<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SOIL</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>SOIL</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SOIL</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">SOIL</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2199-398X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/soil-8-149-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Network complexity of rubber plantations is lower than tropical forests for
soil bacteria but not for fungi</article-title><alt-title>Forest conversion alters soil microbial networks</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Forest conversion alters soil microbial networks}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Lan et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lan</surname><given-names>Guoyu</given-names></name>
          <email>langyrri@163.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-4252</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Chuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Zhixiang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-8717</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Rui</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-5066</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Bangqian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-4285</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Xicai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural
Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Danzhou 571737, Hainan, PR China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-ecosystem National Observation and Research
Station, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Danzhou 571737, Hainan, PR China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guoyu Lan (langyrri@163.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>149</fpage><lpage>161</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e137">Soil microbial communities play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning.
Past research has examined the effects of forest conversion on soil
microbial composition and diversity, but it remains unknown how networks
within these communities respond to forest conversion, including when
tropical rainforests are replaced with rubber plantations. Microbial
networks are viewed as critical indicators of soil health and quality. They
consist of two parts: nodes and edges. In this study, we used data from
Illumina sequencing and shotgun metagenome sequencing to analyze bacterial
and fungal community network structure in a large number of soil samples
from tropical rainforests and rubber plantation sites on Hainan Island,
China. Our results showed that only 5 %–10 % of shared network edges (i.e., links
between species A and B existing in both rubber plantations and rainforests)
were observed in both bacterial and fungal communities, which indicates that
forest conversion altered the soil microbial network structure. The identity of
keystone operational
taxonomic units (OTUs) differed entirely between rubber plantation and rainforest
sites, further underscoring the altered network structure. More edges and
more negative correlations within the soil bacterial–fungal networks were
observed at rubber plantation sites (dry season: 4284 total edges, 844
negative; rainy season: 7257 total edges, 1744 negative) than at rainforest
sites (dry season: 3650 total edges, 149 negative; rainy season: 6018 total edges, 489
negative), demonstrating that soil bacterial–fungal network structure was
more complex and stable in rubber plantations than in rainforests. For
bacteria, a larger number of network edges were observed among bacterial
networks in samples from tropical rainforest than in samples from rubber
plantations, indicating that rainforest bacterial networks were more complex
than those from rubber plantations. However, soil fungal networks from
rubber plantations showed more links, suggesting that forest conversion
increased fungal network complexity. More edges of network and more links
between species and functions were observed in the rainy season than in the
dry season, indicating that seasonal changes had a strong effect on network
structure and function. Further analysis shows that soil pH, potassium (AK), and
total nitrogen (TN) had more links with species of some phyla. In
conclusion, forest conversion results in an increase in soil pH as well as a
decrease in AK and TN, and these changes as well as seasonal variations had
a great impact on soil microbial composition, network structure and
function.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e149">“Soil microbiome” refers to the enormous variety of microorganisms
inhabiting the complex soil environment. It is highly diverse and comprises
up to one-quarter of Earth's species (Wagg et al., 2019). Soil microbes play
a critical role in the maintenance of soil quality and function, and they
represent more than half of the biodiversity of terrestrial ecosystems
(Philippot et al., 2013). A number of studies have investigated how the
conversion of tropical forests to rubber plantations impacts soil microbial
composition and diversity (Schneider et al., 2015; Kerfahi et al., 2016; Lan
et al., 2017a, b, c, 2020a, b, 2021). Studies
conducted in Indonesia (Schneider et al., 2015), Malaysia (Kerfahi et al.,
2016) and southern China (Lan et al., 2017a, b, c)
have found significant differences between rubber plantations and tropical
forests, specifically that the diversity of soil bacteria was higher in
rubber plantations than in rainforest. Compared with primary forests,
agricultural systems tend to have higher bacterial richness but lower fungal
richness (Lan et al., 2017a; Cai et al., 2018; Tripathi et al., 2012;
Kerfahi et al., 2016). Compared with <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> plantations, rubber
plantations have been found to possess a higher diversity of both bacteria and
fungi (Ma et al., 2019). Song et al. (2019) reported that tropical forest
conversion to rubber plantation results in reduced fungal microbial
community network complexity. However, there are few studies on the impact
of forest conversion on the soil bacterial community network structure nor on
the drivers leading to changes in network structure.</p>
      <p id="d1e155">The soil microbial network is viewed as a critical indicator of soil health
and quality (Kuperman et al., 2014). Microbial networks consist of two
parts: nodes and edges. Nodes indicate microbe types, generally operational
taxonomic units (OTUs) or
species, but can also indicate environmental variables of interest, such as
soil pH. Edges (or links) indicate significant correlations between nodes.
The number of links connected to a node is known as the node's degree
(Röttjers and Faust, 2018). Usually, the more links a network has, the
more complex the community is. Similarly, the higher the degree of a node
(OTU or species), the more important the species is to the network structure
(Berry and Widder, 2014). In recent years, microbial network analysis has
been used to identify keystone taxa (Banerjee et al., 2018) and provide
comprehensive insight into the microbial community structure and assembly
(Fuhrman, 2009). The complexity of network structure is understood by
calculating the number of edges, whereas keystone species of the community are
found by estimating the degree of each species. The stability of the
microbial community is determined by calculating the ratio of positive to
negative correlations of the network, as a microbial community with a large proportion of positive
correlations is thought to be unstable (Coyte et
al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e158">Previous work has shown that agricultural intensification can reduce
microbial network complexity (Banerjee et al., 2019). Logging alters the soil
fungal network in tropical rainforests, i.e., more organized fungal
communities in cut stands compared with primary stands (Chen et al.,
2019). Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought conditions than fungal
networks (De Vries et al., 2018). While the exact drivers of microbial
network structure still remain unknown, previous work has shown that soil
nutrients, such as soil phosphorus content, and soil pH are the main
drivers of the network structure for microbial communities (Banerjee et
al., 2019). Seasonal variation also affects the network structure by
changing the identity of keystone species in the community, given that a
keystone species might be present only during a specific season or time period
(Banerjee et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e161">Hainan Island is home to a large area of tropical rainforest that is rich in
biodiversity. It is a part of the Indian–Malay rainforest system at the
northern edge of the world's rainforest distribution. However, rubber
plantations now account for almost a quarter of the total extent of
vegetated areas on Hainan Island (Lan et al., 2021). Previous work on the
island has shown that forest conversion from rainforest to rubber
plantations can result in shifts in bacterial composition, from
Proteobacteria to Chloroflexi, and fungal composition, from Basidiomycota to
Ascomycota (Lan et al., 2021). Other research has shown that microbial (including
bacteria and fungi) diversity was higher in rainforest soils than in rubber
plantations (Lan et al., 2021). Therefore, we hypothesize the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e166">The conversion of rainforest to rubber plantations results in changes in the
dominant phyla of soil microbes, with concomitant changes in the network
structure and identity of keystone species.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e170">Soil bacterial–fungal
network structure is less complex but more stable in rubber plantations than
in rainforest because high species diversity leads to complex network
structure and unstable microbiome communities (Coyte et al., 2015).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e174">Soil
bacterial networks in rubber plantations are less complex than in
rainforests because intensive cropping reduces the complexity of bacterial
network, even as richness increases (Karimi et al., 2019).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e178">Soil fungal
network structure at rubber plantation sites is more complex than in the
rainforest because organic farming has been shown to result in a much more complex fungal network
than conventional or no-tillage farm systems, due to the use of organic
fertilizer and the return of litter to the field (Banerjee et al., 2019).</p></list-item></list>
By
testing these hypotheses, we want to clarify the drivers and mechanisms of
microbial community assembly that link forest conversion to differences in the
soil microbial network structure. This study will provide critical
information for understanding and managing microbial communities in the tropical
forests of China and elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study site</title>
      <p id="d1e197">This study was conducted on Hainan Island (18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 108<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–111<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), in southern China. The total area of Hainan Island is about 34 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lopez et al., 2009). It is the largest island within the
Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot of tropical Asia (Francisco-Ortega et al.,
2010) and has a tropical monsoon climate. Hainan Island has a warm and humid
climate year-round, with an average annual temperature of
22–26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Rainfall is abundant, ranging from 1000 to 2600 mm
