018; Asano and Wagai, 2014). Introduction of tillage and removal of permanent vegetative coverage
usually adversely affect iPOM-induced physical protection (Besnard et al., 1996). However, differences between untilled native vegetation or secondary
forest, on the one hand, and tilled cropland, on the other, might not be significant for volcanic soils (Dörner et al., 2012; Huygens et al., 2005; Linlin et al.,
2016) as abundant nano-sized organo-mineral composites especially act as binding agents in microaggregates in Andosols (Asano and Wagai, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e246">In Indonesia, the Sunda volcanic arc region (Mt. Tangkuban Perahu and Mt. Burangrang) in West Java was covered by native forest until only about two
centuries back but has since then been largely replaced by secondary pine forest or agricultural land use. The co-occurrence of native forest,
secondary forest, and agricultural land use forms a useful means to understand how land use would influence geochemical properties and impact SOC
storage and stability in volcanic soils. A first objective was to further investigate how cultivation history in this region would have resulted in
differential soil aggregation and levels of iPOM, as well as mineral-associated OM vs. free relatively unprotected OM. We did so by assessing soil OM
fractions for a set of six Indonesian volcanic soils (Cambisols and Andosols) with native forest, secondary pine forest, or agricultural land use. A
second goal was to infer how OM degradability in the topsoil of these tropical volcanic soils itself differs as a function of forest vs. agricultural
land use. Assessing the indirect effect of land use on SOC degradability through its mediation of soil mineralogy is, however, complicated by the fact
that the quality of native SOC itself is also a function of land use. We therefore assessed the degradability of a single model exogenous OM source
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-labeled ryegrass residues) to see how land use changes affect stability of OC in soil. We hypothesize that the enhanced formation of
pedogenic poorly crystalline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under agricultural land use, as we previously confirmed (Anindita et al., 2022), results in a relative
stabilization of the exogenous OM as compared to native forest or secondary forest. In doing so, we take account of the well-known phenomenon that
labile OC inputs can accelerate the decomposition of native SOC, a process called positive priming (Chen et al., 2014), or conversely restrain
decomposition of SOC and induce negative priming (Blagodatskaya et al., 2014; Qiao et al., 2014). By using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-isotope mixing model (Werth and
Kuzyakov, 2010), mineralization of the exogenous OM (i.e., ryegrass) and native SOC are distinguished in the soil incubation experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description and soil sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e292">Our study covered soils from the Mount Tangkuban Perahu and Mount Burangrang regions that are part of the Sunda volcanic complex in West Java,
Indonesia. Six sites were<?pagebreak page445?> selected to represent the dominant land use types in the area, viz. primary forest (NF-y), pine forest (PF-i and PF-o), and
horticulture (AG-y, AG-i, and AG-o). The mean annual temperature in the study sites is 19–21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and mean annual precipitation ranges
around 2000–3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per year. Soils at sites NF-y and PF-i are andic Cambisols, and at the PF-o, AG-y, AG-i, and AG-o sites they are aluandic Andosols (Anindita et al., 2022). All soils contain silicate minerals (i.e., quartz, cristobalite, tridymite), gibbsite, albite, hornblende, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clay
minerals, and non-crystalline materials (Anindita et al., 2022). The proportion of primary minerals is higher in the younger NF-y soil as it is closer
(within 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the crater of Mt. Tangkuban Perahu and received ash more recently. The pine forest and agricultural sites were originally
all under the primary forest vegetation. At PF-i and PF-o, secondary forests were planted in 1962 for restoration purposes, following earlier
deforestation. Agricultural land use at AG-y, AG-i, and AG-o dates back to just 30–50 years ago with mainly diverse horticultural crop rotations
with crops such as potatoes (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic>), cabbage (<italic>Brassica oleracea</italic>), green beans (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>), tomatoes
(<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic>), and chayote (<italic>Sechium edule</italic>). Detailed information about land use history and land management is given in
(Anindita et al., 2022).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e354">Physicochemical soil properties of six sampled soil profiles in the Sunda volcanic complex in West Java, Indonesia (partly taken from Anindita et al., 2022).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="justify" colwidth="55mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">pH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OC stock<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Clay</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Exch. Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxalate extractable </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">SSA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Amorphous</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Land use and estimated annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ratio</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">materials</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(–)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(‰)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(–)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Primary forest (NF-y)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.77</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">288</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col14" morerows="2">Natural vegetation (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input: 6.7–12.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">25.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">254</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">52.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">69</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">378</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Pine forest (PF-i)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">67.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">41.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">91</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">471</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col14" morerows="2">Pine forest (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input: 3.6–9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">71.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">32.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">117</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">429</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">70–90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.69</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">64.35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">124</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">481</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Pine forest (PF-o)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55.48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">28.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">17.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">107</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">497</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col14" morerows="2">Pine forest (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input: 3.6–9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">17.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">145</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">506</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">48.82</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">17.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">127</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">447</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-y)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.67</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">26.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">114</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">548</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry colname="col14" morerows="2">Intensive horticulture <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 years <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; organic fertilizer <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">19.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">125</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">523</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61.43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">22.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">12.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">134</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">547</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-i)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">31.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">7.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">623</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry colname="col14" morerows="2">Intensive horticulture <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 years (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; organic fertilizer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">33.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">128</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">645</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">50–70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.07</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">36.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">185</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">650</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-o)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">54.91</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">9.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">74</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">531</oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{55mm}?><oasis:entry colname="col14" morerows="2">Horticulture <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 years (estimated plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; organic fertilizer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">8.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">91</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">502</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62.81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">108</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">460</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e357"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{2mm}}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bulk density; OC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> organic carbon; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> aluminum extracted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxalate; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> iron extracted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxalate; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> aluminum extracted by Na-pyrophosphate; SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> specific surface area;  Exch. Ca <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> exchangeable calcium. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs from vegetation (forest or annual crops) and organic amendments. Forest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs estimated from studies on Indonesian pine forest (Bruijnzeel, 1985) and Indonesian tropical primary forest (Guillaume et al., 2018; Hertel et al., 2009). Crop <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs based on farmer interviews as well as the Soil Service of Belgium (SSB) and the University of Ghent (2008). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs from organic amendments were based on farmer interviews and lab analyses. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> History of land use can be referred to in Anindita et al. (2022).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2334">At every site, soil samples were taken at 0–20, 20–40, and 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depths. At each depth, the bulk samples were mixed into composite ones
(three subsamples), which were then dried in air, homogenized, and sieved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) until further analysis at the Department of Environment at
Ghent University (Belgium). The pH of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured using a glass electrode pH meter in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil solution slurry. The estimated clay
content was determined using the pipet method after full soil dispersion with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resin (Bartoli et al., 1991), after testing with several other
procedures for soil texture analysis that proved incompatible with the investigated set of volcanic soils. The concentrations of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined by dry combustion at 1100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a LECO 928 series CN analyzer. Aluminum extracted by
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pyrophosphate solution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was taken as a measure of complexed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to OM (McKeague, 1967). Iron and aluminum extractable
by ammonium oxalate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were used as estimates of X-ray amorphous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We previously quantified
crystalline minerals using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The amount of amorphous materials undetectable by XRD was semi-quantitatively
estimated from the difference between the obtained and the real amount of internal standard (zincite 20 %) after semi-quantification of
crystalline minerals using BGMN Rietveld and Profex as the user interface. Soil specific surface area (SSA) was assessed from adsorption–desorption of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) approach. Detailed methods and the results of geochemical analyses of
the samples were documented in Anindita et al. (2022). Selected physicochemical soil properties are given in Table 1. More detailed information on
geochemical soil properties can be found in Table S1 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Soil organic matter fractionation</title>
      <?pagebreak page447?><p id="d1e2523">Soils were fractionated using size, density, and chemical separation steps according to a modified version of a fractionation scheme proposed by
Zimmermann et al. (2007) (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). This procedure separates SOC into five pools, namely, (i) OC contained in sand and associated with soil aggregates (S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A), (ii) in free particulate organic matter (POM), (iii) in water
dissolvable OC (DOC), (iv) in oxidizable OC associated with the silt and clay (s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC) fraction, and (v) in a chemically resistant SOC
(rSOC) pool. Briefly, 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of equivalent dry soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was initially dispersed in water by a calibrated ultrasonic probe with