yearly, with an average annual precipitation of 1639 mm. The rainy season
occurs from May to October, with a total precipitation of about 1500 mm,
accounting for 70 %–90 % of the total annual precipitation. Only 10 %–30 %
of the total annual precipitation falls within the dry season, from November
to April. The central part of Hainan Island is mountainous and contains
old-growth tropical rainforests and monsoon forests. Rubber plantations are
found on the plateaus surrounding the central mountainous zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Soil sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e299">The tropical rainforests of Hainan are mainly distributed in Bangwangling,
Diaoloshan, Wuzhishan, Yinggeling and Jianfengling national forest parks. Therefore, we selected a
tropical rainforest at each of these sites for our study objectives. There
are about 530 000 ha of rubber plantations on Hainan Island. Five
rubber plantations were selected, one in Wanning, Ledong, Danzhou,
Haikou and Qiongzhong, respectively. These five rubber plantations are located in the east,
south, west, north and middle of Hainan, respectively (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). We
selected 25- to 30-year-old rubber trees (i.e., mature rubber plantations) for
our study objectives. Latex harvest and fertilizer application are common
management practices in rubber plantations. Usually, compound fertilizer
(1–1.5 kg per tree) and organic fertilizers (20–25 kg per tree) were applied
once or twice a year. More information on the study sites is provided in
Table S1 in the Supplement. Before soil sampling, we sterilized the soil drill with 75 %
alcohol. After the removal of the litter layer using a 5 cm diameter steel
drill, topsoil (0 to 20 cm) was collected, homogenized and passed
through a 2 mm mesh sieve. For each site, 13 soil samples were
collected; thus, a total of 130 samples were collected between the
rubber plantation and tropical rainforest sites. Soil sampling was performed
twice in 2018, once in January (dry season) and once in July (rainy season),
resulting in a total of 260 soil samples (130 per forest type). Soil
samples were divided into two parts. One was used to analyze soil water
content, soil pH, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium
(TK), nitrate nitrogen (NN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus
(AP) and potassium (AK). Soil water content (%) was measured
gravimetrically. Soil pH was measured in a soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> water suspension (1 : 2.5,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a pH meter. TN was determined using micro-Kjeldahl digestion
followed by steam distillation. TP and TK were measured following digestion
with NaOH. NN and AN were determined by steam distillation and
indophenol-blue colorimetry, respectively. Soil samples were extracted with
NaHCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the extract was then used to measure available soil phosphorus AP
via molybdate-blue colorimetry. To measure soil AK, soil was extracted with
ammonium acetate, and the extract was then loaded onto an atomic absorption
spectrometer with ascorbic acid as a reductant (Chen et al., 2019). Soil
properties of the rubber plantation and rainforest sites are shown in Table S2. The other part of each soil sample was stored in an ultralow-temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) refrigerator for later DNA extraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification</title>
      <p id="d1e357">Microbial DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil using E.Z.N.A.<sup>®</sup>
soil DNA kits (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the
manufacturer's protocol. The fungal ITS1 hypervariable region was amplified
using the PCR primers ITS1F (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ITS2R
(5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Adams et al., 2013). For bacteria and archaea,
the V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified
using the PCR primers 515FmodF (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 806RmodR
(5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Walters et al., 2016; Sampson et al., 2016).
The PCR reactions were conducted using the following approach: an initial 3 min denaturation at 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 27 cycles of 30 s at
95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 30 s of annealing at 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 45 s of elongation
at 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and a 10 min final extension at 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Illumina MiSeq sequencing</title>
      <p id="d1e490">Amplicons were extracted from 2 % agarose gels, purified using the AxyPrep
DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and
quantified using a QuantiFluor™ single-tube fluorometer (Promega,
USA). Purified amplicons were pooled in an equimolar solution and then
sequenced (paired-end, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bp) on an Illumina MiSeq platform
according to standard protocols.</p>
      <p id="d1e505">Shotgun metagenomic sequencing libraries were prepared and then sequenced by
Majorbio, Inc. (Shanghai, China) using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The
NRGene gene catalog was aligned against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and
Genomes (KEGG) database using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, version 2.2.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Qin et al., 2010).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Bioinformatics and data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e525">Raw FASTQ files were demultiplexed and quality filtered using QIIME
(Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology, version 1.17; Caporaso et al., 2010). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
were clustered with a 97 % similarity cutoff using UPARSE (Edgar, 2013),
and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME. Using the
RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) classifier, the phylogenetic affiliation of each 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS)
gene sequence was determined using a confidence threshold of 70 % with the
SILVA 16S rRNA database and UNITE database, respectively (Amato et al.,
2013). For each site, the relative abundance of different taxa (Good, 1953)
and the Shannon diversity index were calculated based on resampled sequence
data using mothur (Schloss et al., 2009). The raw reads were deposited into
the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: SRP108394,
SRP278296, SRP278319).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e536">To make the co-occurrence network analyses simple, we only used the top 300
most abundant bacterial and fungal OTUs to analyze the network structure of
the two forest types. These OTUs roughly match the OTUs with a relative
abundance greater than 0.05 % (Jiao et al., 2016). Four networks,
representing each habitat during each sampling period (rainforest and rubber
plantations in the dry and rainy seasons) were constructed with 65 samples
each. We also performed the bacterial–fungal community network analysis to
investigate the soil microbial network complexity of each of the four.
Interactions consisted of Spearman's rank correlations. Co-occurrence
networks were constructed using only significant correlations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Barberan et al., 2012), as this
cutoff includes a range of interaction strengths (De Vries et al., 2018).
The networks were then visualized in R using the “igraph” package. To reveal the
distribution pattern of correlation coefficients, the frequency of the
coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were plotted. The
“NetworkAnalyzer” tool in Cytoscape (version 3.4.0) was used to calculate
network topology parameters including number of nodes, edges, degree,
betweenness and closeness. The number of shared edges and unique edges as well
as keystone OTUs were calculated to evaluate whether the network structure
changed. We defined a shared network edge as the link (edge) between two species (species
A and species B) that not only exist in the rubber plantation network but also exist in the
rainforest network. In contrast, a unique edge was defined as a link that only exists
in either the rubber plantations or rainforests. The numbers of shared edges and
unique edges were calculated using igraph and were visualized using Venn diagrams.
Keystone OTUs are known to be important for ecosystem structure and function
and were selected on the basis of high network degree, high closeness
centrality, and low betweenness centrality, as defined by Berry and Widder (2014). To evaluate the proportional influence of each phylum on bacterial
and fungal network structure, node degrees of each phylum were calculated
and bar plots were created. Correlation coefficients between species and
functions were calculated based on metagenomics data. Here, we used the top
50 most abundant species and the top 50 KEGG functions (pathway level 3). The species and function correlation network was then constructed on the Majorbio cloud platform (<uri>https://cloud.majorbio.com/</uri>, last access: 23 January 2022). To reveal the relationship
between microbial taxa and environmental variables, two-way correlation
networks were also constructed on the Majorbio cloud platform. The
topological role of each node in a network was assessed by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the connectivity of node <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within a
module, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures the degree of the connection of node <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with other modules
(Roger and Amaral, 2005). All species can be divided into four groups
according to simplified criteria (Olesen et al., 2007), namely
peripherals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), connectors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), module hubs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
network hubs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were calculated using the “GIANT” package in
Cytoscape. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot was created with “ggplot2” in R.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Bacterial and fungal networks</title>
      <p id="d1e801">Our results showed that the bacterial–fungal community network was more
complex in rubber plantations (4284 edges in the dry season, 7257 in the
rainy season) than in primary forests (3650 in the dry season, 6507 in the
rainy season) and that it was more complex during the rainy season than during the dry season
(Fig. 1). Most nodes of bacterial networks (Fig. 2) and fungal networks
(Fig. 3) varied with forest type in both the dry and rainy seasons. For
bacterial networks, there were 2559 and 2501 edges in the forests and
rubber plantations, respectively, in the dry season, but these two networks
only shared 262 edges, accounting for only about 10 % the total edges
(Fig. 4a, b). Similarly, these networks only shared 519 edges during the
rainy season. For fungal networks, there were only four and five shared edges
(i.e., no more than 5 % of the total edges) in the dry and rainy seasons,
respectively (Fig. 4c, d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e806">The soil bacterial–fungal community network of rubber plantations
and rainforests in the dry and rainy seasons. Red solid circles indicate
fungi, and green solid circles indicate bacteria. Red lines indicate
a positive correlation between OTUs, and green lines indicate a negative correlation.
The absolute value of the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e841">The soil bacterial network structure of rubber plantations and tropical
rainforests in the dry and rainy seasons. Red lines indicate a positive
correlation between OTUs, and green lines indicate a negative correlation. The absolute
value of the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e877">The soil fungal network structure of rubber plantations and tropical
rainforests in the dry and rainy seasons. Red lines indicate a positive
correlation between OTUs, and green lines indicate a negative correlation. The absolute
value of the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e912">The number of shared and unique edges of soil bacterial and fungal
networks in rubber plantations and tropical rainforests in the dry and rainy
seasons. The number where the two circles cross is the number of shared edges.
Numbers in the red circles present the unique edges in rainforests, whereas numbers in
blue circles present the unique edges in rubber plantations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e921">The number of edges of bacterial and fungal networks were almost equivalent
during the dry season. However, in the rainy season, there were more edges
in the rainforest bacterial network than in the rubber plantation network
(Table 1, Fig. 4b). For the network structure of the fungal community,
more edges were observed in rubber plantations in the rainy season (Table 1, Fig. 4d). Similarly, there were no significant differences in
the degree of the bacterial or fungal networks between the tropical
rainforest sites and rubber plantations in the dry season (Fig. 5a, c). In
the rainy season, rainforest sites had a higher bacterial network degree,
while rubber plantations showed a higher fungal network degree (Fig. 5b, d).
For bacterial networks, more nodes (OTUs) with a high degree (rubber
plantation had two nodes with a degree greater than 75, rainforest had eight such
nodes) were observed in the rainforest during the rainy season (Fig. S2B).
For fungal networks, 15 nodes of a higher degree (degree greater than 25) were
observed in rubber plantations; however, only 7 such nodes existed for
rainforest sites (Fig. S2D). These results indicate that the fungal
network structure in the rubber plantations was more complex than for
tropical rainforests during the rainy season but that the reverse was true
for bacteria.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e926">The network degree of soil bacterial and fungal communities of rubber
plantations (blue) and tropical rainforests (red) in the dry and rainy
seasons.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e939">Topological properties of the soil microbial (bacterial and fungi)
network structure in a rubber plantation and tropical rainforest in the dry and
rainy seasons.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Bacteria </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center">Fungi </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rubber,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Rainforest,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rubber,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Rainforest,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Rubber,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Rainforest,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Rubber,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Rainforest,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">rainy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">rainy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">rainy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">rainy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of nodes</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">287</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">296</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">296</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">243</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">244</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of edges</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2448</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2559</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4248</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">791</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">769</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">905</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of positive edges</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2052</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2508.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3385</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4901</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">760</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">764</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1195</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">897</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of negative edges</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">396</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">863</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Connectivity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average degree</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average betweenness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">93.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">208.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">185.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">170.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">266.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average of shortest path length</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clustering coefficient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.451</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.457</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of clusters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">94.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">67.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Degree centralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Betweenness centralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0067</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0053</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0049</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Closeness centralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.351</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Neighborhood connectivity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Topological coefficient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1542">When considering the ratio of positive to negative correlation coefficients,
the bacterial–fungal community network revealed that rubber plantations (844
edges in the dry season, 1744 edges in the rainy season) have more negative links
than rainforests (149 edges in the dry season, 489 edges in the rainy season),
indicating that the rubber plantation network was more stable than that
of the rainforests (Fig. 1). More correlations (greater than 0.3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were also calculated to investigate the positive to
negative correlation ratio, and the results showed that negative correlations
between bacterial and fungal OTUs in the rubber plantations were
consistently stronger than in the tropical rainforests in both the dry season
and the rainy season (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1559">Frequency distributions of the correlation strength in bacterial (<bold>a</bold> – dry season, <bold>b</bold> – rainy season) and fungal (<bold>c</bold> – dry season, <bold>d</bold> – rainy season)
networks of rubber plantations and tropical rainforests in the dry and rainy
seasons (absolute correlation coefficient greater than 0.3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Correlations in rainforest networks are red, and correlations in rubber
plantation networks are blue.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Keystone taxa</title>
      <p id="d1e1600">Module hubs and network hubs have been commonly identified as keystone taxa
in networks. However, for both the bacterial and fungal communities, neither
tropical rainforest nor rubber plantation networks possessed module hubs and
network hubs (Figs. S3, S4). The keystone taxa of bacteria were very
different between rubber plantations and tropical rainforest sites in both
the dry and rainy seasons. For bacteria, there were more keystone taxa at
tropical rainforest sites than in the rubber plantations in both the dry and
rainy seasons, indicating that the tropical rainforest networks had higher
complexity. We found that some groups of Acidobacteria are keystone taxa at
tropical rainforest sites but disappeared after forest conversion. There
were more Actinobacteria in rubber plantations than at tropical rainforest
sites (Table S3).</p>
      <p id="d1e1603">For fungi, more keystone taxa were observed in rubber plantations than at
tropical rainforest sites during both the dry and rainy seasons, indicating
that the rubber plantation networks were more complex. Most keystone taxa
belong to Ascomycota, suggesting that members of this group are very
important for network structure. In addition to forest conversion, seasonal
changes also affect the keystone taxa of the fungal community network. There
were more Basidiomycota OTUs in the dry season but more Ascomycota in the rainy
season (Table S4).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Drivers of microbial composition and network structure</title>
      <p id="d1e1615">Two-way correlation network analysis of the 300 most abundant OTUs and
environmental variables revealed that elevation, AK and soil pH were the main drivers of bacterial community composition and had 106, 104 and 86 degrees, respectively (Fig. S5A). For fungi, elevation had the highest degree (61), followed by AK (51)
(Fig. S5B). The relationship between OTU abundance and soil pH revealed
that the soil pH was negatively correlated with the abundance of some species of Acidobacteria
but was positively correlated with the abundance of some species of Chloroflexi and some species
of Ascomycota (Fig. S6). AK was positively correlated with the abundance of
Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Basidiomycota species but was negatively correlated
with the abundance of Chloroflexi and Ascomycota. In other words, AK and soil pH were important
drivers of microbial composition.</p>
      <p id="d1e1618">The total degree of each phylum was used to reveal the influence of each
phylum on network structure (Fig. 7). For bacteria, Proteobacteria,
Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria had a large influence on network structure.
Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes contributed more to rainforest networks
than to rubber plantation networks. However, Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi
showed the opposite pattern. For fungi, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota had
large influences on network structure. Both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota had
stronger influences on rainforest networks than rubber plantation networks.