an output energy of 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting slurries were wet sieved over a 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sieve and rinsed with deionized water until
the rinsing water became clear. In the original Zimmermann et al. (2007) method, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction is further separated
into S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and POM based on density differences using sodium polytungstate at 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, several samples could not be well
separated into free OM, on the one hand, and predominantly mineral material of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction, on the other. After pre-tests, we instead used a
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium polytungstate solution to separate free POM from the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A soil fraction, as per the advice by Cerli et al. (2012) to optimize the density cutoff per soil for best separation of free and occluded POM. A subsample of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suspension
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived from the wet sieving step was filtered through a 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nylon membrane filter. The filtrate was analyzed
for its dissolved OC concentration using a Formacs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HT</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> total organic carbon analyzer (Skalar, the Netherlands). The DOC pool was calculated by multiplying this OC
concentration with the volume of flush water used in the preceding wet sieving step. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suspension was dried
at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and weighed to constitute the overall silt plus clay (s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c) fraction. A chemically inert share of the SOC (rSOC) was
isolated by subjecting the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction to oxidation by 6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To this end, 1 g of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c material was weighed inside a
65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Nalgene centrifuge tube, and 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adjusted to pH 8 was added and allowed to react for 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After centrifugation, remnant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was discarded by decantation. This procedure was repeated three times; the pellet
was washed three more times with deionized water, transferred to a pre-weighed aluminum cup, dried at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and weighed. The
obtained S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction remains composite as it contains silt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> clay-associated OC next to occluded POM. In addition to the original scheme
proposed by Zimmermann et al. (2007) and Poeplau et al. (2013), a further fractionation of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A into s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c and POM and sand-associated OM
was included: A 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> subsample of the obtained S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction was further dispersed by ultrasonication at 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then
separated into two size fractions by passing the obtained slurries over a 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sieve. The obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction
contains s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OM. Meanwhile, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction primarily contains occluded POM and sand-bound OM contained in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction as well as OM contained in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregates resistant to dispersal at 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions were further on considered to constitute a single joint OM fraction with s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c obtained after the first 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ultrasonication and 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sieving step. All
fractions were analyzed for their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration using a LECO 928 series CN analyzer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Soil incubation experiment and isotopic signature measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e3067">Soils were incubated in a standardized way to compare degradability of a model plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substrate and SOC in the topsoil (0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the
six considered sites. Decomposition of either substrate was derived by regular measurement of the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and inference of its
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature. Soil mesocosms were prepared by repacking approximately 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of soil (depending on bulk density) into PVC
tubes (diameter: 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, height: 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to reach a height of 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bulk density as encountered at the field sites. Soil
moisture content was set to 50 % water-filled pore space by addition of deionized water. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-labeled plant substrate,
i.e., pulse-labeled ryegrass (<italic>Lolium perenne</italic>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 53.7 ‰, was applied at a dose of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of dry matter. The contrast in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with SOC (Table 1) allowed us to distinguish emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into parts
stemming from either native SOC or grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of topsoil (expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
(‰) vs. the international Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite standard) was measured using a PDZ Europe ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer,
interfaced with a Sercon 20-22 isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) with SysCon electronics (SerCon, Cheshire, UK).</p>
      <p id="d1e3255">Soils were incubated at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On days 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 17, 24, 32, 38, 47, 59, 73, 87, 101, 111, and 120, soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission was inferred by measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buildup in a cylindrical closed chamber attached consecutively on top of each PVC tube
for at least 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The evolution of the headspace <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured every 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by connecting the closed chamber with a cavity ring-down spectrometer (G2201-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> CRDS isotopic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer, Picarro, USA) in a loop via
Teflon tubing. The soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux rate (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated from the slope of the accumulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration as a function of time using the ideal gas law. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis intercept
of derived Keeling plots (Keeling, 1958). The fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from grass was calculated using the following equations introduced by
Werth and Kuzyakov (2010):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M213" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>total-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in ‰) being the net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic fractionation resulting from native SOC mineralization and diffusive
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport in soil until its efflux into the headspace air. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux
monitoring of parallel triplicate sets of control soils without grass added. A third parallel set of soils was amended with a very high dose of grass
(viz. 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> added grass, i.e., about 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value was operationally
calculated by subtracting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of soil with
6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grass under the assumption that virtually any emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was then derived from grass mineralization.</p>
      <p id="d1e3839">Using Eqs. (1)–(3), the fraction of emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization was calculated per soil and per point in
time. The rate of grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each measurement day was
calculated by multiplying the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value with the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission. The rate of SOC mineralization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min,
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated by subtracting the rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
rate. Cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions derived from native SOC-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained by consecutively summing up
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, per time increment between flux measurements. The percent (%) of mineralized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was then derived from dividing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-</mml:mtext><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Statistics</title>
      <p id="d1e4123">Two-way ANOVA with depth increment and land use as fixed factors was used to compare soil properties and the distribution of OC over soil
fractions. For individual increments (0–20, 20–40, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests were used as well to test for specific
differences between pine forest and agricultural land use. Total, ryegrass, and native SOC cumulative OC mineralization and net cumulative priming of
native SOC were only assessed for the 0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth increment, and the comparison of means between the pine forest and agriculture land uses
was made by independent sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests. The primary forest land use was excluded from this comparison as it emerged that the parent material from which it
developed differed from the other sites (Anindita et al., 2022). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to investigate relations between soil
fraction SOC proportions, soil OC mineralization, and geochemical properties for the group of pine forest and agricultural soils. Analyses were
completed in IBM SPSS Statistics 27.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4166">Mass proportion, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, and total content of SOC contained in soil fractions isolated by a modified version of the Zimmermann et al. (2007) method.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Soil mass proportion (%) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col14" align="center">Amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gkg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">POM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">DOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">POM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Total SOC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">rSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">rSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">in bulk soil</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Primary forest (NF-y) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">412.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">18.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">37.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">393.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">16.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">26.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">367.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">26.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">28.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Pine forest (PF-i) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">227.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">23.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">162.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">13.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">70–90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">92.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">103.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">5.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Pine forest (PF-o) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">83.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">188.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">10.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">14.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">33.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">84.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">148.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">18.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">135.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">15.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-y) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">206.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">29.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">65.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">13.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">11.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-i) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">350.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">54.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">401.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">30.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">42.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">50–70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">587.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">16.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">26.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Agriculture (AG-o) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">420.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">47.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">91.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">311.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">28.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">95.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Organic carbon in soil fractions</title>
      <?pagebreak page448?><p id="d1e5338">Across the studied soils, a greater part of the soil material (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %) was found as the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction (Table 2). There were particularly large
proportions of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c in the PF-i, PF-o, and AG-o soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %). Conversely, in the AG-i subsoil, the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction was the