The influence of Ascomycota was stronger during the rainy season than during the
dry season, indicating that seasonal change also had an impact on fungal community
networks. The degree of each phylum of bacterial and fungal network also
revealed that seasonality had effects on the network degree (Fig. S7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1623">The proportional influence of different phyla on the bacterial and fungal
network structure in both the dry and rainy seasons. The influence was the
number of degrees of nodes belonging to a particular phylum: panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows bacteria in the
dry season, panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows bacteria in the rainy season, panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows fungus in the dry season and panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows fungus
in the rainy season.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Interaction between species and functions</title>
      <p id="d1e1652">Two-way network analysis of the 50 most abundant species (all belonging to
bacteria groups based on metagenomic data) and the 50 most abundant KEGG
functions revealed the interaction between microbial composition and
functions. The results showed that soil network structure at rainforests
sites (460 edges in the dry season, 1750 in the rainy season) was more
complex than that of rubber plantations (223 in the dry season, 451 in the
rainy season) (Fig. 8), indicating that more links between microbial
species and functions were observed in the soils of rainforest sites. Both
rubber plantation and rainforest networks were more complex in the rainy
season than in the dry season. We also found that metabolism was the most
important function in soil microbial networks. Surprisingly, species of
Actinobacteria were negatively correlated with function in rubber plantations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1657">Network of the top 50 most abundant species (based on metagenomics
data) and the top 50 most frequent KEGG functions (pathway level 3) of rubber
plantation and tropical rainforest sites in the dry and rainy seasons: panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows rubber in the dry season, panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows rainforest in the dry season, panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows rubber in the rainy
season and panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows rainforest in the rainy season. The size of the node indicates the
species/function abundance. A red line indicates a positive correlation
between species/functions, and a green line indicates a negative correlation.
The absolute value of the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/8/149/2022/soil-8-149-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Forest conversion reduces soil bacterial network complexity</title>
      <p id="d1e1719">Land-use changes increasingly threaten biodiversity, particularly in
tropical forests (Gibson et al., 2011). However, we still have little
understanding of how soil networks respond to forest conversion, such as when
rainforests are converted to rubber plantations. Our results showed that
forest conversion had large effects on both soil bacterial and fungal
networks. Tropical rainforest bacterial networks had more edges (Table 1)
and a higher degree (Fig. 4) than rubber plantation networks,
especially during the rainy season, indicating that the rainforest bacterial
network was more complex than the rubber plantation network. This finding is
consistent with previous observations that soil bacterial networks were more
complex in natural systems than in crop soil (Karimi et al., 2019). Further
study showed that soil networks become more connected through the process of
ecological restoration (Morriën et al., 2017). The observed decreases in
network complexity and cohesion support the hypothesis that cropping may
enhance the isolation of bacterial taxa (Karimi et al., 2019), which results
in lower numbers of connections in the network. In addition, at the
microscale, the structure of tilled soils is more homogeneous, and the soil
pores are less connected than in soils that are not tilled (Pagliai et al.,
2004), such as rainforest soil. In nature, soil ecosystems are highly
heterogeneous, as hot spots of soil microbial biodiversity can form
spatial and temporally within soil aggregates (Bach et al., 2018). This
spatial heterogeneity likely plays an important role in the interactions
among microbes and the mechanisms by which more complex and diverse
communities drive various nutrient-cycling processes on small spatial scales
(Wagg et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e1722">A large number of studies employing microbial network analysis have enriched
our understanding of microbial co-occurrence patterns in various soil
ecosystems. However, very little is known about whether differences in the
structure of microbial networks have consequences for microbiome functioning
(Wagg et al., 2019). Our results demonstrated that more species were correlated
with metabolism in a natural system than in an agricultural system,
especially during the rainy season. This is in line with a previous study
conducted in Sumatra, Indonesia, which found that the transformation of
forest to rubber plantation results in a 10 %–16 % decrease in community metabolism
(Barnes et al., 2014). Fewer interactions between microbial species (most of
them are bacteria) and functions in rubber plantations demonstrated that
forest conversion reduced the soil bacterial network complexity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Forest conversion increased soil fungal network complexity</title>
      <p id="d1e1733">Surprisingly, rainforest bacterial networks were characterized by fewer
edges (Table 1) and a lower degree (Fig. 4) than the rainforest bacterial
networks, meaning that rubber plantation bacterial networks were more
complex than those of native forests. Our results were not consistent with a
study conducted in Xishuangbanna (Song et al., 2019) which showed that
tropical forest conversion reduced fungal network complexity, but out work is consistent
with previous observations which found that fungal community networks were
more organized in disturbed forest compared with primary forest (Chen et
al., 2019). The observations of Banerjee et al. (2019) showed that organic
agricultural fields harbored much more complex fungal networks with many
more keystone taxa than conventionally managed fields. Forest conversion
resulted in shifts in fungal composition from Basidiomycota to Ascomycota
(Fig. S8), as seen in previous investigations (Lan et al., 2021, 2020a). Previous work showed that Basidiomycota species display higher
drought sensitivity than Ascomycota species (Taniguchi et al., 2018); this
would result in a shift in the richness and abundance of Basidiomycota species
(Fig. S8). Many Basidiomycota species are capable of long-distance
dispersal (Egidi et al., 2019; Geml et al., 2012), which may result in a
decrease in fungal network complexity. This possibly explained why
Ascomycota OTUs contribute more to the network structure than Basidiomycota
(Fig. 6). Overall, reductions in the abundance and richness of
Basidiomycota species led to an increase in fungal links in rubber
plantations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Forest conversion enhanced the stability of the soil network</title>
      <p id="d1e1744">The ability of a microbial community to resist and recover from disturbances
is defined as the stability of the community (De Vries and Shade, 2013).
The ratio of positive to negative network links constitutes the balance
between facilitative and inhibitive relationships within a network (Karimi
et al., 2017). Theoretical studies, for example, predict that ecological
networks that consist of weak interactions are more stable than those with
strong interactions (Neutel et al., 2002; Coyte et al., 2015) and that
compartmentalization and the presence of negative interactions increase the
stability of networks under disturbances (Coyte et al., 2015; Rooney et al.,
2006; Stouffer and Bascompte, 2011). In our study, more negative
correlations were detected in the rubber plantation, indicating that the network
structure of rubber plantation soils was more stable than that of rainforest
soils (De Vries et al., 2018). Forest conversion from rainforest to rubber
plantations resulted in shifts in bacterial composition from Proteobacteria
to Chloroflexi and shifts in fungal composition from Basidiomycota to Ascomycota (Lan
et al., 2021). Proteobacteria and Basidiomycota are copiotrophic
microorganisms, whereas Chloroflexi and Ascomycota are oligotrophic (Yang et
al., 2019; Lan et al., 2021). This indicated that forest conversion resulted in
shifts in soil microbial composition from more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-strategists to more
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-strategists (De Vries and Shade, 2013). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-strategists are quick-growing and
less resistant but are more resilient to disturbances. However, growth is not
the only mechanism that could maintain community stability, as the
responses of microorganisms to disturbance are very complex.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Main drivers of soil microbial composition and network structure</title>
      <p id="d1e1776">Forest conversion results in a loss of plant diversity, a loss of plant biomass and
an increase in soil pH (Lan et al., 2017a, b). Rubber plantations had a
significantly higher pH, which explains the relative decrease in the
abundance of Acidobacteria (Lan et al., 2017a). Our results demonstrate that
forest conversion drives a shift in which soil microbes act as keystone
species (Table 1). We found that many OTUs of Acidobacteria fit our criteria
as keystone species for rainforest sites, which is consistent with previous
findings (Banerjee et al., 2018). Unexpectedly, OTU11388 and OTU11373, both
Acidobacteria, were observed in rainforest soils in both the dry and rainy
seasons, indicating that Acidobacteria were very important for rainforest soil
bacterial networks (Fig. 6, Table S3). Higher AK concentrations
resulted in a higher abundance and more taxa of Actinobacteria (Fig. 9),
which suggests that Actinobacteria contributed more in rubber plantation
than in rainforest (Fig. 6). Indeed, forest conversion reduced the
abundance of Actinobacteria OTUs (Fig. S9). Due to human disturbance
in rubber plantations, the soil will inevitably be slightly polluted with
herbicides and domestic garbage. A previous study observed a member of
Actinobacteria in contaminated soil (Jiao et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e1779">Forest conversion also increases land-use intensity (Brinkmann et al.,
2019), including the application of fertilizer and herbicide. The
application of herbicides has also been linked to significant decreases in
root colonization and spore biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in
tropical agriculture (Zaller et al., 2014). Soil nutrient concentrations
show a decline around the roots of rubber plantations compared with those from
rainforests (Sahner et al., 2015). Our study was no exception. For instance,
the AK and TN concentrations were significantly lower in rubber plantations than in
samples from the rainforest sites (Table S2). Higher concentrations of AK
reasonably explained the higher contribution of Basidiomycota to the network
structure (Fig. 8b) due to the positive association of AK with
Basidiomycota.</p>
      <p id="d1e1782">Spatiotemporal heterogeneity can be a major driver of the abundance and
distribution of keystone taxa in soil, which is a highly heterogeneous and
multifaceted environment (Mills et al., 1993; Power et al., 1996; Mouquet et
al., 2013). Seasonal variability determines the structural and compositional
properties of microbiomes in an environment; as such, a keystone species
might be present only during a specific season or time period (Banerjee et al.,
2018). It was interesting that more bacterial OTUs were identified as
connectors during the rainy season than during the dry season. Connectors have been
characterized as generalists (Olesen et al., 2007), and generalists drive
covariation among communities in a network (Chen et al., 2019). Previous
observations have demonstrated that some keystone taxa that were found in
the dry season disappeared during the rainy season (Lan et al., 2018).
Seasonal changes possibly explain why some keystone taxa were observed in
the rainy season but not in the dry season.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Possible impact of forest conversion on microbial community function</title>
      <p id="d1e1794">Forest conversion results in a decrease in the abundance of Proteobacteria
and an increase in Actinobacteria. Most species of Proteobacteria were
positively correlated with metabolic function, whereas most of Actinobacteria
were negatively associated with metabolic function (Fig. 8). Therefore,
the changes in the abundance of these two phyla result in a reduction in
microbial community function after forest conversion. Because the metabolic
function of a specific species is often affected by environmental conditions
(Louca et al., 2018), some species are not correlated with any function in
the dry season but are correlated with metabolic function in the rainy season,
indicating that some microorganisms do not participate in the metabolic
process during the dry season, especially in the rubber plantations. In
conclusion, forest conversion as well as seasonal variation had a great
impact on soil microbial community functions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e1807">Our knowledge about land-use impacts on soil ecosystems is mostly limited to
biodiversity and ecosystem functions, leaving uncertainty about how soil
networks change after forest conversion. This study is the most
comprehensive report on changes in network structure that occur when
tropical rainforests are converted into rubber plantations. Our study showed
that forest conversion altered both bacterial and fungal soil networks,
reduced bacterial network complexity and enhanced fungal network complexity,
especially during the rainy season. One possible reason maybe that forest
conversion altered soil pH and other soil properties, which altered
bacterial composition, subsequent network structure and certain soil
ecosystem functions. Our study demonstrates the impact of forest conversion
on soil network structure, which has important implications for ecosystem
functioning, such as metabolic activity, and the health of soil ecosystems in
tropical regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1814">The code and data generated in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1817">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-149-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-149-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1826">GL was responsible for conceptualizing the study; developing the methodology; and writing, reviewing and editing the paper.
CY, RS, BC, XZ and ZW carried out the
investigation.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1832">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e1838">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1844">We appreciate J. Aaron Hogan and another anonymous reviewer very much for their
positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1849">This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31770661), the High-level Talents Project of Hainan Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 320RC733), the Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (grant no. ZDYF2019145) and the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-33-ZP3).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1855">This paper was edited by Ember Morrissey and reviewed by J. Aaron Hogan and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Adams, R. I., Miletto, M., Taylor, J. W., and Bruns, T. D.: Dispersal in
microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show
dispersal limitation at short distances, ISME J., 7, 1262–1273, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Amato, K. R., Yeoman, C. J., Kent, A., Carbonero, F., Righini, N., Estrada,
A. E., Gaskins, H. R., Stumpf, R. M., Yildirim, S., Torralba, M., Gillis, M.,
Wilson, B. A., Nelson, K. E., White, B. A., and Leigh, S. R.: Habitat
degradation impacts primate gastrointestinal microbiomes, ISME J., 7,
1344–1353, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bach, E. M., Williams, R. J., Hargreaves, S. K., Yang, F., and Hofmockel, K.
S.: Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 118, 217–226, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Banerjee, S., Schlaeppi, K., and van der Heijden, M. G. A.: Keystone taxa as
drivers of microbiome structure and functioning, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 16,
567–576, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Banerjee, S., Walder, F., Büchi, L., Meyer, M., Held, A. Y., Gattinger,
A., Keller, T., Charles, R., and van der Heijden, M. G. A.: Agricultural
intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of
keystone taxa in roots, ISME J., 13, 1722–1736, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barberan, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., and Fierer, N.: Using network
analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities,
ISME J., 6, 343–351, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barnes, A. D. Jochum, M., Mumme, S., Haneda, N. F., Farajallah, A., Widarto,
T. H., and Brose, U.: Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic
biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, Nat. Commun., 5, 5351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms6351</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berry, D. and Widder, S.: Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting
keystone species with co-occurrence networks, Front. Microbiol., 5, 1–14,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brinkmann, N., Schneider, D., Sahner, J., Ballauff, J., Edy, N., Barus, H.,
Irawan, B., Budi, S. W., Qaim, M., Danie, R., and Polle, A.: Intensive tropical
land use massively shifts soil fungal communities, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 3403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39829-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-39829-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cai, Z. Q., Zhang, Y. H., Yang, C., and Wang, S.: Land-use type strongly shapes
community composition, but not always diversity of soil microbes in tropical
China, Catena, 165, 369–380, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D.,
Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., and Gordon,
J. I.: QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data,
Nat. Methods, 7, 335–336, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chen, J., Xu, H., He, D., Li, Y. D., Luo, T. S., Yang, H. G., and Lin, M. X.: Historical logging alters soil fungal community composition and
network in a tropical rainforest, Forest Ecol. Manage., 433, 228–239, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Coyte, K. Z., Schluter, J., and Foster, K. R.: The ecology of the microbiome:
networks, competition, and stability, Science, 350, 663–666, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Vries, F. T. and Shade, A.: Controls on soil microbial community
stability under climate change, Front. Microbiol., 4, 265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., Mark, B., Craig, H., Girlanda, M., Gweon,
H. S., Hallin, S., Kaisermann, A., Keith, A. M., Kretzschmar, M., Lemanceau,
P., Lumini, E., Mason, K. E., Oliver, A., Ostle, N., Prosser, J. I., Thion,
C., Thomson, B., and Bardgett, R. D.: Soil bacterial networks are less stable
under drought than fungal networks, Nat. Commun., 9, 3033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Edgar, R. C.: UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon
reads, Nat. Methods, 10, 996–998, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Egidi, E., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Plett, J. M., Wang, J., Eldridge, D. J.,
Bardgett, R. D., Maestre, F. T., and Singh, B. K.: A few Ascomycota taxa dominate
soil fungal communities worldwide, Nat. Commun., 10, 2369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Francisco-Ortega, J., Wang, Z. S., Wang, F. G., Xing, F. W., Liu, H., Xu, H.,
Xu, W. X., Luo, Y. B., Song, X. Q., Gale, S., Boufford, D. E., Maunder, M., and
An, S. Q.: Seed plant endemism on Hainan Island: a framework for conservation
actions, Bot. Rev., 76, 346–376, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fuhrman, J. A.: Microbial community structure and its functional
implications, Nature, 459, 193–199, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Geml, J., Timling, I., Robinson, C. H., Lennon, N., Nusbaum, H. C., Brochmann,
C., Noordeloos, M. E., and Taylor, D. L.: An arctic community of symbiotic
fungi assembled by dispersers: phylogenetic diversity of ectomycorrhizal
basidiomycetes in Svalbard based on soil and sporocarp DNA, J. Biogeogr.,
39, 74–88, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J.,
Peres, C. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., and Sodhi,
N. S.: Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity,
Nature, 478, 378–381, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Good, I. L.: The population frequencies of species and the estimation
of population parameters, Biometrika, 40, 237–264, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jiao, S., Liu, Z. S., Lin, Y. B., Yang, J., Chen, W. M., and Wei, G. H.:
Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: biogeography and co-occurrence patterns, Soil Biol. Biochem., 98, 64–73, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Karimi, B., Maron, P. A., Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, N., Bernard, N., Gilbert,
D., and Ranjard, L.: Microbial diversity and ecological networks as
indicators of environmental quality, Environ. Chem. Lett., 15, 265–281, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Karimi, B., Dequiedt, S., Terrat, S., Jolivet, C., Arrouays, D.,
Wincker, P., Cruaud, C., Bispo, A., Prévost-Bouré, N. C., and Ranjard,
L.: Biogeography of soil bacterial networks along a gradient of cropping
intensity, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 3812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kerfahi, D., Tripathi, B. M., Dong, K., Go, R., and Adams, J. M.: Rainforest
conversion to rubber plantation may not result in lower soil diversity of
bacteria fungi and nematodes, Microb. Ecol., 72, 359–371, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuperman, R. G., Siciliano, S. D., Römbke, J., and Oorts, K.: Deriving
site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: rationale for
including protection of soil microbial processes, Integr. Environ. Assess., 10, 388–400, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Soil bacterial diversity impacted
by conversion of secondary forest to rubber or eucalyptus plantations – a
case study of Hainan Island, south China, Forest Sci., 63, 87–93, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Jatoi, M. T., Tan, Z. H., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Change
in soil microbial community compositions and diversity following the
conversion of tropical forest to rubber plantations in Xishuangbanan
southwest China, Trop. Conserv. Sci., 10, 1–14, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Impact of tropical forest
conversion on soil bacterial diversity in tropical region of China, Eur. J.