largest. The OC concentration of soil fractions decreased in the following order: POM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c (including rSOC) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DOC and was generally
higher in the topsoil than subsoil. The OC concentration of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction was higher under agricultural than under forest land use
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1), particularly in topsoils of the sites under agricultural land use (30–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction). No such difference in OC
concentration existed between SOC in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c, POM, DOC, or rSOC fractions under agriculture compared to forest (i.e., including primary
forest). The OC concentrations of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC fractions were generally higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1) in the agricultural soils when compared
to the pine forest soils solely. The size of the DOC fraction was negligibly small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction) and is further
disregarded. The mean total SOC content in all fractions was higher in agricultural soils (29.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) than pine
forest soils (16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e5595">The distribution of OC over soil fractions obtained by a modified version of the Zimmermann et al. (2007) procedure for six soil profiles sampled at 0–20, 20–40, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Sunda volcanic complex in West Java, Indonesia. Error bars indicate standard deviations for three lab replicates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5633">Overall, the bulk of SOC was present in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 79 %) with higher proportion in rSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 %) than in the
s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %) fraction, followed by S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 %) and POM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %) fractions (Fig. 1). The mean OC
content in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction was higher in the agricultural (11.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) than pine forest
(1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil; though only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09) soils. Likewise, its relative contribution to SOC was larger in the
agricultural soils (32 % of SOC), when compared to all three forest sites (8 % of SOC) or to just the two pine forest sites (9 % of
SOC) (though only at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08). Particularly in AG-y at a depth range of 0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (12.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) and in AG-i at depths of 0–20 and 20–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (22.3 and 30.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil, respectively), a larger share of the SOC was in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction. The s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction followed an opposite trend with a larger SOC proportion under forest (all three (89.5 % of SOC) or just the two pine forests (89.8 % of
SOC)) than under agricultural land use (68 % of SOC) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08) (Fig. 1). Out of
the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction the resistant SOC (rSOC) fraction accounted for approximately a third to half of SOC, and its proportion (52 % of SOC) was likewise
higher under pine forest when compared to agricultural land use (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). Free POM contributed on average less than 5 % of SOC. The occasional low concentrations of free POM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 2) indicate that some mineral matter was left in the isolated POM fraction. However, given its very small mass
proportion (median 0.1 %), this artifact has negligible further impact on the overall distribution of SOC across soil fractions. The SOC proportion
of free POM (percent of SOC) was also higher under pine forest than agricultural land use (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;<?pagebreak page449?></mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5924">Ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and oxalate-extractable aluminum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and iron (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Primary forest (NF-y) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">39.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">74.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Pine forest (PF-i) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">70–90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Pine forest (PF-o) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Agriculture (AG-y) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Agriculture (AG-i) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">45.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">50–70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7">Agriculture (AG-o) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0–20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20–40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60–80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{C:N}$}~ratio, amorphous aluminum and iron in the sand aggregates (S\,$+$\,A), and silt--clay (s\,$+$\,c) fractions}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, amorphous aluminum and iron in the sand aggregates (S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A), and silt–clay (s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c) fractions</title>
      <p id="d1e6678">The ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 7.3–19.8 in S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and 7.5–20.1 in s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c (Table 3), and their mean values did not differ. The
S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was higher in the agricultural soils than in the pine forest soils (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07). The content of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied
from 1.7 to 56.6 and from 3.2 to 46.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions, respectively. Meanwhile,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 9.6 to 34.3 and from 7.6 to 74.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions, respectively. A
much lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content in the NF-y site s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c and S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fractions compared to all other soils was in line with its distinctive total
elemental composition previously reported by Anindita et al. (2022). The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction at all depths was higher
under agriculture (28.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than pine forest (20.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions were generally higher under pine forest than agricultural soils, particularly at depths of 20–40 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with no significant difference.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6982">Scatter plots of the SOC proportion of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction and the amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in bulk soil and sand-aggregate fraction) and amorphous materials. Symbols and Pearson correlation coefficients in black, red, and blue represent correlation at depths of 0–20, 20–40, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Sites under agriculture and pine forest are indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>▴</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>•</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Correlations between SOC fractions and selected chemical soil properties</title>
      <p id="d1e7049">The proportion of several of the isolated SOC fractions correlated to some of the geochemical soil properties (Fig. 2). By considering only pine
forest and agricultural soils, the SOC proportion of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction was positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in bulk soil as well as in
the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction, and content of amorphous materials at all depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). These soil
properties were also positively correlated with the amount of OC in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) and OC concentration in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A
fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction). Positive correlations existed between SOC proportion in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction with the amount of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05), but the amount of OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) and OC concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction) in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction correlated negatively to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction at all depths. The proportion of rSOC
in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction (i.e., rSOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100) correlated positively (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content at a depth
of 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9), SSA at 20–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9), and the micropore volume at 0–20 and 20–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86, respectively).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e7424">Gross cumulative amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralized in soil with and without 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ryegrass added. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of three lab replicates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) and are presented for the grass-amended soils only. Sites under forest and agriculture are indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>•</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>▴</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Carbon mineralization experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title>Gross soil carbon mineralization</title>
      <?pagebreak page451?><p id="d1e7505">Across all sites, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-min) rates were highest for AG-i and AG-o and peaked already during the first day of incubation,
while for the other soils rates peaked at day 3 or 5 only. After day 38, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-min rates stabilized across time. The cumulative total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and derived amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralized (SOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ryegrass) generally followed a sequence
of NF-y <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AG-y <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AG-i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PF-i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AG-o <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PF-o. Pine forest soils displayed higher cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization than agricultural soils
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). Overall, the 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization was 194–419 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher in soil with grass added than
without (Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Grass {$\protect\chem{C}$} mineralization}?><title>Grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization</title>
      <p id="d1e7676">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rates peaked within 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the start of the incubation, and they dropped thereafter to just half to one-third of the initial rates. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rate was conspicuously high on the first day of incubation in
soils<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> AG-i and AG-o, whereas for the other soils mineralization peaked on day 5 only. From day 38 onwards, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate had become more or less similar in all six sites. By the end of the 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> incubations, 22 %–38 % of
the added ryegrass had been mineralized. The highest cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate was found for PF-o (389 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by
AG-i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AG-o<?xmltex \hack{\break}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PF-i <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AG-y <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF-y. There were no significant differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the sets of
agricultural and forest soils.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e7807">The percentage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right) mineralized during 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of incubation in soils with 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grass or no grass added, respectively. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of triplicate lab repetitions. Sites under forest and agriculture are indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>•</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>▴</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>3.4.3</label><title>Native SOC mineralization</title>
      <p id="d1e7887">Mineralization of SOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contributed more to gross soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>grass-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did. There
were large differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil layers of the six sites. By the end of the incubation, the
highest cumulative amount of SOC mineralized was found for PF-o (953 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while a 4-fold lower amount was mineralized in
the case of NF-y (195 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Significantly less SOC was mineralized in the agricultural soils
(517 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in the pine forest soils (813 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 156 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01). Relatively,
0.5 %–2.9 % of the SOC had been mineralized within the 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> incubations (Fig. 4). A larger relative share of SOC was mineralized in
the pine forest soils (2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 % of SOC) than in the agricultural soils (1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 % of SOC) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e8093">Net effect of grass addition (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on cumulative native SOC mineralization. Positive and negative values denote net positive or net negative cumulative priming of SOC mineralization. Dashed lines present the temporal evolution of the mean net cumulative priming effect for either forest or agricultural land uses, with, respectively, only upper or lower error bars representing the standard deviations on the data.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e8119">Priming of native SOC mineralization was assessed by comparing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the soils with and without 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grass
added (Fig. 5). During the first week, grass addition tended to increase the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate in most soils; that is, there was positive