Soil Biol., 83, 91–97, 2017c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Lesueur, D., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Seasonal changes
impact soil bacterial communities in a rubber plantation on Hainan Island
China, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 826–834, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Sun, R., Yang, C., Chen, B. Q., and Zhang, X. C.: Tropical
rainforest conversion into rubber plantations results in changes in soil
fungal composition, but underling mechanisms of community assembly remain
unchanged, Geoderma, 375, 114505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114505</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Li, Y. W., and Chen, B. Q.: The drivers of soil bacterial
communities in rubber plantation at local and geographic scales, Arch.
Agron. Soil Sci., 66, 358–369, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Sun, R., Yang, C., Chen, B. Q., and Zhang, X. C.: Forest
conversion changed the structure and functional process of tropical forest
soil microbiome, Land. Degrad. Dev., 32, 613–627, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lopez, S., Rousset, F., Shaw, F. H., Ruth, G., Shaw, R. G., and Ophélie, R.:
Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of
genetic load after fragmentation, Conserv. Biol., 23, 1618–1627, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Louca, S., Polz, M. F., Mazel, F., Albright, M. B. N., Huber, J. A., O'Connor,
M. I., Ackermann, M., Hahn, A. S., Srivastava, D. S., Crowe, S. A., Doebeli, M.,
and Parfrey, L. W.: Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems,
Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 936–943, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, H., Zou, W., Yang, J., Hogan, J. A., and Chen, J.: Dominant tree species
shape soil microbial community via regulating assembly processes in planted
subtropical forests, Forests, 10, 978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f10110978</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mills, L. S., Soulé, M. E., and Doak, D. F.: The keystone-species concept
in ecology and conservation, BioScience, 43, 219–224, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morriën, E., Hannula, S. E., Snoek, L. B., Helmsing, N. R., Zweers, H.,
de Hollander, M., Soto, R. L., Bouffaud, M.-L., Buee, M., Dimmers, W.,
Duyts, H., Geisen, S., Girlanda, M., Griffiths, R. I., Jogensen, H.-B.,
Jensen, J., Plassart, P., Redecker, D., Schmelz, R. M., Schmidt, O.,
Thomson, B. C., Tisserant, E., Uroz, S., Winding, A., Bailey, M. J.,
Bonkowski, M., Faber, J. H., Martin, F., Lemanceau, P., de Boer, W., van
Veen, J. A., and van der Putten, W. H.: Soil networks become more connected and
take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses, Nat. Commun., 8,
14349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms14349</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mouquet, N., Gravel, D., Massol, F., and Calcagno, V.: Extending the concept
of keystone species to communities and ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 16, 1–8, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., and de Ruiter, P. C.: Stability in real
food webs: weak links in long loops, Science, 296, 1120–1123, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., and Jordano, P.: The modularity of
pollination networks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 19891–19896, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pagliai, M., Vignozzi, N., and Pellegrini, S.: Soil structure and the effect
of management practices, Soil Till. Res., 79, 131–143, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Philippot, L., Spor, A., Hénault, C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F.,
Jones, C. M., Sarr, A., and Maron, P. A.: Loss in microbial diversity affects
nitrogen cycling in soil Laurent, ISME J., 7, 1609–1619, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Power, M., Tilman, D., Estes, J., Menge, B., Bond, W., Mills, S., Daily, G.,
Castilla, J., Lubchenco, J., Paine, R., Power, M., Tilman, D., Estes, J.,
Menge, B., Bond, W., Mills, L., Daily, G., Castilla, J., Lubchenco, J., and
Paine, R.: Challenges in the quest for keystones, Bioscience, 46, 609–620,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C.,
Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., and Yamada, T.: A human gut microbial gene
catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing, Nature, 464, 59–65, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roger, G.  and Amaral, L. A. N.: Functional cartography of complex metabolic
networks, Nature, 433, 895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03288</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G., and Moore, J. C.: Structural asymmetry
and the stability of diverse food webs, Nature, 442, 265–269, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Röttjers, L. and Faust, K.: From hairballs to hypotheses–biological
insights from microbial networks, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 10, 1093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/femsre/fuy030</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sahner, J., Budi, S. W., Barus, H., Edy, N., Meyer, M., Corré, M. D.,
and Polle, A.: Degradation of root community traits as indicator for
transformation of tropical lowland rain forests into oil palm and rubber
plantations, PloS One, 10, e0138077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0138077</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sampson, T. R., Debelius, J. W., Thron, T., Janssen, S., Shastri, G. G., Ilhan,
Z. E., Challis, C., Schretter, C. E., Rocha, S., Gradinaru, V., Chesselet,
M. F., Keshavarzian, A., Shannon, K. M., Krajmalnik-Brown, R.,
Wittung-Stafshede, P., Knight, R., and Mazmanian, S. K.: Gut microbiota
regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson's
disease, Cell, 167, 1469–1480, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M.,
Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., and Robinson,
C. J.: Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent,
community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial
communities, Appl. Environ. Microb., 75, 7537–7541, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schneider, D., Engelhaupt, M., Allen, K., Kurniawan, S., Krashevska, V.,
Heinemann, M., and Scheu, S.: Impact of lowland rainforest transformation on
diversity and composition of soil prokaryotic communities in Sumatra
Indonesia, Front. Microbiol., 6, 296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01339</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, H., Singh, D., Tomlinson, K. W., Yang, X. D., Ogwu, M. C., Slik, J. W. F.,
and Adams, J. M.: Tropical forest conversion to rubber plantation in southwest
China results in lower fungal beta diversity and reduced network complexity,
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 95,  fiz092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/femsec/fiz092</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stouffer, D. B. and Bascompte, J.: Compartmentalization increases food-web
persistence, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 3648–3652, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Taniguchi, T., Kitajima, K., Douhan, G. W., Yamanaka, N., and Allen, M. F.: A
pulse of summer precipitation after the dry season triggers changes in
ectomycorrhizal formation, diversity, and community composition in a
Mediterranean forest in California, USA, Mycorrhiza, 28, 665–677, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tripathi, B. M., Kim, M., Singh, D., Lee-Cruz, L., Lai-Hoe, A., Ainuddin, A.
N., and Adams, J. M.: Tropical soil bacterial communities in Malaysia: pH
dominates in the equatorial tropics too, Microb. Ecol., 64, 474–484, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wagg, C., Schlaeppi, K., Banerjee, S., Kuramae, E. E., and van der Heijden,
M. G. A.: Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict
ecosystem functioning, Nat. Commun., 10, 4841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, W., Hyde, E. R., Berg-Lyons, D., Ackermann, G., Humphrey, G.,
Parada, A., Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K., Caporaso, J. G., Fuhrman, J. A.,
Apprill, A., and Knight, R.: Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5)
and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial
community surveys, mSystems, 1, e00009-15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00009-15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/mSystems.00009-15</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, W., Zhang, D., Cai, X., Xia, L., Luo, Y. Q., Cheng, X., and An, S. Q.:
Significant alterations in soil fungal communities along a chronosequence of
<italic>spartina alterniflora</italic> invasion in a Chinese yellow sea coastal wetland, Sci. Total Environ.,
693, 133548, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.354</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zaller, J. G., Heigl, F., Ruess, L., and Grabmaier, A.: Glyphosate herbicide
affects belowground interactions between earthworms and symbiotic
mycorrhizal fungi in a model ecosystem, Sci. Rep., 4, 5634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep05634</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Network complexity of rubber plantations is lower than tropical forests for soil bacteria but not for fungi</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adams, R. I., Miletto, M., Taylor, J. W., and Bruns, T. D.: Dispersal in
microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show
dispersal limitation at short distances, ISME J., 7, 1262–1273, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Amato, K. R., Yeoman, C. J., Kent, A., Carbonero, F., Righini, N., Estrada,
A. E., Gaskins, H. R., Stumpf, R. M., Yildirim, S., Torralba, M., Gillis, M.,
Wilson, B. A., Nelson, K. E., White, B. A., and Leigh, S. R.: Habitat
degradation impacts primate gastrointestinal microbiomes, ISME J., 7,
1344–1353, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bach, E. M., Williams, R. J., Hargreaves, S. K., Yang, F., and Hofmockel, K.
S.: Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 118, 217–226, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Banerjee, S., Schlaeppi, K., and van der Heijden, M. G. A.: Keystone taxa as
drivers of microbiome structure and functioning, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 16,
567–576, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Banerjee, S., Walder, F., Büchi, L., Meyer, M., Held, A. Y., Gattinger,
A., Keller, T., Charles, R., and van der Heijden, M. G. A.: Agricultural
intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of
keystone taxa in roots, ISME J., 13, 1722–1736, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barberan, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., and Fierer, N.: Using network
analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities,
ISME J., 6, 343–351, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Barnes, A. D. Jochum, M., Mumme, S., Haneda, N. F., Farajallah, A., Widarto,
T. H., and Brose, U.: Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic
biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, Nat. Commun., 5, 5351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6351</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Berry, D. and Widder, S.: Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting
keystone species with co-occurrence networks, Front. Microbiol., 5, 1–14,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brinkmann, N., Schneider, D., Sahner, J., Ballauff, J., Edy, N., Barus, H.,
Irawan, B., Budi, S. W., Qaim, M., Danie, R., and Polle, A.: Intensive tropical
land use massively shifts soil fungal communities, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 3403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39829-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39829-4</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, Z. Q., Zhang, Y. H., Yang, C., and Wang, S.: Land-use type strongly shapes
community composition, but not always diversity of soil microbes in tropical
China, Catena, 165, 369–380, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D.,
Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., and Gordon,
J. I.: QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data,
Nat. Methods, 7, 335–336, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J., Xu, H., He, D., Li, Y. D., Luo, T. S., Yang, H. G., and Lin, M. X.: Historical logging alters soil fungal community composition and
network in a tropical rainforest, Forest Ecol. Manage., 433, 228–239, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Coyte, K. Z., Schluter, J., and Foster, K. R.: The ecology of the microbiome:
networks, competition, and stability, Science, 350, 663–666, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
De Vries, F. T. and Shade, A.: Controls on soil microbial community
stability under climate change, Front. Microbiol., 4, 265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
De Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., Mark, B., Craig, H., Girlanda, M., Gweon,
H. S., Hallin, S., Kaisermann, A., Keith, A. M., Kretzschmar, M., Lemanceau,
P., Lumini, E., Mason, K. E., Oliver, A., Ostle, N., Prosser, J. I., Thion,
C., Thomson, B., and Bardgett, R. D.: Soil bacterial networks are less stable
under drought than fungal networks, Nat. Commun., 9, 3033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Edgar, R. C.: UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon
reads, Nat. Methods, 10, 996–998, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Egidi, E., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Plett, J. M., Wang, J., Eldridge, D. J.,
Bardgett, R. D., Maestre, F. T., and Singh, B. K.: A few Ascomycota taxa dominate
soil fungal communities worldwide, Nat. Commun., 10, 2369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Francisco-Ortega, J., Wang, Z. S., Wang, F. G., Xing, F. W., Liu, H., Xu, H.,
Xu, W. X., Luo, Y. B., Song, X. Q., Gale, S., Boufford, D. E., Maunder, M., and
An, S. Q.: Seed plant endemism on Hainan Island: a framework for conservation
actions, Bot. Rev., 76, 346–376, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fuhrman, J. A.: Microbial community structure and its functional
implications, Nature, 459, 193–199, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Geml, J., Timling, I., Robinson, C. H., Lennon, N., Nusbaum, H. C., Brochmann,
C., Noordeloos, M. E., and Taylor, D. L.: An arctic community of symbiotic
fungi assembled by dispersers: phylogenetic diversity of ectomycorrhizal
basidiomycetes in Svalbard based on soil and sporocarp DNA, J. Biogeogr.,
39, 74–88, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J.,
Peres, C. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., and Sodhi,
N. S.: Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity,
Nature, 478, 378–381, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Good, I. L.: The population frequencies of species and the estimation
of population parameters, Biometrika, 40, 237–264, 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jiao, S., Liu, Z. S., Lin, Y. B., Yang, J., Chen, W. M., and Wei, G. H.:
Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: biogeography and co-occurrence patterns, Soil Biol. Biochem., 98, 64–73, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Karimi, B., Maron, P. A., Chemidlin-Prevost Boure, N., Bernard, N., Gilbert,
D., and Ranjard, L.: Microbial diversity and ecological networks as
indicators of environmental quality, Environ. Chem. Lett., 15, 265–281, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Karimi, B., Dequiedt, S., Terrat, S., Jolivet, C., Arrouays, D.,
Wincker, P., Cruaud, C., Bispo, A., Prévost-Bouré, N. C., and Ranjard,
L.: Biogeography of soil bacterial networks along a gradient of cropping
intensity, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 3812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kerfahi, D., Tripathi, B. M., Dong, K., Go, R., and Adams, J. M.: Rainforest
conversion to rubber plantation may not result in lower soil diversity of
bacteria fungi and nematodes, Microb. Ecol., 72, 359–371, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kuperman, R. G., Siciliano, S. D., Römbke, J., and Oorts, K.: Deriving
site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: rationale for
including protection of soil microbial processes, Integr. Environ. Assess., 10, 388–400, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Soil bacterial diversity impacted
by conversion of secondary forest to rubber or eucalyptus plantations – a
case study of Hainan Island, south China, Forest Sci., 63, 87–93, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Jatoi, M. T., Tan, Z. H., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Change
in soil microbial community compositions and diversity following the
conversion of tropical forest to rubber plantations in Xishuangbanan
southwest China, Trop. Conserv. Sci., 10, 1–14, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Impact of tropical forest
conversion on soil bacterial diversity in tropical region of China, Eur. J.