priming of native SOC. Along the 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment, however, the direction and magnitude of the net cumulative priming effect varied strongly
among soils. Little or no net priming of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SOC-min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred in the NF-y soil, as a result of initial positive priming until day 17 but
negative priming afterwards. In the pine forest soils, likewise, periods of positive and negative priming alternated, with at the end of the
120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> period an alike limited net positive priming of SOC at both PF sites. Priming of SOC was diverse among the three agricultural
soils. While there was strong positive priming throughout the 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> period in the AG-o soil, the opposite was true for AG-y, and no net priming occurred
in the case of<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> AG-i. On average, the net 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cumulative priming of SOC in forest (19.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was lower than
agricultural (31.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) land use, but due to a wide variation between replicate sites, this difference proved
insignificant; moreover, net priming rates were not significantly different from zero.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Land use effects on free and aggregate-protected OC</title>
      <p id="d1e8299">Overall, the portion of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction material (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ultrasonication-resistant (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) aggregates, and sand particles) was nearly double in the agricultural sites (34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 %) than in pine forest sites (13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %), and it was nearly double compared to all forest, including primary forest (though only at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, probably due to the small sample number). This indicated stronger soil aggregation and
aggregate stability under agriculture. In agreement, a 4-fold share of SOC resided in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction under agriculture (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 %) than
pine forest (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08). The important role of soil microaggregates for SOC storage has been displayed by numerous studies
(Dungait et al., 2012; Rabbi et al., 2016; Six et al., 2002). We expected a lesser share of SOC to be occluded inside aggregates in the tilled
agricultural soils, as absence of tillage results in less disruption of macroaggregates with increased formation of<?pagebreak page452?> microaggregates and occlusion of
POM (Six et al., 2000b; Zheng et al., 2018). However, tillage is not the only determinant of soil aggregate formation and breakdown as aggregate
stability also depends on the presence of binding agents that cluster mineral and organic particles into aggregates as well as size and mineralogy of the
less-reactive “skeletal” particles. A further analysis of the soil mineralogy could prove useful to explain the observed variation in storage of OM
in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction between both land uses. With respect to skeletal particles, the main identified constituents were from the quartz group
(tridymite, quartz, cristobalite) (7 %–14 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clay minerals (5 %–35 %) (Anindita et al., 2022), which, because of their
inherent low permanent negative charge, may be considered relatively unreactive as well. In addition, smaller shares of hornblende, andesine,
albite, and rutile were present as well. Unsurprisingly, the XRD-estimated levels of these primary minerals and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clays did not correlate to
the mass proportion of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction, indeed suggesting that instead mainly other soil constituents acted as binding agents. Moreover, as
contents of these relatively unreactive phases did not differ between the PF and AG soils, their variation could not explain the strong contrast in
S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A-contained OC between both land uses.</p>
      <?pagebreak page453?><p id="d1e8454">Major binding agents considered to work at micron-to-submicron scales are instead poorly crystalline minerals, redox-sensitive minerals, and microbial
products (detritus and metabolites) (Oades and Waters, 1991). Particularly, XRD amorphous materials
constituted the bulk of the mineral phase (up to 65 %). The limited oxalate-extracted Si suggested allophane, imogolite, and volcanic glass levels
to be minor (Anindita et al., 2022). Hence a large pool of unidentified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (oxy-)(hydr)oxides instead likely formed the chief
part of the XRD amorphous mineral phase. Particularly, minerals associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would appear to be relevant colloids as the bulk soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level correlated well with bulk soil micropore volume and specific surface area. Wagai et al. (2018) indeed also found the reactive metal
phase to be important binding agents in allophanic Andosols. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxalate extraction is not entirely selective toward poorly crystalline
minerals (Rennert, 2019), it is probable that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partly derived from crystalline gibbsite as well. The same goes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
crystalline pedogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All soils contained rather large proportions of XRD-detectable Gibbsite (3 %–15 %) with the exception of
AG-y, also with 1 %–3 % magnetite. However, with no consistent differences in their XRD-spectrum proportions between both land uses, and no
correlation to the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction mass proportion, it is unlikely that variation in these secondary crystalline minerals led to contrasting soil
aggregation and distribution of OC between the isolated S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A or s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions between the PF and AG land uses. Instead, the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A mass
proportion (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bulk soil) correlated to S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A concentrations (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction) of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) and OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). It is thus likely that the glue between skeletal mineral particles
consisted of a mixture of OM and poorly crystalline non-allophane/imogolite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing minerals. In turn, the SOC proportion of the
S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction correlated positively with contents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the percent of X-ray amorphous materials, particularly at depths of 20–40
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). This indicates that higher levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as accumulation of SOC
under agriculture and pine forest would have enhanced aggregation and thus a larger share of SOC inside these aggregates. Furthermore, repeated
addition of labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via manure and compost amendments was shown to result in greater formation of macroaggregate (Du et al., 2014; Mikha and
Rice, 2004; Yu et al., 2012) by increased production of microbial-derived binding agents. Manure and compost amendments to the AG sites were vast
(Table 1), and so the enhanced addition of labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as compared to the forest sites may have boosted aggregate formation with more SOC storage
in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction under agricultural land use. Nevertheless, it is long known that soil organic matter (SOM) can have an inhibiting effect on the crystallization
process of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides, similar to the anti-gibbsite effect, leading to polymerization rather than crystallization (Borggaard et al.,
1990). Kang et al. (2009) as well argued that SOM can inhibit the crystallization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in less crystalline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides, which
are in turn adsorbents of SOM. Particularly in a tropical climate where weathering and SOC decomposition occur fast, there may be important positive feedback between accumulation of SOM, which is induced by vast addition of exogenous OM, and formation of poorly crystalline Al in Andosols that has not been looked into to date. Lastly, less free POM was found in the agricultural than forest soils, likely as a logical consequence of more POM occlusion
under agriculture. However, we cannot exclude that a better degradability of crop-derived residues vs. pine or native forest litter co-explains
these trends. It is well established that litter rich in cutin, waxes, and lignin such as those derived from pine forests is less degradable than plant
litter richer in carbohydrates and organic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> like most crop residues (Berg and McClaugherty, 2003).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e8820">Relation between the proportion of SOC that was oxidizable by 6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the pine forest and agricultural soils with the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, micropore volume, and soil specific surface area (at each depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5). Sites under agriculture and pine forest are indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>▴</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>•</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Symbols and Pearson correlation coefficients in black, red, and blue represent correlations at depths of 0–20, 20–40, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/9/443/2023/soil-9-443-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Effect of land use on SOC in the silt and clay fraction</title>
      <p id="d1e8900">Interaction of SOC with silt and clay provides long-term stabilization of SOC against decomposition and therefore forms a key mechanism for SOC
sequestration (De Clercq et al., 2015). SOC sorbs to phyllosilicate clays; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Mn oxides; poorly crystalline minerals; and polyvalent cations that form a bridge between minerals and organic constituents (Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2004). However, for our soils we found that,
despite higher concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under agriculture, a lesser share of the SOC was present in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction (as percent of SOC)
compared to the pine forest soils (though only at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08). Association of OC with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–containing minerals could not explain the
higher SOC proportion of OC in s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c under forest. As the amount of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OC (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) was in fact similar between both
land uses, it appears that a lower s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c SOC contribution in the agricultural soils was instead simply mirroring trends in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A
fraction. A positive correlation between the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c SOC proportion and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) could indicate that association with poorly crystalline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stabilizes OM in the silt and clay fraction. But, again, as s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c
SOC content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) and OC concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction) correlated negatively at all measured depths with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction, such land use control on s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-associated SOC seems unlikely. On the other hand, the higher SOC content
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) in the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction of NF-y compared to other soils, particularly at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60–80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, might be due to the
differences in mineralogy. At this depth range, the amorphous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in NF-y was very high compared to the
other soils. The s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fraction was as per the Zimmermann et al. (2007) fractionation procedure
subdivided into oxidizable and resistant parts, expected to coincide roughly with SOC stabilized by mineral association as opposed to its own
biochemical inertness, respectively. Negative correlations existed between the share of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OC (percent of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OC) that was oxidizable
by 6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rSOC) with the contents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the bulk soil of SSA, and micropore volume (Fig. 6). These
correlations suggest that the association of SOC with short-range-order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydr)oxides has been found to limit oxidation of SOC by 6 % of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaOCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mikutta et al., 2006). It appears that geochemical properties influence the degree of mineral association of OC and its content in these
Andosols. As neither chemical inertness of the s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OC (agriculture at 53 % of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c vs. pine forest at 59 % of s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c) nor the
s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, bulk soil SSA, or micropore volume differed between both land uses, it appears that land use history did not impact the
degree of mineral association of OC and its content in these Andosols. This outcome further contradicts the fact that more s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c OC would accumulate under
forest because of a more biochemical inertness of the OC inputs compared to agriculture.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page454?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Land use effects on native SOC degradability</title>
      <p id="d1e9368">The percentage of SOC mineralized after 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of incubation was less than half in the agricultural soils (1.2 %) than in the pine forest
soils (2.9 %) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01). This result was rather unexpected, given the lower soil pH by 0.8 under pine forest, as acidic conditions are well
known to retard decomposition of SOC (Högberg et al., 2007; Malik et al., 2018) in line with Anda and Dahlgren (2020). To understand the apparent
relative stabilization of SOC in the agricultural soils, we again consider the distribution of SOC across soil fractions. We (Anindita et al., 2022)