Soil Biol., 83, 91–97, 2017c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Li, Y. W., Lesueur, D., Wu, Z. X., and Xie, G. S.: Seasonal changes
impact soil bacterial communities in a rubber plantation on Hainan Island
China, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 826–834, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Sun, R., Yang, C., Chen, B. Q., and Zhang, X. C.: Tropical
rainforest conversion into rubber plantations results in changes in soil
fungal composition, but underling mechanisms of community assembly remain
unchanged, Geoderma, 375, 114505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114505</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Li, Y. W., and Chen, B. Q.: The drivers of soil bacterial
communities in rubber plantation at local and geographic scales, Arch.
Agron. Soil Sci., 66, 358–369, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lan, G. Y., Wu, Z. X., Sun, R., Yang, C., Chen, B. Q., and Zhang, X. C.: Forest
conversion changed the structure and functional process of tropical forest
soil microbiome, Land. Degrad. Dev., 32, 613–627, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez, S., Rousset, F., Shaw, F. H., Ruth, G., Shaw, R. G., and Ophélie, R.:
Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of
genetic load after fragmentation, Conserv. Biol., 23, 1618–1627, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Louca, S., Polz, M. F., Mazel, F., Albright, M. B. N., Huber, J. A., O'Connor,
M. I., Ackermann, M., Hahn, A. S., Srivastava, D. S., Crowe, S. A., Doebeli, M.,
and Parfrey, L. W.: Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems,
Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 936–943, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, H., Zou, W., Yang, J., Hogan, J. A., and Chen, J.: Dominant tree species
shape soil microbial community via regulating assembly processes in planted
subtropical forests, Forests, 10, 978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110978</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, L. S., Soulé, M. E., and Doak, D. F.: The keystone-species concept
in ecology and conservation, BioScience, 43, 219–224, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Morriën, E., Hannula, S. E., Snoek, L. B., Helmsing, N. R., Zweers, H.,
de Hollander, M., Soto, R. L., Bouffaud, M.-L., Buee, M., Dimmers, W.,
Duyts, H., Geisen, S., Girlanda, M., Griffiths, R. I., Jogensen, H.-B.,
Jensen, J., Plassart, P., Redecker, D., Schmelz, R. M., Schmidt, O.,
Thomson, B. C., Tisserant, E., Uroz, S., Winding, A., Bailey, M. J.,
Bonkowski, M., Faber, J. H., Martin, F., Lemanceau, P., de Boer, W., van
Veen, J. A., and van der Putten, W. H.: Soil networks become more connected and
take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses, Nat. Commun., 8,
14349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14349</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Mouquet, N., Gravel, D., Massol, F., and Calcagno, V.: Extending the concept
of keystone species to communities and ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 16, 1–8, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., and de Ruiter, P. C.: Stability in real
food webs: weak links in long loops, Science, 296, 1120–1123, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., and Jordano, P.: The modularity of
pollination networks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 19891–19896, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pagliai, M., Vignozzi, N., and Pellegrini, S.: Soil structure and the effect
of management practices, Soil Till. Res., 79, 131–143, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Philippot, L., Spor, A., Hénault, C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F.,
Jones, C. M., Sarr, A., and Maron, P. A.: Loss in microbial diversity affects
nitrogen cycling in soil Laurent, ISME J., 7, 1609–1619, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Power, M., Tilman, D., Estes, J., Menge, B., Bond, W., Mills, S., Daily, G.,
Castilla, J., Lubchenco, J., Paine, R., Power, M., Tilman, D., Estes, J.,
Menge, B., Bond, W., Mills, L., Daily, G., Castilla, J., Lubchenco, J., and
Paine, R.: Challenges in the quest for keystones, Bioscience, 46, 609–620,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C.,
Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., and Yamada, T.: A human gut microbial gene
catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing, Nature, 464, 59–65, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Roger, G.  and Amaral, L. A. N.: Functional cartography of complex metabolic
networks, Nature, 433, 895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03288" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03288</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G., and Moore, J. C.: Structural asymmetry
and the stability of diverse food webs, Nature, 442, 265–269, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Röttjers, L. and Faust, K.: From hairballs to hypotheses–biological
insights from microbial networks, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 10, 1093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy030</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sahner, J., Budi, S. W., Barus, H., Edy, N., Meyer, M., Corré, M. D.,
and Polle, A.: Degradation of root community traits as indicator for
transformation of tropical lowland rain forests into oil palm and rubber
plantations, PloS One, 10, e0138077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138077</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Sampson, T. R., Debelius, J. W., Thron, T., Janssen, S., Shastri, G. G., Ilhan,
Z. E., Challis, C., Schretter, C. E., Rocha, S., Gradinaru, V., Chesselet,
M. F., Keshavarzian, A., Shannon, K. M., Krajmalnik-Brown, R.,
Wittung-Stafshede, P., Knight, R., and Mazmanian, S. K.: Gut microbiota
regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson's
disease, Cell, 167, 1469–1480, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M.,
Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., and Robinson,
C. J.: Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent,
community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial
communities, Appl. Environ. Microb., 75, 7537–7541, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, D., Engelhaupt, M., Allen, K., Kurniawan, S., Krashevska, V.,
Heinemann, M., and Scheu, S.: Impact of lowland rainforest transformation on
diversity and composition of soil prokaryotic communities in Sumatra
Indonesia, Front. Microbiol., 6, 296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01339</a>, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Song, H., Singh, D., Tomlinson, K. W., Yang, X. D., Ogwu, M. C., Slik, J. W. F.,
and Adams, J. M.: Tropical forest conversion to rubber plantation in southwest
China results in lower fungal beta diversity and reduced network complexity,
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 95,  fiz092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz092</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Stouffer, D. B. and Bascompte, J.: Compartmentalization increases food-web
persistence, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 3648–3652, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Taniguchi, T., Kitajima, K., Douhan, G. W., Yamanaka, N., and Allen, M. F.: A
pulse of summer precipitation after the dry season triggers changes in
ectomycorrhizal formation, diversity, and community composition in a
Mediterranean forest in California, USA, Mycorrhiza, 28, 665–677, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Tripathi, B. M., Kim, M., Singh, D., Lee-Cruz, L., Lai-Hoe, A., Ainuddin, A.
N., and Adams, J. M.: Tropical soil bacterial communities in Malaysia: pH
dominates in the equatorial tropics too, Microb. Ecol., 64, 474–484, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wagg, C., Schlaeppi, K., Banerjee, S., Kuramae, E. E., and van der Heijden,
M. G. A.: Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict
ecosystem functioning, Nat. Commun., 10, 4841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Walters, W., Hyde, E. R., Berg-Lyons, D., Ackermann, G., Humphrey, G.,
Parada, A., Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K., Caporaso, J. G., Fuhrman, J. A.,
Apprill, A., and Knight, R.: Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5)
and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial
community surveys, mSystems, 1, e00009-15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00009-15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00009-15</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, W., Zhang, D., Cai, X., Xia, L., Luo, Y. Q., Cheng, X., and An, S. Q.:
Significant alterations in soil fungal communities along a chronosequence of
<i>spartina alterniflora</i> invasion in a Chinese yellow sea coastal wetland, Sci. Total Environ.,
693, 133548, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.354</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zaller, J. G., Heigl, F., Ruess, L., and Grabmaier, A.: Glyphosate herbicide
affects belowground interactions between earthworms and symbiotic
mycorrhizal fungi in a model ecosystem, Sci. Rep., 4, 5634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05634</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