previously hypothesized that the nearly doubled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content of the agricultural soils (21.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average) compared to the
pine forest soils (13.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) would partially explain the relatively elevated SOC stocks under agriculture for our study area due to
enhanced organo-mineral association. Basile-Doelsch et al. (2005) likewise found that volcanic ash soil horizons containing much poorly crystalline
material (proto-imogolite and proto-imogolite allophane) store large amounts of organic matter which turns over very slowly. But as no negative
correlations existed between the amount or proportion of SOC mineralized and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content, this hypothesis was not confirmed. As mentioned
above, we did find a higher percent of SOC to be present in the rSOC fraction under forest, but its content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) was not higher than
under agricultural land use, and again no correlation existed with SOC mineralization. Mikutta et al. (2006) indeed demonstrated that a larger chemical
recalcitrance of SOC does not really translate into a larger biological stability. Once more, it appears that the larger SOC proportion of rSOC seems
to simply result from less accumulation of SOC in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction under forest.</p>
      <p id="d1e9474">The proportion and concentration of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction of OC were higher under agriculture, so enhanced soil aggregation and occlusion of SOC might
have significantly physically protected SOC against microbially mediated decomposition compared to pine forest land use. A study of Andosols in
Colombia by Gijsman and Sanz (1998) also reported that aggregation holds considerable control on SOC decomposability as these authors observed a
significant increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization after crushing large and small macroaggregates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Indeed, we found that
the amount of OC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil) in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction negatively correlated to percent SOC mineralized for the set of soils with
agricultural and pine forest land use (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.78; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). It then appears that enhanced soil aggregation and occlusion of SOC under
agricultural land use in part limited degradability of SOC rather than enhanced association of SOC with soil minerals, including poorly crystalline
or amorphous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing minerals. As argued in Sect. 4.2, we can add to this that
formation of amorphous materials and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the agricultural soils most likely promoted soil aggregation. Hence, we hypothesize that
enhanced pedogenesis forms a relevant indirect mechanism via which conversion to agricultural land use impacts the SOC balance of these relatively
young tropical volcanic soils. However, since large amounts of exogenous OM are annually being applied to the investigated agricultural
fields in this study (Table 1), we cannot unequivocally exclude that these instead explain the high SOC stocks and contribution of aggregate-associated OC here, and more observations on an expanded set of sites will be required to test this hypothesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Land use effects of exogenous organic matter decomposition and net priming of SOC</title>
      <p id="d1e9603">In contrast to native SOC mineralization, added grass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization did not differ between forest and agricultural soils. Therefore,
apparent protection of ryegrass OC either by<?pagebreak page455?> mineral association or occlusion inside aggregates must have been similar between both land uses and,
in any case, did not impact its degradability in soil. Laboratory incubations with disturbed soils do not necessarily adequately reproduce field
conditions in terms of soil structure, microclimate, and food webs. The observed similar degradability of ryegrass-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not suggest a
likewise enhanced storage of freshly added OM like for native SOC under agriculture than under forest. Possibly, such an impact only emerges in the
longer term when the added OM has been subject to sufficient diminution into smaller POM that could be occluded in microaggregates. Six et al. (2002)
summarized that particularly 50–250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scaled microaggregates grant sizable physical protection to POM, while the macroaggregate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) structure exerts little control on POM decomposability. Adding ryegrass to the 0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soils initially seemed to
impact mineralization of native SOC with a general positive priming effect in the first week of incubation, in line with many other studies, e.g., Liu
et al. (2017). Thereafter, however, in four of the six studied soils net negative priming countered this initial stimulation of SOC
mineralization. Such an adverse impact of adding fresh OM on SOC mineralization could be due to a preferential utilization of the added substrate by
microorganisms (Derrien et al., 2014). Regardless, the net result was that after 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SOC mineralization was not significantly stimulated (on
average by 1.6 %). There was also no land use effect on the net priming of SOC after 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, in spite of differences in SOC quality
under both land uses, as inferred from different SOC proportions of S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and free POM, no differential stimulation of SOC mineralization by
addition of a relatively labile plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substrate existed between agricultural or forest land uses. These observations imply that no adverse
effect is to be expected for the addition of generally relatively labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aboveground crop residues, animal manure) on stability of the
native SOC present under agricultural land use.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Importance of physical occlusion of POM for SOC stabilization</title>
      <p id="d1e9706">As an important side note to the interpretation of the SOC fractionation data, it should be borne in mind that there is no guarantee that isolated SOM
fractions coincide with distinct SOM pools, neither in terms of bioavailability nor intrinsic degradability. By expanding the Zimmermann et al. (2007)
fractionation procedure with a strong (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ultrasonic dispersion step, we attempted to isolate s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c-associated OC from POM
contained in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction. This ultrasonication step proved to result in incomplete disruption of the apparently very
stable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sized aggregates. With high levels of both OM and amorphous materials as well as poorly crystalline metal oxides, this is perhaps not surprising. The insignificant difference in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio between the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A and s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c fractions suggests that, while they
obviously differ in their physical organization, there is probably no strong contrast in the biochemical composition of the OM. Previous studies also
found no clear difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition from sand to clay fractions in Andosols (Baldock et al., 1992). Regardless, the here-achieved
subdivision of the SOM into OM present inside (S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A) or not inside (s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> c) the microaggregate structure would yet still appear relevant as the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A SOC proportion correlated negatively with SOC mineralization, suggesting indeed that such a physical organization of soil grants “physical protection”
against microbial breakdown, thought to result from reduced accessibility of microbes, exoenzymes, and/or e-acceptors (Keil and Mayer, 2013; Lehmann
et al., 2007). The overall rather low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction (13.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2) indicates that it mainly contained mineral-associated OM and probably little POM, complicating interpretation of mechanisms for a particular S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A SOC storage in agricultural sites. Still, in
the 0–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer, a higher S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of the agriculture (17.0) vs. pine forest (11.0) S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction suggests
that, at least to some extent, enhanced SOC storage in aggregates under agricultural land use might have resulted from extra occlusion of POM. However,
our data do not provide unequivocal proof that the physical protection of SOM in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction causes relative protection against
mineralization. In addition, the absence of any land use effect on protection of freshly added plant litter (see Sect. 4.4) leads us to question this. Extra aggregation of OM into the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction in the agricultural soils might just be but
a concomitant effect of the larger presence of tightly intermixed organometallic phases, while such smaller-scaled structures themselves are instead
zones of SOC stabilization. On the other hand, the fact that there was no negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the relative
SOC mineralization, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did positively relate to the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A SOC proportion, would instead suggest that indeed the physical arrangement
of OM into stable aggregates led to a relative stabilization of SOC. From the limited presence of POM in the S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A fraction, it logically emerges
that mainly occlusion of smaller-sized OM and its protection into aggregates was important. To further elucidate this, however, more detailed
investigation of the formation of organomineral phases and their organization into the microstructure is required, building on the recently forwarded
organometallic glue hypothesis and proposed methodologies by Wagai et al. (2020).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <?pagebreak page456?><p id="d1e9954">Following the fractionation of SOC by Zimmermann et al. (2007), the silt- and clay-associated OC forms the dominant SOC pool in tropical volcanic
soils in Indonesia, regardless of land use. But land use strongly impacts SOC contained within ultrasonic-dispersion-resistant (400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
soil aggregates as its contribution to SOC rose from 8 % of SOC in forest to as much as 32 % of SOC several decades after conversion to
agricultural use, with, alongside also, more OC stored in this fraction. The S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> A SOC proportion was positively related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the percent of amorphous materials. Our study thus indicates that the larger abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in agricultural soils promoted soil aggregation and
physical occlusion of OC compared to pine forest. A negative correlation between relative decomposability of the SOC and the portion of SOC that is
physically occluded further suggests that enhanced soil aggregation under cropland effectively stabilizes part of the SOC compared to under forest
land use. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, we found no proof that stimulated formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and amorphous minerals would have
increased association of SOC with soil minerals under agriculture. Based on the present study, we hypothesize that enhanced formation of amorphous
minerals and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under agriculture with high OM inputs promoted the development of stable soil aggregates and OC occlusion therein, and this
would in part counter otherwise expected losses of SOC compared to primary and secondary forest. However, the contribution of large OM inputs
vs. land use conversion, per se, could not be elucidated here, and this will require study of other tropical Andosol forest–agricultural land use
pairs with a detailed inventory of OC inputs. Moreover, confirmation that agricultural land use promotes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation vs. forest will require
time series analysis of such sites. At least, our study points at the overall need to account for potential indirect land use effects on the stability
of SOC via its control on pedogenesis. This is especially so for pedoclimatic combinations where weathering can be very fast, like in tropical
Andosols that have only relatively recently been cultivated.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10041">The data generated in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e10044">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10053">SS, PF, and SA conceptualized the study. SA conducted soil sampling and performed the experiment. SA prepared the manuscript with contributions from all the co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10059">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>SOIL</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10068">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10074">We thank the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) for the internal support of this research, as well as Orly Mendoza, Haichao Li, and Heleen Dero from the Soil Fertility Research Group (Ghent University) for laboratory assistance.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10079">This research has been supported by the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e10085">This paper was edited by Karsten Kalbitz and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1b?><mixed-citation>Anda, M. and Dahlgren, R. A.:
Long-term response of tropical Andisol properties to conversion from rainforest to agriculture, Catena, 194, 104679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Anindita, S., Sleutel, S., Vandenberghe, D., Grave, J. De, Vandenhende, V., and Finke, P.:
Land use impacts on weathering, soil properties, and carbon storage in wet Andosols, Indonesia, Geoderma, 423, 115963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Asano, M. and Wagai, R.:
Evidence of aggregate hierarchy at micro- to submicron scales in an allophanic andisol, Geoderma, 216, 62–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.10.005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Asano, M. and Wagai, R.:
Distinctive organic matter pools among particle-size fractions detected by solid-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NMR, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses only after strong dispersion in an allophanic andisol, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 61, 242–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2014.982492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00380768.2014.982492</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Asano, M., Wagai, R., Yamaguchi, N., Takeichi, Y., Maeda, M., Suga, H., and Takahashi, Y.:
In search of a binding agent: Nano-scale evidence of preferential carbon associations with poorly-crystalline mineral phases in physically-stable, clay-sized Aggregates, Soil Syst., 2, 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/soilsystems2020032</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Baldock, J. A.:
Composition and Cycling of Organic Carbon in Soil, in: Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems, edited by: Marschner, P. and Rengel, Z., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg,  1–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68027-7_1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-68027-7_1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Baldock, J. A., Oades, J. M., Waters, A. G., Peng, X., Vassallo, A. M., and Wilson, M. A.:
Aspects of the chemical structure of soil organic materials as revealed by solid-state<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NMR spectroscopy, Biogeochemistry, 16, 1–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00024251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00024251</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Bartoli, F., Burtin, G., and Herbillon, A. J.:
Disaggregation and clay dispersion of Oxisols: Na resin, a recommended methodology, Geoderma, 49, 301–317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(91)90082-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(91)90082-5</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Basile-Doelsch, I., Amundson, R., Stone, W. E. E., Masiello, C. A., Bottero, J. Y., Colin, F., Masin, F., Borschneck, D., and Meunier, J. D.:
Mineralogical control of organic carbon dynamics in a volcanic ash soil on La Réunion, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 56, 689–703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00703.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00703.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page457?><ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Basile-Doelsch, I., Amundson, R., Stone, W. E. E., Borschneck, D., Bottero, J. Y., Moustier, S., Masin, F., and Colin, F.:
Mineral control of carbon pools in a volcanic soil horizon, Geoderma, 137, 477–489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.006</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Berg, B. and McClaugherty, C.:
Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 3rd Edn., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05349-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-662-05349-2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Besnard, E., Chenu, C., Balesdent, J., Puget, P., and Arrouays, D.:
Fate of particulate organic matter in soil aggregates during cultivation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47, 495–503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01849.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01849.x</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Blagodatskaya, E., Khomyakov, N., Myachina, O., Bogomolova, I., Blagodatsky, S., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Microbial interactions affect sources of priming induced by cellulose, Soil Biol. Biochem., 74, 39–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Blanco-Canqui, H. and Lal, R.:
Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates, CRC Cr. Rev. Plant Sci., 23, 481–504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490886842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07352680490886842</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Borggaard, O. K., Jørgensen, S. S., Møberg, J. P., and Raben-Lange, B.:
Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils, J. Soil Sci., 41, 443–449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Bruijnzeel, L. A.:
Nutrient Content of Litterfall in Coniferous Forest Plantations in Central Java, Indonesia, J. Trop. Ecol., 1, 353–372, <uri>http://www.jstor.org/stable/2559453</uri> (last access: 6 April 2016), 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Cerli, C., Celi, L., Kalbitz, K., Guggenberger, G., and Kaiser, K.:
Separation of light and heavy organic matter fractions in soil – Testing for proper density cut-off and dispersion level, Geoderma, 170, 403–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Chen, R., Senbayram, M., Blagodatsky, S., Myachina, O., Dittert, K., Lin, X., Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability determine the priming effect: Microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 2356–2367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12475</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Churchman, G. J. and Lowe, D. J.:
Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils, in: Handbook of Soil Sciences, Vol. 1, edited by: Huang, P. M., Li, Y., and Sumner, M. E., CRC Press (Taylor &amp; Francis), Boca Raton, FL, 20.1–20.72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b11267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b11267</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Covaleda, S., Gallardo, J. F., García-Oliva, F., Kirchmann, H., Prat, C., Bravo, M., and Etchevers, J. D.:
Land-use effects on the distribution of soil organic carbon within particle-size fractions of volcanic soils in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico), Soil Use Manage., 27, 186–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00341.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00341.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Cronan, C. S.:
Ecosystem Biogeochemistry, Springer, Orono, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66444-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-66444-6</ext-link>,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Cusack, D. F., Chadwick, O. A., Ladefoged, T., and Vitousek, P. M.:
Long-term effects of agriculture on soil carbon pools and carbon chemistry along a Hawaiian environmental gradient, Biogeochemistry, 112, 229–243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9718-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9718-z</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>De Clercq, T., Heiling, M., Dercon, G., Resch, C., Aigner, M., Mayer, L., Mao, Y., Elsen, A., Steier, P., Leifeld, J., and Merckx, R.:
Predicting soil organic matter stability in agricultural fields through carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 29–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.011</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Derrien, D., Plain, C., Courty, P. E., Gelhaye, L., Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T. C. W., Thomas, F., Versini, A., Zeller, B., Koutika, L. S., Boschker, H. T. S., and Epron, D.:
Does the addition of labile substrate destabilise old soil organic matter?, Soil Biol. Biochem., 76, 149–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.030</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Doetterl, S., Stevens, A., Six, J., Merckx, R., Van Oost, K., Casanova Pinto, M., Casanova-Katny, A., Muñoz, C., Boudin, M., Zagal Venegas, E., and Boeckx, P.:
Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate, Nat. Geosci., 8, 780–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2516" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2516</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Dörner, J., Dec, D., Feest, E., Vásquez, N., and Díaz, M.:
Dynamics of soil structure and pore functions of a volcanic ash soil under tillage, Soil Till. Res., 125, 52–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.05.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.still.2012.05.019</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Don, A., Schumacher, J., and Freibauer, A.:
Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 1658–1670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Du, Z. L., Wu, W. L., Zhang, Q. Z., Guo, Y. B., and Meng, F. Q.:
Long-Term Manure Amendments Enhance Soil Aggregation and Carbon Saturation of Stable Pools in North China Plain, J. Integr. Agr., 13, 2276–2285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60823-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60823-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S., and Whitmore, A. P.:
Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1781–1796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Gerzabek, M. H., Bajraktarevic, A., Keiblinger, K., Mentler, A., Rechberger, M., Tintner, J., Wriessnig, K., Gartner, M., Valenzuela, X. S., Troya, A., Couenberg, P. M., Jäger, H., Carrión, J. E., and Zehetner, F.:
Agriculture changes soil properties on the Galápagos Islands-two case studies, Soil Res., 57, 201–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR18331</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Gijsman, A. J. and Sanz, J. I.:
Soil organic matter pools in a volcanic-ash soil under fallow or cultivation with applied chicken manure, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 49, 427–436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4930427.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4930427.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Guillaume, T., Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Knohl, A., Krashevska, V., Murtilaksono, K., Scheu, S., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations, Nat. Commun., 9, 2388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Hernández, Z., Almendros, G., Carral, P., Álvarez, A., Knicker, H., and Pérez-Trujillo, J. P.:
Influence of non-crystalline minerals in the total amount, resilience and molecular composition of the organic matter in volcanic ash soils (Tenerife Island, Spain), Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 603–615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01497.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01497.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Hertel, D., Moser, G., Culmsee, H., Erasmi, S., Horna, V., Schuldt, B., and Leuschner, C.:
Below- and above-ground biomass and net primary production in a paleotropical natural forest (Sulawesi, Indonesia) as compared to neotropical forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 258, 1904–1912, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.019</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Högberg, M. N., Högberg, P., and Myrold, D. D.:
Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, the trees, or all three?, Oecologia, 150, 590–601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0562-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-006-0562-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page458?><ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Huygens, D., Boeckx, P., Van Cleemput, O., Oyarzún, C., and Godoy, R.:
Aggregate and soil organic carbon dynamics in South Chilean Andisols, Biogeosciences, 2, 159–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-159-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2-159-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Kang, J., Hesterberg, D., and Osmond, D. L.:
Soil Organic Matter Effects on Phosphorus Sorption: A Path Analysis, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 360–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2008.0113</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Keeling, D.:
The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 13, 322–334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Keil, R. G. and Mayer, L. M.:
Mineral Matrices and Organic Matter, edited by: Holland, H. D. and Turekian, K. K., 2nd Edn., Elsevier Ltd., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Kleber, M., Eusterhues, K., Keiluweit, M., Mikutta, C., Mikutta, R., and Nico, P. S.:
Mineral-Organic Associations: Formation, Properties, and Relevance in Soil Environments, in: Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 130, edited by: Sparks, D. L., Elsevier Ltd.,  1–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.:
The contentious nature of soil organic matter, Nature, 528, 60–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature16069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Lehmann, J., Kinyangi, J., and Solomon, D.:
Organic matter stabilization in soil microaggregates: Implications from spatial heterogeneity of organic carbon contents and carbon forms, Biogeochemistry, 85, 45–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9105-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-007-9105-3</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Du, J., Zhong, S., Ci, E., and Wei, C.:
Changes in the profile properties and chemical weathering characteristics of cultivated soils affected by anthropic activities, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11, 20822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00302-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-00302-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Linlin, G., Taku, N., Hiromi, I., and Zhigang, S.:
Carbon Mineralization Associated with Soil Aggregates as Affected by Short-Term Tillage, J. Resour. Ecol., 7, 101–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.02.004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Liu, X. J. A., Sun, J., Mau, R. L., Finley, B. K., Compson, Z. G., van Gestel, N., Brown, J. R., Schwartz, E., Dijkstra, P., and Hungate, B. A.:
Labile carbon input determines the direction and magnitude of the priming effect, Appl. Soil Ecol., 109, 7–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Lyu, H., Watanabe, T., Kilasara, M., Hartono, A., and Funakawa, S.:
Soil organic carbon pools controlled by climate and geochemistry in tropical volcanic regions, Sci. Total Environ., 761, 143277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143277</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Malik, A. A., Puissant, J., Buckeridge, K. M., Goodall, T., Jehmlich, N., Chowdhury, S., Gweon, H. S., Peyton, J. M., Mason, K. E., van Agtmaal, M., Blaud, A., Clark, I. M., Whitaker, J., Pywell, R. F., Ostle, N., Gleixner, G., and Griffiths, R. I.:
Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes, Nat. Commun., 9, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Matus, F., Rumpel, C., Neculman, R., Panichini, M., and Mora, M. L.:
Soil carbon storage and stabilisation in andic soils: A review, Catena, 120, 102–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.008</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>McKeague, J. A.:
An evaluation of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pyrophosphate and pyrophosphate-dithionite in comparison with oxalate as extractants of the accumulation products in podzols and some other soils, Can. J. Soil Sci., 47, 95–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss67-017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4141/cjss67-017</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Mikha, M. M. and Rice, C. W.:
Tillage and Manure Effects on Soil and Aggregate-Associated Carbon and Nitrogen, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 809–816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.8090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2004.8090</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Mikutta, R., Kleber, M., Torn, M. S., and Jahn, R.:
Stabilization of soil organic matter: Association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance?, Biogeochemistry, 77, 25–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-0712-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-005-0712-6</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Mikutta, R., Schaumann, G. E., Gildemeister, D., Bonneville, S., Kramer, M. G., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O. A., and Guggenberger, G.:
Biogeochemistry of mineral-organic associations across a long-term mineralogical soil gradient (0.3–4100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Hawaiian Islands, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 2034–2060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.028</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Miyazawa, M., Takahashi, T., Sato, T., Kanno, H., and Nanzyo, M.:
Factors controlling accumulation and decomposition of organic carbon in humus horizons of Andosols: A case study for distinctive non-allophanic Andosols in northeastern Japan, Biol. Fert. Soils, 49, 929–938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0792-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-013-0792-8</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oades, J. and Waters, A.: Aggregates hierarchy in soils, Austr. J. Soil Res., 29, 815–825, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR9910815</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Parfitt, R. L.:
Allophane and imogolite: role in soil biogeochemical processes, Clay Miner., 44, 135–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2009.044.1.135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1180/claymin.2009.044.1.135</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Poeplau, C., Don, A., Dondini, M., Leifeld, J., Nemo, R., Schumacher, J., Senapati, N., and Wiesmeier, M.:
Reproducibility of a soil organic carbon fractionation method to derive RothC carbon pools, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 735–746, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12088</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Poirier, V., Basile-Doelsch, I., Balesdent, J., Borschneck, D., Whalen, J. K., and Angers, D. A.:
Organo-Mineral Interactions Are More Important for Organic Matter Retention in Subsoil Than Topsoil, Soil Syst., 4, 4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/soilsystems4010004</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Qiao, N., Schaefer, D., Blagodatskaya, E., Zou, X., Xu, X., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Labile carbon retention compensates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> released by priming in forest soils, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1943–1954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12458" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12458</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Rabbi, S. M. F., Daniel, H., Lockwood, P. V., Macdonald, C., Pereg, L., Tighe, M., Wilson, B. R., and Young, I. M.:
Physical soil architectural traits are functionally linked to carbon decomposition and bacterial diversity, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 33012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep33012</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Rennert, T.:
Wet-chemical extractions to characterise pedogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species –a critical review, Soil Res., 57, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR18299</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Six, J., Elliott, E. T., and Paustian, K.:
Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: A mechanism for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sequestration under no-tillage agriculture, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 2099–2103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6</ext-link>, 2000a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., and Combrink, C.:
Soil Structure and Organic Matter I. Distribution of Aggregate-Size Classes and Aggregate-Associated Carbon, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 681–689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x</ext-link>, 2000b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page459?><ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., and Paustian, K.:
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-saturation of soils, Plant Soil, 241, 155–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1016125726789</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Smith, W. K., Cleveland, C. C., Reed, S. C., and Running, S. W.:
Agricultural conversion without external water and nutrient inputs reduces terrestrial vegetation productivity, Geophys. Prospect., 41, 449–455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058857</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>SSB and UGhent (The Soil Service of Belgium and Ghent University): Study LA BOD/STUD 2006 01 04 for the Flemish Government – Development of expertsystem for C-management advise for cropland soils: part 1 literature study &amp; part 2 development of an advice system, Dept. Environment, Nature and Energy of the Flemish Government, Brussels, <uri>https://publicaties.vlaanderen.be/view-file/20207</uri> (last access: 28 July 2023), 2008 (in Dutch).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Tamrat, W. ., Rose, J., Grauby, O., Doelsch, E., Levard, C., Chaurand, P., and Basile-Doelsch, I.:
Soil organo-mineral associations formed by co-precipitation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in presence of organic ligands, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 260, 15–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.05.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2019.05.043</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>Taylor, M. D., Lowe, D. J., Hardi, P., Smidt, G. A., and Schnug, E.:
Comparing volcanic glass shards in unfertilised and fertilised Andisols derived from rhyolitic tephras, New Zealand: Evidence for accelerated weathering and implications for land management, Geoderma, 271, 91–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Van Breemen, N., Mulder, J., and Driscoll, C.:
Acidification and alkalinization of soils, Plant Soil, 75, 283–308, <uri>http://www.jstor.com/stable/42934465</uri> (last access: 9 April 2021), 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Wagai, R., Kajiura, M., Uchida, M., and Asano, M.:
Distinctive roles of two aggregate binding agents in allophanic andisols: Young carbon and poorly-crystalline metal phases with old carbon, Soil Syst., 2, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/soilsystems2020029</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Wagai, R., Kajiura, M., and Asano, M.:
Iron and aluminum association with microbially processed organic matter via meso-density aggregate formation across soils: organo-metallic glue hypothesis, SOIL, 6, 597–627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-597-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/soil-6-597-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Wei, X., Shao, M., Gale, W., and Li, L.:
Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land, Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 6–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep04062</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Werth, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractionation at the root-microorganisms-soil interface: A review and outlook for partitioning studies, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1372–1384, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Ding, W., Luo, J., Geng, R., Ghani, A., and Cai, Z.:
Effects of long-term compost and fertilizer application on stability of aggregate-associated organic carbon in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil, Biol. Fert. Soils, 48, 325–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0629-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-011-0629-2</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Zheng, H., Liu, W., Zheng, J., Luo, Y., Li, R., Wang, H., and Qi, H.:
Effect of long-term tillage on soil aggregates and aggregate-associated carbon in black soil of northeast China, PLOS ONE, 13, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0199523</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Zimmermann, M., Leifeld, J., Schmidt, M. W. I., Smith, P., and Fuhrer, J.:
Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 658–667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality  and degradability in relation to  soil geochemistry as affected by land use</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anda, M. and Dahlgren, R. A.:
Long-term response of tropical Andisol properties to conversion from rainforest to agriculture, Catena, 194, 104679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104679</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anindita, S., Sleutel, S., Vandenberghe, D., Grave, J. De, Vandenhende, V., and Finke, P.:
Land use impacts on weathering, soil properties, and carbon storage in wet Andosols, Indonesia, Geoderma, 423, 115963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115963</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asano, M. and Wagai, R.:
Evidence of aggregate hierarchy at micro- to submicron scales in an allophanic andisol, Geoderma, 216, 62–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.10.005</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asano, M. and Wagai, R.:
Distinctive organic matter pools among particle-size fractions detected by solid-state <sup>13</sup>C-NMR, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N analyses only after strong dispersion in an allophanic andisol, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 61, 242–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2014.982492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2014.982492</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asano, M., Wagai, R., Yamaguchi, N., Takeichi, Y., Maeda, M., Suga, H., and Takahashi, Y.:
In search of a binding agent: Nano-scale evidence of preferential carbon associations with poorly-crystalline mineral phases in physically-stable, clay-sized Aggregates, Soil Syst., 2, 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020032</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baldock, J. A.:
Composition and Cycling of Organic Carbon in Soil, in: Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems, edited by: Marschner, P. and Rengel, Z., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg,  1–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68027-7_1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68027-7_1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baldock, J. A., Oades, J. M., Waters, A. G., Peng, X., Vassallo, A. M., and Wilson, M. A.:
Aspects of the chemical structure of soil organic materials as revealed by solid-state<sup>13</sup>C NMR spectroscopy, Biogeochemistry, 16, 1–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00024251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00024251</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartoli, F., Burtin, G., and Herbillon, A. J.:
Disaggregation and clay dispersion of Oxisols: Na resin, a recommended methodology, Geoderma, 49, 301–317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(91)90082-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(91)90082-5</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Basile-Doelsch, I., Amundson, R., Stone, W. E. E., Masiello, C. A., Bottero, J. Y., Colin, F., Masin, F., Borschneck, D., and Meunier, J. D.:
Mineralogical control of organic carbon dynamics in a volcanic ash soil on La Réunion, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 56, 689–703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00703.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00703.x</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Basile-Doelsch, I., Amundson, R., Stone, W. E. E., Borschneck, D., Bottero, J. Y., Moustier, S., Masin, F., and Colin, F.:
Mineral control of carbon pools in a volcanic soil horizon, Geoderma, 137, 477–489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.006</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berg, B. and McClaugherty, C.:
Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 3rd Edn., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05349-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05349-2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Besnard, E., Chenu, C., Balesdent, J., Puget, P., and Arrouays, D.:
Fate of particulate organic matter in soil aggregates during cultivation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47, 495–503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01849.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01849.x</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blagodatskaya, E., Khomyakov, N., Myachina, O., Bogomolova, I., Blagodatsky, S., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Microbial interactions affect sources of priming induced by cellulose, Soil Biol. Biochem., 74, 39–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.017</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blanco-Canqui, H. and Lal, R.:
Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates, CRC Cr. Rev. Plant Sci., 23, 481–504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490886842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490886842</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borggaard, O. K., Jørgensen, S. S., Møberg, J. P., and Raben-Lange, B.:
Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils, J. Soil Sci., 41, 443–449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00078.x</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bruijnzeel, L. A.:
Nutrient Content of Litterfall in Coniferous Forest Plantations in Central Java, Indonesia, J. Trop. Ecol., 1, 353–372, <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/2559453" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 April 2016), 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cerli, C., Celi, L., Kalbitz, K., Guggenberger, G., and Kaiser, K.:
Separation of light and heavy organic matter fractions in soil – Testing for proper density cut-off and dispersion level, Geoderma, 170, 403–416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, R., Senbayram, M., Blagodatsky, S., Myachina, O., Dittert, K., Lin, X., Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: Microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 2356–2367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12475</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Churchman, G. J. and Lowe, D. J.:
Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils, in: Handbook of Soil Sciences, Vol. 1, edited by: Huang, P. M., Li, Y., and Sumner, M. E., CRC Press (Taylor &amp; Francis), Boca Raton, FL, 20.1–20.72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b11267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b11267</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Covaleda, S., Gallardo, J. F., García-Oliva, F., Kirchmann, H., Prat, C., Bravo, M., and Etchevers, J. D.:
Land-use effects on the distribution of soil organic carbon within particle-size fractions of volcanic soils in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico), Soil Use Manage., 27, 186–194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00341.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00341.x</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cronan, C. S.:
Ecosystem Biogeochemistry, Springer, Orono, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66444-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66444-6</a>,  2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cusack, D. F., Chadwick, O. A., Ladefoged, T., and Vitousek, P. M.:
Long-term effects of agriculture on soil carbon pools and carbon chemistry along a Hawaiian environmental gradient, Biogeochemistry, 112, 229–243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9718-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9718-z</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Clercq, T., Heiling, M., Dercon, G., Resch, C., Aigner, M., Mayer, L., Mao, Y., Elsen, A., Steier, P., Leifeld, J., and Merckx, R.:
Predicting soil organic matter stability in agricultural fields through carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 29–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.011</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Derrien, D., Plain, C., Courty, P. E., Gelhaye, L., Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T. C. W., Thomas, F., Versini, A., Zeller, B., Koutika, L. S., Boschker, H. T. S., and Epron, D.:
Does the addition of labile substrate destabilise old soil organic matter?, Soil Biol. Biochem., 76, 149–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.030</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doetterl, S., Stevens, A., Six, J., Merckx, R., Van Oost, K., Casanova Pinto, M., Casanova-Katny, A., Muñoz, C., Boudin, M., Zagal Venegas, E., and Boeckx, P.:
Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate, Nat. Geosci., 8, 780–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2516" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2516</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dörner, J., Dec, D., Feest, E., Vásquez, N., and Díaz, M.:
Dynamics of soil structure and pore functions of a volcanic ash soil under tillage, Soil Till. Res., 125, 52–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.05.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.05.019</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Don, A., Schumacher, J., and Freibauer, A.:
Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 1658–1670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, Z. L., Wu, W. L., Zhang, Q. Z., Guo, Y. B., and Meng, F. Q.:
Long-Term Manure Amendments Enhance Soil Aggregation and Carbon Saturation of Stable Pools in North China Plain, J. Integr. Agr., 13, 2276–2285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60823-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60823-6</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S., and Whitmore, A. P.:
Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1781–1796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerzabek, M. H., Bajraktarevic, A., Keiblinger, K., Mentler, A., Rechberger, M., Tintner, J., Wriessnig, K., Gartner, M., Valenzuela, X. S., Troya, A., Couenberg, P. M., Jäger, H., Carrión, J. E., and Zehetner, F.:
Agriculture changes soil properties on the Galápagos Islands-two case studies, Soil Res., 57, 201–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18331</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gijsman, A. J. and Sanz, J. I.:
Soil organic matter pools in a volcanic-ash soil under fallow or cultivation with applied chicken manure, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 49, 427–436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4930427.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4930427.x</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guillaume, T., Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Knohl, A., Krashevska, V., Murtilaksono, K., Scheu, S., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations, Nat. Commun., 9, 2388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hernández, Z., Almendros, G., Carral, P., Álvarez, A., Knicker, H., and Pérez-Trujillo, J. P.:
Influence of non-crystalline minerals in the total amount, resilience and molecular composition of the organic matter in volcanic ash soils (Tenerife Island, Spain), Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 603–615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01497.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01497.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hertel, D., Moser, G., Culmsee, H., Erasmi, S., Horna, V., Schuldt, B., and Leuschner, C.:
Below- and above-ground biomass and net primary production in a paleotropical natural forest (Sulawesi, Indonesia) as compared to neotropical forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 258, 1904–1912, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.019</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Högberg, M. N., Högberg, P., and Myrold, D. D.:
Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three?, Oecologia, 150, 590–601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0562-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0562-5</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huygens, D., Boeckx, P., Van Cleemput, O., Oyarzún, C., and Godoy, R.:
Aggregate and soil organic carbon dynamics in South Chilean Andisols, Biogeosciences, 2, 159–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-159-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-159-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kang, J., Hesterberg, D., and Osmond, D. L.:
Soil Organic Matter Effects on Phosphorus Sorption: A Path Analysis, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 360–366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0113</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keeling, D.:
The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 13, 322–334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keil, R. G. and Mayer, L. M.:
Mineral Matrices and Organic Matter, edited by: Holland, H. D. and Turekian, K. K., 2nd Edn., Elsevier Ltd., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01024-X</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleber, M., Eusterhues, K., Keiluweit, M., Mikutta, C., Mikutta, R., and Nico, P. S.:
Mineral-Organic Associations: Formation, Properties, and Relevance in Soil Environments, in: Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 130, edited by: Sparks, D. L., Elsevier Ltd.,  1–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.005</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.:
The contentious nature of soil organic matter, Nature, 528, 60–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehmann, J., Kinyangi, J., and Solomon, D.:
Organic matter stabilization in soil microaggregates: Implications from spatial heterogeneity of organic carbon contents and carbon forms, Biogeochemistry, 85, 45–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9105-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9105-3</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Du, J., Zhong, S., Ci, E., and Wei, C.:
Changes in the profile properties and chemical weathering characteristics of cultivated soils affected by anthropic activities, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11, 20822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00302-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00302-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Linlin, G., Taku, N., Hiromi, I., and Zhigang, S.:
Carbon Mineralization Associated with Soil Aggregates as Affected by Short-Term Tillage, J. Resour. Ecol., 7, 101–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.02.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.02.004</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X. J. A., Sun, J., Mau, R. L., Finley, B. K., Compson, Z. G., van Gestel, N., Brown, J. R., Schwartz, E., Dijkstra, P., and Hungate, B. A.:
Labile carbon input determines the direction and magnitude of the priming effect, Appl. Soil Ecol., 109, 7–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.002</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lyu, H., Watanabe, T., Kilasara, M., Hartono, A., and Funakawa, S.:
Soil organic carbon pools controlled by climate and geochemistry in tropical volcanic regions, Sci. Total Environ., 761, 143277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143277</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Malik, A. A., Puissant, J., Buckeridge, K. M., Goodall, T., Jehmlich, N., Chowdhury, S., Gweon, H. S., Peyton, J. M., Mason, K. E., van Agtmaal, M., Blaud, A., Clark, I. M., Whitaker, J., Pywell, R. F., Ostle, N., Gleixner, G., and Griffiths, R. I.:
Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes, Nat. Commun., 9, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matus, F., Rumpel, C., Neculman, R., Panichini, M., and Mora, M. L.:
Soil carbon storage and stabilisation in andic soils: A review, Catena, 120, 102–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.008</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
McKeague, J. A.:
An evaluation of 0.1&thinsp;M pyrophosphate and pyrophosphate-dithionite in comparison with oxalate as extractants of the accumulation products in podzols and some other soils, Can. J. Soil Sci., 47, 95–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss67-017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss67-017</a>, 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mikha, M. M. and Rice, C. W.:
Tillage and Manure Effects on Soil and Aggregate-Associated Carbon and Nitrogen, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 809–816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.8090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.8090</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mikutta, R., Kleber, M., Torn, M. S., and Jahn, R.:
Stabilization of soil organic matter: Association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance?, Biogeochemistry, 77, 25–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-0712-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-0712-6</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mikutta, R., Schaumann, G. E., Gildemeister, D., Bonneville, S., Kramer, M. G., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O. A., and Guggenberger, G.:
Biogeochemistry of mineral-organic associations across a long-term mineralogical soil gradient (0.3–4100&thinsp;kyr), Hawaiian Islands, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 2034–2060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.028</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miyazawa, M., Takahashi, T., Sato, T., Kanno, H., and Nanzyo, M.:
Factors controlling accumulation and decomposition of organic carbon in humus horizons of Andosols: A case study for distinctive non-allophanic Andosols in northeastern Japan, Biol. Fert. Soils, 49, 929–938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0792-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0792-8</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oades, J. and Waters, A.: Aggregates hierarchy in soils, Austr. J. Soil Res., 29, 815–825, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910815</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Parfitt, R. L.:
Allophane and imogolite: role in soil biogeochemical processes, Clay Miner., 44, 135–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2009.044.1.135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2009.044.1.135</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poeplau, C., Don, A., Dondini, M., Leifeld, J., Nemo, R., Schumacher, J., Senapati, N., and Wiesmeier, M.:
Reproducibility of a soil organic carbon fractionation method to derive RothC carbon pools, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 64, 735–746, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12088</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poirier, V., Basile-Doelsch, I., Balesdent, J., Borschneck, D., Whalen, J. K., and Angers, D. A.:
Organo-Mineral Interactions Are More Important for Organic Matter Retention in Subsoil Than Topsoil, Soil Syst., 4, 4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010004</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qiao, N., Schaefer, D., Blagodatskaya, E., Zou, X., Xu, X., and Kuzyakov, Y.:
Labile carbon retention compensates for CO<sub>2</sub> released by priming in forest soils, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1943–1954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12458" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12458</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rabbi, S. M. F., Daniel, H., Lockwood, P. V., Macdonald, C., Pereg, L., Tighe, M., Wilson, B. R., and Young, I. M.:
Physical soil architectural traits are functionally linked to carbon decomposition and bacterial diversity, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 33012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33012</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rennert, T.:
Wet-chemical extractions to characterise pedogenic Al and Fe species –a critical review, Soil Res., 57, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18299</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., and Paustian, K.:
Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 2099–2103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6</a>, 2000a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E. T., and Combrink, C.:
Soil Structure and Organic Matter I. Distribution of Aggregate-Size Classes and Aggregate-Associated Carbon, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 681–689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x</a>, 2000b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., and Paustian, K.:
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils, Plant Soil, 241, 155–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, W. K., Cleveland, C. C., Reed, S. C., and Running, S. W.:
Agricultural conversion without external water and nutrient inputs reduces terrestrial vegetation productivity, Geophys. Prospect., 41, 449–455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058857</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
SSB and UGhent (The Soil Service of Belgium and Ghent University): Study LA BOD/STUD 2006 01 04 for the Flemish Government – Development of expertsystem for C-management advise for cropland soils: part 1 literature study &amp; part 2 development of an advice system, Dept. Environment, Nature and Energy of the Flemish Government, Brussels, <a href="https://publicaties.vlaanderen.be/view-file/20207" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 July 2023), 2008 (in Dutch).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tamrat, W. ., Rose, J., Grauby, O., Doelsch, E., Levard, C., Chaurand, P., and Basile-Doelsch, I.:
Soil organo-mineral associations formed by co-precipitation of Fe, Si and Al in presence of organic ligands, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 260, 15–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.05.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.05.043</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, M. D., Lowe, D. J., Hardi, P., Smidt, G. A., and Schnug, E.:
Comparing volcanic glass shards in unfertilised and fertilised Andisols derived from rhyolitic tephras, New Zealand: Evidence for accelerated weathering and implications for land management, Geoderma, 271, 91–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.035</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Breemen, N., Mulder, J., and Driscoll, C.:
Acidification and alkalinization of soils, Plant Soil, 75, 283–308, <a href="http://www.jstor.com/stable/42934465" target="_blank"/> (last access: 9 April 2021), 1983.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wagai, R., Kajiura, M., Uchida, M., and Asano, M.:
Distinctive roles of two aggregate binding agents in allophanic andisols: Young carbon and poorly-crystalline metal phases with old carbon, Soil Syst., 2, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2020029</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wagai, R., Kajiura, M., and Asano, M.:
Iron and aluminum association with microbially processed organic matter via meso-density aggregate formation across soils: organo-metallic glue hypothesis, SOIL, 6, 597–627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-597-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-597-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, X., Shao, M., Gale, W., and Li, L.:
Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land, Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 6–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04062</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Werth, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.:
<sup>13</sup>C fractionation at the root-microorganisms-soil interface: A review and outlook for partitioning studies, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1372–1384, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, H., Ding, W., Luo, J., Geng, R., Ghani, A., and Cai, Z.:
Effects of long-term compost and fertilizer application on stability of aggregate-associated organic carbon in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil, Biol. Fert. Soils, 48, 325–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0629-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0629-2</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, H., Liu, W., Zheng, J., Luo, Y., Li, R., Wang, H., and Qi, H.:
Effect of long-term tillage on soil aggregates and aggregate-associated carbon in black soil of northeast China, PLOS ONE, 13, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199523</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zimmermann, M., Leifeld, J., Schmidt, M. W. I., Smith, P., and Fuhrer, J.:
Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 658–667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
